Constitutive representation of womanhood

References

1. Aljazeera, Turkey
   2013 “Türkiye’debaşörtüsüyasağı: Nasılbaşladı, nasılçözüldü?” on30 December. www.aljazeera.com.tr/dosya/turkiyede-basortusu-yasagi-nasil-basladi-nasil-cozuldu
2. Arat, Yeşim
   1994 “Toward a democratic society”. Women’s Studies International Forum17(2–3): 241–248. 10.1016/0277‑5395(94)90030‑2
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(94)90030-2 [Google Scholar]
3. Arat, Yeşim
   1995 “Feminism and Islam: Considerations on the Journal Kadin veAile”, InWomen in Modem Turkish Society, ed.Sirin Tekeli, London: Zed Books.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Arat, Yeşim
   1998 “Türkiye’de Kadınların Değişen Siyasi Rolleri 1934–1980.” In75 Yılda Kadınlar ve Erkekler, ed.Ayşe Berktay Hacımirzaoğlu, 249–266. İstanbul: TarihVakfı.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Arat, Yeşim
   2021 “Democratic Backsliding and the Instrumentalization of Women’s Rights in Turkey,” Politics & Gender, 1–31.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Arik, Hülya
   2012 “Speaking of Women? Exploring Violence Against Women Through Political Discourses: A Study of Headscarf Debates in Turkey.” E-cadernosCES161: 10–31. 10.4000/eces.1009
   https://doi.org/10.4000/eces.1009 [Google Scholar]
7. Ayata, Ayşe Güneş
   1998 “Laiklik, Güç ve Katılım Üçgeninde Türkiye’de Kadın ve Siyaset,” In75 YıldaKadınlarveErkekler, ed.Ayşe Berktay Hacımirzaoğlu, 237–248. İstanbul: TarihVakfı.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bektas, Eda and Issever-Ekinci, Esra
   2019 “Who Represents Women in Turkey? An Analysis of Gender Difference in Private Bill Sponsorship in the 2011–15 Turkish Parliament,” Politics & Gender, 15(4): 851–881. 10.1017/S1743923X18000363
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X18000363 [Google Scholar]
9. Bennett, Samuel
   2022 “Mythopoetic legitimation and the recontextualisation of Europe’s foundational myth,” Journal of Language & Politics, 21 (2), pp.370–389. 10.1075/jlp.21070.ben
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21070.ben [Google Scholar]
10. BIANET
    BIANET 2004 “DTH GenelYaklaşımveİlkeleri” December 29. https://bianet.org/bianet/siyaset/51671-dth-genel-yaklasim-ve-ilkeleri
11. Bulut, Alper T.
    2020 “What Drives Women’s Substantive Representation in Muslim- Majority Countries? Lessons from Turkey”, Political Research Quarterly1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Burrell, Barbara C.
    1994 A Woman’s Place is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era, AnnHarbor: The University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.14231
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14231 [Google Scholar]
13. Celis, Karen, Sarah Childs, Johanna Kantola, and Mona Lena Krook
    2014 “Constituting Women’s Interests through Representative Claims.” Politics & Gender10 (2): 149–74. 10.1017/S1743923X14000026
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X14000026 [Google Scholar]
14. Celis, Karen
    2009 “Substantive Representation of Women (and Improving it): What it is and should be About?” Comparative European Politics71: 95–113. 10.1057/cep.2008.35
    https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2008.35 [Google Scholar]
15. Chilton, Paul
    2004 Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203561218
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 [Google Scholar]
16. Cizre, Ümit
    2007 Secular and Islamic Politics in Turkey: The Making of the Justice and Development Party. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Cramer Walsh, Katherine
    2002 “Female Legislators and the Women’s Rights Agenda.” InWomen Transforming Congress, ed.Cindy Simon Rosenthal, 370–396. University of Oklahoma Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi Tüzüğü
    Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi Tüzüğü 2018 March10. https://content.chp.org.tr/file/chp_tuzuk_10_03_2018.pdf. 10.1016/S0262‑1762(18)30200‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-1762(18)30200-1
19. Cumhuriyet
    Cumhuriyet 2014 “BDP, DBP oldu işte yeni başkanlar.” July11. https://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/bdp-dbp-oldu-iste-yeni-baskanlar-93331
20. Fairclough, Norman, and Isabela Fairclough
    2015 “Textual Analysis.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Interpretive Political Science, ed.Mark Bevir, and R. A. W. Rhodes, 186–198. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Fairclough, Norman
    2003 Analysing Discourse Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203697078
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078 [Google Scholar]
22. Forchtner, Bernhard and Özvatan Özgür
    2022 “De/legitimisingEUrope through the Performance of Crises: The Far-Right Alternative for Germany on ‘climate hysteria’ and ‘corona hysteria’”, Journal of Language and Politics. 21(2): 208–232. 10.1075/jlp.21064.for
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21064.for [Google Scholar]
23. Güngör, Behçet
    2004 “’DemokratikToplumHareketi’ aynıçizgidekipartileri birleştirdi” YeniŞafakNovember4. https://www.yenisafak.com/gundem/demokratik-toplum-hareketi-ayni-cizgideki-partileri-birlestirdi-2713140
    [Google Scholar]
24. Halkların Demokratik Partisi Tüzüğü
    Halkların Demokratik Partisi Tüzüğü 2014 “Article 1”, June22. https://hdp.org.tr/tr/parti-tuzugu/10/
25. Hoşgör, Şebnem
    2018 “Cumhurİttifakı’ Protokolü’nün tam metni.” Milliyet, May4. https://www.milliyet.com.tr/siyaset/cumhur-ittifaki-protokolu-nun-tammetni-2662293
    [Google Scholar]
26. Ileter, Emel, and Bulut, Alper Tolga
    2020 “Substantive Representation of Women in Turkish Politics: A Quantitative Analysis of Parliamentary Bills,” SİYASAL: Journal of Political Sciences, 29(1): 165–188.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Jónasdóttir, Anna G., and Kathleen B. Jones
    2009 The political interests of GenderRevisited: RedoingTheoryandresearchwith a feminist face. Manchester: Manchester UniversityPress.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kathlene, Lyn
    2001 “Words that Matter: Women’s Voice and Institutional Bias in Public Policy Formation.” InSue Carroll, editor, The Impact of Women in Public Office. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kranert, Michael
    2018 “Political myth as a legitimation strategy: The case of the golden age myth in the discourses of the Third Way,” Journal of Language and Politics, 17(6): 882 – 906. 10.1075/jlp.17059.kra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17059.kra [Google Scholar]
30. Koyuncu, Berrin, and Aylin Özman
    2019 “Women’s rights organizations and Turkish state in the post-2011 era: ideological disengagement versus conservative alignment,” Turkish Studies, 20:5, 728–753. 10.1080/14683849.2018.1539622
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2018.1539622 [Google Scholar]
31. Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
    1985 Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Official Gazette
    Official Gazette 2013 Amendment dated 4/10/2013 and numbered 2013/5443 of the 16.07.1982 dated 16.07.1982 numbered 17849. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuatmetin/3.5.85105.pdf
33. Phillips, Anne
    1994 “Democracy and representation. Or, why should it matter who our representatives are?” In: Frauen und Politik: Schweizerisches Jahrbuch fur Politische Wissenschaft. Association suisse de science politique, Zurich, Switzerland, pp.63–76.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Pitkin, Hannah
    1967 The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520340503
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520340503 [Google Scholar]
35. Reingold, Beth, and Michele Swers
    2011 “An Endogenous Approach to Women’s Interests: When Interests Are Interesting in and of Themselves.” Politics & Gender, 7(3): 429–435. 10.1017/S1743923X11000201
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X11000201 [Google Scholar]
36. Reyes, Antonio
    2011 “Strategies of Legitimization in Political Discourse: From Words to Actions.” Discourse & Society22, (6): 781–807. 10.1177/0957926511419927
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927 [Google Scholar]
37. Saward, Michael
    2006 Democracy and citizenship: expanding domains. InOxford Handbook of Political Theory, ed.John S. Dryzek, Bonnie Honig, and Anne Phillips, 400–419. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Saward, Michael
    2010 The representative claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579389.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579389.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
39. Serafis, Dimitris, Kitis, E. Dimitris, and Assimakopoulos, Stavros
    2022 “Sailing to Ithaka: The transmutation of Greek left-populism in discourses about the European Union.” Journal of Language & Politics, 21(2):344–369. 10.1075/jlp.21063.ser
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21063.ser [Google Scholar]
40. Squires, Judith
    2008 “The Constitutive Representation of Gender: Extra-Parliamentary Re-Presentations of Gender Relations.” Representation44(2): 187–204. 10.1080/00344890802080464
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890802080464 [Google Scholar]
41. Swers, Michele L.
    1998 “Are women more likely to vote for women’s issue bills than their male colleagues?” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 23(3): 435–448. 10.2307/440362
    https://doi.org/10.2307/440362 [Google Scholar]
42. Swers, Michele L.
    2002 The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226772738.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226772738.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
43. Tamerius, Karin. L.
    1995 “Sex, Gender, and Leadership in the Representation of Women” InGender Power Leadership and Governance, ed. ByG. Duerst-Lahti and R. M. Kelly, USA: The University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Tank, Pınar
    2005 “Political Islam in Turkey: A State of Controlled Secularity”, Turkish Studies6(1–3):12. 10.1080/1468384042000339294
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1468384042000339294 [Google Scholar]
45. Ucaray-Mangitli, Burcu, and Senem Yildirim
    2023 “Gender segregation in parliamentary committees of Turkey: Intermediary spaces of women’s political representation,” Women’s Studies International Forum, 971. 10.1016/j.wsif.2023.102681
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2023.102681 [Google Scholar]
46. Ugur-Cinar, Meral
    2024 Memory, Patriarchy and Economy in Turkey: Narratives of Political Power. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Ugur-Cinar, Meral and Ali Acikgoz
    2023 “Social Democracy at the Crossroads in Turkey: Global Questions, Local Answers,” European Legacy, 28:6, 615–638. 10.1080/10848770.2023.2202466
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2023.2202466 [Google Scholar]
48. Vaara, Eero
    2014 “Struggles over legitimacy in the Eurozone crisis: Discursive legitimation strategies and their ideological underpinnings,” Discourse & Society, 25(4):500–518. 10.1177/0957926514536962
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514536962 [Google Scholar]
49. van Dijk, Teun
    1997 “What is Political Discourse Analysis?” InPolitical Linguistics, ed.Jan Blommaert and Chris Bulcean, 11–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bjl.11.03dij
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij [Google Scholar]
50. van Leeuwen, Theo
    2008 “The Discursive Construction of Legitimation”, Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Analysis, Oxford Studies in Sociolinguistics. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
51. Williams, Melissa S.
    1998 Voice, Trust, and Memory. The Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400822782
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400822782 [Google Scholar]
52. Young, Iris Marion
    1997 “Deferring Group Representation.” InEthnicity and Group Rights, Yearbook of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy, ed.Ian Shapiro and Will Kymlicka, 349–376. New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]