“You are fake news”

References

1. Albert, Saul and Chase Raymand
   2019 Conversation analysis at the ‘middle region’ of public life: Greetings and the interactional construction of Donald Trump’ political persona. Language and Communication691: 67–83. 10.1016/j.langcom.2019.08.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.08.001 [Google Scholar]
2. Bull, Peter
   1994 On identifying questions, replies and non-replies in political interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology13(2): 115–153. 10.1177/0261927X94132002
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X94132002 [Google Scholar]
3. Chang, J.
   2020, February26. San Francisco Chinatown Affected by Coronavirus Fears, Despite No Conffrmed Cases: NPR. NPR. Retrieved fromhttps://www.npr.org/2020/02/26/809741251/san-francisco-chinatown-affected-by-coronavirus-fears-despite-no-confirmed-cases
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chovanec, Jan
   2020 “Those are not my words”: Evasion and metalingual accountability in political scandal talkJournal of Pragmatics1581: 66–79. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.01.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.01.003 [Google Scholar]
5. Clayman, Steven
   2001 Answers and evasionsLanguage in Society30 (3): 403–442. 10.1017/S0047404501003037
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404501003037 [Google Scholar]
6. Clayman, Steven
   2002 Disagreements and third parties: dilemma of neutralism in panel news interviews. Journal of Pragmatics341:1385–1401. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00070‑X
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00070-X [Google Scholar]
7. Clayman, Steven
   2013 Conversation analysis in the news interviewIn: The Handbook of Conversation Analysised. bySidnell Jack. and Stivers Tanya. 630–656. Wiley-Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Clayman, Steven and John Heritage
   2002a The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613623
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623 [Google Scholar]
9. Clayman, Steven and John Heritage
   2002b Questioning presidents: journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of U.S presidents Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication52(4): 749–775. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2002.tb02572.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02572.x [Google Scholar]
10. Clayman, Steven and John Heritage
    2021 Conversation analysis and the study of sociohistorical change. Research on Language and Social Interaction. 54(2): 225–240. 10.1080/08351813.2021.1899717
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899717 [Google Scholar]
11. Clayman, Steven, John Heritage, Marc Elliot and McDonald Laurie
    2007 When does the watchdog bark? Conditions of aggressive questions in presidential news conferences. American Sociological Review72(1): 23–41. 10.1177/000312240707200102
    https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200102 [Google Scholar]
12. Degani, Marta
    2016 “Endangered intellect: A case study of Clinton vs. Trump campaign discourse.” Iperstoria – Testi Letterature Linguaggi81.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dhanani, Y. Lindsay and Franz, Berkeley
    2020 Why public health framing matters: An experimental study of the effects of Covid-19 framing on prejudice and xenophobia in the United States. Social Science and Medicine2691: 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ekström, Mats
    2009a Announced refusal to answer: a study of norms and accountability in broadcast political interviews. Discourse Studies11(6): 681–702. 10.1177/1461445609347232
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609347232 [Google Scholar]
15. Ekström, Mats
    2009b Power and affiliation in presidential press conferences-A study on interruptions, jokes and laughter. Journal of Language and Politics8(3): 386–415. 10.1075/jlp.8.3.03eks
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.8.3.03eks [Google Scholar]
16. Ekström, Mats. and Goran Eriksson
    2018 Press conferencesIn: The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politicsed. byWodak, Ruth and Bernhard Forchtner, 342–354. Taylor &Francis Group.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gitlin, Todd
    2018 From ‘Liberal Media’ to ‘Fake News’. The American Prospect121.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Greatbatch, David
    1986a Aspects of topical organization in news interviews: the use of agenda-shifting procedures by interviews. Media, Culture and Society8(4): 441–455. 10.1177/0163443786008004005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443786008004005 [Google Scholar]
19. Greatbatch, David
    1988 A turn-taking system for British news interviewsLanguage in Society17(3), 401–430. 10.1017/S0047404500012963
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500012963 [Google Scholar]
20. Harris, Sandra
    1991 Evasion action: how politicians respond to questions in political interviewsIn: Broadcast Talked. byPaddy Scannell, 76–99. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Heritage, John
    1984b Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Heritage, John
    1985 Amazing news interviews: aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In: Handbook of Discourse Analysised. byTeun A. Dijk, 95–119. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Heritage, John
    2002b The limits of questioning: negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of Pragmatics34 (10–11): 1427–1446. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00072‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00072-3 [Google Scholar]
24. Heritage, John and Steven, Clayman
    2010 Talk in InteractionWiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Heritage, John and Greatbatch, David
    1986 Greeting applause: a study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences. American Journal of Sociology92(1): 110–157. 10.1086/228465
    https://doi.org/10.1086/228465 [Google Scholar]
26. Heritage, John and Greatbatch, David
    1991 On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interviews. In: Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysised. byBoden Deirdre and Donald Zimmerman, 93–137. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Jacobsen, Ronald Rosendal
    2019 Interruption and co-construction in the First 2016 Trump-Clinton US presidential debate. Journal of Pragmatics1481: 71–87. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.019 [Google Scholar]
28. Jones, H. Rodney
    2021 The wounded leader: The illness narratives of Boris Johnson and Donald Trump. Discourse, Context and Media411:1–11. 10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100499
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100499 [Google Scholar]
29. Kumar, Joynt Martha
    2020 Contemporary presidency–Presidents meet reporters: Is Donard Trump an outlier among recent presidents?Presidential Studies Quarterly501: 193–215. 10.1111/psq.12638
    https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12638 [Google Scholar]
30. Montgomery, Martin
    2017 Post-truth politics? -Authentity, populism and the electoral discourses of Donald Trump. Journal of Language and Politics16(4): 619–639. 10.1075/jlp.17023.mon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17023.mon [Google Scholar]
31. Reyes, Antonio
    2020 I, Trump-The cult of personality, anti-intellectualism and the Post-Truth era. Journal of Language and Politics19(6): 869–893. 10.1075/jlp.20002.rey
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20002.rey [Google Scholar]
32. Romaniuk, Tanya
    2013 Pursuing answers to questions in broadcast journalism. Research on Language and Social Interaction46 (2): 144–164. 10.1080/08351813.2013.780339
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.780339 [Google Scholar]
33. Ross, S. Andrew and Caldwell, David
    2020 ‘Going negative’: An ALLRAISAL analysis of the rhetoric of Donald Trump on twitter. Language and Communication701: 13–27. 10.1016/j.langcom.2019.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.09.003 [Google Scholar]
34. Schalash, D.
    (2020) The disaffiliative use of ‘did you know’ questions in Arabic news interviews: the case of Aljazeera’s ‘The opposite direction’. Discourse Studies22(5): 590–609. 10.1177/1461445620916367
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445620916367 [Google Scholar]
35. Schubert, Christoph
    2019 ‘Ok, well, first of all, let me say…’: Discursive uses of response initiators in US presidential primary debates. Discourse Studies21(4): 438–457. 10.1177/1461445619842734
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445619842734 [Google Scholar]
36. Sclafani, Jennifer
    2018 Talking about Donald Trump: A Sociolinguistic Study of Style, Metadiscourse, and Political Identity. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Stopfner, Maria
    2021 Just thank God for Donald Trump – Dialogue practices of populists and their supporters before and after taking office. Journal of Pragmatics1861: 308–320. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.002 [Google Scholar]
38. ten Have, Paul
    1999 Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Wodak, Ruth and Michal Krzyzanowski
    2017 Right-wing populism in Europe & USA-Contesting politics & discourse beyond ‘Orbanism’ and ‘Trumpism’, Journal of Language and Politics16(4): 471–484. 10.1075/jlp.17042.krz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17042.krz [Google Scholar]
40. Wodak, Ruth, Jonathan Culpeper and Elena Semino
    2020 Shameless normalization of impoliteness: Berlusconi’s and Trump’s press conferences. Discourse & Society32(3): 369–393. 10.1177/0957926520977217
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520977217 [Google Scholar]