Rickety democracies

References

1. Ashima, Abhishek Soni and Arun Vanam Kumar
   2022 “Political Slogans and Its Impact on Society.” NeuroQuantology, no. : –. 10.48047/NQ.2022.20.17.NQ880154
   https://doi.org/10.48047/NQ.2022.20.17.NQ880154 [Google Scholar]
2. Blanco, Desiderio and Raúl Bueno
   1989 Metodología del Análisis Semiótico. [Semiotic analysis methodology.] Lima: Fondo Editorial de la Universidad de Lima.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Courtés, Joseph
   1997 Análisis Semiótico del Discurso. Del Enunciado a la Enunciación. [Semiotic análisis of discurse. From the enunciate to the enunciation] Translated byEnrique Ballón. Barcelona: Gredos.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Denk, Thomas and Daniel, Silander
   2012 “Problems in paradise? Challenges to future democratization in democratic states.” International Political Science Review, no.: –. 10.1177/0192512110393487
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512110393487 [Google Scholar]
5. Direk, Zeynep
   2020 “Politics of Shame in Turkey: Public Shaming and Mourning.” Sophia: –. 10.1007/s11841‑020‑00772‑x
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-020-00772-x [Google Scholar]
6. Dromi, Shai M. and Gülay Türkmen
   2020 “What Does Trauma Have to Do with Politics? Cultural Trauma and the Displaced Founding Political Elites of Israel and Turkey.” The Sociological Quarterly, no.: –. 10.1080/00380253.2019.1580547
   https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2019.1580547 [Google Scholar]
7. Fontanille, Jacques
   2016 Prácticas Semióticas. [Semiotic practices.] Translated byDesiderio Blanco. Lima: Fondo Editorial de la Universidad de Lima.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Foucault, Michel
   1982 “The Subject and Power.” Critical Inquiry, no. : –. 10.1086/448181
   https://doi.org/10.1086/448181 [Google Scholar]
9. Fuchs, Christian
   2012 “Social media, riots, and revolutions.” Capital & Class, no. : –. 10.1177/0309816812453613
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816812453613 [Google Scholar]
10. Gorman, Brandon, Ijlal Naqvi and Charles Kurzman
    2019 “Who Doesn’t Want Democracy? A Multilevel Analysis of Elite and Mass Attitudes.” Sociological Perspectives, no. : –. 10.1177/0731121418785626
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121418785626 [Google Scholar]
11. Hartig, Falk
    2018 “Political slogans as instruments of international government communication – the case of China.” The Journal of International Communication, no. : –. 10.1080/13216597.2018.1444664
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2018.1444664 [Google Scholar]
12. INEI
    INEI 2020 Perú: Percepción Ciudadana sobre Gobernabilidad, Democracia y Confianza en las Instituciones. Octubre 2019 – marzo 2020. [Citizen perception about governability, democracy and trust in institutions. October 2019–2020.] Lima: INEI. m.inei.gob.pe/biblioteca-virtual/boletines/gobernabilidad-democracia-y-confianza-en-las-instituciones-9866/1/#lista
    [Google Scholar]
13. IPSOS
    IPSOS 2021 “Estudio de Opinión – IPSOS Perú, Febrero de 2021”. [Opinion study – IPSOS Peru, february 2021.] Opinion data. AccessedJanuary 10, 2022. https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2021-02/6980221inf_v1_17feb21.pdf
14. Kruse, Stefan, Maria Ravilik and Christian Welzel
    2019 “Democracy Confused: When People Mistake the Absence of Democracy for Its Presence”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, no.: –. 10.1177/0022022118821437
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022118821437 [Google Scholar]
15. Latinobarómetro
    Latinobarómetro 2021 Informe Latinobarómetro. [Latinobarometer report.] Lima: INEI. AccessedJanuary 10, 2022. https://www.latinobarometro.org/lat.jsp
    [Google Scholar]
16. Lawler, Michael G. and Todd A. Salzman
    2016 “Conscience and Experience: Choosing the True and the Good”. Irish Theological Quarterly, no.. 10.1177/0021140015616531
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0021140015616531 [Google Scholar]
17. Lenard, Patti T.
    2008 “Trust Your Compatriots, but Count Your Change: The Roles of Trust, Mistrust and Distrust in Democracy.” Political Studies, no.: –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9248.2007.00693.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00693.x [Google Scholar]
18. Lewis, Helen. B.
    1971 “Shame and Guilt in Neurosis.” The Psychoanalytical Review, no.: –.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Li, Lianjiang
    2021 “Distrust in Government and Preference for Regime Change in China.” Political Studies, no.: –. 10.1177/0032321719892166
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719892166 [Google Scholar]
20. Lu, Xing
    1999 “An Ideological/Cultural Analysis of Political Slogans in Communist China.” Discourse & Society, no.: –. 10.1177/0957926599010004003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010004003 [Google Scholar]
21. Makovicky, Nicolette, Anne-Christine Trémon and Sheyla S. Zandonai
    2019 “Slogans. Circulations, contestations, and current engagements with neoliberal policies.” InSlogans Subjection, Subversion, and the Politics of Neoliberalism, edited byNicolette Makovicky, Anne-Christine Trémon, Sheyla S. Zandonai, –. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Markoff, John
    2019 “Overflowing Channels: How Democracy Didn’t Work as Planned (and Perhaps a Good Thing It Didn’t).” Sociological Theory, no.: –. 10.1177/0735275119850866
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275119850866 [Google Scholar]
23. ONPE
    ONPE (n.d.). “Elecciones / Histórico de elecciones”. [Elections / Elections register.] AccessedJanuary 10, 2022. https://www.onpe.gob.pe/elecciones/
24. Quezada, Óscar
    1991 Semiótica Generativa. Bases Teóricas. [Generative semiotics. Theoretical bases.] Lima: Centro de Investigación en Comunicación Social de la Universidad de Lima – CICOSUL.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Stacul, Jaro
    2018 “The Constructive Power of Slogans in Post-Socialist Poland.” Anthropologica, , no. : –. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/713382
    [Google Scholar]
26. Statista
    Statista (n.d.). “Social media usage in Peru – Statistics & Facts”. Statista. https://www.statista.com/topics/7219/social-media-usage-in-peru/#topicOverview
    [Google Scholar]
27. Tilly, Charles
    2003 “Inequality, Democratization and De-democratization.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior, no.: –. 10.1111/1467‑9558.00174
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9558.00174 [Google Scholar]
28. Tilly, Charles
    2007 Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511804922
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804922 [Google Scholar]