1887
image of France’s “drôle de guerre”
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper sheds light on the sociopolitical polarisation reflected in the responses to a political metaphor, in French public discourse about covid-19. The aim is to uncover how polarisation may influence metaphorical representation of a political issue. The study focuses on the French President’s metaphor “we are at war”, in his announcement of the national lockdown. Responses to this “war” metaphor in public discourse are analysed following a combination of metaphor theories and argumentation theories. Results show that such responses transformed the ”war” metaphor into the “phoney war” metaphor for covid-19. This yielded four main arguments which 1.established causals links between covid-19 and policies, 2.partially endorsed the metaphor, 3.focused on the President’s discursive pattern, and 4.focused on the President’s status. It is argued that more research is needed into public reception to political discourse, in view of the arguments derived from resistance to metaphor.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22047.aug
2024-04-02
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahrens, Kathleen
    2009Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors. London: Palgrave. 10.1057/9780230245235
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245235 [Google Scholar]
  2. Andolfatto, Dominique, and Dominique Labbé
    2020 “Crise des retraites: Un contre-modele social [Pension crisis: A social counter-example]”. Le Débat (): –. 10.3917/deba.209.0004
    https://doi.org/10.3917/deba.209.0004 [Google Scholar]
  3. Anthony, Laurence
    2023AntConc (Version 4.2.4) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. URL: https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Augé, Anaïs
    2022 “Ideological and Explanatory Uses of the Covid-19 as a War Metaphor in Science”. Review of Cognitive Linguistics (): –. 10.1075/rcl.00117.aug
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00117.aug [Google Scholar]
  5. 2024a “Metaphors and Political Arguments in Environmental Debates: Our House is still on Fire”. InPolitical Discourse Analysis: Legitimisation Strategies in Crisis and Conflict, edited byRobert Butler, –. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9781399523202‑014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781399523202-014 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2024b “Situationally-triggered Metaphor as Political Argument: Public Response and Argumentative Exploitation”. Journal of Argumentation in Context (), in production.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bandelow, Nils, Patrick Hassenteufel, and Johanna Hornung
    2021 “Patterns of Democracy in the Covid-19 Crisis”. International Review of Public Policy (): –. 10.4000/irpp.1788
    https://doi.org/10.4000/irpp.1788 [Google Scholar]
  8. Béguin, Francois
    2019 La greve s’étend dans les services d’Urgence de l’AP-HP [The strike spreads to the emergency services in Paris’ hospital]. Le Monde, April 20, 2019. https://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2019/04/20/la-greve-s-etend-dans-les-services-d-urgences-de-l-ap-hp_5452815_3224.html
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brugman, Britta, Ellen Droog, Gudrun Reijnierse, Saskia Leymann, Giula Frezza, and Kiki Renardel de Lavalette
    2022 “Audience Perceptions of Covid-19 Metaphors: The Role of Source Domain and Country Context”. Metaphor and Symbol (): –. 10.1080/10926488.2021.1948332
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1948332 [Google Scholar]
  10. Burgers, Christian, Melanie Jong Tjien Fa, and Anneke de Graaf
    2019 “A Tale of Two Swamps: Transformations of a Metaphorical Frame in Online Partisan Media”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.018 [Google Scholar]
  11. Butler, Robert
    2024Political Discourse Analysis: Legitimisation Strategies in Crisis and Conflict. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9781399523202
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781399523202 [Google Scholar]
  12. CEDROM-SNi
    CEDROM-SNi (1999) Europresse. URL: europresse.com
  13. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2011Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. London: Palgrave. 10.1057/9780230319899
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230319899 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2021Metaphors of Coronavirus: Invisible Enemy or Zombie Apocalypse?London: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑85106‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85106-4 [Google Scholar]
  15. Clémenceau, Georges
    1917 Déclaration ministérielle et discussion des interpellations a la chambre des députés (20 Novembre 1917) [Ministerial declaration and discussion of arguments in the House of Representatives (November 20th, 1917)]. Gallica-BNF, URL: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k6484m/texteBrut
  16. De Cock, Barbara, Pauline Dupret, Philippe Hambye, and Andrea Pizarro Pedraza
    2022 “Polarising Representations of Immigrant Communities in Belgian French-speaking Online Political Discourse”. InDiscourse Approaches to Sociopolitical Polarisation and Conflict, edited byLaura Filardo-Llamas, Esperanza Morales-López, and Alan Floyd, –. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Durović, Tatjana and Nadežda Silaški
    2010 “Metaphors We Vote By. The Case of ‘Marriage’ in Contemporary Serbian Political Discourse”. Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.9.2.04dur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.2.04dur [Google Scholar]
  18. Fauconnier, Gilles
    2003Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Filardo-Llamas, Laura
    2022 “From the War on Covid-19 to Political Wars. Metaphor as a Mechanism of Polarisation in the Early Stages of the 2020 Pandemic”. InDiscourse Approaches to Sociopolitical Polarisation and Conflict, edited byLaura Filardo-Llamas, Esperanza Morales-López, and Alan Floyd, –. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Filardo-Llamas, Laura, and Esperanza Morales-López
    2022 “Introduction”. InDiscourse Approaches to Sociopolitical Polarisation and Conflict, edited byLaura Filardo-Llamas, Esperanza Morales-López, and Alan Floyd, –. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Filardo-Llamas, Laura, Esperanza Morales-López, and Alan Floyd
    eds. 2022Discourse Approaches to Sociopolitical Polarisation and Conflict. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Grossman, Emiliano
    2019 “France’s Yellow Vests: Symptoms of a Chronic Disease”. Political Insight (): –. 10.1177/2041905819838152
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2041905819838152 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hanne, Michael
    2022 “How We Escape Capture by the ‘War’ Metaphor for Covid-19”. Metaphor Symbol (): –. 10.1080/10926488.2021.1935261
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1935261 [Google Scholar]
  24. Heyvaert, Pauline, Francois Randour, Jérémy Dodeigne, Julien Perrez, and Min Reuchamps
    2019 “Metaphors in Political Communication: A Case Study of the Use of Deliberate Metaphors in Non-institutional Political Interviews”. Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.17057.hey
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17057.hey [Google Scholar]
  25. Hunston, Susan
    2002Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524773
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524773 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lakoff, Georges
    1993 “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor”. InMetaphor and Thought, edited byAndrew Ortony, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  27. Larousse
    Larousse. n.d.URL: www.larousse.fr
  28. Musolff, Andreas
    2022a “World-beating Pandemic Responses: Ironical, Sarcastic, and Satirical Use of War and Competition Metaphors in the Context of the Covid-19 Pandemic”. Metaphor and Symbol (): –. 10.1080/10926488.2021.1932505
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1932505 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2022b “Fake Conspiracy: Trump’s Anti-Chinese ‘Covid-19 as War’ Scenario”. InConspiracy Theory Discourses, edited byMassimiliano Demata, Virginia Zorzi, and Angela Zottola, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.98.06mus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.98.06mus [Google Scholar]
  30. Nelson, Daniel
    2003 “Conclusion: Word Peace”. InAt War with Words, edited byMirjina Dédaic and Daniel Nelson, –. De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110897715.449
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110897715.449 [Google Scholar]
  31. Olza, Ines, Veronika Koller, Iraide Ibarretxe-Antunano, Paula Pérez-Sobrino, and Elena Semino
    2021 “The#ReframeCovid Initiative”. Metaphor and the Social World (): –. 10.1075/msw.00013.olz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00013.olz [Google Scholar]
  32. Perrez, Julien and Min Reuchamps
    2015 “The ‘Belgian tetris’ Assessing the Political Impact of Metaphors on Citizens’ Representations of Belgian Federalism”. Metaphor & the Social World (): –. 10.1075/msw.5.2.03per
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.5.2.03per [Google Scholar]
  33. Perrez, Julien, Min Reuchamps, and Paul Thibodeau
    2019Variation in Political Metaphor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.85
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.85 [Google Scholar]
  34. Pettit, Joanne
    2021Covid-19, the Second World War, and the Idea of Britishness. London: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Randour, Francois, Julien Perrez, and Min Reuchamps
    2020 “Twenty Years of Research on Political Discourse : A Systematic Review and Directions for Future Research”. Discourse & Society (): –. 10.1177/0957926520903526
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520903526 [Google Scholar]
  36. Renardel de Lavalette, Kiki, Corina Andone, and Gerard J. Steen
    2019 “I did not say that the Government should be plundering Anybody’s Savings. Resistance to Metaphors Expressing Starting Points in Parliamentary Debates”. Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.18066.ren
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18066.ren [Google Scholar]
  37. Reuchamps, Min, Jérémy Dodeigne, and Julien Perrez
    2018 “Changing your Political Mind: the Impact of a Metaphor on Citizens’ Representations and Preferences for Federalism”. Regional & Federal Studies (): –. 10.1080/13597566.2018.1433663
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2018.1433663 [Google Scholar]
  38. Rohela, Pallavi, Anant Bhan, Divya Ravindranath, Devi Leena Bose, and Soumitra Pathare
    2020 “Must There be a ‘War’ against Coronavirus?” Indian Journal of Medical Ethics (): –. 10.20529/IJME.2020.070
    https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2020.070 [Google Scholar]
  39. Rondiat, Coline
    . forthcoming. “We are following the Science: Science* as a Sociopolitical Keyword in the Tweets of Belgian Experts and Policymakers”. Journal of Corpora and Discourse Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Rossi-Landi, Guy
    2022 “Drôle de Guerre” [Phoney War] Encyclopædia Universalis, https://www.universalis.fr/encyclopedie/drole-de-guerre/
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Rouban, Luc
    2018La démocratie représentative est-elle en crise? [Is representative democracy in crisis?] Paris: La Documentation Française.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Shchinova, Nadezda
    2023 “A Meaningless Buzzword or a Meaningful Label ? How do Spanish Politicians use Populismo and Populista on Twitter?” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.23042.shc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.23042.shc [Google Scholar]
  43. Szabo, Lilla Petronella, and Gabriella Szabo
    2022 “Attack of the Critics. Metaphorical Delegitimisation in Viktor Orban’s Discourse during the Covid-19 Pandemic”. Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.21068.sza
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21068.sza [Google Scholar]
  44. Thibodeau, Paul and Lera Boroditsky
    2011 “Metaphors We Think With: the Role of Metaphor in Reasoning”. PLoS ONE (): . 10.1371/journal.pone.0016782
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016782 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2013 “Natural Language Metaphors Covertly Influence Reasoning”. PLoS ONE (): . 10.1371/journal.pone.0052961
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052961 [Google Scholar]
  46. van Eemeren, Frans and Rob Grootendorst
    2004A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: the Pragma-Dialectic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. van Poppel, Lotte
    2018 “Argumentative Functions of Metaphors: How can Metaphors trigger Resistance?” InProceedings of the Second European Conference on Argumentation, edited bySteve Oswald and Didier Maillat, –. London: College Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Wackers, Dunja, José Plug, and Gerard J. Steen
    2021 “For Crying Out Loud, Don’t Call Me a Warrior: Standpoints of Resistance against Violence Metaphors for Cancer”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.021 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22047.aug
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22047.aug
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: legitimisation ; metaphor ; polarisation ; Covid-19 ; resistance
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error