Anthropomorphism, anthropocentrism, and human-orientation in environmental discourse

References

1. Abram, David
   1997 The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World. New York: Vintage.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ahn, Hee-Kyung, Hae Joo Kim, and Pankaj Aggarwal
   2014 “Helping Fellow Beings: Anthropomorphized Social Causes and the Role of Anticipatory Guilt.” Psychological Science8 (1): 224–229. 10.1177/0956797613496823
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613496823 [Google Scholar]
3. Alaimo, Stacy
   2008 “Transcorporeal Feminisms and the Ethical Space of Nature.” InMaterial Feminisms, ed. byStacy Alaimo and Susan J. Hekman, 237–264. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Aswad, Noor Ghazal
   2019 “Portrayals of Endangered Species in Advertising: Exercising Intertextuality to Question the Anthropocentric Lens.” Environmental Communication13 (1): 118–134. 10.1080/17524032.2018.1427609
   https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1427609 [Google Scholar]
5. Atran, Scott, Douglas Medin, Norbert Ross, Elizabeth Lynch, Valentina Vapnarsky, Edilberto Ucan Ek’, John Coley, Christopher Timura, and Michael Baran
   2002 “Folkecology, Cultural Epidemiology, and the Spirit of the Commons: A Garden Experiment in the Maya Lowlands, 1995–2000.” Current Anthropology43 (3): 421–450. 10.1086/339528
   https://doi.org/10.1086/339528 [Google Scholar]
6. Barnett, Joshua Trey
   2019 “Naming, Mourning, and the Work of Earthly Coexistence.” Environmental Communication13 (3): 287–299. 10.1080/17524032.2018.1561485
   https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1561485 [Google Scholar]
7. Barnett, Joshua Trey
   2021 “Vigilant Mourning and the Future of Earthly Coexistence.” InCommunicating in the Anthropocene: Intimate Relations, ed. byAlexa M. Dare and C. Vail Fletcher, 13–33. Lanham: Lexington Books.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brannen, Peter
   2019 “The Amazon is Not the Earth’s Lungs.” The Atlantic. August 17, 2019. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/08/amazon-fire-earth-has-plenty-oxygen/596923/
   [Google Scholar]
9. Brereton, Pat
   2015 “Cinema, Ecology and Environment.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication, ed. byAnders Hansen and Robert Cox, 258–269. New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Broad, Garrett M.
    2016 “Animal Production, Ag-Gag Laws, and the Social Production of Ignorance: Exploring the Role of Storytelling.” Environmental Communication10 (1): 43–61. 10.1080/17524032.2014.968178
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.968178 [Google Scholar]
11. Burke, Kenneth
    1950 A Rhetoric of Motives. New York: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Caraway, Kylie, and Brett R. Caraway
    2020 “Representing Ecological Crises in Children’s Media: An Analysis of The Lorax and Wall-E.” Environmental Communication14 (5): 686–697. 10.1080/17524032.2019.1710226
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1710226 [Google Scholar]
13. Coupe, Laurence
    2001 “Kenneth Burke: Pioneer of Ecocriticism.” Journal of American Studies35 (3): 413–431. 10.1017/S0021875801006697
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021875801006697 [Google Scholar]
14. Cudmore, Becca
    2015 “Carl Safina Makes a Case for Anthropomorphism.” Audubon.com. July 9, 2015. https://www.audubon.org/news/carl-safina-makes-case-anthropomorphism
    [Google Scholar]
15. Cunningham, Carolyn. M., and Heather M. Crandall
    2022 The Climate Girl Effect: Fridays, Flint, and Fire. Lanham: Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Cuthbert, Lori, and Douglas Main
    2018 “Orca Mother Drops Calf, after Unprecedented 17 Days of Mourning.” National Geographic. August 13, 2018. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/orca-mourning-calf-killer-whale-northwest-news
    [Google Scholar]
17. Dacey, Mike
    2017 “Anthropomorphism as Cognitive Bias.” Philosophy of Science84 (217): 1152–1164. 10.1086/694039
    https://doi.org/10.1086/694039 [Google Scholar]
18. Dare, Alexa M., and C. Vail Fletcher
    2021 “Introduction: Intimate Relations for Earthly Survival.” InCommunicating in the Anthropocene: Intimate Relations, ed. byAlexa M. Dare and C. Vail Fletcher, 1–9. Lanham: Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Daston, Lorraine, and Gregg Mitman
    (eds) 2005 Thinking with Animals: New Perspectives on Anthropomorphism. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Davis, Corey B., Mark Glantz, and David R. Novak
    2016 “’You Can’t Run Your SUV on Cute. Let’s Go!’: Internet Memes as Delegitimizing Discourse.” Environmental Communication10 (1): 62–83. 10.1080/17524032.2014.991411
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.991411 [Google Scholar]
21. de Waal, Frans
    2001 The Ape and the Sushi Master: Cultural Reflections by a Primatologist. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
22. DeLuca, Kevin
    2007 “A Wilderness Environmentalism Manifesto: Contesting the Infinite Self-Absorption of Humans.” InEnvironmental Justice and Environmentalism: The Social Justice Challenge to the Environmental Movement, ed. byRonald Sandler and Phaedra C. Pezzullo, 27–55. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/2781.003.0005
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2781.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
23. Dickinson, Elizabeth
    2011 “Displaced in Nature: The Cultural Production of (Non-)Place in Place-Based Forest Conservation Pedagogy.” Environmental Communication5 (3): 300–319. 10.1080/17524032.2011.584889
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2011.584889 [Google Scholar]
24. Endres, Danielle
    2020 “Environmental Criticism.” Western Journal of Communication84 (3): 314–331. 10.1080/10570314.2019.1689288
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2019.1689288 [Google Scholar]
25. Epley, Nicholas, Adam Waytz, and John T. Cacioppo
    2007 “On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism.” Psychological Review114 (4): 864–886. 10.1037/0033‑295X.114.4.864
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864 [Google Scholar]
26. Freeman, Carrie P.
    2020 The Human Animal Earthling Identity: Shared Values Unifying Human Rights, Animal Rights, and Environmental Movements. Athens: The University of Georgia Press. 10.2307/j.ctvxhrmr1
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvxhrmr1 [Google Scholar]
27. Gebhard, Ulrich, Patricia Nevers, and Elfriede Billmann-Mahecha
    2003 “Moralizing Trees: Anthropomorphism and Identity in Children’s Relationships to Nature.” InIdentity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature, ed. bySusan Clayton & Suan Opotow, 91–111. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/3644.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3644.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
28. Goldstein, Thalia R., and Kayla Alperson
    2020 “Dancing Bears and Talking Toasters: A Content Analysis of Supernatural Elements in Children’s Media.” Psychology of Popular Media9 (2): 214–223. 10.1037/ppm0000222
    https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000222 [Google Scholar]
29. Gray, Heather M., Kurt Gray, and Daniel M. Wegner
    2007 “Dimensions of Mind Perception.” Science315 (5812): 619. 10.1126/science.1134475
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134475 [Google Scholar]
30. Grey, William
    1993 “Anthropocentrism and Deep Ecology.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy71 (4): 464–475. 10.1080/00048409312345442
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409312345442 [Google Scholar]
31. Haraway, Donna
    1991 Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Hawhee, Debra
    2010 “Kenneth Burke’s Jungle Book.” The Minnesota Review73/741: 171–182.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Hawhee, Debra
    2011 “Toward a Bestial Rhetoric.” Philosophy and Rhetoric44 (1): 81–87. 10.5325/philrhet.44.1.0081
    https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.1.0081 [Google Scholar]
34. Holland, Eva
    2020 “Bear Witness.” Columbia Journalism Review: 24–31.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Ingraham, Chris
    2020 “The Human Rights of a River: Codifying the Post-Human.” InWater, Rhetoric, and Social Justice: A Critical Confluence, ed. byCasey R. Schmitt, Christopher S. Thomas, and Theresa R. Castor, 313–329. Lanham: Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Isaacson, Kathy
    2021 “Listen to the Lake: Nature as Stakeholder.” InCommunicating in the Anthropocene: Intimate Relations, ed. byAlexa M. Dare and C. Vail Fletcher, 321–324. Lanham: Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Jensen, Tim
    2019 Ecologies of Guilt in Environmental Rhetorics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑05651‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05651-3 [Google Scholar]
38. Kennedy, George A.
    1992 “A Hoot in the Dark: The Evolution of General Rhetoric.” Philosophy and Rhetoric25 (1): 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Kennedy, George A.
    1998 Comparative Rhetoric: An Historical and Cross-Cultural Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. King, Donna Lee
    1994 “Captain Planet and the Planateers: Kids, Environmental Crisis, and Competing Narratives of the New World Order.” The Sociological Quarterly35 (1): 103–120. 10.1111/j.1533‑8525.1994.tb00401.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1994.tb00401.x [Google Scholar]
41. Leopold, Aldo
    1966 A Sand County Almanac. New York Balantine.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Liu, Jiangang, Jun Li, Lu Feng, Ling Li, Jie Tian, and Kang Lee
    2014 “Seeing Jesus in Toast: Neural and Behavioral Correlates of Face Pareidolia.” Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior531: 60–77. 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.01.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.01.013 [Google Scholar]
43. McGreavy, Bridie, Justine Wells, George F. McHendry, and Samantha Senda-Cook
    (eds) 2018 Tracing Rhetoric and Material Life: Ecological Approaches. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑65711‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65711-0 [Google Scholar]
44. McHendry, George F.
    2012 “Whale Wars and the Axiomatization of Image Events on the Public Screen.” Environmental Communication6 (2): 139–155. 10.1080/17524032.2012.662163
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2012.662163 [Google Scholar]
45. Meisner, Mark S., and Bruno Takahashi
    2013 “The Nature of Time: How the Covers of the World’s Most Widely Read Weekly News Magazine Visualize Environmental Affairs.” Environmental Communication7 (2): 255–276. 10.1080/17524032.2013.772908
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2013.772908 [Google Scholar]
46. Meister, Mark
    2015 “Celebrity Culture and Environment.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication, ed. byAnders Hansen and Robert Cox, 281–289. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Milstein, Tema
    2008 “When Whales ‘Speak for Themselves’: Communication as a Mediating Force in Wildlife Tourism.” Environmental Communication2 (2): 173–192. 10.1080/17524030802141745
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030802141745 [Google Scholar]
48. Milstein, Tema
    2009 “‘Somethin’ Tells Me It’s All Happening at the Zoo’: Discourse, Power, and Conservationism.” Environmental Communication3 (1): 25–48. 10.1080/17524030802674174
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030802674174 [Google Scholar]
49. Milstein, Tema
    2011 “Nature Identification: The Power of Pointing and Naming.” Environmental Communication5 (1): 3–24. 10.1080/17524032.2010.535836
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2010.535836 [Google Scholar]
50. Moore, Ellen E.
    2016 “Green Screen or Smokescreen? Hollywood’s Messages about Nature and the Environment.” Environmental Communication10 (5): 539–555. 10.1080/17524032.2015.1014391
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1014391 [Google Scholar]
51. Morton, Timothy
    2007 Ecology Without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Moser, Susanne C.
    2015 “Whither the Heart(-to-Heart)?: Prospects for a Humanistic Turn in Environmental Communication as the World Changes Darkly.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication, ed. byAnders Hansen and Robert Cox, 402–413. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Muller, S. Marek
    2021 “Personal Affairs: Litigating Nonhuman Animal Personhood in the Anthropocene.” InCommunicating in the Anthropocene: Intimate Relations, ed. byAlexa M. Dare and C. Vail Fletcher, 231–251. Lanham: Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Næss, Arne
    1973 “The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement. A Summary.” Inquiry161: 95–100. 10.1080/00201747308601682
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747308601682 [Google Scholar]
55. Nagel, Thomas
    1974 “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?” The Philosophical Review83 (4): 435–450. 10.2307/2183914
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2183914 [Google Scholar]
56. News 18
    News 18 2020 “Watch: Video of Firefighter Feeding Water to Koala in Australia Wins Hearts on Internet.” News181. January 8, 2020. https://www.news18.com/news/buzz/watch-video-of-firefighter-feeding-water-to-koala-in-australia-wins-hearts-on-internet-2451167.html
    [Google Scholar]
57. Northfield, Jesse K., and Clive R. McMahon
    2010 “Crikey! Overstating the Conservation Influence of the Crocodile Hunter.” Science Communication32 (3): 412–417. 10.1177/1075547010379424
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547010379424 [Google Scholar]
58. O’Neill, Saffron
    2022 “Defining a Visual Metonym: A Hauntological Study of Polar Bear Imagery in Climate Communication.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 10.1111/tran.12543
    https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12543 [Google Scholar]
59. Oldenburg, Christopher J.
    2020 “Reviving Anthropomorphism: Sister Water, Catholic Social Justice, and Pope Francis’ Eco-Rhetoric for the Care of Creation. InWater, Rhetoric, and Social Justice: A Critical Confluence, ed. byCasey R. Schmitt, Christopher S. Thomas, and Theresa R. Castor, 171–187. Lanham: Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Palmer, Colin J., and Colin W. G. Clifford
    2020 “Face Pareidolia Recruits Mechanisms for Detecting Human Social Attention.” Psychological Science31 (8): 1001–1012. 10.1177/0956797620924814
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620924814 [Google Scholar]
61. Parkinson, Claire
    2020 Animals, Anthropomorphism and Mediated Encounters. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Pfister, Damien S.
    2015 “‘A Short Burst of Inconsequential Information’: Networked Rhetorics, Avian Consciousness, and Bioegalitarianism.” Environmental Communication9 (1): 118–136. 10.1080/17524032.2014.910243
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.910243 [Google Scholar]
63. Plous, S.
    1993 “Psychological Mechanisms in the Human Use of Animals.” Journal of Social Issues49 (1), 11–52. 10.1111/j.1540‑4560.1993.tb00907.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00907.x [Google Scholar]
64. Plante, Courtney N., Stephen Reysen, Sharon E. Roberts, and Kathleen Gerbasi
    2018 “‘Animals Like Us’: Identifying with Nonhuman Animals and Support for Nonhuman Animal Rights.” Anthrozoös31 (2): 165–177. 10.1080/08927936.2018.1434045
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2018.1434045 [Google Scholar]
65. Plumwood, Val
    1996 “Androcentrism and Anthropocentrism: Parallels and Politics.” Ethics and the Environment1 (2): 119–152.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Plumwood, Val
    2002 Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Preston, Jesee L., and Faith Shin
    2020 “Anthropocentric Biases in Teleological Thinking: How Nature Seems Designed for Humans.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General150 (5): 943–955. 10.1037/xge0000981
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000981 [Google Scholar]
68. Rock, Jenny, and Ellen Sima
    2021 “If the Ocean Were a Person.” InCommunicating in the Anthropocene: Intimate Relations, ed. byAlexa M. Dare and C. Vail Fletcher, 225–229. Lanham: Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Ross, Andrew S., and Damian J. Rivers
    2019 “Internet Memes, Media Frames, and the Conflicting Logics of Climate Change Discourse.” Environmental Communication13 (7): 975–994. 10.1080/17524032.2018.1560347
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1560347 [Google Scholar]
70. Rowley, Loretta, and Kevin A. Johnson
    2018 “Anthropomorphic Anthropocentrism and the Rhetoric of Blackfish.” Environmental Communication12 (6): 825–839. 10.1080/17524032.2016.1167757
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1167757 [Google Scholar]
71. Salvador, Michael, and Tracylee Clarke
    2011 “The Weyekin Principle: Toward an Embodied Critical Rhetoric.” Environmental Communication5(3): 243-260. 10.1080/17524032.2011.586713
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2011.586713 [Google Scholar]
72. Sealey, Alison
    2018 “Animals, Animacy and Anthropocentrism.” International Journal of Language & Culture5 (2): 224–247. 10.1075/ijolc.00008.sea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.00008.sea [Google Scholar]
73. Slawter, Lisa D.
    2008 “TreeHuggerTV: Re-Visualizing Environmental Activism in the Post-Network Era.” Environmental Communication2 (2): 212–228. 10.1080/17524030802141760
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030802141760 [Google Scholar]
74. Sowards, Stacey K.
    2006 “Identification through Orangutans: Destabilizing the Nature/Culture Dualism.” Ethics & the Environment11 (2): 45–61. 10.2979/ETE.2006.11.2.45
    https://doi.org/10.2979/ETE.2006.11.2.45 [Google Scholar]
75. Steele, Carie
    2021 “Never the Same River Twice: How Legal Personhood of Rivers Affects Perceived Stability of Policy Solutions. InCommunicating in the Anthropocene: Intimate Relations, ed. byAlexa M. Dare and C. Vail Fletcher, 275–297. Lanham: Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Stone, Christopher D.
    2010 Should Trees Have Standing? Law, Morality, and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Swim, Janet K., and Brittany Bloodhart
    2015 “Portraying the Perils to Polar Bears: The Role of Empathic and Objective Perspective-Taking toward Animals in Climate Change Communication.” Environmental Communication9 (4): 446–468. 10.1080/17524032.2014.987304
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.987304 [Google Scholar]
78. Takahashi, Kohske, and Katsumi Watanabe
    2013 “Gaze Cueing by Pareidolia Faces.” I-Perception4 (8): 490–492. 10.1068/i0617sas
    https://doi.org/10.1068/i0617sas [Google Scholar]
79. Tam, Kim-Pong
    2014 “Anthropomorphism of Nature and Efficacy in Coping with the Environmental Crisis.” Social Cognition32 (3): 276–296. 10.1521/soco.2014.32.3.276
    https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2014.32.3.276 [Google Scholar]
80. Tam, Kim-Pong, Sau-Lai Lee, and Melody Manchi Chao
    2013 “Saving Mr. Nature: Anthropomorphism Enhances Connectedness to and Protectiveness toward Nature.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology49 (3): 514–521. 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.001 [Google Scholar]
81. Thibault, Mattia, and Gabriele Marino
    2018 “Who Run the World? Cats: Cat Lovers, Cat Memes, and Cat Languages across the Web.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law31 (3): 473–490. 10.1007/s11196‑018‑9559‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-018-9559-8 [Google Scholar]
82. Todd, Anne Marie
    2010 “Anthropocentric Distance in National Geographic’s Environmental Aesthetic.” Environmental Communication4 (2): 206–224. 10.1080/17524030903522371
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030903522371 [Google Scholar]
83. Todd, Anne Marie
    2013 Communicating Environmental Patriotism: A Rhetorical History of the American Environmental Movement. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203521694
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203521694 [Google Scholar]
84. Todd, Anne Marie
    2015 “Cartoons and the Environment.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication, ed. byAnders Hansen and Robert Cox, 250–257. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Urquiza-Haas, Esmeralda G., and Kurt Kotrschal
    2015 “The Mind behind Anthropomorphic Thinking: Attribution of Mental States to Other Species.” Animal Behavior1091: 167–176. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.08.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.08.011 [Google Scholar]
86. von Essen, Erica, and Michael P. Allen
    2017 “Solidarity between Human and Non-Human Animals: Representing Animal Voices in Policy Deliberations.” Environmental Communication11 (5): 641–653. 10.1080/17524032.2016.1269820
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1269820 [Google Scholar]
87. Waytz, Adam, Carey K. Morewedge, Nicholas Epley, George Monteleone, Jia-Hong Gao, J., and John T. Cacioppo
    2010 “Making Sense by Making Sentient: Effectance Motivation Increases Anthropomorphism.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology99 (3): 410–435. 10.1037/a0020240
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020240 [Google Scholar]
88. Williams, Keith, and Suzanne Brant
    2021 “Plant Persons, More-Than-Human Power, and Institutional Practices in Indigenous Higher Education.” InCommunicating in the Anthropocene: Intimate Relations, ed. byAlexa M. Dare and C. Vail Fletcher, 197–214. Lanham: Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Wolfe, Dylan
    2008 “The Ecological Jeremiad, the American Myth, and the Vivid Force of Color in Dr. Seuss’s The Lorax.” Environmental Communication2 (1): 3–24. 10.1080/17524030801936707
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030801936707 [Google Scholar]