Revisiting the rhetorical construction of political consent

References

1. Aiolfi, Théo
   2022 Populism as a Transgressive Style. Global Studies Quarterly, no.. https://academic.oup.com/isagsq/article/2/1/ksac006/6546411. 10.1093/isagsq/ksac006
   https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksac006 [Google Scholar]
2. Al-Salman, Saleh, and Ahmad S. Haider
   2021 “Covid-19 Trending Neologisms and Word Formation Processes in English.” Russian Journal of Linguistics, no.: –. https://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/view/25996/19172. 10.22363/2687‑0088‑2021‑25‑1‑24‑42
   https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-1-24-42 [Google Scholar]
3. Aristotle and Robert C. Bartlett
   2019 Aristotle’s Art of Rhetoric. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226591766.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226591766.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
4. Benwell, Bethan and Elizabeth Stokoe
   2006 Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748626533
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748626533 [Google Scholar]
5. Bilá, Magdalena, Alena Kačmárová and Ingrida Vaňková
   2020 “The Encounter of Two Cultural Identities: The Case of Social Deixis.” Russian Journal of Linguistics, no.: –. 10.22363/2687‑0088‑2020‑24‑2‑344‑365
   https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-2-344-365 [Google Scholar]
6. Blondel, Jean and Ferdinand Müller-Rommel
   2009 “Political Elites.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited byRussell J. Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.003.0044
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270125.003.0044 [Google Scholar]
7. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
   1987 Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Vol.. Cambridge, Cambridge university press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
8. Busygina, Irina and Mikhail Filippov
   2015 “The Calculus of Non-Protest in Russia: Redistributive Expectations from Political Reforms.” Europe-Asia Studies, no.: –. 10.1080/09668136.2014.1002679
   https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2014.1002679 [Google Scholar]
9. Castro Seixas, Eunice
   2021 “War Metaphors in Political Communication on Covid-19.” Frontiers in Sociology. 10.3389/fsoc.2020.583680 2020.
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.583680 [Google Scholar]
10. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2004 Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Chen, Chinchih, Frey Carl, Benedikt and Giorgio Presidente
    20221 “Culture and Contagion: Individualism and Compliance with Covid-19 Policy.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation, no. (October): –. 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.07.026
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.07.026 [Google Scholar]
12. Chilton, Paul A.
    2004 Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203561218
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 [Google Scholar]
13. Chilton, Paul A., and Christina Schäffner
    2011 “Discourse and Politics.” InDiscourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, edited byTeun Van Dijk. –. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446289068.n15
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446289068.n15 [Google Scholar]
14. Churchill, Winston
    1940 “First Speech as Prime Minister to the House of Commons.” AccessedFebruary 12, 2024. https://winstonchurchill.org/resources/speeches/1940-the-finest-hour/blood-toil-tears-sweat/
15. De Fina, Anna
    1995 “Pronominal Choice, Identity and Solidarity in Political Discourse.” Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, no.: –. 10.1515/text.1.1995.15.3.379
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1995.15.3.379 [Google Scholar]
16. Duszak, Anna
    2002 Us and Others: Social Identities Across Languages, Discourses and Cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.98
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.98 [Google Scholar]
17. Fairclough, Norman
    2003 Textual Analysis for Social Research. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak
    1997 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” InDiscourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction Vol. , edited byTeun van Dijk. –. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Fairclough, Norman, and Isabela Fairclough
    2012 Political Discourse Analysis. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fetzer, Anita
    2008 “And I think that is a Very Straightforward Way of Dealing with it. The Communicative Function of Cognitive Verbs in Political Discourse.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology, no. (December): –. 10.1177/0261927X08322481
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X08322481 [Google Scholar]
21. Flinders, Matthew
    2020 “Not a Brexit election? Pessimism, Promises and Populism UK-style.” Parliamentary Affairs, no. (September): –. 10.1093/pa/gsaa030
    https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsaa030 [Google Scholar]
22. Fuchs, Christian
    2021 “Everyday life and everyday communication in coronavirus capitalism.” InCommunicating COVID-19: Everyday Life, Digital Capitalism, and Conspiracy Theories in Pandemic Times. Emerald Publishing. –. 10.1108/9781801177207.
    https://doi.org/10.1108/9781801177207 [Google Scholar]
23. Gardelle, Laure, and Sandrine Sorlin
    2015 The Pragmatics of Personal Pronouns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.171
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.171 [Google Scholar]
24. Halmari, Helena
    2008 “On the Language of the Clinton-Dole Presidential Campaign Debates. General Tendencies and Successful Strategies.” Journal of Language and Politics, no.: –. 10.1075/jlp.7.2.04hal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.7.2.04hal [Google Scholar]
25. Hofstede, Guy
    2001 Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hunston, Susan
    2007 “Semantic Prosody Revisited.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, no.: –. 10.1075/ijcl.12.2.09hun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.12.2.09hun [Google Scholar]
27. Kopytowska, Monika., and Radoslaw Krakowiak
    2020 “Online Incivility in Times of Covid-19: Social Disunity and Misperceptions of Tourism Industry in Poland.” Russian Journal of Linguistics, no.: –. 10.22363/2687‑0088‑2020‑24‑4‑743‑773
    https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-4-743-773 [Google Scholar]
28. Krzyżanowski, Michal and Natalia Krzyżanowska
    2022 “Narrating the ‘New Normal’ or Pre-Legitimising Media Control? Covid-19 and the Discursive Shifts in the Far-Right Imaginary of ‘Crisis’ as a Normalisation Strategy.” Discourse and Society, no.: –. 10.1177/09579265221095420
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221095420 [Google Scholar]
29. Krzyżanowski, Michał, Ekman, Mattias, Nilsson, Per-Erik, Gardell, Mattias and Christian Christensen
    2021 “Uncivility, Racism, and Populism: Discourses and Interactive Practices in Anti- and Post-Democratic Communication.” Nordicom Review (): –. 10.2478/nor‑2021‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0003 [Google Scholar]
30. Krzyżanowski, Michal and Mats Ekstrom
    2022 “The Normalization of Far-Right Populism and Nativist Authoritarianism: Discursive Practices in Media, Journalism and the Wider Public Sphere/s” Discourse and Society, no.. 10.1177/09579265221095406
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221095406 [Google Scholar]
31. Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Mats Ekström
    2022 “The normalization of far-right populism and nativist authoritarianism: Discursive practices in media, journalism and the wider public sphere/s.” Discourse & Society (): –. 10.1177/09579265221095406
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221095406 [Google Scholar]
32. Krämer, Benjamin, and Christina Holtz-Bacha
    2020 Perspectives on Populism and the Media: Avenues for Research. Baden-Baden: Nomos. 10.5771/9783845297392
    https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845297392 [Google Scholar]
33. Kroenig, Matthew
    2020 The Return of Great Power Rivalry: Democracy versus Autocracy from the Ancient World to the U.S. and China. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190080242.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190080242.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
34. Larina, Tatiana
    2015 “Culture-specific Communicative Styles as a Framework for Interpreting Linguistic and Cultural Idiosyncrasies.” International Review of Pragmatics, no.: –. 10.1163/18773109‑00702003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-00702003 [Google Scholar]
35. Larina, Tatiana, Mustajoki Arto and Ekaterina Protassova
    2017 “Dimensions of Russian Culture and Mind.” InPhilosophical and Cultural Interpretations of Russian Modernisation, edited byKatja Lehtisaari and Arto Mustajok. –. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Larina, Tatiana and Douglas Mark Ponton
    2020 “Tact or Frankness in English and Russian Blind Peer Reviews.” Intercultural Pragmatics, no.: –. 10.1515/ip‑2020‑4004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2020-4004 [Google Scholar]
37. Lassila, Jussi
    2018 “Putin as a Non-Populist Autocrat.” Russian Politics, no. (June): –. 10.1163/2451‑8921‑00302002
    https://doi.org/10.1163/2451-8921-00302002 [Google Scholar]
38. Macagno, Fabrizio
    2014 “Manipulating Emotions: Value-Based Reasoning and Emotive Language.” Argumentation and Advocacy, no.: –. 10.1080/00028533.2014.11821842
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2014.11821842 [Google Scholar]
39. Mamontov, Vladimir D., Tatiana M. Kozhevnikova, and Yana Y. Radyukova
    2014 “Collectivism and Individualism in Modern Russia.” Asia Social Science, no. (November): –. 10.5539/ass.v10n23p199
    https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n23p199 [Google Scholar]
40. Martin James, R.
    2004 “Mourning: How we Get Aligned.” Discourse and Society, no.: –. 10.1177/0957926504041022
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504041022 [Google Scholar]
41. Mehta, Jayur Madhusudan, Chakrabarti Choeeta, De Leon Jessica, Homan Patricia, Skipton Tara, and Rachel Sparkman
    2023 “Assessing the Role of Collectivism and Individualism on Covid-19 Beliefs and Behaviors in the Southeastern United States.” PLoS ONE, no. (January). 10.1371/journal.pone.0278929
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278929 [Google Scholar]
42. Naumov, Alexander, and Sheila Puffer
    2020 “Measuring Russian Culture using Hofstede’s Dimensions.” Applied Psychology, no.: –. 10.1111/1464‑0597.00041
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00041 [Google Scholar]
43. Pavlina, Svetlana Y.
    2022 “Pragmatic and Stylistic Perspectives on British and American Covid-19 Cartoons.” Russian Journal of Linguistics, no.: –. 10.22363/2687‑0088‑27107
    https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-27107 [Google Scholar]
44. Ponton, Douglas Mark
    2021 “Never in my Life have I Heard such a Load of absolute Nonsense. Wtf.” Political Satire on the Handling of the Covid-19 Crisis”. Russian Journal of Linguistics, no.: –. 10.22363/2687‑0088‑2021‑25‑3‑767‑788
    https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-767-788 [Google Scholar]
45. Ponton, Douglas Mark, Ozyumenko Vladimir and Tatiana Larina
    2023 “Lingua-Cultural Identity in Translation: ‘We’ vs ‘I’ Cultures.” Journal of Language and Education, no.: –. 10.17323/jle.2023.17832
    https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.17832 [Google Scholar]
46. Ponton, Douglas Mark and Davletshina, Dilyara
    2022 “Poems in Lockdown: Cultural Aspects of English and Russian Coroneologisms.” Topics in Linguistics, no. (June): –. 10.2478/topling‑2022‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2022-0003 [Google Scholar]
47. Purnell, Sonia
    2022 “Reality is Closing in on Boris Johnson, a Narcissist Scared of What He has Unleashed.” Accessed12 February, 2022. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jun/25/reality-is-closing-in-on-boris-johnson-narcissist
48. Schnepf, Julia, and Ursula Christmann
    2021 “It’s a War! It’s a Battle! It’s a Fight!: Do Militaristic Metaphors Increase People’s Threat Perceptions and Support for Covid-19 Policies?” International Journal of Psychology, no: –. 10.1002/ijop.12797
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12797 [Google Scholar]
49. Tower, Rupert Kinglake, Caroline Kelly, and Anne Richards
    1997 “Individualism, collectivism and reward allocation: A cross-cultural study in Russia and Britain.” British Journal of Social Psychology(): –. 10.1111/j.2044‑8309.1997.tb01135.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01135.x [Google Scholar]
50. Van Dijk, Teun
    1993 “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse and Society, no. (April): –. 10.1177/0957926593004002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 [Google Scholar]
51. Van Dijk, Teun
    2013 “Ideological Discourse Analysis.” Accessed12 Febraury 2024. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/11271699/ideological-discourse-analysis-website-of-teun-a-van-dijk
52. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    1996 “The Representation of Social Actors.” InTexts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited byMalcolm Coulthard and Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard. –. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Waylen, Georgina
    2021 “Gendering Political Leadership: Hypermasculine Leadership and Covid-19.” Journal of European Public Policy, no.: –. 10.1080/13501763.2021.1942160
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1942160 [Google Scholar]
54. Wierzbicka, Anna
    2003/1991 Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110220964
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110220964 [Google Scholar]
55. Wierzbicka, Anna
    1994 Cultural Scripts: A Semantic Approach to Cultural Analysis and Cross-Cultural Communication. Pragmatics and Language Learning: –.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Wilson, John
    1990 Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. Oxford, UK and Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
57. Wilson, Nick
    2019 “When we means you: The social meaning of English pseudoinclusive personal pronouns”, inPaul Bouissac (ed), The Social Dynamics of Pronominal Systems. A comparative approach. Amsterdam, John Benjamins (ebook), 10.1075/pbns.304.02wil.
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.304.02wil [Google Scholar]
58. Winter Eugene, O.
    1977 “A Clause-Relational Approach to English texts: A Study of Some Predictive Lexical Items in Written Discourse.” Instructional Science, no.: –. 10.1007/BF00125597
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125597 [Google Scholar]
59. Yetiskin, Ebru
    2022 “Biopolitics of “Acquired Immunity”: The War Discourse and Feminist Response-abilities in Art, Science, and Technology during Covid-19.” OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, no.: –. 10.1089/omi.2022.0091
    https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2022.0091 [Google Scholar]
60. Zupnik, Yael-Janette
    1994 “A Pragmatic Analysis of the Use of Person Deixis in Political Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics, no.: –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90010‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90010-8 [Google Scholar]