1887
Volume 22, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Discourse-focused analyses of political communication show a complex interplay between narration and argumentation. Yet, current analytical tools fall short of accounting for the multifarious ways in which narratives perform as arguments. This paper adopts the notion narrative argument, developed in argumentation theory, to examine the ways the ‘hero-protector’ narrative serves as argument. The paper analyzes four speeches given by Donald Trump and Joe Biden, whereby the use of force on foreign grounds is justified via the ‘hero-protector’ narrative. The analytical framework combines the argumentation strategies of the Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA) with pragma-dialectics’ argumentation schemes. The analysis shows that each narrative sequence constituting the ‘hero-protector’ narrative constructs specific argument schemes, and the logical connections between these sequences link arguments in chains to collectively justify the rightness of claims. The paper, thus, seeks to illustrate the possibility of conceptualizing narrative discourse as an effective way to argue for or against a claim.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22066.eln
2023-02-16
2024-05-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bergstrand, Kelly, and James M. Jasper
    2018 “Villains, victims, and heroes in character theory and affect control.” Theory Social Psychology Quarterly81(3): 228–247. 10.1177/0190272518781050
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272518781050 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bex, Floris, and Trevor J. Bench-Capon
    2017 “Arguing with stories.” InNarration as Argument, ed. byPaula Olmos, 31–46. Cham: Springer, pp.31–46. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑56883‑6_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56883-6_3 [Google Scholar]
  3. Campbell, Joseph
    1949The hero with a Thousand Faces. Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Carranza, Isloda E.
    1998 “Low Narrativity: Narratives and Argumentation.” Narrative Inquiry8(2): 287–317. 10.1075/ni.8.2.04car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.8.2.04car [Google Scholar]
  5. 1999 “Winning the Battle in Private Discourse: Rhetorical–logical Operations in Storytelling.” Discourse and Society10(4): 509–41. 10.1177/0957926599010004004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010004004 [Google Scholar]
  6. Charteris-Black, Jonathon
    2014Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑36833‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-36833-1 [Google Scholar]
  7. Clément, Maéva, Thomas Lindemann, and Eric Sangar
    2017 “The ‘Hero-Protector Narrative”: Manufacturing Emotional Consent for the Use of Force”. Political Psychology38(6): 991–1008. 10.1111/pops.12385
    https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12385 [Google Scholar]
  8. de Fina, Anna, and Alexandra Georgakopoulou
    2012Analyzing Narrative Discourse and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ellis, Donald
    2014 “Narrative as Deliberative Argument.” Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict7(1): 95–108. 10.1080/17467586.2014.915337
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17467586.2014.915337 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough
    2012Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fisher, Walter R.
    1987 “Technical Logic, Rhetorical Logic, and Narrative Rationality.” Argumentation1(1): 3–21. 10.1007/BF00127116
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127116 [Google Scholar]
  12. Forchtner, Bernhard
    2014 “Historia magistra vitae: The topos of history as a teacher in public struggles of self and other representation”. InContemporary Critical Discourse Studies, ed. byChristopher Hart, and Piotr Cap, 19–43. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2020 ”Critique, Habermas and Narrative (genre): The Discourse-Historical Approach in Critical Discourse Studies.” Critical Discourse Studies18(3): 314–331. 10.1080/17405904.2020.1803093
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1803093 [Google Scholar]
  14. Forchtner, Bernhard, and Christoffer Kolvraa
    2012 “Narrating a ‘New Europe’: From ‘Bitter Past’ to Self-Righteousness?” Discourse & Society23(4): 377–400. 10.1177/0957926512441108
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926512441108 [Google Scholar]
  15. Govier, Trudy, and Lowell Ayers
    2012 “Logic, Parables, and Argument.” Informal Logic32(2): 161–189. 10.22329/il.v32i2.3457
    https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v32i2.3457 [Google Scholar]
  16. Groth, Stefan
    2019 “Political narratives / Narrations of the Political: An Introduction.” Narrative Culture6(1): 1–18. 10.13110/narrcult.6.1.0001
    https://doi.org/10.13110/narrcult.6.1.0001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Halliday, Michael A. K., and Christian M. I. Matthiessen
    1999Construing Experience through Meaning: A language-Based Approach to Cognition. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Heer, Hannes, Walter Manoschek, Alexander Pollak, and Ruth Wodak
    2008The Discursive Construction of History: Remembering the Wehrmacht’s War of Annihilation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hoven, Paul
    2017 “Narratives and pragmatic arguments: Ivens’ The 400 Million.” InNarration as Argument, ed. byPaula Olmos, 103–122. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑56883‑6_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56883-6_7 [Google Scholar]
  20. Jakobsen, Peter, and Jens Ringsmose
    2015 “For our own security and for the sake of the Afghans: how the Danish public was persuaded to support an unprecedented costly military endeavour in Afghanistan.” InStrategic Narratives, Public Opinion, and War, ed. byBeatrice de Graaf, Dimitriu George, and Jens Ringsmose, 138–156. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jasper, James, Michael Young, and Elke Zuern
    2018 “Character Work in Social Movements.” Theory and Society47 (1):113–31. 10.1007/s11186‑018‑9310‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-018-9310-1 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kienpointner, Manfred
    2009 “Plausible and fallacious strategies to silence one’s opponent.” InExamining Argumentation in Context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering, ed. byFrans H. van Eemeren, 61–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.1.05kie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.1.05kie [Google Scholar]
  23. Kvernbekk, Tone, and Ola Bøe-Hansen
    2017 “How to win wars: The role of the war narrative.” InNarration as Argument, ed. byPaula Olmos, 216–234. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑56883‑6_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56883-6_12 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lakoff, George
    1991 “Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System Used to Justify War in the Gulf.” The Canadian Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies23(2/3): 25–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mayer, Frederick W.
    2014Narrative Politics: Stories and Collective Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199324460.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199324460.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  26. McGee, Michael, and John Nelson
    1985 “Narrative Reason in Public Argument.” Journal of Communication35(4): 139–155. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1985.tb02978.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02978.x [Google Scholar]
  27. Mühlberger, Wolfgang
    2020 “Introduction: The power of narratives in political contexts.” InPolitical Narratives in the Middle East and North Africa: Conceptions of Order and Perceptions of Instability, ed. byWolfgang Mühlberger, and Toni Alaranta, 1–17. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑35217‑2_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35217-2_1 [Google Scholar]
  28. Olmos, Paula
    2014 “Classical fables as arguments: Narration and analogy.” InSystematic Approaches to Argument by Analogy, ed. byHenrique J. Ribeiro, 189–208. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑06334‑8_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06334-8_11 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2015 “Story credibility in narrative arguments.” InReflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory, ed. byFrans H. van Eemeren, and Bart Garssen, 155–167Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑21103‑9_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21103-9_12 [Google Scholar]
  30. Patterson, Molly, and Kristen Monroe
    1998 “Narrative in Political Science.” Annual Review Political Science11: 315–331. 10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.315
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.315 [Google Scholar]
  31. Plumer, Gilbert
    2011 “Novels as arguments.” InProceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. byFrans H. van Eemeren, 1547–1558. Netherlands. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Reisigl, Martin
    2020 ‘“Narrative!” I can’t hear that anymore’. A linguistic critique of an overstretched umbrella term in cultural and social science studies, discussed with the example of the discourse on climate change.” Critical Discourse Studies18(3): 368–386. 10.1080/17405904.2020.1822897
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1822897 [Google Scholar]
  33. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2001Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2009 “The discourse historical approach.” InMethods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. byRuth Wodak, Michael Meyer, 87–121London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Reyes, Antonio
    2011 “Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions.” Discourse & Society22(6): 781–807. 10.1177/0957926511419927
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927 [Google Scholar]
  36. Rheindorf, Markus, and Ruth Wodak
    2017 “It Was a Long, Hard Road: A Longitudinal Perspective on Discourses of Commemoration in Austria.” 10plus1: Living Linguistics31: 22–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Richardson, John E.
    2018 “Sharing Values to Safeguard the Future: British Holocaust Memorial Day Commemoration as Epideictic Rhetoric.” Discourse & Communication12(2): 171–191. 10.1177/1750481317745743
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481317745743 [Google Scholar]
  38. Ricoeur, Paul
    1991 “Life in quest of narrative.” InOn Paul Ricoeur: Narrative and Interpretation, ed. byDavid Wood, 20–33. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ringmar, Erik
    2006 “Inter-textual relations: the quarrel over the Iraq war as a conflict between narrative types.” Cooperation and Conflict: Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association41(4): 403–421. 10.1177/0010836706069611
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836706069611 [Google Scholar]
  40. Rojo, Luisa, and Teun A. van Dijk
    1997 “There Was a Problem, and It Was Solved! Legitimating the Expulsion of Illegal Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse.” Discourse & Society8(4): 523–566. 10.1177/0957926597008004005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008004005 [Google Scholar]
  41. Schubert, Christoph
    2010 “Narrative sequences in political discourse: Forms and functions in speeches and hypertext frameworks.” InNarrative Revisited: Telling a Story in the Age of New Media, ed. byChristian Hoffmann, 143–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/pbns.199.08sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.199.08sch [Google Scholar]
  42. Somers, Margaret
    1994 “The Narrative Constitution of Identity: A Relational and Network Approach.” Theory and Society, 23(5): 605–649. 10.1007/BF00992905
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992905 [Google Scholar]
  43. Toolan, Michael
    2001 “Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction.” London: Routledge.
  44. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1993 “Stories and racism.” InNarrative and Social Control: Critical Perspectives, ed. byDennis Mumby, 121–142. Newbury: Sage Publications. 10.4135/9781483345277.n6
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483345277.n6 [Google Scholar]
  45. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
    1992Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser
    1999 “Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse.” Discourse Studies1(4): 479–497. 10.1177/1461445699001004005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001004005 [Google Scholar]
  47. van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. Krabbe, Francisca A. Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij, and Jean H. M. Wagemans
    2014Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑9473‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5 [Google Scholar]
  48. van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, and Bert Meuffels
    2009Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness: Empirical research concerning the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑2614‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2614-9 [Google Scholar]
  49. Van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak
    1999 “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies1(1): 83–118. 10.1177/1461445699001001005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001005 [Google Scholar]
  50. Walton, Douglas
    1997Appeal to pity: Argumentum ad misericordiam. New York: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 2012 “Story similarity in arguments from analogy.” Informal Logic321: 190–221. 10.22329/il.v32i2.3159
    https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v32i2.3159 [Google Scholar]
  52. Wrisley, George
    2019 “Appeal to emotion: Pity”. InBad arguments: 100 of the Most Important Fallacies in Western Philosophy, ed.byRobert Arp, Steven Barbone, and Michael Bruce, 102–105. Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Wodak, Ruth
    2015The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446270073
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073 [Google Scholar]
  54. Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, Ruth Rodger, and Karin Liebhart
    2009The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Žagar, Igor
    2009 “Topoi in Critical Discourse Analysis.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 6(1), 3–27.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22066.eln
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22066.eln
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error