1887
Volume 22, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article has two main objectives. One, to advance methodological development in both discourse theory and media and communications research by proposing an eclectic, replicable methodology. Two, to demonstrate how to apply that methodology to furnish both ontic and ontological explanations for the contingent origins of a discourse using the editorials of the Pakistani newspaper on the Pakistan Steel Mills privatization case as a case study. An earlier study had identified the surprising conclusion that this traditionally conservative paper had from the outset fully endorsed the radical opposition to the government’s suspension of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Pakistan which led to an uprising known as the Lawyers’ Movement. This article locates the origins of that shift in the newspaper’s reaction to the Pakistan Steel Mills privatization issue. The article has implications for the fields of discourse theory, media and communication studies, and political science.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22138.sul
2023-02-16
2024-02-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahmed, Zahid Shahab, and Maria J. Stephan
    2010 “Fighting for the Rule of Law: Civil Resistance and the Lawyers’ Movement in Pakistan.” Democratization17 (3): 492–513. 10.1080/13510341003700360
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13510341003700360 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashraf, Muhammad Junaid, Faiza Muhammad, and Trevor Hopper
    2018 “Accounting Signifiers, Political Discourse, Popular Resistance and Legal Identity during Pakistan Steel Mills Attempted Privatization.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting601: 18–43. 10.1016/j.cpa.2018.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brüggemann, Michael, and Paul D’Angelo
    2018 “Defragmenting News Framing Research.” InDoing News Framing Analysis II, edited byPaul D’Angelo, 90–111. Florence: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315642239‑5
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315642239-5 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cacciatore, Michael A., Dietram A. Scheufele, and Shanto Iyengar
    2016 “The End of Framing as We Know It … and the Future of Media Effects.” Mass Communication & Society19 (1): 7–23. 10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811 [Google Scholar]
  5. Carpentier, Nico, and Benjamin De Cleen
    2007 “Bringing Discourse Theory into Media Studies: The Applicability of Discourse Theoretical Analysis (DTA) for the Study of Media Practises and Discourses.” Journal of Language and Politics6(2): 265–93. 10.1075/jlp.6.2.08car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.2.08car [Google Scholar]
  6. Carragee, Kevin M.
    2019 “Communication, Activism and the News Media: An Agenda for Future Research.” Communication & Society32 (4): 361–78. 10.15581/003.32.4.361‑378
    https://doi.org/10.15581/003.32.4.361-378 [Google Scholar]
  7. Carragee, Kevin M., and Wim Roefs
    2004 “The Neglect of Power in Recent Framing Research.” Journal of Communication54 (2): 214–33. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2004.tb02625.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02625.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheema, Moeen H.
    2016 “The ‘Chaudhry Court’: Deconstructing the ‘Judicialization of Politics’ in Pakistan.” Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal25 (3): 447–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2018 “Courting Constitutionalism: The Politics of Judicial Review in Pakistan.” ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  10. Chong, Dennis and James N. Druckman
    2007 “A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation in Competitive Elite Environments.” Journal of Communication57(1): 99–118. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2006.00331.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331.x [Google Scholar]
  11. Dahlberg, Lincoln, and Sean Phelan
    eds. 2011Discourse Theory and Critical Media Politics. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230343511
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230343511 [Google Scholar]
  12. D’Angelo, Paul
    2002 “News Framing as a Multiparadigmatic Research Program: A Response to Entman.” Journal of Communication52 (4): 870–88. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2002.tb02578.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02578.x [Google Scholar]
  13. 2019 “Framing Theory and Journalism.” InThe International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies, edited byT. P. Vos and F. Hanusch, 1–10. New York: Wiley. 10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0021
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0021 [Google Scholar]
  14. D’Angelo, Paul, Jack Lule, W. Russell Neuman, Lulu Rodriguez, Daniela V. Dimitrova, and Kevin M. Carragee
    2019 “Beyond Framing: A Forum for Framing Researchers.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly96 (1): 12–30. 10.1177/1077699018825004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018825004 [Google Scholar]
  15. D’Angelo, Paul, and Donna Shaw
    2018 “Journalism as Framing.” InJournalism, edited byTim P. Vos, 205–34. De Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501500084‑011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501500084-011 [Google Scholar]
  16. De Cleen, Benjamin, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos, and Yannis Stavrakakis
    2021 “Moving Discourse Theory Forward: A Five-Track Proposal for Future Research.” Journal of Language and Politics20 (1): 22–46. 10.1075/jlp.20076.dec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20076.dec [Google Scholar]
  17. De Cleen, Benjamin, and Yannis Stavrakakis
    2017 “Distinctions and Articulations: A Discourse Theoretical Framework for the Study of Populism and Nationalism.” Javnost24 (4): 301–19. 10.1080/13183222.2017.1330083
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2017.1330083 [Google Scholar]
  18. Entman, Robert M.
    2003 “Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House’s Frame After 9/11.” Political Communication20 (4): 415–32. 10.1080/10584600390244176
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390244176 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fairclough, Norman
    1992Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gamson, William A., and Andre Modigliani
    1989 “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach.” American Journal of Sociology95 (1): 1–37. 10.1086/229213
    https://doi.org/10.1086/229213 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ghias, Shoaib A.
    2010 “Miscarriage of Chief Justice: Judicial Power and the Legal Complex in Pakistan under Musharraf.” Law & Social Inquiry35 (4): 985–1022. 10.1111/j.1747‑4469.2010.01211.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2010.01211.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Glynos, Jason, and David Howarth
    2007Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London, New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203934753
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934753 [Google Scholar]
  23. Glynos, Jason, David Howarth, Ryan Flitcroft, Craig Love, Konstantinos Roussos, and Jimena Vazquez
    2020 “Logics, Discourse Theory and Methods.” Journal of Language and Politics20 (1):1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Howarth, David, Jason Glynos, and Steven Griggs
    2016 “Discourse, Explanation and Critique.” Critical Policy Studies10 (1): 99–104. 10.1080/19460171.2015.1131618
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2015.1131618 [Google Scholar]
  25. Huckin, Thomas
    2002 “Textual Silence and the Discourse of Homelessness.” Discourse & Society13 (3): 347–72. 10.1177/0957926502013003054
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013003054 [Google Scholar]
  26. Huntington, Samuel P.
    1957 “Conservatism as an Ideology.” The American Political Science Review51 (2): 454–73. 10.2307/1952202
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1952202 [Google Scholar]
  27. Johnson-Cartee, Karen S.
    2004News Narratives and News Framing: Constructing Political Reality. Lanham, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kalhan, Anil
    2013 “‘Gray Zone’ Constitutionalism and the Dilemma of Judicial Independence in Pakistan.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law46 (1): 1–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kishwar, Munir, and Iram Khalid
    2018 “Judicial Activism in Pakistan: A Case Study of Supreme Court Judgments 2008–13.” South Asian Studies33 (2): 321–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Krzyzanowski, Michal
    2018 “Discursive Shifts in Ethno-Nationalist Politics: On Politicization and Mediatization of the ‘Refugee Crisis’ in Poland.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies16 (1–2): 76–96. 10.1080/15562948.2017.1317897
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2017.1317897 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2020 “Discursive Shifts and the Normalisation of Racism: Imaginaries of Immigration, Moral Panics and the Discourse of Contemporary Right-Wing Populism.” Social Semiotics30 (4): 503–27. 10.1080/10350330.2020.1766199
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1766199 [Google Scholar]
  32. Laclau, Ernesto
    1990New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London, New York: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Marchart, Oliver
    2011 “From Media to Mediality: Mediatic (Counter-)Apparatuses and the Concept of the Political in Communication Studies.” InDiscourse Theory and Critical Media Politics, edited byLincoln Dahlberg and Sean Phelan. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230343511_3
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230343511_3 [Google Scholar]
  34. 2018Thinking Antagonism: Political Ontology after Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9781474413329
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474413329 [Google Scholar]
  35. Marttila, Tomas
    2016Post-Foundational Discourse Analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. 10.1057/9781137538406
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137538406 [Google Scholar]
  36. Note 2010 “The Pakistani Lawyers’ Movement and the Popular Currency of Judicial Power.” Harvard Law Review1231: 1705–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Pan, Yeheng, Michaël Opgenhaffen, and Baldwin Van Gorp
    2019 “Negotiating Climate Change: A Frame Analysis of COP21 in British, American, and Chinese News Media.” Public Understanding of Science28 (5): 519–33. 10.1177/0963662518823969
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518823969 [Google Scholar]
  38. Pan, Zhongdang, and Gerald M. Kosicki
    1993 “Framing Analysis: An Approach to News Discourse.” Political Communication101: 55–75. 10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963 [Google Scholar]
  39. Qazi, Asher Asif
    2018 “A Government of Judges: A Story of the Pakistani Supreme Court’s Strategic Expansion.” ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  40. Remling, Elise
    2018 “Logics, Assumptions and Genre Chains: A Framework for Poststructuralist Policy Analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies15 (1): 1–18. 10.1080/17405904.2017.1382382
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1382382 [Google Scholar]
  41. Saharov, Juhan
    2021 “Combining Laclauian Discourse Analysis and Framing Theory: Vaclav Havel’s ‘Hegemonic Rhetoric’ in Charter 77.” Czech Journal of Political Science28(2): 186–203. 10.5817/PC2021‑2‑186
    https://doi.org/10.5817/PC2021-2-186 [Google Scholar]
  42. Scheufele, Bertram
    2004 “Framing Effects Research: A Theoretical and Methodical Critique.” Communications – European Journal of Communication Research29(4). 401–428.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Scheufele, Dietram
    1999 “Framing as a Theory of Media Effects.” Journal of Communication49(1): 103–122. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1999.tb02784.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x [Google Scholar]
  44. Scheufele, Dietram A., and Shanto Iyengar
    2017 “The State of Framing Research: A Call for New Directions.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Political Communication, edited byKate Kenski and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Shafqat, Sahar
    2018 “Civil Society and the Lawyers’ Movement of Pakistan.” Law & Social Inquiry43 (03): 889–914. 10.1111/lsi.12283
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12283 [Google Scholar]
  46. Stevenson, Hayley
    2014 “Alternative Theories: Constructivism, Marxism and Critical Approaches.” InRoutledge Handbook of Global Environmental Politics, 42–55. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203799055‑10
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203799055-10 [Google Scholar]
  47. Sulehry, Rizwan S., and Derek Wallace
    2022 “Using Frame Analysis to Operationalize Discourse Theory for Critical News Media Research.” Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations23 (3): 7–23. 10.21018/rjcpr.2021.3.331
    https://doi.org/10.21018/rjcpr.2021.3.331 [Google Scholar]
  48. The Nation
    The Nation 2006a “Digging Up PSM Sale,” May 25, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. The Nation
    The Nation 2006b “Historic Verdict,” June 24, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. The Nation
    The Nation 2006c “Privatisation Concerns,” July 9, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. The Nation
    The Nation 2006d “Disregarding Dissent,” August 3, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. The Nation
    The Nation 2006e “Government in a Fix,” August 11, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. The Nation
    The Nation 2006f “Seeking Review,” September 9, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Torfing, Jacob
    1999New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Zizek. Oxford; Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Van Brussel, Leen, Nico Carpentier, and Benjamin De Cleen
    eds. 2019Communication and Discourse Theory: Collected Works of The Brussels Discourse Theory Group. Bristol: Intellect. 10.2307/j.ctv36xvhx4
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv36xvhx4 [Google Scholar]
  56. Vreese, Claes H. de
    2005 “News Framing: Theory and Typology.” Information Design Journal + Document Design13 (1): 51–62. 10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre [Google Scholar]
  57. Zaidi, S. Akbar
    2008 “An Emerging Civil Society?” Journal of Democracy19 (4): 38–40. 10.1353/jod.0.0042
    https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0042 [Google Scholar]
  58. Zienkowski, Jan
    2014 “Articulating Metalinguistic and Political Awareness in Flemish Discourses on Integration and Allochthony.” Journal of Political Ideologies19 (3): 283–306. 10.1080/13569317.2014.951146
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2014.951146 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22138.sul
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22138.sul
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error