The power of old ideas newly expressed

References

1. Ambrosetti, David
   2009 Normes et rivalités diplomatiques à l’ONU: le Conseil de sécurité en audience. Bruxelles: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑0352‑6211‑7
   https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0352-6211-7 [Google Scholar]
2. Anghie, Antony
   2014 “Towards a Postcolonial International Law.” InCritical International Law: Postrealism, Postcolonialism, and Transnationalism, ed. byPrabhakar Singh and Benoît Mayer, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199450633.003.0005
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199450633.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
3. Annan, Kofi
   1999 “Two Concepts of Sovereignty.” The Economist (): –.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Ban Ki-moon
   2009 A/63/677 — Implementing the Responsibility to Protect. Report of the Secretary General. New York: United Nations.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Barnett, Michael N.
   1997 “Bringing in the New World Order: Liberalism, Legitimacy, and the United Nations.” World Politics (): –. 10.1017/S0043887100008042
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100008042 [Google Scholar]
6. Barnett, Michael N.
   2011 Empire of Humanity. A History of Humanitarianism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bélanger-Vincent, Ariane
   2020 “‘Bypass the UN’: Diplomatic Practices and Change in Multilateral Settings.” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review (): –. 10.1111/plar.12340
   https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12340 [Google Scholar]
8. Bellamy, Alex J.
   2005 “Responsibility to Protect or Trojan Horse? The Crisis in Darfur and Humanitarian Intervention after Iraq.” Ethics & International Affairs (): –. 10.1111/j.1747‑7093.2005.tb00499.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2005.tb00499.x [Google Scholar]
9. Bellamy, Alex J.
   2006 “Whither the Responsibility to Protect? Humanitarian Intervention and the 2005 World Summit.” Ethics & International Affairs (): –. 10.1111/j.1747‑7093.2006.00012.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2006.00012.x [Google Scholar]
10. Bellier, Irène
    2005 “Anthropology of Institutions and Discourse Analysis: Looking Into Interdisciplinarity.” InA New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis, ed. byRuth Wodak and Paul Chilton, –. 10.1075/dapsac.13.16bel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.13.16bel [Google Scholar]
11. Bourdieu, Pierre
    1984 [1979] Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bourdieu, Pierre
    1990 [1980] The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 10.1515/9781503621749
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621749 [Google Scholar]
13. Bourdieu, Pierre
    1991 Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Calhoun, Craig
    2010 “The Idea of Emergency: Humanitarian Action and Global (Dis)Order.” InContemporary States of Emergency: The Politics of Military and Humanitarian Interventions, ed. byDidier Fassin and Mariella Pandolfi, –. New York: Zone Books.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Cooper, Andrew F., and John English
    2005 “International Comission and the Mind of Global Governance.” InInternational Commissions and the Power of Ideas, ed. byRamesh Thakur, Andrew F. Cooper and John English, –. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Deng, Francis, Sadikiel Kimaro, Terrence Lyons, Donald Rothchild, and William I. Zartman
    1996 Sovereignty as Responsibility: Conflict Management in Africa. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAIT)
    Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAIT) 2000 “Changes Made to the Proposal For Canada to Launch an International Commission After Consultations with Missions and Inputs from Stakeholders,” obtained bythe author through the Access to Information Act, emphasis in the original.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Dillon, Michael, and Julian Reid
    2001 “Global Liberal Governance: Biopolitics, Security and War.” Millenium (): –. 10.1177/03058298010300010501
    https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298010300010501 [Google Scholar]
19. Duffield, Mark
    2001 Global Governance and the New Wars. The Merging of Development and Security. London: Zed Books.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Evans, Gareth
    2005 “Foreword.” InInternational Commissions and the Power of Ideas, ed. byRamesh Thakur, Andrew F. Cooper and John English, –. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Evans, Gareth
    2008 Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and For All. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Fairclough, Norman
    2005 “Blair’s Contribution to Elaborating a New Doctrine of ‘International Community’”. Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.4.1.03fai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.1.03fai [Google Scholar]
23. Fairclough, Norman
    2006 Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Fukuyama, Francis
    1992 The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Global Center for the Responsibility to Protect
    Global Center for the Responsibility to Protect, n.d. “What is R2P?” AccessedOctober 2, 2022. https://www.globalr2p.org/what-is-r2p/
26. Gupta, Akhil, and James Ferguson
    1997 “Discipline and Practice: ‘The Field’ as Site, Method, and Location in Anthropology.” InAnthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science, ed. byAkhil Gupta and James Ferguson, –. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Gusterson, Hugh
    1997 “Studying Up Revisited.” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Gusterson, Hugh
    2001 “Elites, Anthropology of.” InInternational Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, ed. byNeil J. Smelser and Paul B. Baltes, –. Oxford: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑043076‑7/00854‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00854-8 [Google Scholar]
29. Hehir, Aidan
    2019 Hollow Norms and the Responsibility to Protect. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑90536‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90536-5 [Google Scholar]
30. ICISS
    ICISS 2001a The Responsibility to Protect. Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
    [Google Scholar]
31. ICISS
    ICISS 2001b The Responsibility to Protect. Research, Bibliography, Background. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Malkki, Liisa H.
    1992 “National Geographic: The Rooting of Peoples and the Territorialization of National Identity Among Scholars and Refugees.” Cultural Anthropology (): –. 10.1525/can.1992.7.1.02a00030
    https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1992.7.1.02a00030 [Google Scholar]
33. Marcus, G. E.
    1995 “Ethnography in/of the World System : The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography.” Annual Review of Anthropology: –. 10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523 [Google Scholar]
34. McRae, Rob, and Don Hubert
    ed. 2001 Human Security and the New Diplomacy. Protecting People, Promoting Peace. Montréal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press. 10.1515/9780773569300
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773569300 [Google Scholar]
35. Nader, Laura
    1999 [1972] “Up the Anthropologist — Perspectives Gained from Studying Up.” InReinventing Anthropology, ed. byDell Hymes, –. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Reyes, Antonio
    2011 “Strategies of Legitimization in Political Discourse: From Words to Actions.” Discourse & Society (): –. 10.1177/0957926511419927
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927 [Google Scholar]
37. Strauss, Hekkehard
    2009 “A Bird in the Hand is Worth Two in the Bush — On the Assumed Legal Nature of the Responsibility to Protect.” Global Responsibility to Protect (): –. 10.1163/187598409X450785
    https://doi.org/10.1163/187598409X450785 [Google Scholar]
38. Thakur, Ramesh
    2002 “Intervention, Sovereignty and Responsibility to Protect: Experience from ICISS.” Security Dialogue (): –. 10.1177/0967010602033003007
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010602033003007 [Google Scholar]
39. Thakur, Ramesh, and Thomas Weiss
    2009 “R2P: From Idea to Norm — and Action?” Global Responsibility to Protect (): –. 10.1163/187598409X405460
    https://doi.org/10.1163/187598409X405460 [Google Scholar]
40. UN
    UN 1993 United Nations Year Book 47. New York: United Nations.
    [Google Scholar]
41. UNGA
    UNGA 2005 2005 World Summit Outcome. A/RES/60/1. https://undocs.org/A/RES/60/1
42. Weber, Max
    1978 “The Types of Legitimate Domination.” InEconony and Society — Volume 1, ed. byGuenther Roth and Claus Wittich, –. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Weiss, Thomas, Tatiana Carayannis, and Richard Jolly
    2009 “The ‘Third’ United Nations.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations (): –. 10.1163/19426720‑01501008
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-01501008 [Google Scholar]
44. Wheeler, Nicholas J.
    2000 Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Wright, Susan, and Sue Reinhold
    2011 “‘Studying through’: a Strategy for Studying Political Transformation. Or Sex, Lies, and British Politics.” InPolicy Words. Anthropology and Analysis of Contemporary Power, ed. byCris Shore, Susan Wright and Davide Pero, –. New York: Berghahn Books.
    [Google Scholar]