1887
Volume 23, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

There have been limited studies comparing Chinese and American news media in their descriptions of vaccines, especially their use of metaphors in the context of COVID-19. Hence, this paper employs a corpus-assisted critical approach to examine the metaphors used in constructing crisis discourses relating to vaccines in Chinese and American newspapers. The study reveals four conceptual metaphors: WEAPON, MACHINE, TRAVELLER, and CONTEST. The usage of these metaphors is intertwined with wider discursive contexts, which are shaped by the two countries’ distinct journalistic and geopolitical/sociocultural contexts. These have resulted in the adoption of different strategies for handling the COVID-19 crisis, reflecting the ideologies of collectivism in China and capitalism in America. The study highlights the significance of metaphors in shaping the ideologies of governments and/or the public towards vaccines through news media. Additionally, this paper provides a useful framework for comparing metaphor usage in two large corpora using Wmatrix.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22153.lu
2023-11-30
2024-10-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abbas, Ali Haif
    2022 “Politicizing COVID-19 Vaccines in the Press: A Critical Discourse Analysis.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique35 (3): 1167–85. 10.1007/s11196‑021‑09857‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-021-09857-3 [Google Scholar]
  2. Altindis, Emrah
    2022 “Inequitable COVID-19 Vaccine Distribution and the Intellectual Property Rights Prolong the Pandemic.” Expert Review of Vaccines21 (4): 427–30. 10.1080/14760584.2022.2014819
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2022.2014819 [Google Scholar]
  3. Anthony, Laurence
    2005 “AntConc: Design and Development of a Freeware Corpus Analysis Toolkit for the Technical Writing Classroom.” InIPCC 2005. Proceedings. International Professional Communication Conference, 2005, 729–37. IEEE. 10.1109/IPCC.2005.1494244
    https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2005.1494244 [Google Scholar]
  4. Atanasova, Dimitrinka, and Nelya Koteyko
    2017 “Metaphors in Guardian Online and Mail Online Opinion-Page Content on Climate Change: War, Religion, and Politics.” Environmental Communication11 (4): 452–69. 10.1080/17524032.2015.1024705
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1024705 [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker, Paul
    2012 “Acceptable Bias? Using Corpus Linguistics Methods with Critical Discourse Analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies9 (3): 247–56. 10.1080/17405904.2012.688297
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.688297 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak
    2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society19 (3): 273–306. 10.1177/0957926508088962
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar]
  7. Boas, Hans C.
    2008 “Resolving Form-Meaning Discrepancies in Construction Grammar.” In, 11–36. 10.1075/cal.5.02boa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.5.02boa [Google Scholar]
  8. Bollyky, Thomas J., and Chad P. Bown
    2020 “The Tragedy of Vaccine Nationalism: Only Cooperation Can End the Pandemic.” Foreign Aff. 991: 96.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Breeze, Ruth, Kayo Kondo, Andreas Musolff, and Sara Vilar-Lluch
    eds. 2022Pandemic and Crisis Discourse: Communicating COVID-19 and Public Health Strategy. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chan, Tayden Fung, and Yating Yu
    2023 “Building a Global Community of Health for All: A Positive Discourse Analysis of COVID-19 Discourse.” Discourse and Communication17 (3): 1–16. 10.1177/17504813231163078
    https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813231163078 [Google Scholar]
  11. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2004Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230000612
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, Yi-Tui
    2021 “The Effect of Vaccination Rates on the Infection of COVID-19 under the Vaccination Rate below the Herd Immunity Threshold.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health18 (14): 7491. 10.3390/ijerph18147491
    https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147491 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chotpitayasunondh, Tawee, Thea Kølsen Fischer, Jean-Michel Heraud, Aeron C. Hurt, Arnold S. Monto, Albert Osterhaus, Yuelong Shu, and John S. Tam
    2021 “Influenza and COVID-19: What Does Co-existence Mean?” Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses15 (3): 407–12. 10.1111/irv.12824
    https://doi.org/10.1111/irv.12824 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cohen, Jon
    2020 “China’s Vaccine Gambit.” Science370 (6522): 1263–67. 10.1126/science.370.6522.1263
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.370.6522.1263 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dijk, Teun A. van
    2001 “Principles of Critical Discourse.” InDiscourse Theory and Practice:A Reader, edited byMargaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor, and Simeon J. Yates, 300–317. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dou, Eva, Lyric Li, Chico Harlan, and Rick Noack
    2021 “The Search for Coronavirus Patient Zero, from Wuhan to Paris to Milan.” The Washington Post 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Du, Fanxing, Tracey Chantler, Mark R. Francis, Fiona Yueqian Sun, Xuan Zhang, Kaiyi Han, Lance Rodewald,
    2020 “The Determinants of Vaccine Hesitancy in China: A Cross-Sectional Study Following the Changchun Changsheng Vaccine Incident.” Vaccine38 (47): 7464–71. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.09.075
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.09.075 [Google Scholar]
  18. Editorial Board
    Editorial Board 2020 “Stop the Coronavirus Stigma Now.” Nature580 (7802): 165-165. 10.1038/d41586‑020‑01009‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01009-0 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fairclough, Norman
    1989 “Language and Power.” Language in Social Life Series, 2591.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 1992Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2010Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. 2nd ed.London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak
    1997 “Critical Discourse Analysis” inT. A. van Dijk (Ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction. 1st ed.London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Flusberg, Stephen J., Teenie Matlock, and Paul H. Thibodeau
    2018 “War Metaphors in Public Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol33 (1): 1–18. 10.1080/10926488.2018.1407992
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2018.1407992 [Google Scholar]
  24. Fuchs, Christian
    2021Communicating COVID-19: Everyday Life, Digital Capitalism, and Conspiracy Theories in Pandemic Times. Emerald Group Publishing. 10.1108/9781801177207
    https://doi.org/10.1108/9781801177207 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hardie, Andrew, Veronika Koller, Paul Rayson, and Elena Semino
    2007 “Exploiting a Semantic Annotation Tool for Metaphor Analysis.” InCorpus Linguistics Conference (CL2007).
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Josephi, Beate
    2013 “How Much Democracy Does Journalism Need?” Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism14 (4): 474–89. 10.1177/1464884912464172
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884912464172 [Google Scholar]
  27. Katz, Ingrid T., Rebecca Weintraub, Linda-Gail Bekker, and Allan M. Brandt
    2021 “From Vaccine Nationalism to Vaccine Equity – Finding a Path Forward.” New England Journal of Medicine384 (14): 1281–83. 10.1056/NEJMp2103614
    https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2103614 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kövecses, Zoltán
    2005Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511614408
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2010Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2016 “Recontextualisation of Neoliberalism and the Increasingly Conceptual Nature of Discourse: Challenges for Critical Discourse Studies.” Discourse and Society27 (3): 308–21. 10.1177/0957926516630901
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630901 [Google Scholar]
  31. Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Natalia Krzyżanowska
    2022 “Narrating the ‘New Normal’ or Pre-Legitimising Media Control? COVID-19 and the Discursive Shifts in the Far-Right Imaginary of ‘Crisis’ as a Normalisation Strategy.” Discourse & Society33 (6): 805–18. 10.1177/09579265221095420
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221095420 [Google Scholar]
  32. Krzyżanowski, Michał, Anna Triandafyllidou, and Ruth Wodak
    2018 “The Mediatization and the Politicization of the ‘Refugee Crisis’ in Europe.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies16 (1–2): 1–14. 10.1080/15562948.2017.1353189
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2017.1353189 [Google Scholar]
  33. Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Ruth Wodak
    2011 “Political Strategies and Language Policies: The European Union Lisbon Strategy and Its Implications for the EU’s Language and Multilingualism Policy.” Language Policy101: 115–36. 10.1007/s10993‑011‑9196‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-011-9196-5 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kyriakidis, Nikolaos C., Andrés López-Cortés, Eduardo Vásconez González, Alejandra Barreto Grimaldos, and Esteban Ortiz Prado
    2021 “SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Strategies: A Comprehensive Review of Phase 3 Candidates.” Npj Vaccines6 (1): 28. 10.1038/s41541‑021‑00292‑w
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-021-00292-w [Google Scholar]
  35. Leech, Geoffrey
    2013 “Virginia Woolf Meets Wmatrix.” Etudes de Stylistique Anglaise, no.4 (March): 15–26. 10.4000/esa.1405
    https://doi.org/10.4000/esa.1405 [Google Scholar]
  36. Mallapaty, Smriti
    2021 “China’s COVID Vaccines Are Going Global – But Questions Remain.” Nature593 (7858): 178–79. 10.1038/d41586‑021‑01146‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01146-0 [Google Scholar]
  37. Mardell, Jacob
    2020 “China’s Vaccine Diplomacy Assumes Geopolitical Importance.” Merics 2020 https://merics.org/en/comment/chinas-vaccine-diplomacy-assumes-geopolitical-importance
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Offit, Paul A., and Jew K. Rita
    2003 “Addressing Parents’ Concerns: Do Vaccines Contain Harmful Preservatives, Adjuvants, Additives, or Residuals?” Pediatrics112 (6): 1394–97. 10.1542/peds.112.6.1394
    https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.112.6.1394 [Google Scholar]
  39. Ophir, Yotam
    2018 “Coverage of Epidemics in American Newspapers through the Lens of the Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication Framework.” Health Security16 (3): 147–57. 10.1089/hs.2017.0106
    https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2017.0106 [Google Scholar]
  40. Paiva, Ely L., and Priscila L. S. Miguel
    2022 “Overcoming Enduring Inequalities in Global Value Chains? Interpreting the Case of Brazil’s Covid-19 Vaccine Supply through a Chess Metaphor.” Organisation29 (3): 414–25. 10.1177/13505084211057259
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084211057259 [Google Scholar]
  41. Pardi, Norbert, Michael J. Hogan, Frederick W. Porter, and Drew Weissman
    2018 “MRNA Vaccines – a New Era in Vaccinology.” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery17 (4): 261–79. 10.1038/nrd.2017.243
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2017.243 [Google Scholar]
  42. Partington, Alan
    2010 “Modern Diachronic Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (MD-CADS) on UK Newspapers: An Overview of the Project.” Corpora5 (2): 83–108. 10.3366/cor.2010.0101
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2010.0101 [Google Scholar]
  43. Rayson, P.
    2008 “From Key Words to Key Semantic Domains.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics13 (4): 519–49. 10.1075/ijcl.13.4.06ray
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.13.4.06ray [Google Scholar]
  44. Rayson, Paul, and Roger Garside
    2000 “Comparing Corpora Using Frequency Profiling.” InThe Workshop on Comparing Corpora, 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Robbins, Rebecca
    2021 “Moderna, Racing for Profits, Keeps Covid Vaccine out of Reach of Poor.” The New York Times 2021 https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/09/business/moderna-covid-vaccine.html
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Schmidt, Charles
    2020 “Genetic Engineering Could Make a COVID-19 Vaccine in Months Rather than Years.” Scientific American322 (6): 40–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Semino, Elena
    2017 “Corpus Linguistics and Metaphor.” The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press Cambridge. 10.1017/9781316339732.029
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339732.029 [Google Scholar]
  48. 2021 “‘Not Soldiers but Fire-Fighters’ – Metaphors and Covid-19.” Health Communication36 (1): 50–58. 10.1080/10410236.2020.1844989
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1844989 [Google Scholar]
  49. Semino, Elena, Zsófia Demjén, Andrew Hardie, Sheila Payne, and Paul Rayson
    2017Metaphor, Cancer and the End of Life. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315629834
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315629834 [Google Scholar]
  50. Smith, Nicholas Ross, and Tracey Fallon
    2020 “An Epochal Moment? The COVID-19 Pandemic and China’s International Order Building.” World Affairs183 (3): 235–55. 10.1177/0043820020945395
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0043820020945395 [Google Scholar]
  51. Steen, Gerard
    2010A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
  52. Szabó, Lilla Petronella, and Gabriella Szabó
    2022 “Attack of the Critics: Metaphorical Delegitimisation in Viktor Orbán’s Discourse during the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Language and Politics21 (2): 255–76. 10.1075/jlp.21068.sza
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21068.sza [Google Scholar]
  53. Tan, Huileng
    2022 “2 Reasons Why China Is Still in Lockdowns, More than 2 Years after the Pandemic Started – and What It’ll Take for Life to Go Back to Normal.” Business Insider 2022 https://www.businessinsider.com/china-zero-covid-policy-lockdowns-global-economy-vaccine-treatments-pandemic-2022-8
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Vaage, Nora S.
    2020 “Living Machines: Metaphors We Live By.” NanoEthics14 (1): 57–70. 10.1007/s11569‑019‑00355‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-019-00355-2 [Google Scholar]
  55. Wang, Huili, Tamara Runtsova, and Hongjun Chen
    2013 “Economy Is an Organism–a Comparative Study of Metaphor in English and Russian Economic Discourse.” Text & Talk33 (2): 259–88. 10.1515/text‑2013‑0012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-0012 [Google Scholar]
  56. Wang, Jiayu, and Mingfeng Yang
    2023 “Interpersonal-Function Topoi in Chinese Central Government’s Work Report (2020) as Epidemic (Counter-)Crisis Discourse.” Journal of Language and Politics22 (2): 185–203. 10.1075/jlp.22022.wan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22022.wan [Google Scholar]
  57. Wawrzuta, Dominik, Justyna Klejdysz, Mariusz Jaworski, Joanna Gotlib, and Mariusz Panczyk
    2022 “Attitudes toward COVID-19 Vaccination on Social Media: A Cross-Platform Analysis.” Vaccines10 (8): 1190. 10.3390/vaccines10081190
    https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10081190 [Google Scholar]
  58. Wodak, Ruth
    2021 “Crisis Communication and Crisis Management during COVID-19.” Global Discourse11 (3): 329–53. 10.1332/204378921X16100431230102
    https://doi.org/10.1332/204378921X16100431230102 [Google Scholar]
  59. World Health Organization
    World Health Organization 2020 “Naming the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) and the Virus That Causes It.” World Health Organization 2020 https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/naming-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-2019)-and-the-virus-that-causes-it
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Xi, Jinping
    2021 “Working Together to Build a Global Community of Health for All.” Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. May 21, 2021. https://www.mfa.gov.cn/ce/cohk//eng/Topics/gjfz/t1877666.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Yu, Yating
    2022a “Legitimising a Global Fight for a Shared Future: A Critical Metaphor Analysis of the Reportage of COVID-19 in China Daily.” InPandemic and Crisis Discourse: Communicating COVID-19, edited byRuth Breeze, Kayo Kondo, Andreas Musolff, and Sara Vilar-Lluch, 241–54. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing. 10.5040/9781350232730.ch‑013
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350232730.ch-013 [Google Scholar]
  62. 2022b “Resisting Foreign Hostility in China’s English-Language News Media during the COVID-19 Crisis.” Asian Studies Review46 (2): 254–71. 10.1080/10357823.2021.1947969
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2021.1947969 [Google Scholar]
  63. Yu, Yating, and Dennis Tay
    2022 “Formulating a Discourse of Solidarity amid COVID-19: A Positive Discourse Analysis of Remarks given by China’s Foreign Ministry Spokespersons.” InCovid, Culture and Communication, edited byFiona Rossette-Crake and Elvis Buckwalter, 76–94. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003276517‑7
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003276517-7 [Google Scholar]
  64. Yu, Yating, Dennis Tay, and Qian Yue
    2023 “Media Representations of China amid COVID-19: A Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse Analysis.” Media International Australia, March, 1329878X2311599. 10.1177/1329878X231159966
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X231159966 [Google Scholar]
  65. Zhang, Dechun, and Ahmed Bux Jamali
    2022 “China’s ‘Weaponised’ Vaccine: Intertwining between International and Domestic Politics.” East Asia39 (3): 279–96. 10.1007/s12140‑021‑09382‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-021-09382-x [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22153.lu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22153.lu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error