1887
Volume 22, Issue 6
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Starting from the ambivalent discursive constructions of belongings and attachments, this paper is a description of the uneasy and uncomfortable relation between the UK and the ‘continent’. It discusses the historical British insular attitude looking at the metaphorical language used around Brexit, with a special emphasis on the metaphor “have one’s cake and eat it”, referring to the “cherry-picking” attitude that the British government wishes to have, retaining EU membership benefits without its obligations. Boris Johnson admitted that his policy on cake was “pro having it and pro eating it”, expressing an argument that, on withdrawing from the European Union, Britain would still retain many of the benefits that it had enjoyed as a member, since Britain was already “cherry-picking from the European tree without bothering to water the soil or tend to its branches”.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22036.mil
2023-10-24
2025-06-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bauman, Zygmunt
    2016Strangers at Our Door. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennett, Samuel
    2019 “Values as tools of legitimation in EU and UK Brexit discourses”. InDiscourses of Brexit, edited byVeronika Koller, Susanne Kopf and Marlene Miglbauer, 17–31. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351041867‑2
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351041867-2 [Google Scholar]
  3. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2019Metaphors of Brexit: No Cherries on the Cake?London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑28768‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28768-9 [Google Scholar]
  4. Daddow, Oliver
    2013New Labour and the new European Union: Blair and Brown’s logic of history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2015 Interpreting the outsider tradition in British European Policy Speeches from Thatcher to Cameron. Journal of Common Market Studies53 (1), 71–88. 10.1111/jcms.12204
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12204 [Google Scholar]
  6. Hannan, Martin
    2017 Jacob Rees-Mogg on Brexit: ‘I like cake and I like eating it’, The National.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2010The Discursive Construction of European Identities. A Multi-Level Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson
    1980Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Maccaferri, Marzia
    2019 “Splendid isolation again? Brexit and the role of the press and online media in re-narrating the European discourse”. Critical Discourse Studies16 (4), 389–402. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1592766
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1592766 [Google Scholar]
  10. Miers, David
    2004 Britain in Europe: Community to Union 1973–2001. InBritain in the European Union: Law, policy and parliament, edited byPhilip Giddings and Gavin Drewry, 12–36. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230523159_2
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523159_2 [Google Scholar]
  11. Milizia, Denise
    2014 “In, out, or half way? The European attitude in the speeches of British leaders”. Lingue e Linguaggi111, 157–175.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2019 “Pull up the drawbridge? Conventionality and creativity in British political discourse”, inWorlds of Words: Complexity, Creativity, and Conventionality in English Language, Literature and Culture11, edited byVeronica Bonsignori, Gloria Cappelli and Elisa Mattiello, 293–309. Pisa: Pisa University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Milizia, Denise and Cinzia Spinzi
    2020 “When a relationship ends, “there can be no turning back”. The divorce metaphor in the Brexit discourse”. Lingue e Linguaggi341, 137–165.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Musolff, Andreas
    2000Mirror images of Europe: Metaphors in public debate about Europe in Britain and Germany. Munich: Iudicium.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2004Metaphor and Political Discourse. New York: Palgrave. 10.1057/9780230504516
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504516 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2013 “The heart of Europe: Synchronic variation and historical trajectories of a political metaphor”. InSpeaking of Europe, edited byKjersti Fløttum, 135–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.49.07mus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.49.07mus [Google Scholar]
  17. 2019 “Brexit as ‘having your cake and eating it’: the discourse career of a proverb”. InDiscourses of Brexit, edited byVeronika Koller, Susanne Kopf and Marlene Miglbauer, 208–221. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351041867‑13
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351041867-13 [Google Scholar]
  18. Ruzza, Carlo and Milica Pejovic
    2019 “Populism at work: the language of the Brexiteers and the European Union”. Critical Discourse Studies16 (4), 432–448. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1605300
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1605300 [Google Scholar]
  19. Scott, Mike
    2017WordSmith Tools 7.0. Lexical Analysis Software Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Semino, Elena
    2008Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Spinzi, Cinzia and Elena Manca
    2017 “Reading Figurative Images in the Political Discourse of the British Press”. Textus11, 241–256.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Wodak, Ruth
    2015The Politics of Fear. What right-wing populist discourses mean. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE. 10.4135/9781446270073
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2016 “We have the character of an island nation”. A discourse-historical analysis of David Cameron’s “Bloomberg Speech” on the European Union. EUI RSCAS, 2016/36, Global Governance Programme-224, Europe in the World – https://hdl.handle.net/1814/42804. 10.2139/ssrn.2870570
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2870570 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2021The Politics of Fear. The shameless normalization of far-right discourse. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE. 10.4135/9781529739664
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529739664 [Google Scholar]
  25. Zappettini, Franco
    2019a “The official vision for ‘global Britain’. Brexit as rupture and continuity between free trade, liberal internationalism and ‘values’”. InDiscourses of Brexit, ed. byVeronika Koller, Susanne Kopf and Marlene Miglbauer, 140–154. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351041867‑9
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351041867-9 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2019b The Brexit referendum: how trade and immigration in the discourse of the official campaigns have legitimized a toxic (inter)national logic. Critical Discourse Studies16 (4), 403–419. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1593206
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1593206 [Google Scholar]
  27. Zappettini, Franco and Michał Krzyżanowski
    2019 “The critical juncture of Brexit in media & political discourses: from national-populist imaginary to cross-national social and political crisis”. Critical Discourse Studies16 (4), 381–388. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1592767
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1592767 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22036.mil
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22036.mil
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): ambivalent; Britain; cake; cherry; compromise; EU; metaphor
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error