1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Language and Politics
  4. Volume 23, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 23, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The 23rd of January 2019 marked the beginning of the Venezuelan Presidential Crisis, a unique socio-political conflict that confronted Nicolás Maduro, president of Venezuela, to the self-proclaimed leader Juan Guaidó. This paper explores the divisive power of conceptual metaphors in this context through the analysis of polarising metaphors, namely, metaphors that conceptualise ‘Us’ positively and/or ‘Them’ negatively. More specifically, from a corpus-based critical socio-cognitive perspective (Musolff 2016; Soares da Silva 2020; Charteris-Black 2011), this study looks at the main polarising metaphors of Maduro and Guaidó’s political discourses and examines their role in the discursive construction of ideological polarisation, social identities, and legitimacy using a target-based approach (Stefanowitsch and Gries 2006). The results show that both leaders strategically use polarising metaphors, especially those of , and , to reproduce their ideologies, reinforce their social identities, and legitimise their political positions.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22169.pet
2023-11-30
2024-10-07

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22169.pet
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ädel, Amelie
    2010 “How to Use Corpus Linguistics in the Study of Political Discourse.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, edited byAnne O’Keeffe and Michael McCarthy, 591–604. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203856949‑42
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949-42 [Google Scholar]
  2. Adrián, Thays
    2010 “La metáfora conceptual en el discurso político venezolano: Rómulo Betancourt y Hugo Chávez Frías [Conceptual metaphor in Venezuelan political discourse: Rómulo Betancourt and Hugo Chávez Frías].” ALED10 (1): 9–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Ghazzi, Omar
    2021 “We Will Be Great Again: Historical Victimhood in Populist Discourse.” European Journal of Cultural Studies24 (1): 45–59. 10.1177/1367549420985851
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549420985851 [Google Scholar]
  4. Atkins, Scott, Ashley Mote, Kimberly Gonzalez, and Krystal Alexander
    2020 “No Sympathy for the Bully: A Metaphor Analysis of Two Speeches on the Topic of Immigration.” Metaphor and the Social World10 (1): 1–21. 10.1075/msw.19001.atk
     https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.19001.atk [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker, Paul, and Tony McEnery
    eds. 2015 Corpora and Discourse Studies: Integrating Discourse and Corpora. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137431738
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137431738 [Google Scholar]
  6. Boeynaems, Amber, Christian Burgers, Elly A. Konijn, and Gerard J. Steen
    2017 “The Effects of Metaphorical Framing on Political Persuasion: A Systematic Literature Review.” Metaphor and Symbol32 (2): 118–34. 10.1080/10926488.2017.1297623
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2017.1297623 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bolívar, Adriana
    2018 Political Discourse as Dialogue: A Latin American Perspective. London/New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Breeze, Ruth
    2019 “Emotion in Politics: Affective-Discursive Practices in UKIP and Labour.” Discourse and Society30 (1): 24–43. 10.1177/0957926518801074
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926518801074 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2020 “Exploring Populist Styles of Political Discourse in Twitter.” World Englishes39 (4): 550–67. 10.1111/weng.12496
     https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12496 [Google Scholar]
  10. Castro Pumarega, Daniel
    2021 “Diccionario de venezolanismos [Dictionary of Venezuelan phrases]” 2021 projetbabel.org/internet/venezonalismos.htm
  11. Charaudeau, Patrick
    2019 “El discurso populista como síntoma de una crisis de los poderes [The populist discourse as a symptom of a crisis of the powers].” RÉTOR9 (2): 96–128.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2004 Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230000612
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2011 Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. 2nd ed.Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230319899
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230319899 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chilton, Paul
    2004 Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203561218
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dabrowska, Ewa, and Dagmar Divjak
    eds. 2015 Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110292022
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110292022 [Google Scholar]
  16. Deignan, Alice
    2010 “The Evaluative Properties of Metaphors.” InResearching and Applying Metaphor in the Real World, edited byGraham Low, Zazie Todd, Alice Deignan, and Lynne Cameron, 357–73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.26.21dei
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.26.21dei [Google Scholar]
  17. Dijk, Teun A. Van
    1998 Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. 10.4135/9781446217856
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446217856 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2018 “Socio-Cognitive Discourse Studies.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, edited byJohn Flowerdew and John E. Richardson, 26–43. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315739342‑3
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342-3 [Google Scholar]
  19. Filardo-Llamas, Laura
    2021 “From the War on Covid-19 to Political Wars: Metaphor and Polarization in the Early Stages of the 2020 Pandemic.” InDiscursive Approaches to Sociopolitical Polarization and Conflict, edited byLaura Filardo-Llamas and Esperanza Morales-López, 192–212. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003094005‑12
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003094005-12 [Google Scholar]
  20. Filardo-Llamas, Laura, Esperanza Morales-López, and Alan Floyd
    eds. 2021 Discursive Approaches to Socio-Political Polarization and Conflict. Preprint. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003094005
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003094005 [Google Scholar]
  21. Flowerdew, John, and John E. Richardson
    eds. 2018 The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315739342
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342 [Google Scholar]
  22. Flusberg, Stephen J., Teenie Matlock, and Paul H. Thibodeau
    2018 “War Metaphors in Public Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol33 (1): 1–18. 10.1080/10926488.2018.1407992
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2018.1407992 [Google Scholar]
  23. García-Guadilla, María Pilar, and Ana Mallen
    2019 “Polarization, Participatory Democracy, and Democratic Erosion in Venezuela’s Twenty-First Century Socialism.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science681 (1): 62–77. 10.1177/0002716218817733
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218817733 [Google Scholar]
  24. Geeraerts, Dirk, and Hubert Cuyckens
    eds. 2007 The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Goatly, Andrew
    2007 Washing the Brain: Metaphor and Hidden Ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.23
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.23 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hampe, Beate
    ed. 2005 From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110197532
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hart, Christopher
    2010 Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230299009
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299009 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hogg, Michael A.
    2016 “Social Identity Theory.” InUnderstanding Peace and Conflict Through Social Identity Theory: Contemporary Global Perspectives, edited byShelley McKeown, Reeshma Haji, and Neil Ferguson, 3–17. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑29869‑6_1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29869-6_1 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kilgarriff, Adam, Vít Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubícek, Vojtech Kovár, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý, and Vít Suchomel
    2014 “The Sketch Engine: Ten Years On.” Lexicography1 (1): 7–36. 10.1007/s40607‑014‑0009‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9 [Google Scholar]
  30. Koller, Veronika
    2014 “Applying Social Cognition Research to Critical Discourse Studies: The Case of Collective Identities.” InContemporary Critical Discourse Studies, edited byChristopher Hart and Piotr Cap, 147–66. London: Bloomsbury Academic. 10.5040/9781472593634.ch‑006
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472593634.ch-006 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kövecses, Zoltán
    2010 Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/lancaster/detail.action?docID=535440
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2020 “Discursive Shifts and the Normalisation of Racism: Imaginaries of Immigration, Moral Panics and the Discourse of Contemporary Right-Wing Populism.” Social Semiotics30 (4): 503–27. 10.1080/10350330.2020.1766199
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1766199 [Google Scholar]
  33. Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Per Ledin
    2017 “Uncivility on the Web: Populism in/and the Borderline Discourses of Exclusion.” Journal of Language and Politics16 (4): 566–81. 10.1075/jlp.17028.krz
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17028.krz [Google Scholar]
  34. Lakoff, George
    1987 Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/W/bo3632089.html. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  35. 2016 Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. 3rd ed.University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226411323.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226411323.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Li, Tao, and Yifan Zhu
    2020 “How Does China Appraise Self and Others? A Corpus-Based Analysis of Chinese Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society31 (2): 153–71. 10.1177/0957926519880036
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926519880036 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lozada, Mireya
    2020 “Neo-autoritarismos y resistencias sociales en Venezuela: Vida cotidiana de la mitología bolivariana [Neo-authoritarianisms and social resistance in Venezuela: Daily life of the Bolivarian mythology].” InPsicologia Dos Extremismos Políticos, edited byDomenico Uhng Hur and José Manuel Sabucedo, 147–75. Petrópolis.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Martín Rojo, Luisa, and Teun A. Van Dijk
    1997 “‘There Was a Problem, and It Was Solved!’: Legitimating the Expulsion of ‘illegal’ Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse.” Discourse and Society8 (4): 523–66. 10.1177/0957926597008004005
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008004005 [Google Scholar]
  39. Masroor, Farzana, Qintarah N. Khan, Iman Aib, and Zulfiqar Ali
    2019 “Polarization and Ideological Weaving in Twitter Discourse of Politicians.” Social Media and Society5 (4) : 1–14. 10.1177/2056305119891220
     https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119891220 [Google Scholar]
  40. Muelas Gil, María
    2019 “Ideology, Metaphor and Persuasion in Times of Elections: A Corpus-Based Study of British and Spanish Economic Reports.” Complutense Journal of English Studies271: 223–46. 10.5209/cjes.63865
     https://doi.org/10.5209/cjes.63865 [Google Scholar]
  41. Musolff, Andreas
    2004 Metaphor and Political Discourse. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230504516
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504516 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2016 Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury Academic. https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/political-metaphor-analysis-9781441160669/
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Oddo, John
    2011 “War Legitimation Discourse: Representing ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in Four US Presidential Addresses.” Discourse and Society22 (3): 287–314. 10.1177/0957926510395442
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510395442 [Google Scholar]
  44. Over, Harriet, and Cade McCall
    2018 “Becoming Us and Them: Social Learning and Intergroup Bias.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass12 (4): 1–13. 10.1111/spc3.12384
     https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12384 [Google Scholar]
  45. Pantoulas, Dimitris, and Jennifer McCoy
    2019 “Venezuela: An Unstable Equililbrium.” Revista de Ciencia Política39 (2): 391–408. 10.4067/S0718‑090X2019000200391
     https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2019000200391 [Google Scholar]
  46. Peterssen, Silvia
    2022 “Ideological Polarisation in the Venezuelan Presidential Crisis.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines14 (1): 63–85. https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/journals/cadaad/volume-14-2022/
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Piñero Piñero, Gracia
    2018 “Metáfora conceptual y el marco ESPECTÁCULO en el discurso político de los medios de comunicación [Conceptual metaphor and the frame SPECTACLE in political discourse in the media].” Ibérica36 (2018): 119–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Piñero Piñero, Gracia, and John Moore
    2015 “Metaphorical Conceptualization of Migration Control Laws: Narratives of Oppression.” Journal of Language and Politics14 (4): 577–98. 10.1075/jlp.14.4.05pin
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.4.05pin [Google Scholar]
  49. Real Academia Española
    Real Academia Española 2021 “Diccionario de la lengua española [Dictionary of the Spanish language]” 2021 https://dle.rae.es
  50. Romano, Manuela
    2019 “‘Refugees Are Streaming into Europe’: An Image-Schema Analysis of the Syrian Refugee Crisis in the Spanish and British Press.” Complutense Journal of English Studies271: 39–57. 10.5209/cjes.64561
     https://doi.org/10.5209/cjes.64561 [Google Scholar]
  51. Romano, Manuela, and Maria Dolores Porto
    eds. 2016 Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction: Multimodal and Cross-Linguistic Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027267221. 10.1075/pbns.262
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.262 [Google Scholar]
  52. Semino, Elena
    2008 Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. 2017 “Corpus Linguistics and Metaphor.” InThe Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, edited byBarbara Dancygier, 463–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316339732.029
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339732.029 [Google Scholar]
  54. Sharifian, Farzad
    2011 Cultural Conceptualisations and Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/clscc.1
     https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.1 [Google Scholar]
  55. Soares da Silva, Augusto
    2016 “The Persuasive (and Manipulative) Power of Metaphor in ‘Austerity’ Discourse.” InExploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction: Multimodal and Cross-Linguistic Perspectives, 262–79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.262.04soa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.262.04soa [Google Scholar]
  56. 2020 “From Economic Crisis to Austerity Policies through Conceptual Metaphor. A Corpus-Based Comparison of Metaphors of Crisis and Austerity in the Portuguese Press.” InThe Language of Crisis. Metaphors, Frames and Discourses, edited byMimi Huang and Lise-Lotte Holmgreen, 51–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.87.02soa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.87.02soa [Google Scholar]
  57. Soares da Silva, Augusto, Maria Josep Cuenca, and Manuela Romano
    2017 “The Conceptualisation of Austerity in the Portuguese, Spanish and Irish Press.” InAdvances in Cultural Linguistics, edited byFarzad Sharifian, 345–68. Singapore: Springer Nature. 10.1007/978‑981‑10‑4056‑6_16
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4056-6_16 [Google Scholar]
  58. Steen, Gerard J., Aletta G. Dorst, J. Berenike Herrmann, Anna A. Kaal, Tina Krennmayr, and Trijntje Pasma
    2010 A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.14
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
  59. Stefanowitsch, Anatol, and Stefan Th. Gries
    eds. 2006 Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/lancaster/detail.action?docID=280194. 10.1515/9783110199895
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199895 [Google Scholar]
  60. Talmy, Leonard
    1988 “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition.” Cognitive Science12 (1): 49–100. 10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2 [Google Scholar]
  61. Taylor, Charlotte, and Anna Marchi
    eds. 2018 Corpus Approaches to Discourse. A Critical Review. Abingdon: Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Corpus-Approaches-to-Discourse-A-Critical-Review/Taylor-Marchi/p/book/9781138895805
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Turner, John C., Michael A. Hogg, Penelope J. Oakes, Stephen D. Reicher, and Margaret S. Wetherell
    1987 Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/lancaster/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=280194
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Wirth-Koliba, Victoria
    2016 “The Diverse and Dynamic World of ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in Political Discourse.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines8 (1): 23–37. cadaad.net/%5Cnwww.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/journals/cadaad/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Volume-8_Wirth-Koliba.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Wodak, Ruth
    2011 “‘Us’ and ‘Them’: Inclusion and Exclusion – Discrimination via Discourse.” InIdentity, Belonging and Migration, edited byGerard Delanty, Ruth Wodak, and Paul Jones, 54–77. Liverpool University Press. 10.5949/UPO9781846314537.004
     https://doi.org/10.5949/UPO9781846314537.004 [Google Scholar]
  65. 2021 The Politics of Fear: The Shameless Normalization of Far-Right Discourse. 2nd ed.London: SAGE. 10.4135/9781529739664
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529739664 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22169.pet
Loading
Polarising metaphors in the Venezuelan Presidential Crisis
Journal of Language and Politics 23, 588 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22169.pet
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22169.pet
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.22169.pet
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): polarisation; polarising metaphor; political discourse; Venezuela

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error