The aesthetic values of the semiotic choices in Arab protests

References

1. Al-Rikaby, A. B. M., & Mahadi, T. S. T.
   2018 “The significance of the discursive strategies in al-Baghdadi’s and al-Zawahiri’s hortatory speeches: A multidisciplinary approach.” Journal of Language and Politics, 17(6): 769–788. 10.1075/jlp.17048.moh
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17048.moh [Google Scholar]
2. Al-Rikaby, A. B., Mahadi, T. S. T., & Tan, D. A. L.
   2018 “Analyzing the Political Uses of Figures of Speech in Non-State Leaders’ Rhetorical Titles: Case Studies of Al-Qa’ida and ISIS.” Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities. 26 (T): 299 – 311.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bakhtin, M. M.
   1986 “The Problem of Speech Genres.” InSpeech Genres and Other Late Essays, edited byC. Emerson and M. Holquist, 60–102. Austin: The University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bassiouney, R.
   2012 “Politicizing Identity: Code choice and stance taking during the Egyptian revolution.” Discourse & Society, 23(2): 107–126. 10.1177/0957926511431514
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511431514 [Google Scholar]
5. Chandler, D.
   2007 Semiotics: The Basics. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203014936
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203014936 [Google Scholar]
6. Cherribi, S.
   2017 Fridays of Rage: Al Jazeera, the Arab Spring, and Political Islam. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199337385.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199337385.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
7. Coleman, R.
   2010 “Framing the Pictures in Our Heads: Exploring the Framing and Agenda-Setting Effects of Visual Images.” InDoing News Framing Analysis Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, edited byPaul D’Angelo and Jim, A. K., 233–261. New York: Routledge
   [Google Scholar]
8. Coupland, N.
   2010 “Welsh linguistic landscapes from above and from below.” InSemiotic landscapes: Language, Image, Space, edited byA. Jaworski and C. Thurlow, 77–101. New York: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Coupland, N. and Garrett, P.
   2010 “Linguistic landscapes, discursive frames and metacultural performance.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2051: 7–36. 10.1515/ijsl.2010.037
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2010.037 [Google Scholar]
10. Dolores Porto, M.
    2022 “Water Metaphors and Evaluation of Syrian Migration: The Flow of Refugees in the Spanish Press.” Metaphor and Symbol37, 3: 252–267. 10.1080/10926488.2021.1973871
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1973871 [Google Scholar]
11. Fagin, A.
    2000 “Environmental Protest in the Czech Republic: Three Stages of Post-communist Development.” Czech Sociological Review8(2):139–56. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-53309. 10.13060/00380288.2000.36.12.03
    https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2000.36.12.03 [Google Scholar]
12. Fairclough, N. L.
    1992a “Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Society, 3(2):193–217. 10.1177/0957926592003002004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002004 [Google Scholar]
13. Fairclough, N.
    1992b Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fairclough, N.
    2003 Analysing Discourse – textual research for social research. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203697078
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078 [Google Scholar]
15. Fauconnier, G. and Sweetser, E.
    1996 Spaces, Worlds and Grammar. London: University of Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Frekko, S. E.
    2009 “Signs of respect: Neighborhood, public, and language in Barcelona.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 19(2): 227–245. 10.1111/j.1548‑1395.2009.01032.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2009.01032.x [Google Scholar]
17. Flowerdew, I.
    2003 “Discourse as History: History as Discourse. ‘The Rise of Modern China’ – a History Exhibition in Post-Colonial Hong Kong.” InRe/reading the past: Critical and functional perspectives on time and value, edited byR. Martin & R. Wodak, 195–216. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.8.11flo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.8.11flo [Google Scholar]
18. Jones, P. R., & Krzyzanowski, Majid
    2008 “Identity, Belonging and Migration: Beyond Describing ‘Others’.” InIdentity, Belonging, Migration, edited byG. Delanty, R. Wodak, & P. R. Jones, 38–53. Liverpool University Press. 10.5949/liverpool/9781846311185.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.5949/liverpool/9781846311185.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
19. Gee, J. P.
    2015 Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideologies in Discourse. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315722511
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315722511 [Google Scholar]
20. Hanauer, D. I.
    2011 “The discursive construction of the separation wall at Abu Dis: Graffiti as political discourse.” Journal of Language and Politics, 10(3): pp.301–321. 10.1075/jlp.10.3.01han
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.10.3.01han [Google Scholar]
21. Kress, Gunther, & Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2006 Reading images: The Grammar of Visual Design. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203619728
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728 [Google Scholar]
22. Ledin, P. and Machin, D.
    2018 Doing Visual Analysis: From Theory to Practice. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781529793529
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529793529 [Google Scholar]
23. Kasanga, Luanga A.
    2012 “Mapping the linguistic landscape of a commercial neighborhood in central Phnom Penh.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 321: 553–567. 10.1080/01434632.2012.683529
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2012.683529 [Google Scholar]
24. Kasanga, Luanga A.
    2014 “The linguistic landscape: mobile signs, code choice, symbolic meaning and territoriality in the discourse of protest.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2301: 19–44. 10.1515/ijsl‑2014‑0025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2014-0025 [Google Scholar]
25. Kecskes, Istvan
    2010 “Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts.” Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 11: 2889–2897. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.008 [Google Scholar]
26. KhosraviNik, Majid
    2018 “Social Media Techno-Discursive Design, Affective Communication and Contemporary Politics.” Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(4): 427–442. 10.1007/s40647‑018‑0226‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-018-0226-y [Google Scholar]
27. Krzyzanowski, Majid
    2010 The Discursive Construction of European Identities: A Multi-Level Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kumar, A.
    2001 Rewriting the Language of Politics. New Delhi: Monohar.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kwon, Winston, Clarke, Ian. and Wodak, Ruth
    2009 “Organizational Decision-making, Discourse, and Power: Integrating across contexts and scales.” Discourse & Communication, 3(3): 273–302. 10.1177/1750481309337208
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481309337208 [Google Scholar]
30. Luke, A.
    2002 “Beyond science and ideology critique: Developments in critical discourse analysis.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 221 (March): 96–110. 10.1017/S0267190502000053
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190502000053 [Google Scholar]
31. Linke, U.
    2008 “The language of resistance: Rhetorical tactics and symbols of protest in Germany.” City and Society, 2(2): 127–133. 10.1525/city.1988.2.2.127
    https://doi.org/10.1525/city.1988.2.2.127 [Google Scholar]
32. Machin, D. and Mayr, A.
    2012 How to do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Mason, J.
    2019 Intertextuality in practice (Vol.331). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/lal.33
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.33 [Google Scholar]
34. Martin, J. R., & Wodak, R.
    eds. 2003 Re/reading the past. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.8 [Google Scholar]
35. Morva, Oya
    (2016) “The humorous language of street dissent.” The European Journal of Humour Research, 4(2), 19–34. 10.7592/EJHR2016.4.2.morva
    https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2016.4.2.morva [Google Scholar]
36. Pan, Zhongdang and Kosicki, Gerald M.
    1993 “Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse.” Political Communication, 10(1):55–75. 10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963 [Google Scholar]
37. Papen, U.
    2012 “Commercial discourses, gentrification and citizens’ protest: The linguistic landscape of Prenzlauer Berg, Berlin.” Journal of Sociolinguistics, 16(1): 56–80. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2011.00518.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00518.x [Google Scholar]
38. Philipps, Axel
    2012 “Visual protest materials as empirical data.” Visual Communication, 11(1): 3–21. 10.1177/1470357211424675
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357211424675 [Google Scholar]
39. Pickard, S.
    2019 Politics, protest and young people: Political participation and dissent in 21st century Britain. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑57788‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57788-7 [Google Scholar]
40. Riggins, S. H.
    1990 Beyond Goffman: Studies on Communication, Institution, and Social Interaction. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110847291
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110847291 [Google Scholar]
41. Rose, G.
    2007 Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Said, S. B., & Kasanga, L. A.
    2016 “The discourse of protest: Frames of identity, intertextuality and interdiscursivity.” InNegotiating and contesting identities in linguistic landscapes, edited byRobert, B., Elizabeth, L. & Hirut, W., 71–83. India: Bloomsbury Academic
    [Google Scholar]
43. Salahshour, N.
    2017 Representation of Immigrants in New Zealand Print Media: A Critical Discourse Analysis. 10.26686/wgtn.17059892.v1
    https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.17059892.v1 [Google Scholar]
44. Scalmer, S.
    2002 Dissent events: Protest, the media, and the political gimmick in Australia. UNSW Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Scollon, Ron
    1997 Handbills, tissues, and condoms: A site of engagement for the construction of identity in public discourse. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 1(1): 39–61. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00003
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00003 [Google Scholar]
46. Scollon, Ron
    2001a Mediated Discourse: The Nexus of Practice. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Scollon, Ron
    2001b “Action and text: Towards an integrated understanding of the place of text in social (inter)action, mediated discourse analysis and the problem of social action.” InMethods in critical discourse analysis, edited byRuth Wodak and M. Meyer, 141–184. London: Sage Publications. 10.4135/9780857028020
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020 [Google Scholar]
48. Scollon, Ron. and Scollon, S.
    2003 Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203422724
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422724 [Google Scholar]
49. Scollon, Ron. and Scollon, S.
    2004 Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emergent Internet. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203694343
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203694343 [Google Scholar]
50. Ukeje, Charles
    2004 “From Aba to Ugborodo: Gender identity and alternative discourse of social protest among women in the oil delta of Nigeria.” Oxford Development Studies, 32(4): 605–617. 10.1080/1360081042000293362
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1360081042000293362 [Google Scholar]
51. Van Dijk, T.
    2002 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” InHandbook of Discourse Analysis, edited byDeborah, T., Deborah, S. and Heidi, H., 352–371. Oxford: Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
52. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2005 Introducing Social Semiotics. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2008 Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
54. Wood, Andrew. G.
    2001 “Urban protest and the discourse of popular nationalism in post- revolutionary Mexico: The case of the Veracruz rent strike.” National Identities, 2(3): pp.265–276. 10.1080/713687698
    https://doi.org/10.1080/713687698 [Google Scholar]
55. Wodak, Ruth
    2001 “The Discourse-Historical Approach.” InMethods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited byRuth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 63–94. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]