1887
Volume 23, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper critically examines the recent presidential memorandum that replaced the Anglicized exonymic version “Turkey” with the endonym “Türkiye” as a conscious, performative and public relations campaign at both national and international levels. On the surface, this change addresses populist sociolinguistic hypersensitivities surrounding the connotations of the term “turkey” while simultaneously harnessing the commodification and marketization of the Turkey brand through selective references culled from collective memory (i.e., past) and branding aimed at economic gains (i.e., future). However, at the deeper level, this transformation serves as a discursive political instrument and a top-down nation branding effort powered by substantial resources from the state and its institutions with an ultimate motivation to consolidate President Erdoğan’s political power and authority, elevate his status to that of a national leader and institutionalize his populist/nationalist rhetoric from a to within as a competitive authoritarian regime.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22104.sel
2023-11-28
2024-10-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alderman, Derek
    2002 “Street Names as Memorial Arenas: The Reputational Politics of Commemorating Martin Luther King, Jr. in A Georgia County,” Historical Geography301: 99–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2008 “Place, Naming and the Interpretation of Cultural Landscapes.” InThe Ashgate Research Companion to Heritage and Identity, ed. byBrian Graham, and Peter Howard, 195–214. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315613031‑15
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315613031-15 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2009 “Virtual Place-Naming, Internet Domains, and the Politics of Misdirection: The Case of www.martinlutherking.org” InCritical Toponymies: The Contested Politics of Place Naming, ed. byLawrence D. Berg and Jani Vuolteenaho, 267–284. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315258843‑21
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315258843-21 [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson, Benedict
    1993Imagined Communities. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Azaryahu, Maoz
    1996 “The Power of Commemorative Street Names.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space14 (3): 311–330. 10.1068/d140311
    https://doi.org/10.1068/d140311 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2011 “The Politics of Commemorative Street Renaming: Berlin 1945–1948.” Journal of Historical Geography371: 483–492. 10.1016/j.jhg.2011.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2011.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Azaryahu, Maoz, and Rebecca Kook
    2002 “Mapping the Nation: Street Names and Arab-Palestinian Identity: Three Case Studies.” Nations and Nationalism8 (2): 195–213. 10.1111/1469‑8219.00046
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8219.00046 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bora, Tanıl
    2018Zamanın Kelimeleri: Yeni Türkiye’nin Siyasi Dili [Words of the Zeitgeist: The political language of the New Turkey]. İstanbul: İletişim.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brand Finance
    Brand Finance, “Nation Brands 2023,” accessedSeptember 30, 2023. https://brandirectory.com/rankings/nation-brands/table
  10. Cambridge Dictionary
    Cambridge Dictionary. “Turkey.” accessedJune 21, 2022. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/turkey
  11. Christofis, Nikos
    2019Erdoğan’s ‘New’ Turkey: Attempted Coup d’état and the Acceleration of Political Crisis. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429330216
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429330216 [Google Scholar]
  12. Christensen, Christian
    2013 “@Sweden: Curating a Nation on Twitter.” Popular Communication11 (1): 30–46. 10.1080/15405702.2013.751855
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2013.751855 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cohen, Saul B., and Nurit Kliot
    1992 “Place-Names in Israel’s Ideological Struggle over the Administered Territories.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers82 (4): 653–680. 10.1111/j.1467‑8306.1992.tb01722.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1992.tb01722.x [Google Scholar]
  14. Cook, Steven A.
    “What a Turkey!,” POLITICO Magazine, August 5, 2014, https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/08/what-a-turkey-109734/
    [Google Scholar]
  15. “Why does Trump Keep Pardoning Turkey?” POLITICO Magazine, November 28, 2019, https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2019/11/28/trumppardon-turkey-073704. Accessed27 April 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dinçer, Ethan
    . “Turkey or Türkiye? The Politics of a Name Change” Oxford Middle East Review, March 16, 2022, https://omerjournal.com/2022/03/16/turkey-or-turkiye-the-politics-of-a-name-change/
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Düzgün, Doğuş
    2021 “The Death of the Author in Place Names: A Barthesian Intervention into Critical Toponymy.” Geography Compass. 10.1111/gec3.12598
    https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12598 [Google Scholar]
  18. Esen, Berk, and Şebnem Gümüşçü
    2016 “Rising Competitive Authoritarianism in Turkey.” Third World Quarterly37 (9): 1581–1606. 10.1080/01436597.2015.1135732
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1135732 [Google Scholar]
  19. Eshuis, Jasper, and Erik Hans Klijn
    2012Branding in Governance and Public Management. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203145159
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203145159 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fan, Ying
    2006 “Branding the Nation: What is Being Branded?” Journal of Vacation Marketing12 (1): 5–14. 10.1177/1356766706056633
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1356766706056633 [Google Scholar]
  21. Foucault, Michel
    1977Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gambetti, Zeynep, and Joost Jongerden
    2011 “The Spatial (Re)Production of the Kurdish Issue: Multiple and Contradicting Trajectories – Introduction.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies13 (4): 375–388. 10.1080/19448953.2011.621785
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2011.621785 [Google Scholar]
  23. Giraut, Frédéric
    2020 “Plural Toponyms: When Place Names Coexist.” EchoGéo531–8. 10.4000/echogeo.20760
    https://doi.org/10.4000/echogeo.20760 [Google Scholar]
  24. Giraut, Frédéric, and M. Houssay-Holzschuch
    2016 “Place Naming as Dispositif: Toward a Theoretical Framework.” Geopolitics21 (1): 1–21. 10.1080/14650045.2015.1134493
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2015.1134493 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hakala, Ulla, Paula Sjöblom, and Satu-Paivi Kantola
    2015 “Toponyms as Carriers of Heritage: Implications for Place Branding.” Journal of Product & Brand Management24 (3): 263–275. 10.1108/JPBM‑05‑2014‑0612
    https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-05-2014-0612 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hannah, Matthew G.
    2012 “Foucault’s “German moment”: Genealogy of a disjuncture.” Foucault Studies131: 116–137. 10.22439/fs.v0i13.3460
    https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i13.3460 [Google Scholar]
  27. Helander, Kaisa Rautio
    2009 “Toponymic Silence and Sámi Place Names During the Growth of the Norwegian Nation State” InCritical Toponymies: The Contested Politics of Place Naming, ed. byLawrence D. Berg and Jani Vuolteenaho, 253–266. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315258843‑20
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315258843-20 [Google Scholar]
  28. Helleland, Botolv
    2012 “Place Names and Identities.” Oslo Studies in Language4 (2): 95–116. 10.5617/osla.313
    https://doi.org/10.5617/osla.313 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hepçilingirler, Feyza
    . “Türkçe Günlükleri [Diaries of Turkish],” Cumhuriyet Daily, November 21, 2006, https://egazete.cumhuriyet.com.tr/oku/4200/2006-12-21/39
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Iğsız, Aslı
    2014 “Brand Turkey and the Gezi Protests: Authoritarianism in Flux, Law and Neoliberalism” InThe Making of a Protest Movement in Turkey: #occupygezi, ed.byUmut Özkırımlı, 25–49. London: Palgrave Pivot. 10.1057/9781137413789_3
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137413789_3 [Google Scholar]
  31. Jordan, Paul
    2009 “Nation branding: A tool for nationalism?” Journal of Baltic Studies45 (3): 283–303. 10.1080/01629778.2013.860609
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2013.860609 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kadmon, N.
    2002Glossary of Terms for the Standardization of Geographical Names. New York: United Nations Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kaneva, Nadia
    2011 “Nation Branding: Toward an Agenda for Critical Research.” International Journal of Communication51: 117–141. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/704
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kavaratzis, Mihalis, and Gregory Ashworth
    2008 “Place Marketing: How did We Get Here and Where are We Going?” Journal of Place Management and Development1/21: 150–165. 10.1108/17538330810889989
    https://doi.org/10.1108/17538330810889989 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kaya, Ayhan
    2020 Migration as a Leverage Tool in International Relations: Turkey as a Case Study” Uluslararası İlişkiler17 (68): 21–39. 10.33458/uidergisi.856870
    https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.856870 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kaya, Ayhan, and Ayşe Tecmen
    2020 “The Use of the Past in Populist Political Discourse: Justice and Development Party Rule in Turkey” InEuropean Memory in Populism: Representations of Self and Other, eds. byChiara De Cesari and Ayhan Kaya, 69–90. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429454813‑4
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429454813-4 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kaya, Ayhan, Max-Valentin Robert, and Ayşe Tecmen
    2020 “Populism in Turkey and France: nativism, multiculturalism and Euroskepticism.” Turkish Studies21 (3): 361–391. 10.1080/14683849.2019.1637260
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2019.1637260 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kearns, Robin A., and Lawrence D. Berg
    2002 “Proclaiming Place: Towards a Geography of Place Name Pronunciation.” Social & Cultural Geography3 (2): 283–302. 10.1080/1464936022000003532
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1464936022000003532 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kostanski, Laura
    2016 “Toponymic Attachment” InThe Oxford Handbook of Names and Naming, ed. byCarole Hough, 412–426. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199656431.013.42
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199656431.013.42 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kotler, Philip, and David Gertner
    2002 “Country as brand, product, and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective,” Journal of Brand Management94&51: 249–262. 10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540076
    https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540076 [Google Scholar]
  41. Light, Duncan, and Craig Young
    2014 “Habit, Memory, and the Persistence of Socialist-Era Street Names in Postsocialist Bucharest, Romania.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers104 (3): 668–685. 10.1080/00045608.2014.892377
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.892377 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2015 “Toponymy as Commodity: Exploring the Economic Dimensions of Urban Place Names.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research39 (3): 435–450. 10.1111/1468‑2427.12153
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12153 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2017 “The Politics of Toponymic Continuity: The Limits of Change and the Ongoing Lives of Street Names” InThe Political Life of Urban Streetscapes: Naming, Politics and Place, ed. byReuben Rose-Redwood, Derek Alderman, and Maoz Azaryahu, 185–201. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315554464‑11
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315554464-11 [Google Scholar]
  44. Macdonald, S.
    2013Memorylands: Heritage and Identity in Europe Today. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203553336
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203553336 [Google Scholar]
  45. Mamvura, Zvinashe, Itai Muwati, and Davie E. Mutasa
    2018 ‘“Toponymic Commemoration is Not for One Sex”: The Gender Politics of Place Renaming in Harare,’ African Identities16 (4): 429–443. 10.1080/14725843.2018.1474086
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2018.1474086 [Google Scholar]
  46. Marin, Anaïs
    2012 “Bordering Time in the Cityscape. Toponymic Changes as Temporal Boundary-Making: Street Renaming in Leningrad/St. Petersburg.” Geopolitics17 (1): 192–216. 10.1080/14650045.2011.574652
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2011.574652 [Google Scholar]
  47. Maruflu, Selçuk
    2015 “Turkey Değil Türkiye [Türkiye, not Turkey].” Önce Vatan Daily, February 10, 2015. https://www.oncevatan.com.tr/turkey-degil-turkiye-makale,32554.html
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Medway, Dominic, and Gary Warnaby
    2014 “What’s in a Name? Place Branding and Toponymic Commodification.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space46 (1): 153–167. 10.1068/a45571
    https://doi.org/10.1068/a45571 [Google Scholar]
  49. Murphy, Anna Francesca
    . “Turkey’s Name Change to ‘Türkiye’ Shows that the World is No Longer Trying to Appease Britain” iNews, January 21, 2022. https://inews.co.uk/opinion/turkey-name-change-turkiye-world-appease-uk-britain-1407716
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Ok, Ülgen Zeki [Google Scholar]
  51. Öktem, Kerem
    2008 “The Nation’s Imprint: Demographic Engineering and the Change of Toponymes in Republican Turkey.” European Journal of Turkish Studies7 (7). 10.4000/ejts.2243
    https://doi.org/10.4000/ejts.2243 [Google Scholar]
  52. Olins, Wallace
    2002 “Branding the Nation – The Historical Context,’ Journal of Brand Management9 (4&5): 241–248. 10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540075
    https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540075 [Google Scholar]
  53. Palonen, Emilia
    2008 “The city-text in post-communist Budapest: Street names, memorials, and the politics of commemoration.” GeoJournal731: 219–230. 10.1007/s10708‑008‑9204‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-008-9204-2 [Google Scholar]
  54. Presidency of the Republic of Turkey
    Presidency of the Republic of Turkey 2014 ‘Türkiye İhracatçılar Meclisi Türkiye Markası Tanıtım Toplantısı’nda Yaptıkları Konuşma [His Excellency’s Address at the Turkish Exporters Assembly’s Publicity Meeting on the Türkiye Brand],’ https://www.tccb.gov.tr/konusmalar/353/2939/turkiye-ihracatcilar-meclisi-turkiye-markasi-tanitim-toplantisinda-yaptiklari-konusma
  55. Presidency of the Republic of Turkey
    Presidency of the Republic of Turkey 2021 ‘Marka Olarak “Türkiye” Ibaresinin Kullanımı (2021/24) [The Use of the Expression of “Türkiye” as a Brand],’ https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2021/12/20211204-5.pdf
  56. Rose-Redwood, Reuben S.
    2008 “From Number to Name: Symbolic Capital, Places of Memory and The Politics of Street Renaming in New York City.” Social & Cultural Geography9 (4): 431–452. 10.1080/14649360802032702
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360802032702 [Google Scholar]
  57. Rose-Redwood, Reuben S., Derek Alderman, and Maoz Azaryahu
    (2010) “Geographies of Toponymic Inscription: New Directions in Critical Place-Name Studies.” Progress in Human Geography34 (4): 453–470. 10.1177/0309132509351042
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132509351042 [Google Scholar]
  58. Soylu, Ragıp
    . “Turkey to Register its New Name Türkiye to UN in Coming Weeks.” Middle East Eye. January 17, 2022. https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/turkey-turkiye-new-name-register-un-weeks
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Tecmen, Ayşe
    2017 “Nation Branding and Right to Brand/Brand Turkey,’ Research and Policy on Turkey2 (1), 76–89. 10.1080/23760818.2016.1272269
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23760818.2016.1272269 [Google Scholar]
  60. Tek, Ömer Burak
    2021 ““Made in Türkiye”: Yeni Türkiye Markasının Ekonomi Politiği [“Made in Türkiye”: The Econo-Politics of the New Turkey Brand],’ Perspektif Online, 16 December 2021. https://www.perspektif.online/made-in-turkiye-yeni-turkiye-markasinin-ekonomi-politigi/
    [Google Scholar]
  61. The Directorate of Communication
    The Directorate of Communication. “About DoC.” accessedNovember 18, 2023. https://www.iletisim.gov.tr/english/kurum-hakkinda
  62. Trent, Jan
    2015 “Approaches to Research in Toponymy,” A Journal of Onomastics63 (2): 65–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. TurkuazLab
    TurkuazLab. “Türkiye’de Kutuplaşmanın Boyutları 2020 Araştırması [The Research on the Dimensions of Polarization in Turkey 2020],” https://www.turkuazlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Ozet-Bulgular.pdf. Accessed27 April 2022.
  64. Uluç, Doğan
    . “Türkiye hindi değildir [Turkey is not a turkey],” Hürriyet Daily, 21 November 2007, available athttps://www.hurriyet.com.tr/dunya/turkiye-hindi-degildir-7732820. Accessed27 April 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Uncu, B. A.
    (2019) Polarization in Turkey. KONDA Barometer: Polarization in Turkey (January 2019), available athttps://konda.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/ENG1901_Barometer94_PolarizationinTurkey.pdf. Accessed27 April 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Van Houtum, Henk, and Ton van Naerssen
    2002 “Bordering, Ordering and Othering,’ Tijdschift voor. Economische en Sociale Geografie931: 125–136. 10.1111/1467‑9663.00189
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00189 [Google Scholar]
  67. Vuolteenaho, J. and L. D. Berg
    2009 ‘Towards critical toponymies’ InCritical Toponymies: The Contested Politics of Place Naming, ed. byLawrence D. Berg and Jani Vuolteenaho, 1–18. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315258843‑9
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315258843-9 [Google Scholar]
  68. Wideman, Trevor James, and Jeffrey R. Masuda
    2018 “Assembling “Japantown”? A Critical Toponymy of Urban Dispossession in Vancouver, Canada.” Urban Geography39 (4): 493–518. 10.1080/02723638.2017.1360038
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2017.1360038 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22104.sel
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22104.sel
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Erdoğan; nation branding; nationalism; populism; toponomy; Turkey; Türkiye
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error