1887
Volume 22, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article questions the offensive realist explanation of the war in Ukraine found in the work of John Mearsheimer. It argues that Mearsheimer’s failure to take seriously predispositional factors means his account of the war offers an incomplete basis for discerning motives, predicting the conflict’s evolution, or responding to Russian aggression. To address this deficit and explain how ideological beliefs and meanings expressed in discourse are shaping Russia’s prosecution of the war, the article sets out an interpretive framework that draws on insights into armed conflict and ideology from the likes of Michael Freeden and Jonathan Leader Maynard as well as contributions to Political Discourse Analysis (PDA) primarily in the work of Teun van Dijk. To explore the Russian ideological and discursive aspects at play in the Ukraine war, the article fixes its analytical gaze on an address delivered by Putin to the Russian nation on February 24, 2022.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22112.hug
2023-05-09
2024-04-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abioye, Taiwo
    2009 “Typology of Rhetorical Questions as a Stylistic Device in Writing.” The International Journal of Language Society and Culture291: 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Tooze, Adam
    2022 “John Mearsheimer and the dark origins of realism.” The New Statesman, March 8, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berliner Zeitung
    Berliner Zeitung 2023 “The truth will set us free: interview with Roger Waters.” Berliner Zeitung, February 4, 2023. https://rogerwaters.com/berliner/ (accessed12 February 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Blommaert, Jan and Jef Verschueren
    1998Debating Diversity: Analysing the Discourse of Tolerance. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Borger, Julian
    2023 “Ukraine denounces Roger Waters as another brick in the wall of Russian propaganda.” The Guardian, February 6, 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/feb/08/roger-waters-pink-floyd-un-security-council-ukraine-russia (accessed14 February 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Casula, Philip
    2020 “Russia’s Modern Foreign Policy Tools in Crimea and Syria.” InRussia in the Changing International System, ed. byEmer Parlar Dal and Emre Ersen, 205–225. New York City: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑21832‑4_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21832-4_12 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chotiner, Isaac
    2022 “Why John Mearsheimer Blames the US for the Crisis in Ukraine.” The New Yorker, March 1, 2023. https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/why-john-mearsheimer-blames-the-us-for-the-crisis-in-ukraine (accessed2 August 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Collier, Paul and Anke Hoeffler
    2001Greed and grievance in civil war. Washington, DC: World Bank Working Papers.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Douthat, Ross
    2022 “They Predicted the Ukraine War. But did they still get it wrong?” The New York Times, March 9, 2022. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/09/opinion/ukraine-russia-invasion-west.html (accessed1 August 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Drozdova, Oksana and Paul Robinson
    2019 “A Study of Vladimir Putin’s Rhetoric”. Europe-Asia Studies, 71(5): 805–823. 10.1080/09668136.2019.1603362
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2019.1603362 [Google Scholar]
  11. Feng, Huiyun
    2009China’s Strategic Culture and Foreign Policy Decision-Making: Confucianism, Leadership and War. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Freeden, Michael
    1994 “Political concepts and ideological morphology”. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 2(2): 140–164. 10.1111/j.1467‑9760.1994.tb00019.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.1994.tb00019.x [Google Scholar]
  13. 1996Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2003Ideology: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/actrade/9780192802811.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192802811.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2013 “The morphological analysis of ideology”. InThe Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies, ed. byMichael Freeden and Marc Stears. 115–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2017 “After the Brexit referendum: Revisiting populism as an ideology”. Journal of Political Ideologies, 22(1): 1–11. 10.1080/13569317.2016.1260813
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2016.1260813 [Google Scholar]
  17. Frenkel, Sheera and Stuart A. Thompson
    2022 “How Russia and Right-Wing America Converged on War in Ukraine. March 23” The New York Times.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gardey, Ellie
    2022 “Conservative Isolationists Gather in D.C. to Push Against U.S. Escalation in Ukraine.” The American Spectator, March 31. 2022. https://spectator.org/conservative-isolationists-gather-in-d-c-to-push-against-u-s-escalation-in-ukraine/ [accessed9 February 2023].
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Haas, Mark
    2005The Ideological Origins of Great Power Politics, 1789–1989. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Halliday, Michael K. A.
    1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kazharski, Aliaksei and Silvia Macalova
    2020 “Democracies: “Sovereign” and “Illiberal”. The Russian-Hungarian Game of Adjectives and Its Implications for Regional Security”. Journal of Regional Security. 15(2): 235–262. 10.5937/jrs15‑24079
    https://doi.org/10.5937/jrs15-24079 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kings Politics
    Kings Politics 2022 “Crisis in Ukraine. Professor John Mearsheimer.” Streamed live on February 15, 2022. YouTube video, 1:21:47. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nbj1AR_aAcE [accessed5 February 2023].
  23. Kirchick, James
    2022 “How the Anti-war Camp Went Intellectually Bankrupt.” The Atlantic. September 29. 2022. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/09/anti-war-camp-intellectually-bankrupt/671576/ [accessed1 February 2023].
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kukharskyy, Bohdan, Anastassia Fedyk, Yuriy Gorodnichenko and Llona Sologoub
    2023 “Open Letter to Noam Chomsky (and Other Like-Minded Intellectuals) on the Russia-Ukraine War.” May 29. 2023. https://www.e-flux.com/notes/470005/open-letter-to-noam-chomsky-and-other-like-minded-intellectuals-on-the-russia-ukraine-war [accessed16 February 2023].
  25. Laclau, Ernesto
    1990New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 1996Emancipation(s). London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Laclau, Ernesto and Chantal Mouffe
    1985Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Leader Maynard, Jonathan
    2019 “Ideology and armed conflict.” Journal of Peace Research. 56(5): 635–649. 10.1177/0022343319826629
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343319826629 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lister, Tim
    2022 “Ukranian cultural landmarks suffer fresh blow as another museum is hit.” CNN, May 10, 2022. https://edition.cnn.com/style/article/ukraine-culture-destroyed-skovoroda-museum/index.html (accessed1 August 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Matu, Peter M.
    2008 Transitivity as a Tool for Ideological Analysis. Journal of Third World Studies. 25(1): 199–211.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Mclaren-Kennedy, Peter
    2022 “French intelligence chief fired over Ukraine war failure.” Euroweekly, April 1, 2022. https://euroweeklynews.com/2022/04/01/french-intelligence-chief-fired-over-ukraine-war-failure/ (accessed9 February 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mearsheimer, John
    2001The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 2014 “Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: The Liberal Delusion That Provoked Putin.” Foreign Affairs. September/October: 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Owen, John M.
    2010The Clash of Ideas in World Politics: Transnational Networks, States and Regime Change, 1510–2010. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400836765
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400836765 [Google Scholar]
  35. Pisciotta, Barbara
    2020 “Russian revisionism in the Putin era: An overview of post-communist military interventions in Georgia, Ukraine, and Syria.” Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica. 50 (1): 87–106. 10.1017/ipo.2019.18
    https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2019.18 [Google Scholar]
  36. Putin, Vladimir
    2021 “Article by Vladimir Putin: On the Historical Unity of Russia and Ukraine.” Official Internet Resources of the President of Russia. en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/66181 [accessed2 August 2022].
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2022 “Address by the President of the Russian Federation.” February 24, 2022. Official Internet Resources of the President of Russia. en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67843 [accessed2 August 2022].
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Reuters
    Reuters 2023 “Ukraine says Italy’s Berlusconi spreading Russian propaganda.” February 13, 2023. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-says-italys-berlusconi-spreading-russian-propaganda-2023-02-13/ [accessed14 February 2023].
  39. Sanín, Francisco Gutierrez and Elisabeth Jean Wood
    2014 “Ideology in civil war: Instrumental adoption and beyond.” Journal of Peace Research. 51(2): 213–226. 10.1177/0022343313514073
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343313514073 [Google Scholar]
  40. Sayers, Freddie
    2022 “John Mearsheimer: We’re playing Russian roulette.” Unherd, November, 2022. https://unherd.com/2022/11/john-mearsheimer-were-playing-russian-roulette/ [accessed01/02/2023].
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Schwarz, Jon
    2022 “No Russia didn’t get its propaganda from John Mearsheimer.” The Intercept, March 6, 2020. https://theintercept.com/2022/03/06/russia-john-mearsheimer-propaganda/ [accessed9 February 2023].
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Sikorski, Radislaw
    2022 “The Munk Debate- The Russian War.” Streamed live on May 13, 2022. YouTube video. 1:36:10. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivcSVG5eCeQ [accessed2 August 2022].
  43. Snyder, Timothy
    2022a “Nazis, Nukes and NATO Or: what the Russo-Ukranian War is Not About.” Thinking about …, July 21, 2022. https://snyder.substack.com/p/nazis-nukes-and-nato?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email [accessed02 August 2022].
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 2022b “Russia’s genocide handbook: The evidence of atrocity and of intent mounts.” Thinking about …, April 8, 2022. https://snyder.substack.com/p/russias-genocide-handbook [accessed2 August 2022].
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Sowińska, Agnieszka
    2013 “A critical discourse approach to the analysis of values in political discourse: The example of freedom in President Bush’s State of the Union addresses (2001–2008).” Discourse & Society24(6): 792–809. 10.1177/0957926513486214
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513486214 [Google Scholar]
  46. Stavrakakis, Yannis
    2000 “On the emergence of Green ideology: the dislocation factor in Green politics.” InDiscourse Theory and Political Analysis, ed. byDavid, Howarth D., Atletta Norval, Atletta J. Norval and Yannis Stavrakakis, 100–119. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Suslov, Mikhail
    2018 “Russian World” Concept: Post-Soviet Geopolitical Ideology and the Logic of “Spheres of Influence”.” Geopolitics, 23(2): 330–353. 10.1080/14650045.2017.1407921
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1407921 [Google Scholar]
  48. UChicago
    UChicago 2015 “Why is Ukraine the West’s Fault? Featuring John Mearsheimer.” Streamed live on September 25, 2015. YouTube video. 1:14:15. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrMiSQAGOS4&t=14s [accessed9 February 2023].
  49. Van Brussel, Leen, Nico Carpentier and Benjamin De Cleen
    (2019) Communication Discourse Theory: Collected works of the Brussels Discourse Theory Group. Bristol UK/Chicago USA: Intellect. 10.2307/j.ctv36xvhx4
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv36xvhx4 [Google Scholar]
  50. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1995 “Discourse analysis as ideology analysis”. InLanguage and Peace, ed. byAnita Wenden and Christina Schaffner, 17–34. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 1997 “What is political discourse analysis?” Belgian Journal of Linguistics11(1): 11–52. 10.1075/bjl.11.03dij
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij [Google Scholar]
  52. 1998Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. 2002 “Political discourse and political cognition”. InPolitics as Text and Talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse, ed. byPaul Chilton and Christina Schaffner, 203–237. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/dapsac.4.11dij
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.4.11dij [Google Scholar]
  54. 2006 “Politics, Ideology and Discourse”. InEncyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. byRon Asher, 728–740. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00722‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00722-7 [Google Scholar]
  55. Wakefield, Lily
    2021 “Vladimir Putin solidifies Russia’s same-sex marriage ban for generations to come.” PinkNews, April 7, 2021. https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2021/04/07/russia-same-sex-marriage-ban-vladimir-putin-kremlin-constitution/ (accessed2 August 2022).
  56. Wood, Reed M. and Jakana L. Thomas
    2017 Women on the frontline: Rebel group ideology and women’s participation in violent rebellion. Journal of Peace Research, 54(1): 31–46. 10.1177/0022343316675025
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343316675025 [Google Scholar]
  57. Zelenskyy, Volodymyr
    2022 “Ukraine to consider severance of diplomatic relations with Russia and other effective steps to respond to recent events.” President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyy: Official Website, February 22, 2022. https://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/ukrayina-rozglyane-pitannya-rozrivu-diplomatichnih-vidnosin-73057 (accessed7 February 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22112.hug
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): discourse; great power; ideology; Mearsheimer; offensive-realism; prediction; Putin; Ukraine; War
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error