Volume 22, Issue 5
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Sustainability has been well used (and abused) as “buzz-word”, label or language token for certain behavior and action in political, organizational and increasingly in individual communication. Based on critical approaches in language, discourse and communication studies, the paper explores potential processes of normalization of sustainability as a new norm, discusses new theories and methodological variations that can be applied to better understand sustainable development, and offers a theoretical concept for cultivation of sustainability as a dialectic process of questioning and stabilization in transformation and change processes. Complemented by a communication for development and social change perspective, the paper lays the theoretical foundation for an understanding of sustainability as organizing principle in socio-ecological change processes, which is further elaborated in the contributions of this Special Issue, which are introduced at the end.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Allen, Myria
    2016 “Strategic communication for sustainable organizations.” Theory and Practice. Fayetteville, USA: Springer International Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Axelsson, Robert, Per Angelstam, Erik Degerman, Sara Teitelbaum, Kjell Andersson, Marine Elbakidze, and Marcus K. Drotz
    2013 “Social and cultural sustainability: Criteria, indicators, verifier variables for measurement and maps for visualization to support planning.” AMBIO421: 215–228. 10.1007/s13280‑012‑0376‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0376-0 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bandura, Albert
    2003 “Social Cognitive Theory for Personal and Social Change by Enabling Media.” InEntertainment-Education and Social Change, 97–118. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Batel, Susana, Paula Castro, Patrick Devine-Wright, and Caroline Howarth
    2016 “Developing a critical agenda to understand pro-environmental actions: contributions from Social Representations and Social Practices Theories.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change7, no.5: 727–745. 10.1002/wcc.417
    https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.417 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bond, Alan J., and Angus Morrison-Saunders
    2011 “Re-evaluating sustainability assessment: aligning the vision and the practice.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review31, no.1: 1–7. 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.01.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.01.007 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brandt, Patric, Anna Ernst, Fabienne Gralla, Christopher Luederitz, Daniel J. Lang, Jens Newig, Florian Reinert, David J. Abson, and Henrik Von Wehrden
    2013 “A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science.” Ecological Economics921: 1–15. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.008 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brundtland, Gro Harlem
    1987 “Our common future – Call for action.” Environmental Conservation14, no.4: 291–294. 10.1017/S0376892900016805
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900016805 [Google Scholar]
  8. Castro, Paula
    2015 “Social Representations of Sustainability: Researching Time, Institution, Conflict and Communication.” InThe Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations, edited byGordon Sammut, Eleni Andreouli, George Gaskell, and Jaan Valsiner, 295–308. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107323650.025
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323650.025 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cernea, Michael M.
    1993 “Culture and Organization: The Social Sustainability of Induced Development.” Sustainable Development1, no.2: 18–29. 10.1002/sd.3460010207
    https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3460010207 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cheney, Helen, Natalina Nheu, and Lorien Vecellio
    2004 “Sustainability as social change: Values and power in sustainability discourse.” Sustainability and social science: Roundtable proceedings, 225–246.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dahl, Trine
    2022 “Global Villain, but Local Hero? A Linguistic Analysis of Climate Narratives from the Fossil Fuel Sector.” Applied Linguistics431, no.11: 1–20. 10.1093/applin/amab003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab003 [Google Scholar]
  12. Davidson, Scott
    2016 “Public relations theory: An agonistic critique of the turns to dialogue and symmetry.” Public Relations Inquiry5, no.2: 145–167. 10.1177/2046147X16649007
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X16649007 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dessein, Joost, Katriina Soini, Graham Fairclough, Lummina Horlings, Elena Battaglini, Inger Birkeland, Nancy Duxbury
    2015Culture in, for and as sustainable development: Conclusions from the COST Action IS1007 Investigating Cultural Sustainability. Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Diehl, Sandra, Matthias Karmasin, Barbara Mueller, Ralf Terlutter, and Franzisca Weder
    eds. 2017Handbook of integrated CSR communication. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑44700‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44700-1 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dutta, Mohan J.
    2015 “Decolonizing communication for social change: A culture-centered approach.” Communication Theory25, no.2: 123–143. 10.1111/comt.12067
    https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12067 [Google Scholar]
  16. Duxbury, Nancy, and Eileen Gillette
    2007 “Culture as a key dimension of sustainability: Exploring concepts, themes, and models.” Working Paper 1, Creative City network of Canada; Centre of Expertise on Culture and Communities: Vancouver, BC, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ehrenfeld, John R.
    2005 “The roots of sustainability.” MIT Sloan Management Review46, no.2: 20–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ekins, Paul, Sandrine Simon, Lisa Deutsch, Carl Folke, and Rudolf De Groot
    2003 “A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability.” Ecological economics44, no.2–3: 165–185. 10.1016/S0921‑8009(02)00272‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00272-0 [Google Scholar]
  19. Enghel, Florencia, and Jessica Noske-Turner
    2018 “Introduction: Communication in international development: towards theorizing across hybrid practices.” InCommunication in International Development, 1–18. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203703977‑1
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203703977-1 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fairclough, Norman
    1992Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fairlough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak
    1997 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” InDiscourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, edited byTeun A Van Dijk, 21: 258–284. London, UK: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Farley, Heather M., and Zachary A. Smith
    2020Sustainability: if it’s everything, is it nothing?. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351124928
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351124928 [Google Scholar]
  23. Foucault, Michel
    1988 “Technologies of the self.” InTechnologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault, 181.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 1995 “Discipline and Punish.” The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2007 “Security, Territory, Population.” Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78. New York: Picador and Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Frank, Aliette K.
    2017 “What is the story with sustainability? A narrative analysis of diverse and contested understandings.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences71: 310–323. 10.1007/s13412‑016‑0388‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-016-0388-3 [Google Scholar]
  27. Fraser, Colin, and Jonathan Villet
    1994Communication: A Key to Human Development. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Godemann, Jasmin
    2011 “Sustainable communication as an inter-and transdisciplinary discipline.” InSustainability Communication: Interdisciplinary Perspectives and Theoretical Foundation, edited byJasmin Godemann, and Gerd Michelsen, 39–51. Berlin, Germany: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑1697‑1_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1697-1_4 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hallahan, Kirk, Derina Holtzhausen, Betteke Van Ruler, Dejan Verčič, and Krishnamurthy Sriramesh
    2007 “Defining strategic communication.” International journal of strategic communication1, no.1: 3–35. 10.1080/15531180701285244
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15531180701285244 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hallgren, Lars, Hanna Bergeå, and Lotten Westberg
    2018 “Communication problems when participants disagree (or avoid disagreeing) in dialogues in Swedish natural resource management – Challenges to agonism in practice.” Frontiers in Communication31: 1–11. 10.3389/fcomm.2018.00056
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00056 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hawkes, Jon
    2001The Fourth Pillar of Sustainability: Culture’s Essential Role in Public Planning. Melbourne, Australia: Common Ground.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hornsey, Matthew J., Emily A. Harris, and Kelly S. Fielding
    2018 “Relationships among conspiratorial beliefs, conservatism and climate scepticism across nations.” Nature Climate Change8, no.7: 614–620. 10.1038/s41558‑018‑0157‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0157-2 [Google Scholar]
  33. Horst, Maja, and Sarah R. Davies
    2021Science communication as culture. Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. London, Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hurst, Bree, and Kim A. Johnston
    2021 “The social imperative in public relations: Utilities of social impact, social license and engagement.” Public Relations Review47, no.2: 102039. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102039
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102039 [Google Scholar]
  35. Iacob, Constantin Ciprian
    2020 “The Role of Organizational Culture in Promoting Sustainable Enterprise.” Annals of the University Dunarea de Jos of Galati: Fascicle: I, Economics & Applied Informatics261, no.11: 77–80. 10.35219/eai1584040984
    https://doi.org/10.35219/eai1584040984 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kannengießer, Sigrid
    2021 “Sozial-ökologische Transformationsforschung: Desiderata der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft.“ InTransformation der Medien Medien der Transformation. Verhandlungen des Netzwerks Kritische Kommunikationswissenschaft, edited byBorchers, Nils S. , 245–258. Frankfurt am Main.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Ketprapakorn, Nuttasorn, and Sooksan Kantabutra
    2022 “Toward an organizational theory of sustainability culture.” Sustainable production and consumption321: 638–654. 10.1016/j.spc.2022.05.020
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.05.020 [Google Scholar]
  38. Ketschau, Thilo J.
    2019 “Dialektik sozialer Nachhaltigkeit als Frage der Gerechtigkeit.” Soziologie und Nachhaltigkeit5, no.1: 27–43. CitetononCRdoi:10.17879/sun‑2019‑2448
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.17879/sun-2019-2448 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kösters, Walther
    1993Ökologische Zivilisierung: Verhalten in der Umweltkrise. Darmstadt, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Kothari, Ashish, Federico Demaria, and Alberto Acosta
    2014 “Buen Vivir, degrowth and ecological Swaraj: Alternatives to sustainable development and the green economy.” Development57, no.3–4: 362–375. 10.1057/dev.2015.24
    https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2015.24 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kozinets, Robert, and Frank-Martin Belz
    2011 “Social media for social change: Sustainability-based community in a sustainable world.” ACR North American Advances.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Krainer, Larissa, and Franzisca Weder
    2011 “Editorial. Nachhaltigkeitskommunikation.” MedienJournal351: 2–3. 10.24989/medienjournal.v35i1.170
    https://doi.org/10.24989/medienjournal.v35i1.170 [Google Scholar]
  43. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2016 “Recontextualisation of Neoliberalism and the Increasingly Conceptual Nature of Discourse: Challenges for Critical Discourse Studies.” Discourse & Society27, no.3: 308–321. 10.1177/0957926516630901
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630901 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2020 “Normalization and the discursive construction of “new” norms and “new” normality: Discourse in the paradoxes of populism and neoliberalism.” Social Semiotics30, no.4: 431–448. 10.1080/10350330.2020.1766193
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1766193 [Google Scholar]
  45. Lam, Jacqueline C. K., Richard M. Walker, and Peter Hills
    2014 “Interdisciplinarity in sustainability studies: a review.” 221, no.31: 158–176. 10.1002/sd.533
    https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.533 [Google Scholar]
  46. Leon, Ramona-Diana
    2013 “From the sustainable organization to sustainable knowledge-based organization.” Economic Insights-Trends & Challenges65, no.2: 63–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Manyozo, Linje
    2012Media, communication and development: Three approaches. New Delhi, India: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Melkote, Srinivas R., and H. Leslie Steeves
    2001Communication for development in the Third World: Theory and practice for empowerment. 2nd ed.London, UK: SAGE. 10.4135/9788132113751
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9788132113751 [Google Scholar]
  49. Meyers, Robert Allen
    2012Encyclopedia of sustainability science and technology. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4419‑0851‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0851-3 [Google Scholar]
  50. Michelsen, Gerd, and Jasmin Godemann
    2011 “Nachhaltigkeit kommunizieren: eine konzeptionelle Rahmung.” MedienJournal35, no.1: 4-15. 10.24989/medienjournal.v35i1.171
    https://doi.org/10.24989/medienjournal.v35i1.171 [Google Scholar]
  51. Milstein, Tema, and Alexis Pulos
    2015 “Culture jam pedagogy and practice: Relocating culture by staying on one’s toes.” Communication, Culture & Critique8, no.3: 395–413. 10.1111/cccr.12090
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12090 [Google Scholar]
  52. Monni, Salvatore, and Massimo Pallottino
    2015 “Beyond growth and development: Buen Vivir as an alternative to current paradigms.” International Journal of Environmental Policy and Decision Making1, no.3: 184–204. 10.1504/IJEPDM.2015.074300
    https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEPDM.2015.074300 [Google Scholar]
  53. Mouffe, Chantal
    2015 “Pluralismus, Dissens und demokratische Staatsbürgerschaft.” Diskurs-radikale Demokratie-Hegemonie, 41–54. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Murphy, Raymond
    2012 “Sustainability: A wicked problem.” Sociologica61, no.21: 0–0. CitetononCRdoi:10.2383/38274
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.2383/38274 [Google Scholar]
  55. Newig, Jens, Daniel Schulz, Daniel Fischer, Katharina Hetze, Norman Laws, Gesa Lüdecke, and Marco Rieckmann
    2013 “Communication Regarding Sustainability: Conceptual Perspectives and Exploration of Societal Subsystems.” Sustainability5, no.7: 2976–2990. 10.3390/su5072976
    https://doi.org/10.3390/su5072976 [Google Scholar]
  56. Noske-Turner, Jessica
    2023 “Communication for social changemaking: A “new spirit” in media and communication for development and social change?.” International Journal of Communication171: 2944–2966.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Olawumi, Timothy O., and Daniel W. M. Chan
    2018 “A scientometric review of global research on sustainability and sustainable development.” Journal of cleaner production1831: 231–250. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.162
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.162 [Google Scholar]
  58. Pihkala, Panu
    2020 “Anxiety and the ecological crisis: An analysis of eco-anxiety and climate anxiety.” Sustainability12, no.19: 7836. 10.3390/su12197836
    https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197836 [Google Scholar]
  59. Rasche, Andreas, Mette Morsing, and Jeremy Moon
    eds. 2017Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategy, Communication, Governance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316335529
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316335529 [Google Scholar]
  60. Reisch, Lucia
    2006 “The cultivation of sustainability: the long way towards more sustainable consumption.” International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability1, no.2005/2006. 10.18848/1832‑2077/CGP/v01i03/54725
    https://doi.org/10.18848/1832-2077/CGP/v01i03/54725 [Google Scholar]
  61. Reyes, Antonio
    2011 “Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions.” Discourse & society221, no.61: 781–807. 10.1177/0957926511419927
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927 [Google Scholar]
  62. Robertson, Margaret
    2018Communicating sustainability. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315659015
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315659015 [Google Scholar]
  63. Salzmann, Oliver, Aileen Ionescu-Somers, and Ulrich Steger
    2005 “The business case for corporate sustainability: literature review and research options.” European Management Journal23, no.1: 27–36. 10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.007 [Google Scholar]
  64. Schäfer, Mike S., and Heinz Bonfadelli
    2017 “Umwelt-und Klimawandelkommunikation.” Forschungsfeld Wissenschaftskommunikation, 315–338. Wiesbaden: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑658‑12898‑2_17
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12898-2_17 [Google Scholar]
  65. Schäfer, Mike S., and James Painter
    2021 “Climate journalism in a changing media ecosystem: Assessing the production of climate change-related news around the world.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change12, no.1: e675. 10.1002/wcc.675
    https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.675 [Google Scholar]
  66. Schneider-Mayerson, Matthew, Abel Gustafson, Anthony Leiserowitz, Matthew H. Goldberg, Seth A. Rosenthal, and Matthew Ballew
    2023 “Environmental literature as persuasion: an experimental test of the effects of reading climate fiction.” Environmental Communication171, no.11: 35–50. 10.1080/17524032.2020.1814377
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1814377 [Google Scholar]
  67. Schoeneborn, Dennis
    2011 “Organization as communication: A Luhmannian perspective.” Management Communication Quarterly25, no.4: 663–689. 10.1177/0893318911405622
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318911405622 [Google Scholar]
  68. Servaes, Jan
    2016 “How ‘sustainable’is development communication research?.” International Communication Gazette78, no.7: 701–710. 10.1177/1748048516655732
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048516655732 [Google Scholar]
  69. 2012 “Comparing development communication.” InThe Handbook of Comparative Communication Research, edited byFrank Esser, and Thomas Hanitzsch, 64–80. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. 1999Communication for Development. One World, Multiple Cultures. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Servaes, Jan, and Muhammad Jameel Yusha’u
    2023 “Introduction: The Need for an 18th Sustainable Development Goal – Communication for All.” InSDG18 Communication for All, Volume 1: The Missing Link between SDGs and Global Agendas, 1–24. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑19142‑8_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19142-8_1 [Google Scholar]
  72. Skitka, Linda J., Brittany E. Hanson, G. Scott Morgan, and Daniel C. Wisneski
    2021 “The psychology of moral conviction.” Annual Review of Psychology721: 347–366. 10.1146/annurev‑psych‑063020‑030612
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-063020-030612 [Google Scholar]
  73. Soini, Katriina, and Inger Birkeland
    2014 “Exploring the scientific discourse on cultural sustainability.” Geoforum511: 213–223. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  74. Soini, Katriina, and Joost Dessein
    2016 “Culture-Sustainability Relation: Towards a Conceptual Framework.” Sustainability8, no.2: 167. 10.3390/su8020167
    https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020167 [Google Scholar]
  75. Takahashi, Bruno, Julia Metag, Jagadish Thaker, and Suzannah Evans Comfort
    2021 “Expanding Conceptualizations of Environmental Communication Research.” InThe Handbook of International Trends in Environmental Communication, 3–13. London, UK: Routledge. 10.4324/9780367275204‑2
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367275204-2 [Google Scholar]
  76. Taylor, Dianna
    2009 “Normativity and normalization.” Foucault studies71: 45–63. 10.22439/fs.v0i7.2636
    https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i7.2636 [Google Scholar]
  77. Thomas, Pradip Ninan
    2012Digital India: understanding information, communication and social change. New Delhi, India: SAGE Publications India. 10.4135/9788132114017
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9788132114017 [Google Scholar]
  78. Thomas, Pradip Ninan, and Elske Van de Fliert
    2014Interrogating the theory and practice of communication for social change: The basis for a renewal. Berlin, Germany: Springer. 10.1057/9781137426314
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137426314 [Google Scholar]
  79. Tufte, Thomas
    2017Communication and social change: A citizen perspective. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. UN
    UN 2022 “Sustainable Development Goals.” AccessedApril 11, 2023. sdgs.un.org/
  81. Van de Fliert, Elske, and Ann R. Braun
    2002 “Conceptualizing integrative, farmer participatory research for sustainable agriculture: From opportunities to impact.” Agriculture and Human Values19, no.1: 25–38. 10.1023/A:1015081030682
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015081030682 [Google Scholar]
  82. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2007 “Legitimation in discourse and communication.” Discourse & Communication1, no.1: 91–112. 10.1177/1750481307071986
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986 [Google Scholar]
  83. Van Norren, Dorine E.
    2020 “The sustainable development goals viewed through gross national happiness, Ubuntu, and Buen Vivir.” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics20, no.3: 431–458. 10.1007/s10784‑020‑09487‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-020-09487-3 [Google Scholar]
  84. Voci, Denise
    2022 “Logos, ethos, pathos, sustainabilitos? About the role of media companies in reaching sustainable development.” Sustainability14, no.5: 2591. 10.3390/su14052591
    https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052591 [Google Scholar]
  85. Wilkins, Karin Gwinn, Thomas Tufte, and Rafael Obregon
    2014The handbook of development communication and social change. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118505328
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118505328 [Google Scholar]
  86. Weder, Franzisca
    2021a “Sustainability as Master Frame of the Future? Potency and Limits of Sustainability as Normative Framework in Corporate, Political and NGO Communication.” InThe sustainability communication reader: A reflective compendium, edited byFranzisca Weder, Larissa Krainer, and Matthias Karmasin, 103–119. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. 10.1007/978‑3‑658‑31883‑3_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31883-3_7 [Google Scholar]
  87. 2021b “Strategic problematization of sustainability reframing dissent in strategic communication for transformation.” Public Relations Inquiry11, no.3: 337–360. 10.1177/2046147X211026857
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X211026857 [Google Scholar]
  88. 2022 “Kommunikative Kultivierung der Nachhaltigkeit. Öffentliche Kommunikation über Umwelt, Klima, nachhaltige Entwicklung und Transformation.” Communicatio Socialis55, no.2: 146–159. 10.5771/0010‑3497‑2022‑2‑146
    https://doi.org/10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146 [Google Scholar]
  89. Weder, Franzisca, Sabine Einwiller, and Tobias Eberwein
    2019 “Heading for new shores: Impact orientation of CSR communication and the need for communicative responsibility.” Corporate Communications: An International Journal24, no.2: 198–211. 10.1108/CCIJ‑02‑2019‑0020
    https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-02-2019-0020 [Google Scholar]
  90. Weder, Franzisca, and Marte Eriksen
    2023CSR Communication and Cultures of Sustainability. Pressbook, UQ, Australia. 10.14264/428d81b
    https://doi.org/10.14264/428d81b [Google Scholar]
  91. Weder, Franzisca, Larissa Krainer, and Matthias Karmasin
    2021Sustainability Communication Reader. Wiesbaden: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Weder, Franzisca, Stefanie Mertl, Renate Hübner, Wilfried Elmenreich, and Robert Sposato
    2022 “Re-Framing Sustainability in a Pandemic. Understanding Sustainability Attitudes, Behaviors, Visions and Responsibilities for a Post-Covid Future.” Journal of Sustainability Research4, no.2: e220006. 10.20900/jsr20220006
    https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20220006 [Google Scholar]
  93. Weder, Franzisca, and Tema Milstein
    2021 “Revolutionaries needed! Environmental communication as a transformative discipline.” InThe handbook of international trends in environmental communication, 407–419. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge. 10.4324/9780367275204‑30
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367275204-30 [Google Scholar]
  94. Weder, Franzisca, and Swastika Samanta
    2021 “Advocacy for sustainability communication: Unseen potential of queer communicators in environmental, climate change and sustainability science.” Sustainability13, no.24: 13871. 10.3390/su132413871
    https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413871 [Google Scholar]
  95. Wilkins, Karin Gwinn, Thomas Tufte, and Rafael Obregon
    2014The handbook of development communication and social change. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118505328
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118505328 [Google Scholar]
  96. Williams, Raymond
    1985Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Wodak, Ruth
    2018 “Vom Rand in die Mitte–“Schamlose Normalisierung”.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift59, no.2: 323–335. 10.1007/s11615‑018‑0079‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-018-0079-7 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error