1887
image of The discursive representation of migrants, refugees and asylum seekers in Austrian news coverage:
2010–2015–2020
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

is paper traces the terminological shifts in the media representation of immigrants from 2010 to 2020. Using a corpus-based approach to Critical Discourse Analysis, we examine the terms “migrant(s),” “refugee(s),” and “asylum seeker(s)” in the Austrian daily newspaper during the refugee crisis (2015) and five years before (2010) and after (2020). Our research, which employs collocation analysis complemented by critical discourse analysis, reveals significant shifts in the connotations of all three terms. The notion of “migrant” evolves from a positive and individualizing portrayal in 2010 to a more negative, stereotypical one by 2020. Conversely, “asylum seekers” shift from being viewed with suspicion in 2010 to being recognized as legitimate beneficiaries of protection in 2020. Only “refugees” remain relatively featureless. We interpret these changes as a reflection of the balancing act between the left-liberal stance of and the rising right-wing extremism in society.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22111.gol
2025-01-23
2025-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baker, Paul, and McEnery, Tony
    2005 “A corpus-based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper texts”. Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.4.2.04bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.2.04bak [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, Paul, Gabrielatos, Costas, and McEnery, Tony
    2013Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511920103
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920103 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, Paul, Gabrielatos, Costas, KhosraviNik, Mijad, Krzyżanowski, Michal, McEnery, Tony, and Wodak, Ruth
    2008 “A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press.” Discourse & Society (): –. 10.1177/0957926508088962
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar]
  4. Binder, Susanne
    2017 “Sozialanthropologische Flüchtlingsforschung: Begriffsbestimmungen, Konzepte und theoretische Perspektiven.” InFacetten von Flucht aus dem Nahen und Mittleren Ostened. byGebhard Fartacek and Susanne Binder, –, Wien: Facultas.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cakir, Alev, Wolter, Stella, Liepold, Mira, and Sauer, Birgit
    2020 “Intersectional contestations — the meanings of integration of ‘migrant’ pupils in Austrian schools.” Annals for Istrian and Mediterranean Studies (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Consterdine, Erica
    2018State-of-the-art report on public attitudes, political discourses and media coverage on the arrival of refugees. Ceaseval Research on the Common European Asylum System (02). Chemnitz: Technische Universität Chemnitz.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. De Cillia, Rudolf, Wodak, Ruth, Rheindorf, Markus, and Lehner, Sabine
    2020Österreichische Identitäten Im Wandel. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. 10.1007/978‑3‑658‑28701‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28701-6 [Google Scholar]
  8. Der Standard [Google Scholar]
  9. Expert Council for Integration
    Expert Council for Integration 2015 “50 Action Points. A Plan for the Integration of Persons entitled to Asylum or Subsidiary Protection in Austria.” AccessedJune 9, 2022. https://www.bmeia.gv.at/fileadmin/user_upload/Zentrale/Integration/Publikationen/Integrationsplan_final.pdf
  10. Expert Council for Integration
    Expert Council for Integration 2020 “Development of Integration Policy in Austria. Integration Report 2020.” AccessedMay 15, 2022. https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/service/publikationen-aus-dem-bundeskanzleramt/publikationen-zu-integration/integrationsberichte.html
  11. Fairclough, Norman
    2001Language and Power. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Flubacher, Mi-Cha
    2021 “The ‘politics of speed’ and language integration policies: on recent developments in Austria.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. 10.1080/13670050.2021.1954387
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2021.1954387 [Google Scholar]
  13. Goodman, Simon, Sirriyeh, Ala, and McMahon, Simon
    2017 “The evolving (re) categorisations of refugees throughout the “refugee/migrant crisis”. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology (), –. 10.1002/casp.2302
    https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2302 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gruber, Oliver and Rosenberger, Sieglinde
    2021 “Between opportunities and constraints: right-wing populists as designers of migrant integration policy.” Policy Studies, –. 10.1080/01442872.2021.2019212
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2021.2019212 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hajek, Peter, and Siegl, Alexandra
    2021Integrationsbarometer 2/2021. Integrationsbefragung. Wien: Österreichischer Integrationsfonds.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jestl, Stefan, Landesmann, Michael, Leitner, Sebastian, and Wanek-Zajic, Barbara
    2022 „Trajectories of Employment Gaps of Refugees and Other Migrants: Evidence from Austria.“ Population Research and Policy Review (): –. 10.1007/s11113‑021‑09666‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-021-09666-3 [Google Scholar]
  17. KhosraviNik, Mijad
    2010 “The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers. A critical discourse analysis.” Journal of Language and Politics (), –. 10.1075/jlp.9.1.01kho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.1.01kho [Google Scholar]
  18. Kohlbacher, Josef, Reeger, Ursula, and Schnell, Philipp
    2015 „Place attachment and social ties-migrants and natives in three urban settings in Vienna.“ Population, Space and Place (): –. 10.1002/psp.1923
    https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1923 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kraler, Albert
    2011 “The case of Austria.” InMigration policymaking in Europe. The dynamics of actors and contexts in past and presented. byGiovanna Zincone, Rinus Penninx and Maren Borkert, –. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kreis, Ramona
    2017 “#refugeesnotwelcome: Anti-refugee discourse on Twitter.” Discourse & Communication (), –. 10.1177/1750481317714121
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481317714121 [Google Scholar]
  21. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2010The discursive construction of European identities. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2018a “We Are a Small Country That Has Done Enormously Lot”: The ‘Refugee Crisis’ and the Hybrid Discourse of Politicizing Immigration in Sweden.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies (): –. 10.1080/15562948.2017.1317895
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2017.1317895 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2018b. „Discursive Shifts in Ethno-Nationalist Politics: On Politicization and Mediatization of the “Refugee Crisis” in Poland.“ Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies (). 10.1080/15562948.2017.1317897
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2017.1317897 [Google Scholar]
  24. Krzyżanowski, Michael, and Wodak, Ruth
    2017The politics of exclusion. Debating migration in Austria. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315133959
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315133959 [Google Scholar]
  25. Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Ekström, Hugo
    2024 “No longer the haven of tolerance”? The press and discursive shifts on immigration in Sweden 2010–2022.” Social Semiotics–. 10.1080/10350330.2024.2352656
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2024.2352656 [Google Scholar]
  26. Krzyżanowski, Michał, Triandafyllidou, Anna, and Wodak, Ruth
    2018 “The mediatization and the politicization of the “refugee crisis” in Europe.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, (). 10.1080/15562948.2017.1353189
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2017.1353189 [Google Scholar]
  27. McMahon, Simon
    2015Immigration and citizenship in an enlarged European Union: The political dynamics of intra-EU mobility. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137433923
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137433923 [Google Scholar]
  28. Morris, Lydia
    2012 “Rights, recognition and judgement: Reflections on the case of welfare and asylum.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations, –. 10.1111/j.1467‑856X.2011.00461.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00461.x [Google Scholar]
  29. Mourão Permoser, Julia, and Rosenberger, Sieglinde
    2012 “Integration policy in Austria.” InInternational perspectives: Integration and inclusioned. byJames Frideres and John Biles, –. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. 10.1515/9781553395133‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781553395133-004 [Google Scholar]
  30. Muckenhuber, Matias, Rehm, Miriam, and Schnetzer, Matthias
    2022 “A Tale of Integration? The Migrant Wealth Gap in Austria.” European Journal of Population, –. 10.1007/s10680‑021‑09604‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-021-09604-1 [Google Scholar]
  31. O’Regan, Veronica, and Riordan, Elaine
    2018 “Comparing the representation of refugees, asylum seekers and migrants in the Irish and UK press: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis.” Journal of Language and Politics (), –. 10.1075/jlp.17043.ore
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17043.ore [Google Scholar]
  32. Perchinig, Bernhard
    2010 “All you need to know to become an Austrian. Naturalisation policy and citizenship testing in Austria.” InA re-definition of belonging? Language and integration tests in Europeed. byRicky van Oers, Eva Ersbøll and Dora Kostakopoulou, –. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff. 10.1163/ej.9789004175068.i‑332.9
    https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004175068.i-332.9 [Google Scholar]
  33. Pochon-Berger, Evelyne, and Lenz, Peter
    2014Sprachliche Anforderungen und Sprachtests im Migrations- und Integrationsbereich. Eine Zusammenfassung der akademischen Literatur. Freiburg: Institut für Mehrsprachigkeit Universität Freiburg.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Reisigl, Martin, and Wodak, Ruth
    2015 The discourse-historical approach (DHA). InMethods of critical discourse studiesed. byRuth Wodak and Michael Meyer, –. Los Angeles: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Rheindorf, Markus, and Wodak, Ruth
    2018 “Borders, fences, and limits — protecting Austria from refugees: Metadiscursive negotiation of meaning in the current refugee crisis.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies (), –. 10.1080/15562948.2017.1302032
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2017.1302032 [Google Scholar]
  36. 2020 „Building ‘Fortress Europe’: Legitimizing exclusion from basic human rights.” InSociolinguistic perspectives on migration control: language policy, identityed. byMarkus Rheindorf and Ruth Wodak, –. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781788924689
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788924689 [Google Scholar]
  37. Sedlak, Maria
    2000 “You really do make an unrespectable foreigner policy“: Discourse on ethnic issues in the Austrian parliament.” InRacism at the top: Parliamentary discourses on ethnic issues in six European statesed. byRuth Wodak, & Teun A. van Dijk, –. Klagenfurt: Drava.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Statistics Austria
  39. Stubbs, Michael
    2001Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wodak, Ruth, and Pohl, Walter
    2012 “The Discursive Construction of “Migrants and Migration”. InMigrations: Interdisciplinary Perspectivesed. byMichi Messer, René Schroeder and Ruth Wodak, –. Vienna: Springer Vienna.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Wodak, Ruth
    2019 “Analysing the micropolitics of the populist far right in the ‘post shame’era.“ InEurope at the crossroads: Confronting populist, nationalist, and global challengesed. byRuth Wodak and Pieter Bevelander, –. Lund: Nordic academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22111.gol
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22111.gol
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error