1887
Volume 23, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862

Abstract

Abstract

In this article, I look at linguistic studies of communist propaganda produced by oppositional scholars in the last two decades of state socialism in Poland. I argue that Polish discourse of linguistics in 1970–1989 was a vehicle for the promotion of liberalism in the People’s Republic of Poland and an important area of political contestation. I demonstrate that Polish linguistic studies of communist propaganda should not be assumed to be “objective” or politically disengaged. Ideas about language detectable in these studies, especially “referentialism”, promote liberal democracy by consistently implying values characteristic of liberalism as a political ideology. In this way, Polish linguists engaged in a form of anti-communist resistance and formulated language policy proposals for the language of liberal democracy. I argue that language ideologies are sometimes systematically related to political ideologies by promoting specific political values or points of view.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.23014.sta
2023-11-28
2024-10-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jlp.23014.sta.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.23014.sta&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abbott, Barbara
    2006 “Definiteness and Indefiniteness”. InThe Handbook of Pragmatics, edited byLaurence R. Horn and Gregory L. Ward, 122–49. Malden, MA; Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756959.ch6
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756959.ch6 [Google Scholar]
  2. Antas, Jolanta
    2000O kłamstwie i kłamaniu: studium semantyczno-pragmatyczne [On Lies and Lying: a Semantic–Pragmatic Study]. Kraków: Universitas.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2013Semantyczność Ciała: Gesty Jako Znaki Myślenia [Semanticity of the Body: Gestures as Signs of Thought]. Łódź: Primum Verbum.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar, Nicole Dehé, and Anne Wichmann
    eds. 2009Where Prosody Meets Pragmatics. Bingley: Emerald. 10.1163/9789004253223
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253223 [Google Scholar]
  5. Berger, Peter Ludwig, and Thomas Luckmann
    1991The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bernhard, Michael H.
    1993The Origins of Democratization in Poland: Workers, Intellectuals, and Oppositional Politics, 1976–1980. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bokeriya, S. A., and A. A. Dieva
    2015 “Information Propaganda in the USSR as an Instrument of ‘Soft Power’”. RUDN Journal of Russian History31: 81–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bralczyk, Jerzy
    1985 “Ograniczony świat propagandy” [“The Limited World of Propaganda”]. InNowo-mowa, edited byAdam Heinz and Jolanta Rokoszowa, 99–109. London: Polonia Book Fund.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cameron, Deborah
    2006 “Ideology and Language”. Journal of Political Ideologies11 (2): 141–52. 10.1080/13569310600687916
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687916 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2012Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203123898
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203123898 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chambers, Jack K., and Natalie Schilling
    2013The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118335598
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118335598 [Google Scholar]
  12. Curzan, Anne
    2014Fixing English: Prescriptivism and Language History. Cambridge: University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139107327
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139107327 [Google Scholar]
  13. Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison
    2007Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Davies, Norman
    1984Heart of Europe: A Short History of Poland. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Deterding, Nicole M., and Mary C. Waters
    2021 “Flexible Coding of In-Depth Interviews: A Twenty-First-Century Approach”. Sociological Methods & Research50 (2): 708–39. 10.1177/0049124118799377
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799377 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ephratt, Michal
    2011 “Linguistic, Paralinguistic and Extralinguistic Speech and Silence”. Journal of Pragmatics43 (9): 2286–2307. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.006 [Google Scholar]
  17. Errington, James Joseph
    2008Linguistics in a Colonial World a Story of Language, Meaning, and Power. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Fairclough, Norman
    1995Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Fawcett, Edmund
    2018Liberalism: The Life of an Idea. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Foucault, Michel
    1972The Archaeology of Knowledge. Translated byA. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Freeden, Michael
    2005Liberal Languages Ideological Imaginations and Twentieth-Century Progressive Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Friszke, Andrzej
    2011 “Opozycja w Polsce 1956–1980” [“Opposition in Poland 1956–1980”]. InPRL od grudnia 70 do czerwca 89 [People’s Republic of Poland from December 1970 to June 1989], edited byKrzysztof Persak and Paweł Machcewicz, 123–45. Warszawa: Bellona.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gal, Susan
    2006 “Migration, Minorities and Multilingualism: Language Ideologies in Europe”. InLanguage Ideologies, Policies, and Practices: Language and the Future of Europe, edited byClare Mar-Molinero and Patrick Stevenson, 13–27. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230523883_2
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523883_2 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gamble, Andrew
    2009 “The Western Ideology”. Government and Opposition44 (1): 1–19. 10.1111/j.1477‑7053.2008.01273.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2008.01273.x [Google Scholar]
  25. Gary, Brett
    1999The Nervous Liberals: Propaganda Anxieties from World War I to the Cold War. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Geertz, Clifford
    2000Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. Basic Books. hdl.handle.net/2027/heb31369.0001.001
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 1973The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Głowiński, Michał
    1990Nowomowa po polsku [Newspeak in Polish]. Warszawa: PEN.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Grice, Herbert Paul
    1991Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Gumperz, John J., and Stephen C. Levinson
    eds. 1996Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Harris, Roy
    1981The Language Myth. London: Duckworth.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 1990 “On Freedom of Speech”. InIdeologies of Language, edited byJ. E. Joseph and T. J. Taylor, 153–61. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hazony, Yoram
    2022Conservatism: A Rediscovery. London: Forum.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Heinz, Adam, and Jolanta Rokoszowa
    eds. 1985Nowo-mowa [New-speak]. London: Polonia Book Fund.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hill, Jane H.
    1998 “‘Today There Is No Respect’: Nostalgia, ‘Respect’, and Oppositional Discourse in Mexicano (Nahuatl) Language Ideology”. InLanguage Ideologies: Practice and Theory, edited byB. B. Schieffelin, K. A. Woolard, and P. V. Kroskrity, 68–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195105612.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195105612.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  36. Irvine, Judith T., and Susan Gal
    2000 “Language Ideology and Linguistic Differentiation”. InRegimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities & Identities, edited byPaul V. Kroskrity, 35–83. Santa Fe: James Currey.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Joseph, John E.
    1987Eloquence and Power. The Rise of Language Standards and Standard Languages. London: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2004Language and Identity: National, Ethnic, Religious. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230503427
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503427 [Google Scholar]
  39. Karpiński, Jakub
    1984Mowa do ludu: szkice o języku polityki [Talk to the People: Essays on the Language of Politics]. London: Puls.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Krastev, Ivan, and Stephen Holmes
    2020The Light That Failed: A Reckoning. London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Kroskrity, Paul V.
    2005 “Language Ideologies”. InA Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, 496–517. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470996522.ch22
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996522.ch22 [Google Scholar]
  42. Kubik, Jan
    1994The Power of Symbols against the Symbols of Power: The Rise of Solidarity and the Fall of State Socialism in Poland. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 2020 “Against the Imitation Thesis: A Critical Reading of The Light That Failed by Ivan Krastev and Stephen Holmes”. InConcilium Civitas Almanac 2020/2021. conciliumcivitas.pl/concilium-civitas-almanac-2020-2021-professor-jan-kubik-against-the-imitation-thesis-a-critical-reading-of-the-light-that-failed-by-ivan-krastev-and-stephen-holmes/
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
    1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Laruelle, Marlene
    2022 “Illiberalism: A Conceptual Introduction”. East European Politics38 (2): 303–27. 10.1080/21599165.2022.2037079
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2022.2037079 [Google Scholar]
  46. Lebow, Katherine
    2013Unfinished Utopia: Nowa Huta, Stalinism, and Polish Society, 1949–56. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 10.7591/cornell/9780801451249.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9780801451249.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  47. Lieb, Hans-Heinrich
    1993Linguistic Variables: Towards a Unified Theory of Linguistic Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.108
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.108 [Google Scholar]
  48. Ligarski, Sebastian, and Rafał Łatka
    eds. 2020Oficjalna prasa w PRL [Official Press in the People’s Republic of Poland] Szczecin-Warszawa: Instytut Pamięci Narodowej.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Linz, Juan J., and Alfred C. Stepan
    1996Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. 10.56021/9780801851575
    https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801851575 [Google Scholar]
  50. Lippi-Green, Rosina
    1997English with an Accent: Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Mill, John Stuart
    2012On Liberty. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Musolff, Andreas
    2010Metaphor, Nation and the Holocaust: The Concept of the Body Politic. Routledge Critical Studies in Discourse. Florence: Taylor & Francis Group. 10.4324/9780203847282
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847282 [Google Scholar]
  53. Nowak, Leszek
    1991Power and Civil Society: Toward a Dynamic Theory of Real Socialism. New York: Greenwood.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Milroy, James, and Lesley Milroy
    2012Authority in Language: Investigating Standard English. Routledge Linguistics Classics. Florence: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203124666
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203124666 [Google Scholar]
  55. Pütz, Martin, and Marjolijn Verspoor
    eds. 2000Explorations in Linguistic Relativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.199
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.199 [Google Scholar]
  56. Puzynina, Jadwiga
    1985 ‘O pojęciu “manipulacja” oraz sensie wyrażenia: “manipulacja językowa”’ [“On the Concept of ‘Manipulation’ and the Meaning of the Expression ‘Linguistic Manipulation’”]. InNowo-mowa, edited byAdam Heinz and Jolanta Rokoszowa, 48–63. London: Polonia Book Fund.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Ricœur, Paul
    1986Lectures on Ideology and Utopia. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Rokoszowa, Jolanta
    1985 “Słowo wstępne” [“Introduction”]. InNowo-mowa, edited byAdam Heinz and Jolanta Rokoszowa, 9–12. London: Polonia Book Fund.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Romek, Zbigniew
    2015 “System cenzury PRL” [“The System of Censorship in the People’s Republic of Poland]. InWielka księga cenzury PRL w dokumentach [The Big Book of Censorship in the People’s Republic of Poland in Documents], byTomasz Strzyżewski, 9–27. Warszawa: Prohibita.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Rothschild, Joseph
    2008Return to Diversity: A Political History of East Central Europe since World War II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Schlesinger, Izchak M.
    1991 “The Wax and Wane of Whorfian Views“. InThe Influence of Language on Culture and Thought, edited byRobert L. Cooper and Bernard J. Spolsky, 7–44. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110859010‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110859010-002 [Google Scholar]
  62. Sclafani, Jennifer
    2017Talking Donald Trump: A Sociolinguistic Study of Style, Metadiscourse, and Political Identity. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315276885
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315276885 [Google Scholar]
  63. Scott, James C.
    1990Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Semków, Piotr
    ed. 2004Propaganda PRL: wybrane problemy. Gdańsk: Instytut Pamięci Narodowej.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Silverstein, Michael
    1976 “Shifters, Linguistic Categories and Cultural Description”. InMeaning in Anthropology, edited byK. H. Basso and H. A. Selby. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Spolsky, Bernard
    2009Language Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Stanley, Jason
    2015How Propaganda Works. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Takeuchi, Jae Dibello
    2021 “Language Ideologies among Japanese Foreign Language Teachers: Keigo and L2 Speakers”. Foreign Language Annals54 (3): 589–606. 10.1111/flan.12575
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12575 [Google Scholar]
  69. Taylor, Talbot J.
    1990 “Which Is to Be Master? The Institutionalization of Authority in the Science of Language”. InIdeologies of Language, edited byJ. E. Joseph and T. J. Taylor, 9–26. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Underhill, James W.
    2011Creating Worldviews: Metaphor, Ideology and Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748647002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748647002 [Google Scholar]
  71. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    1977Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. 2006 “Ideology and Discourse Analysis”. Journal of Political Ideologies11 (2): 115–40. 10.1080/13569310600687908
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908 [Google Scholar]
  73. Vessey, Rachelle, and Elena Nicolai
    2022 “The Language Ideologies of Multilingual Nannies in London”. Journal of Sociolinguistics. Early view: 1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Wierzbicka, Anna
    1990 “Antitotalitarian Language in Poland: Some Mechanisms of Linguistic Self-Defense”. Language in Society19 (1): 1–59. 10.1017/S004740450001410X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001410X [Google Scholar]
  75. Wodak, Ruth
    2007 “Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry”. Pragmatics & Cognition15 (1): 203–25. 10.1075/pc.15.1.13wod
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.15.1.13wod [Google Scholar]
  76. Woolard, Kathryn A.
    2020 “Language Ideology”. InThe International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology, edited byJames Stanlaw. Hoboken: Wiley. 10.1002/9781118786093.iela0217
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786093.iela0217 [Google Scholar]
  77. Woolard, Kathryn A., and Bambi B. Schieffelin
    1994 “Language Ideology”. Annual Review of Anthropology231: 55–82. 10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.000415
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.000415 [Google Scholar]
  78. Zarycki, Tomasz
    2022Polish Elite and Language Sciences. A Perspective of Global Historical Sociology. Basingbroke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑07345‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07345-8 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.23014.sta
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error