1887
Volume 22, Issue 6
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

is a discursively constructed complex entity which can reshape an image of a nation. Even one person powerful enough to be a representative of the whole nation can promote a collective sense of and sovereignty of the country in line with social, historical, or most importantly, a versatile geopolitical context. The present study is an illustration of how lexical choices of a particular political figure – the President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyy – identified by specific corpus linguistic research tools in the discourse, defines and emphasizes a national integrity during the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war. Corpus-based Critical Discourse Analysis is applied to investigate how a prominent Ukrainian political figure – Volodymyr Zelenskyy discursively constructs in the context of the 2022 Russia-Ukraine war. The research is based on the linguistic scrutiny of presidential video addresses, which are stored at the official presidential website and transcribed in English.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22106.gul
2023-05-26
2024-05-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, Benedict
    1983Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anthony, Lawrence
    2012 AntConc (Version 3.3.2) [Windows 3.5.7.]. Waseda University. www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/
  3. Baker, Paul
    2006Using corpora in discourse analysis. Continuum Publishing. 10.5040/9781350933996
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350933996 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2012Contemporary corpus linguistics. Continuum International Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Benvéniste, Emile
    1966La nature des pronoms (The Nature of Pronouns). Collection Gallimard
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bourdieu, Pierre
    1994 “Rethinking the State: Genesis and Structure of the Field.” Sociological Theory12(1): 1–18. 10.2307/202032
    https://doi.org/10.2307/202032 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chilton, Paul, Tian, Hailong, and Ruth, Wodak
    2010 “Reflections on Discourse and Critique in China and the West.” Journal of Language & Politics9(4): 489–507. 10.1075/jlp.9.4.02chi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.4.02chi [Google Scholar]
  8. Chung, Cindy, and James, Pennebaker
    2007 “The psychological functions of function words.” InSocial Communication, ed. byKlaus, Fiedler, 343–359. Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. De Cillia, Rudolf, Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth, Wodak
    1999 “The discursive construction of national identity.” Discourse and Society10(2), 149–173. 10.1177/0957926599010002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010002002 [Google Scholar]
  10. Derrida, Jacques
    1978Writing and difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Feng, Hao, and Yuhui, Liu
    2010 “Analysis of interpersonal meaning in public speeches – a case study of Obama’s speech.” Journal of Language Teaching and Research1(6): 825–829. 10.4304/jltr.1.6.825‑829
    https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.6.825-829 [Google Scholar]
  12. Giner, Salvador
    1994 “The Advent of a European Society.” International Journal of Sociology24(1): 11–30. 10.1080/15579336.1994.11770077
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15579336.1994.11770077 [Google Scholar]
  13. Johnson, Mark
    1987The Body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and Reason. University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnson, Boris
    2022 February24. Boris on Putin: ‘A bloodstained aggressor who believes in imperial conquest’. The Global Herald. https://theglobalherald.com/news/boris-on-putin-a-bloodstained-aggressor-who-believes-in-imperial-conquest/
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Habermas, Jürgen
    2001The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hall, Stuart
    1994Rassismus und kulturelle Identität. Ausgewählte Schriften 2. Hamburg: Argument (Argument Sonderband 226).
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 1996 “Introduction: Who Needs ‘Identity’?” InQuestions of Cultural Identity, ed. byStuart, Hall, and Paul, Du Gay, 1–17. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Halbwachs, Maurice
    1985Das kollektive Gedächtnis. Frankfurt: Fischer.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hassener, Pierre
    2012 (June). The Paradoxes of European Identity. Englesberg Seminar.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Heidegger, Martin, and Joan, Stambaugh
    1969Identity and Difference. 1st ed.Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ifversen, Jan
    2002 “Europe and European Culture: A Conceptual Analysis.” European Societies4(1): 1–26. 10.1080/14616690220130973
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14616690220130973 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kaye, James
    2009 “Out of Maelstroms: Crises and Parlous Developments of Europe since World War Two.” InEuropean Public Sphere and the Media, Europe in Crisis, ed. byAnna, Triandafyllidou, Ruth, Wodak, and Michal, Krzyżanowski, 53–82. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 10.1057/9780230271722_4
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230271722_4 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kuo, Sai-Hua
    2002 “From solidarity to antagonism: The uses of the second-person singular pronoun In Chinese political discourse.” Text22(1): 29–55. 10.1515/text.2002.004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2002.004 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lakomaa, Erik
    2017 “The history of business and war: introduction.” Scandinavian Economic History Review65(3): 224–230. 10.1080/03585522.2017.1397314
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03585522.2017.1397314 [Google Scholar]
  25. Krzyżanowski, Michal
    2010The Discursive Construction of European Identities: A Multi-level Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Krzyżanowski, Michal, and Florain, Oberhuber
    2007(Un)Doing Europe: Discourse and Practices of Negotiating the EU Constitution. Bruxelles: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1983Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
  28. Maalej, Zouheir A.
    2012 “The ‘Jasmine Revolt’ has made the ‘Arab Spring’: A critical discourse analysis of the last three political speeches of the ousted president of Tunisia.” Discourse & Society23(6): 679–700. 10.1177/0957926512452973
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926512452973 [Google Scholar]
  29. Malmborg, Mikael, and Bo, Stråth
    2002The Meaning of Europe: Variety and Contention Within and Among Nations. New York, NY: Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Martin, Denis C.
    1995 “The Choices of Identity.” Social Identities1(1): 5–20. 10.1080/13504630.1995.9959423
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.1995.9959423 [Google Scholar]
  31. Moore, Dahlia, and Baruch, Kimmerling
    1995 “Individual Strategies of Adopting Collective Identities: The Israeli Case.” International Sociology101: 387–408. 10.1177/026858095010004003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026858095010004003 [Google Scholar]
  32. Oberhuber, Florian, Bärenreuter, Christoph, Krzyżanowski, Michal, Schönbauer, Heinz, and Ruth, Wodak
    2005 “Debating the Constitution: On the Representations of Europe / the EU in the Press.” Journal of Language & Politics4(2): 227–271. 10.1075/jlp.4.2.05obe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.2.05obe [Google Scholar]
  33. O’Connor, Brendan, Maisa, Taha, and Megan, Sheehan
    2008 “Castro’s shifters: Locating variation in Political discourse.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics14(2): 120–129. https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol14/iss2/15
    https://doi.org/https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol14/iss2/15 [Google Scholar]
  34. Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula
    2014 “Constructing collectivity with ‘we’ An Introduction.” InConstructing Collectivity ‘We’ across languages and contexts, ed. byTheodossia-Soula, Pavlidou, 1–19. Jon Benjamins Publishing: Amsterdam. 10.1075/pbns.239.03pav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.239.03pav [Google Scholar]
  35. Pennebaker, James W., Matthias R. Mehl, and Kate, G. Niederhoffer
    2003 “Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves.” Annual Review of Psychology541: 547–577. 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041 [Google Scholar]
  36. Pennycook, Alastair
    1994 “The politics of pronouns.” ELT Journal48(2): 173–178. 10.1093/elt/48.2.173
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/48.2.173 [Google Scholar]
  37. Siewierska, Anna
    2004Person. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511812729
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812729 [Google Scholar]
  38. Smith, Anthony D.
    1990 “Towards a Global Culture?” InGlobal Culture. Nationalism, Globalization and Modernity, ed. byMike, Featherstone, 171–192. London: Sage. 10.1177/026327690007002011
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026327690007002011 [Google Scholar]
  39. 1991Nationalism. Theory, Ideology, History. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 1992 “National Identity and the Idea of European Unity.” International Affairs681: 55–76. 10.2307/2620461
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2620461 [Google Scholar]
  41. 1993 “A Europe of Nations-or the Nation of Europe?” Journal of Peace Research301: 129–35. 10.1177/0022343393030002001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343393030002001 [Google Scholar]
  42. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    1998Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Sage Publications, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 2003 “Political discourse and ideology.” Doxa Comunicación11: 207–225. 10.31921/doxacom.n1a12
    https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n1a12 [Google Scholar]
  44. Wodak, Ruth
    2015aPolitics of Fear: What Right-wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446270073
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2015b “Normaliserung nach rechts”: Politischer Diskurs im Spannungsfeld von Neoliberalismus, Populismus, und kritischer Offentilichkeit.” InLinguistik Online73(4): 27–44. 10.13092/lo.73.2191
    https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.73.2191 [Google Scholar]
  46. 2018 “Discourse and European Integration.” KFG Working Paper, 861. Free University: Berlin. 10.1093/hepl/9780198737315.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198737315.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  47. Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf, de Cillia, Martin, Reisigl, and Karin, Liebhart
    2009Discursive construction of national identity. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Wodak, Ruth, and Salomi, Boukala
    2014 “Talking about Solidarity and Security in the Age of Crisis: The Revival of Nationalism and Protectionism in the European Union – A Discourse Historical Approach.” InEU’s Foreign Policy Through the Lenses of Discourse Analysis, ed. byCaterina, Carta, and Jean-Frederic, Morin, 171–190. Farnham: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Wodak, Ruth, and Michael, Meyer
    2016Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage Publications Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Zelenskyy, Volodymyr
    . (n.d). Speeches. [1/04/2021 – 28/03/2022] President of Ukraine | Volodymyr Zelenskyy. https://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/speeches
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22106.gul
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22106.gul
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error