Inside the echo chamber

References

1. Beciu, Camelia, and Mirela Lazăr
   2022 “’We’ in the EU:(De) legitimizing power relations and status: The case of the 2019 European elections in Romania.” Journal of Language and Politics21(2): 300–319. 10.1075/jlp.21067.bec
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21067.bec [Google Scholar]
2. Bednarek, Monika
   2006 “Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: A text-driven approach.” Text & Talk26(6): 635–660. 10.1515/TEXT.2006.027
   https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.027 [Google Scholar]
3. Bell, Allan
   1991 The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann
   1966 The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bernstein, B.
   1990 Class, Codes and Control, Vol. IV: The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Boulianne, Shelley, Karolina Koc-Michalska, and Bruce Bimber
   2020 “Right-wing populism, social media and echo chambers in Western democracies.” New media & society22(4): 683–699. 10.1177/1461444819893983
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893983 [Google Scholar]
7. Carbaugh, Donal A.
   1988 Talking American. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chafe, Wallace L., and Johanna Nichols
   (eds.) 1986 Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chen, Fu and Guofeng Wang
   2022 “A war or merely friction? Examining news reports on the current Sino-U.S. trade dispute in The New York Times and China Daily.” Critical Discourse Studies19(1): 1–18. 10.1080/17405904.2020.1844252
   https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1844252 [Google Scholar]
10. Chen, Lijuan, Danyang Zhang, Yingfei He, and Guoliang Zhang
    2020 “Transcultural political communication from the perspective of proximization theory: A comparative analysis on the corpuses of the Sino–US trade dispute.” Discourse & Communication14(4) : 341–361. 10.1177/1750481320910519
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481320910519 [Google Scholar]
11. Cheng, Xi
    2021 “Legitimation strategies in discourse surrounding Sino-American trade friction: A case study of Chinese government white papers.” Discourse & Communication15(3) : 241–259. 10.1177/1750481321989837
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481321989837 [Google Scholar]
12. Cinelli, Matteo, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Alessandro Galeazzi, Walter Quattrociocchi, and Michele Starnini
    2021 “The echo chamber effect on social media.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118(9). 10.1073/pnas.2023301118
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118 [Google Scholar]
13. De Certeau, Michel
    1984 The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated bySteven Rendall. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Dubois, Elizabeth, and Grant Blank
    2018 “The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media.” Information, Communication & Society21(5): 729–745. 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656 [Google Scholar]
15. Enli, Gunn
    2017 “New media and politics.” Annals of the International Communication Association41(3–4): 220–227. 10.1080/23808985.2017.1392251
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1392251 [Google Scholar]
16. Garimella, Kiran, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Aristides Gionis, and Michael Mathioudakis
    2018 “Political Discourse on Social Media: Echo Chambers, Gatekeepers, and the Price of Bipartisanship.” InProceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference, pp.913–922. https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.01665. 10.1145/3178876.3186139
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186139 [Google Scholar]
17. Graham, Gordon
    2013 White Papers for Dummies. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Guan, Tianru
    2018 “Framing the Boundary of Sino-Japanese Conflicts in China’s Communication Sphere: A Content Analysis of the News Coverage of Japan and Sino-Japanese Controversies by the People’s Daily between 2001 and 2015.” Journal of Chinese Political Science231: 603–618. 10.1007/s11366‑018‑9528‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-018-9528-9 [Google Scholar]
19. Guo, Zhongshi, and Yu Huang
    2002 “Hybridized Discourse: Social Openness and Functions of English Media in Post-Mao China.” World Englishes21(2): 217–230. 10.1111/1467‑971X.00243
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00243 [Google Scholar]
20. Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood
    1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Igwebuike, Ebuka Elias, and Ameh Dennis Akoh
    2022 “Self-legitimation and other-delegitimation in the internet radio speeches of the supreme leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra.” Critical Discourse Studies19(6): 575–592. 10.1080/17405904.2021.1921817
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2021.1921817 [Google Scholar]
22. Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Joseph N. Cappella
    2008 Echo Chamber : Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Jaffe, Alexandra
    2009 Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Published to Oxford Scholarship Online. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
24. Kim, Min-hyung
    2019 “A real driver of US–China trade conflict: The Sino–US competition for global hegemony and its implications for the future.” International Trade, Politics and Development3(1): 30–40. 10.1108/ITPD‑02‑2019‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1108/ITPD-02-2019-003 [Google Scholar]
25. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2014 “Values, imaginaries and templates of journalistic practice: a Critical Discourse Analysis.” Social Semiotics24(3): 345–365. 10.1080/10350330.2014.930607
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2014.930607 [Google Scholar]
26. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2016 “Recontextualization of neoliberalism and the increasingly conceptual nature of discourse: Challenges for critical discourse studies.” Discourse & Society27(3): 308–321. 10.1177/0957926516630901
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630901 [Google Scholar]
27. Linell, Per
    1998 “Discourse across boundaries: On recontextualisations and blending of voices in professional discourse.” Text & Talk18 (2). 143–157. 10.1515/text.1.1998.18.2.143
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.2.143 [Google Scholar]
28. Liu, Xinsheng, and Yi Edward Yang
    2015 “Examining China’s Official Media Perception of the United States: A Content Analysis of People’s Daily Coverage.” Journal of Chinese Political Science, 201: 385–408. 10.1007/s11366‑015‑9340‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-015-9340-8 [Google Scholar]
29. Mackay, Rowan R.
    2015 “Multimodal legitimation: Selling Scottish independence.” Discourse & Society26(3): 323–348. 10.1177/0957926514564737
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514564737 [Google Scholar]
30. Manosuthikit, Aree
    2021 “Legitimation strategies and discourses in editorials: Myanmar’s new foreign policy on ASEAN membership.” Discourse, Context & Media401: 1–11. 10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100464
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100464 [Google Scholar]
31. Martin, James Robert, and Peter R. R. White
    2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
32. Martín-Rojo, Luisa, and Teun A. van Dijk
    1997 “’There was a problem, and it was solved!’: legitimating the expulsion of ‘illegal’ migrants in Spanish parliamentary discourse.” Discourse & Society8(4): 523–566. 10.1177/0957926597008004005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008004005 [Google Scholar]
33. Mayer, Jane
    2019 “The Making of the Fox News White House: Fox News has always been partisan. But has it become propaganda?” The New Yorker, March 4, 2019. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/03/11/the-making-of-the-fox-news-white-house
    [Google Scholar]
34. Mirhosseini, Seyyed-Abdolhamid
    2017 “Discursive double-legitimation of (avoiding) another war in Obama’s 2013 address on Syria.” Journal of Language and Politics16(5): 706–730. 10.1075/jlp.16016.mir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.16016.mir [Google Scholar]
35. Reyes, Antonio
    2011 “Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: from words to actions.” Discourse & Society22(6): 781–807. 10.1177/0957926511419927
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927 [Google Scholar]
36. Song, Jianlin, and James Paul Gee
    2019 “Slogans with Chinese characteristics: the political functions of a discourse form.” Discourse & Society31(2): 201–217. 10.1177/0957926519880033
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926519880033 [Google Scholar]
37. Strömbäck, Jesper., and Esser Frank
    2014 “Mediatization of politics: transforming democracies and reshaping politics.” InMediatization of communication, edited. byKnut Lundby, 375–404. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110272215.375
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110272215.375 [Google Scholar]
38. Sunstein, Cass
    2007 Republic. Com 2.0. New York: Princeton UP.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Tong, Jingrong
    2014 “Discourse of journalism and legitimacy in post-reform China.” InDiscourse, Politics and Media in Contemporary China, edited byQing Cao, Hailong. Tian, and Pau. Chilton, 123–144. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.54.06ton
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.54.06ton [Google Scholar]
40. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1988 News Analysis: Case Studies of International and National News in the Press. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
41. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1998 Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
42. van Dijk, Teun A.
    2006 “Discourse and manipulation.” Discourse & Society17(3): 359–383. 10.1177/0957926506060250
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250 [Google Scholar]
43. van Leeuwen, Theo
    2008 Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
44. van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak
    1999 “Legitimizing immigration control: a discourse-historical analysis.” Discourse Studies1(1): 83–118. 10.1177/1461445699001001005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001005 [Google Scholar]
45. Wang, Guofeng
    2020 “Legitimization strategies in China’s official media: the 2018 vaccine scandal in China.” Social Semiotics30(5): 685–698. 10.1080/10350330.2020.1766262
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1766262 [Google Scholar]
46. Wang, Hong, and Yunfeng Ge
    2019 “Negotiating national identities in conflict situations: The discursive reproduction of China-USA trade dispute in China’s news reports.” Discourse & Communication14(1): 65–83. 10.1177/1750481319893406
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481319893406 [Google Scholar]
47. Wang, Yuzhu, and Fangfei Jiang
    2019 “特朗普政府的经济单边主义及其影响.” [Economic unilateralism of the Trump administration and its impact]. International Studies41: 110–122. rdbk1.ynlib.cn:6251/Qk/Paper/711440
    [Google Scholar]
48. Yu, Wen
    2019 “完善坚持正确导向的舆论引导工作机制.” [Improving the public opinion guidance working mechanism that adheres to the correct orientation]. Cyberspace Administration of China, December 17, 2019. www.cac.gov.cn/2019-12/17/c_1578118239436134.htm
    [Google Scholar]