Volume 22, Issue 5
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Addressing climate change requires engaging with the fluid, dynamic, and amorphous narrative of humanature relationships. I view environmental rhetoric as practices of storytelling that structure reality, guide actions, and shape understanding of the environment. Through rhetorical criticism, I analyzed fragments of climate activist discourse related to the narratives’ temporal and spatial scopes. I argue that reimagining the scope of our climate narratives’ temporal () and spatial () dimensions are inventional opportunities to motivate climate action toward more sustainable futures.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aikenhead, Glen, and Herman Michell
    2011Bridging cultures; Indigenous and Scientific Ways of Knowing Nature. Pearson Canada Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartlett, Cheryl, Murdena Marshall, and Albert Marshall
    2012 “Two-Eyed Seeing and Other Lessons Learned within a Co-Learning Journey of Bringing Together Indigenous and Mainstream Knowledges and Ways of Knowing.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences2 (4): 331–40. 10.1007/s13412‑012‑0086‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-012-0086-8 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bloomfield, Emma Frances
    2019 “The Rhetoric of Energy Darwinism: Neoliberal Piety and Market Autonomy in Economic Discourse.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly49 (4): 320–41. 10.1080/02773945.2019.1634831
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2019.1634831 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bloomfield, Emma Frances, and Randall A. Lake
    2015 “Negotiating the End of the World in Climate Change Rhetoric: Climate Skepticism, Science, and Arguments.” InCommunication for the Commons: Revisiting Participation and the Environment, edited byMark S. Meisner, Nadarajah Sriskandarajah, and Stephen P. Depoe, 384–96. The International Environmental Communication Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bloomfield, Emma Frances, and Chris Manktelow
    2021 “Climate Communication and Storytelling.” Climatic Change167 (3): 1–7. 10.1007/s10584‑021‑03199‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03199-6 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bormann, Ernest G., Roxann L. Knutson, and Karen Musolf
    1997 “Why Do People Share Fantasies? An Empirical Investigation of a Basic tenet of the Symbolic Convergence Communication Theory.” Communication Studies, 48 (3): 254–76. 10.1080/10510979709368504
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979709368504 [Google Scholar]
  7. Burke, Kenneth
    1945A Grammar of Motives. University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Castro-Sotomayor, José
    2019 “Emplacing Climate Change: Civic Action at the Margins.” Frontiers in Communication41. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00033. 10.3389/fcomm.2019.00033
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00033 [Google Scholar]
  9. Climate Store
    Climate Store 2022 “Non-Profit Organizations Working on Climate Change.” https://climatestore.com/take-action/get-involved/non-profit-organizations-working-on-climate-change
  10. Cox, Robert
    2015 “Scale, Complexity, and Communicative Systems.” Environmental Communication9 (3): 370–8. 10.1080/17524032.2015.1044064
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1044064 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dahlstrom, Michael F.
    2014 “Using Narratives and Storytelling to Communicate Science with Nonexpert Audiences.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111 (4): 13614–20. 10.1073/pnas.1320645111
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320645111 [Google Scholar]
  12. DiCaglio, Joshua
    2021Scale Theory: A Nondisciplinary Inquiry. University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/j.ctv22fqc19
    https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctv22fqc19 [Google Scholar]
  13. Friberg, Anna
    2021 “On the Need for (Con)Temporary Utopias: Temporal Reflections on the Climate Rhetoric of Environmental Youth Movements.” Time & Society31 (1): 48–68. 10.1177/0961463X21998845
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X21998845 [Google Scholar]
  14. Garrard, Greg
    2020 “Never Too Soon, Always Too Late: Reflections on Climate Temporality.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change11 (1): 1–5. 10.1002/wcc.605
    https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.605 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hamby, Anne, David Brinberg, and James Jaccard
    2018 “A Conceptual Framework of Narrative Persuasion.” Journal of Media Psychology 30 (3): 113–24. 10.1027/1864‑1105/a000187
    https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000187 [Google Scholar]
  16. Jones, Michael D., and Holly Peterson
    2017 “Narrative Persuasion and Storytelling as Climate Communication Strategies.” InOxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.384
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.384 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim, Jarim, and Xiaoli Nan
    2019 “Temporal framing effects differ for narrative versus non-narrative messages: The case of promoting HPV vaccination.” Communication Research46 (3): 401–17. 10.1177/0093650215626980
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215626980 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kohl, Patrice A., and Neil Stenhouse
    2021 “12 Years Left: How a Climate Change Action Deadline Influences Perceptions and Engagement.” Environmental Communication15 (7): 986–1000. 10.1080/17524032.2021.1941175
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1941175 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kreiswirth, Martin
    2000 “Merely Telling Stories? Narrative and Knowledge in the Human Sciences.” Poetics Today21 (2): 293–318. 10.1215/03335372‑21‑2‑293
    https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-21-2-293 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lawson, James
    2011 “Chronotope, Story, and Historical Geography: Mikhail Bakhtin and the Space-Time of Narratives.” Antipode43 (2): 384–412. 10.1111/j.1467‑8330.2010.00853.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00853.x [Google Scholar]
  21. Morton, Timothy
    2013Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Murphy, Mollie K.
    2017 “What’s in the World Is in the Womb: Converging Environmental and Reproductive Justice through Synecdoche.” Women’s Studies in Communication40 (2): 155–71. 10.1080/07491409.2017.1285839
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2017.1285839 [Google Scholar]
  23. Nielsen, Esben Bjerggaard
    2017 “Climate Crisis Made Manifest: The Shift from a Topos of Time to a Topos of Place.” InTopic-Driven Environmental Rhetoric, edited byDerek G. Ross, 87–105. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315442044‑5
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315442044-5 [Google Scholar]
  24. O’Leary, Stephen D.
    2000 “When Prophecy Fails and When It Succeeds: Apocalyptic Prediction and the Re-Entry into Ordinary Time.” InApocalyptic Time, edited byAlbert I. Baumgartner, 341–62. Brill. 10.1163/9789047400561_019
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047400561_019 [Google Scholar]
  25. Peeples, Jennifer A., and Kevin M. DeLuca
    2006 “The Truth of the Matter: Motherhood, Community and Environmental Justice.” Women’s Studies in Communication29 (1): 59–87. 10.1080/07491409.2006.10757628
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2006.10757628 [Google Scholar]
  26. Pidcock, Roz
    2018 “Why a Communications Handbook for IPCC Authors?” InPrinciples for Effective Communication and Public Engagement on Climate Change, byClimate Outreach, 3–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Rämö, Hans
    1999 “An Aristotelian Human Time-Space Manifold: From Chronochora to Kairotopos.” Time & Society8 (2–3): 309–28. 10.1177/0961463X99008002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X99008002006 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2004 “Spatio-Temporal Notions and Organized Environmental Issues: An Axiology of Action.” Organization11 (6): 849–72. 10.1177/1350508404047254
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508404047254 [Google Scholar]
  29. Rickert, Thomas
    2007 “Invention in the Wind: On Locating Kairos in Space-Time.” InThe Locations of Composition, edited byChristopher J. Keller and Christian R. Weisser, 71–89. SUNY Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Rudiak-Gold, P.
    2013 “‘We Have Seen it With Our Own Eyes’: Why We Disagree about Climate Change Visibility.” Weather, Climate, and Society51: 120–32. 10.1175/WCAS‑D‑12‑00034.1
    https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00034.1 [Google Scholar]
  31. Russill, Chris
    2008 “Tipping Point Forewarnings in Climate Change Communication: Some Implications of an Emerging Trend.” Environmental Communication2 (2): 133–53. 10.1080/17524030802141711
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030802141711 [Google Scholar]
  32. Sangalang, Angeline, and Emma Frances Bloomfield
    2018 “Mother Goose and Mother Nature: Designing Stories to Communicate Information About Climate Change.” Communication Studies69 (5): 583–604. 10.1080/10510974.2018.1489872
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2018.1489872 [Google Scholar]
  33. Seghezzo, Lucas
    2009 “The Five Dimensions of Sustainability.” Environmental Politics18 (4): 539–56. 10.1080/09644010903063669
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010903063669 [Google Scholar]
  34. Schmitt, Casey R.
    2019 “Scapegoat Ecology: Blame, Exoneration, and an Emergent Genre in Environmentalist Discourse.” Environmental Communication13 (2): 152–64. 10.1080/17524032.2018.1500386
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1500386 [Google Scholar]
  35. Schuppert, Fabian
    2011 “Climate Change Mitigation and Intergenerational Justice.” Environmental Politics20 (3): 303–21. 10.1080/09644016.2011.573351
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2011.573351 [Google Scholar]
  36. Simpson, Leanne Betasamosake
    2017As We Have Always Done: Indigenous Freedom through Radical Resistance. University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/j.ctt1pwt77c
    https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt1pwt77c [Google Scholar]
  37. Sultana, Farhana
    2022 “The Unbearable Heaviness of Climate Coloniality.” Political Geography991: 1–14. 10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102638
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102638 [Google Scholar]
  38. Thomas, Christopher Scott
    2020 “Motherhood and Environmental Justice: Women’s Environmental Communication, Maternity, and the Water Crisis in Flint, Michigan.” InThe Rhetoric of Social Movements, edited byNathan Crick, 284–98. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429436291‑22
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429436291-22 [Google Scholar]
  39. Todd, Zoe
    2015 “Indigenizing the Anthropocene.” InArt in the Anthropocene: Encounters among Aesthetics, Politics, Environments and Epistemologies, edited byHeather Davis and Etienne Turpin, 241–54. Open Humanities Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Tschirhart, Phillip, and Emma Frances Bloomfield
    2020 “Framing the Anthropocene as Influence or Impact: The Importance of Interdisciplinary Contributions to Stratigraphic Classification.” Environmental Communication14 (5): 698–711. 10.1080/17524032.2020.1716033
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1716033 [Google Scholar]
  41. Vivian, Bradford
    2014 “Witnessing Time: Rhetorical Form, Public Culture, and Popular Historical Education.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly44 (3): 204–19. 10.1080/02773945.2014.911558
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2014.911558 [Google Scholar]
  42. Weder, Franzisca, Stella Lemke, and Amorpan Tungarat
    2019 “(Re)storying Sustainability: The Use of Story Cubes in Narrative Inquiries to Understand Individual Perceptions of Sustainability. Sustainability91: 1–15. 10.3390/su11195264
    https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195264 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): climate action; narratives; phronesis; scope; spatiality; temporality
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error