1887
Volume 23, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Informed by a critical discourse analytical approach to agency, this paper examines the construction of agency in the speeches of Mia Mottley, the prime minister of Barbados. The analysis reveals that she enacts her agency in three main ways: (1) constructing strong and decisive leadership, (2) sculpting a ‘prophetess’ image and (3) issuing a clarion call to action. These processes enable her to project her voice, foreground the issues that are relevant to her and establish her legitimacy and authority. The study finds that Mia Mottley’s construction of agency is expressed via referential terms, personal pronouns, modal verbs and the representation of social actors. This paper extends existing work on discursive agency and illustrates the role of language and Global South leaders in the decolonization of political processes. It also affirms the view that research that foregrounds female agency is important in dismantling repressive patriarchal structures and building inclusive communities.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22145.nar
2023-11-02
2025-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahearn, Laura
    2010 “Agency and Language”. InSociety and Language Use, edited byJürgen Jaspers, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jef Verschueren, 28–48. John Benjamins. 10.1075/hoph.7.03ahe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.7.03ahe [Google Scholar]
  2. Barca, Lisa
    2018 “The Agency Factor: Neoliberal Configurations of Risk in News Discourse on the Steubenville, Ohio Rape Case. Critical Discourse Studies15(3): 265–284. 10.1080/17405904.2017.1408476
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1408476 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhatia, Aditi
    2008 “Discursive Illusions in the American National Strategy for Combating Crime”. Journal of Language and Politics7(2): 201–227. 10.1075/jlp.7.2.02bha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.7.2.02bha [Google Scholar]
  4. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2005Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9780230501706
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501706 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2014Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑36833‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-36833-1 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chilton, Paul and Schäffner, Christina
    2011 “Discourse and Politics”. InDiscourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, editedTeun van Dijk, 303–33. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446289068.n15
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446289068.n15 [Google Scholar]
  7. Ciaglia, Antonio
    2013 “Politics in the Media and the Media in Politics: A Comparative Study of the Relationship between the Media and Political Systems in Three European Countries”. European Journal of Communication28(5): 541–555. 10.1177/0267323113494882
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113494882 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cresswell, Catherine
    2017 “Female Agency in Action: An Examination of Interactions in an Online ‘Love and Relationships’ Discussion Forum”. Gender and Language11(3): 365–388. 10.1558/genl.27529
    https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.27529 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dunmire, Patricia
    2005 “Preempting the Future: Rhetoric and Ideology of the Future in Political Discourse”. Discourse & Society16(4): 481–513. 10.1177/0957926505053052
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926505053052 [Google Scholar]
  10. Duranti, Alessandro
    2004 “Agency in Language”. InA Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, editedAlessandro Duranti, pp.451–473. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fairclough, Norman
    1992Language and Power. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 1995Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2000New Labour, New Language?Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2001Language and Power. Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2005 “Critical Discourse Analysis”. Marges Linguistiques91: 76–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2010Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fowler, Roger
    1998Language in the News. Discourse and Ideology in the Press. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gastil, John
    1992 “Undemocratic Discourse: A Review of Theory and Research on Political Discourse”. Discourse & Society3(4): 469–500. 10.1177/0957926592003004003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003004003 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ghachem, Ines
    2015 “A Sociocognitive Approach to Agency Framing in David Cameron’s 2010 Pre-election Discourse”. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines7(2): 263–282.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gyasi, Samuel
    1997 “Language and Politics: Indirectness in Political Discourse”. Discourse & Society8(1): 49–83. 10.1177/0957926597008001004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008001004 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hewitt, Roderick
    2015 “Bob Marley’s Redemption Song in Conversation with de Gruchy’s Olive Agenda”. Alternation14(1): 169–189.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hodges, Adam
    2013 “War, Discourse, and Peace”. InDiscourses of War and Peace, edited byAdam Hodges, 3–19. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937271.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937271.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Jones, Rodney
    2021 “The wounded leader: The illness narratives of Boris Johnson and Donald Trump”. Discourse, Context & Media411: 1–11. 10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100499
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100499 [Google Scholar]
  24. Karimullah, Kamran
    2020 “Sketching Women: A Corpus-based Approach to Representations of Women’s Agency in Political Internet Corpora in Arabic and English”. Corpora15(1): 21–53. 10.3366/cor.2020.0184
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2020.0184 [Google Scholar]
  25. Leipold, Sina and Winkel, Georg
    2017 “Discursive Agency: (Re-)Conceptualizing Actors and Practices in the Analysis of Discursive Policymaking”. The Policy Studies Journal45(3): 510–534. 10.1111/psj.12172
    https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12172 [Google Scholar]
  26. Mills, Sara and Jones, Lucy
    2014 “Analysing agency: Reader Responses to Fifty Shades of Grey”. Gender and Language8(2): 225–244. 10.1558/genl.v8i2.225
    https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.v8i2.225 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mwinlaaru, Isaac and Nartey, Mark
    2022 ‘“Free Men We Stand under the Flag of our Land”’: A Transitivity Analysis of African Anthems as Discourses of Resistance against Colonialism. Critical Discourse Studies19(5): 556–572. 10.1080/17405904.2021.1999286
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2021.1999286 [Google Scholar]
  28. Nartey, Mark
    2019 ‘“We Must Unite Now or Perish! Kwame Nkrumah’s Creation of a Mythic Discourse?”’ Journal of Language and Politics18(2): 252–271. 10.1075/jlp.17051.nar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17051.nar [Google Scholar]
  29. 2020 “Voice, Agency and Identity: A Positive Discourse Analysis of ‘Resistance’ in the Rhetoric of Kwame Nkrumah”. Language & Intercultural Communication20(2): 193–205. 10.1080/14708477.2020.1722686
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2020.1722686 [Google Scholar]
  30. Nartey, Mark & Yu, Yating
    2023 “Solidarity Formation and Group Empowerment in Digital Activism: A Discourse Analytic Study of the ‘Fix the Country Campaign’ on Ghanaian Twitter”. New Media and Society9(1): 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Nartey, Mark
    2023Political Myth-making, Populist Performance and Nationalist Resistance: Examining Kwame Nkrumah’s Construction and Promotion of the African Dream. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Nartey, Mark and Ernanda
    2020 “Formulating Emancipatory Discourses and Reconstructing Resistance: A Positive Discourse Analysis of Sukarno’s Speech at the First Afro- Asian Conference”. Critical Discourse Studies17(1): 22–38. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1617758
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1617758 [Google Scholar]
  33. Netz, Hadar and Kuzar, Ron
    2020 “Entanglement and Feminist Agency in Picture Books”. Gender and Language14(4): 386–408. 10.1558/genl.40038
    https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.40038 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ndambuki, Jacinta and Janks, Hilary
    2010 Political Discourses, Women’s Voices: Mismatches in Representation. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines4(1): 73–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Oktar, Lutfiye
    (2001) “The Ideological Organization of Representational Processes in the Presentation of Us and Them”. Discourse & Society12(3): 313–346. 10.1177/0957926501012003003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012003003 [Google Scholar]
  36. Stănculete, Ilina-Mihaela
    2019 “I vs. We. First Person Personal Pronouns in Political Speeches”. East-West Cultural Passage19(1): 122–135. 10.2478/ewcp‑2019‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.2478/ewcp-2019-0008 [Google Scholar]
  37. Stokke, Christian
    2021 “Consciousness Development in Rastafari: A Perspective from the Psychology of Religion”. Anthropology of Consciousness32(1): 81–106. 10.1111/anoc.12129
    https://doi.org/10.1111/anoc.12129 [Google Scholar]
  38. Strange, Louis
    2022 “The Discursive Construction of Gender and Agency in the Linguistic Landscape of Ireland’s 2018 Abortion Referendum Campaign”. Critical discourse Studies1–29. 10.1080/17405904.2022.2150669
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2022.2150669 [Google Scholar]
  39. Van Dijk, Teun
    1998Ideology and Discourse. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 2002 “Political Discourse and Political Cognition”. InPolitics as Text and Talk: Analytical Approaches to Political Discourse, edited byPaul Chilton and Christina Schäffner, 203–237. John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.4.11dij
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.4.11dij [Google Scholar]
  41. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2008Discourse and Practice. New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22145.nar
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error