1887
image of Interests convergence in global human rights politics
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

What explains the convergence and divergence of states’ interests related to global human rights? This study examines the dyadic similarity of the language used in the multilateral dialogue focusing on the role of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and intergovernmental organizations (IGOs). The joint activities of NGOs influence states, and human rights norms are transmitted through IGOs. Using text analysis methods, the similarity between state recommendations during the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) process at the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) is systematically quantified. Analyses suggest that a pair of states are more likely to use similar language in UPR recommendations as the number of joint activities of NGOs, shared memberships in IGOs, and shared experience in the UNHRC increases. The effects are robust even after controlling for different types of political relationships between states.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.23016.kim
2024-02-26
2024-12-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abbott, Kenneth W., and Duncan Snidal
    1998 “Why States Act through Formal International Organizations.” Journal of Conflict Resolution (): –. 10.1177/0022002798042001001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002798042001001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailey, Michael A., Anton Strezhnev, and Erik Voeten
    2017 “Estimating Dynamic State Preferences from United Nations Voting Data.” Journal of Conflict Resolution (): –. 10.1177/0022002715595700
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002715595700 [Google Scholar]
  3. Banta, Benjamin
    2013 “Analysing Discourse as a Causal Mechanism.” European Journal of International Relations (): –. 10.1177/1354066111428970
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111428970 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barbieri, Katherine, and Omar M. G. Omar Keshk
    2016 “Correlates of War Project Trade Data Set Codebook, Version 4.0.” correlatesofwar.org
  5. Baturo, Alexander, Niheer Dasandi, and Slava J. Mikhaylov
    2017 “Understanding State Preferences with Text as Data: Introducing the UN General Debate Corpus.” Research & Politics (): 2053168017712821. 10.1177/2053168017712821
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168017712821 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bearce, David H., and Stacy Bondanella
    2007 “Intergovernmental Organizations, Socialization, and Member-State Interest Convergence.” International Organization (): –. 10.1017/S0020818307070245
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818307070245 [Google Scholar]
  7. Beel, Joeran, Bela Gipp, Stefan Langer, and Corinna Breitinger
    2016 “Research-Paper Recommender Systems: A Literature Survey.” International Journal on Digital Libraries (): –. 10.1007/s00799‑015‑0156‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-015-0156-0 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheibub, Jose Antonio, Jennifer Gandhi, and James Raymond Vreeland
    2010 “Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited.(Report).” Public Choice (): –. 10.1007/s11127‑009‑9491‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9491-2 [Google Scholar]
  9. Conrad, Courtenay R., and Emily Hencken Ritter
    2019Contentious Compliance: Dissent and Repression under International Human Rights Law. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190910976.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190910976.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  10. DeMeritt, Jacqueline H. R.
    2012 “International Organizations and Government Killing: Does Naming and Shaming Save Lives?” International Interactions (): –. 10.1080/03050629.2012.726180
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2012.726180 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dietrich, Simone, and Amanda Murdie
    2017 “Human Rights Shaming through INGOs and Foreign Aid Delivery.” The Review of International Organizations (): –. 10.1007/s11558‑015‑9242‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-015-9242-8 [Google Scholar]
  12. Engstrom, Par
    2010 “Human Rights: Effectiveness of International and Regional Mechanisms.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies 2010 10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.214
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.214 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fariss, Christopher J.
    2014 “Respect for Human Rights Has Improved Over Time: Modeling the Changing Standard of Accountability.” American Political Science Review (): –. 10.1017/S0003055414000070
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000070 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2018 “The Changing Standard of Accountability and the Positive Relationship between Human Rights Treaty Ratification and Compliance.” British Journal of Political Science (): –. 10.1017/S000712341500054X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341500054X [Google Scholar]
  15. Fink, Simon
    2013 “‘When I Find Myself in Times of Trouble …’ : The Conditional Effect of International Organisations on Policy Convergence.” European Journal of Political Research (): –. 10.1111/1475‑6765.12006
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12006 [Google Scholar]
  16. Finnemore, Martha
    1993 “International Organizations as Teachers of Norms: The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cutural Organization and Science Policy.” International Organization, –. 10.1017/S0020818300028101
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028101 [Google Scholar]
  17. Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink
    1998 “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization (): –. 10.1162/002081898550789
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789 [Google Scholar]
  18. Goodman, Ryan, and Derek Jinks
    2013Socializing States: Promoting Human Rights Through International Law. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199300990.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199300990.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gibler, Douglas M.
    2009International Military Alliances 1648–2008 CQ Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Greenhill, Brian
    2010 “The Company You Keep: International Socialization and the Diffusion of Human Rights Norms.” International Studies Quarterly (): –. 10.1111/j.1468‑2478.2009.00580.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00580.x [Google Scholar]
  21. 2016Transmitting Rights: International Organizations and the Diffusion of Human Rights Practices. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190271633.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190271633.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gurciullo, S., and S. J. Mikhaylov
    2017 “Detecting Policy Preferences and Dynamics in the UN General Debate with Neural Word Embeddings.” In2017 International Conference on the Frontiers and Advances in Data Science (FADS), –. 10.1109/FADS.2017.8253197
    https://doi.org/10.1109/FADS.2017.8253197 [Google Scholar]
  23. Haas, Peter M.
    1992 “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization, –. 10.1017/S0020818300001442
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hafner-Burton, Emilie M.
    2005 “Trading Human Rights: How Preferential Trade Agreements Influence Government Repression.” International Organization (): –. 10.1017/S0020818305050216
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050216 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Kiyoteru Tsutsui
    2007 “Justice Lost! The Failure of International Human Rights Law To Matter Where Needed Most.” Journal of Peace Research (): –. 10.1177/0022343307078942
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343307078942 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hansen, Holley E., Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, and Stephen C. Nemeth
    2008 “IO Mediation of Interstate Conflicts: Moving Beyond the Global versus Regional Dichotomy.” Journal of Conflict Resolution (): –. 10.1177/0022002707313693
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002707313693 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hansen, Lene
    2013Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203236338
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203236338 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hathaway, Oona A.
    2002 “Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?” Yale Law Journal (): –. 10.2307/797642
    https://doi.org/10.2307/797642 [Google Scholar]
  29. Human Rights Council
    Human Rights Council 2013 “Summary Prepared by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Accordance with Paragraph 15 (b) of the Annex to Human Rights Council Resolution 5/1 and Paragraph 5 of the Annex to Council Resolution 16/21.”
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Jackson, Richard
    2007 “Constructing Enemies:‘Islamic Terrorism’in Political and Academic Discourse.” Government and Opposition (): –. 10.1111/j.1477‑7053.2007.00229.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00229.x [Google Scholar]
  31. Jansa, Joshua M., Eric R. Hansen, and Virginia H. Gray
    2019 “Copy and Paste Lawmaking: Legislative Professionalism and Policy Reinvention in the States.” American Politics Research (): –. 10.1177/1532673X18776628
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X18776628 [Google Scholar]
  32. Johnston, Alastair Iain
    2001 “Treating International Institutions as Social Environments.” International Studies Quarterly (): –. 10.1111/0020‑8833.00212
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00212 [Google Scholar]
  33. Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink
    1998Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY; London: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kentikelenis, Alexander, and Erik Voeten
    2020 “Legitimacy Challenges to the Liberal World Order: Evidence from United Nations Speeches, 1970–2018.” The Review of International Organizations, October. 10.1007/s11558‑020‑09404‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-020-09404-y [Google Scholar]
  35. Kohlenberg, Paul J., Nadine Godehardt, Stephen Aris, Fred Sündermann, Aglaya Snetkov, and Juliet Fall
    2019 “Introducing UNSCdeb8 (Beta): A Database for Corpus-Driven Research on the United Nations Security Council.” SWP Working Paper: Research Division Asia, WP-01.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Krain, Matthew
    2012 “J’accuse! Does Naming and Shaming Perpetrators Reduce the Severity of Genocides or Politicides?” International Studies Quarterly (): –. 10.1111/j.1468‑2478.2012.00732.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00732.x [Google Scholar]
  37. Lupu, Yonatan
    2013 “Best Evidence: The Role of Information in Domestic Judicial Enforcement of International Human Rights Agreements.” International Organization (): –. 10.1017/S002081831300012X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081831300012X [Google Scholar]
  38. Murdie, Amanda
    2014Help or Harm: The Human Security Effects of International NGOs. Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Murdie, Amanda, and Dursun Peksen
    2013 “The Impact of Human Rights INGO Activities on Economic Sanctions.” The Review of International Organizations (): –. 10.1007/s11558‑012‑9146‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-012-9146-9 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2014 “The Impact of Human Rights INGO Shaming on Humanitarian Interventions.” The Journal of Politics (): –. 10.1017/S0022381613001242
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613001242 [Google Scholar]
  41. Oneal, John R., and Bruce Russett
    2000Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Peterson, Timothy M., Amanda Murdie, and Victor Asal
    2018 “Human Rights, NGO Shaming and the Exports of Abusive States.” British Journal of Political Science (): –. 10.1017/S0007123416000065
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000065 [Google Scholar]
  43. Pevehouse, Jon C. W., Timothy Nordstrom, Roseanne W. McManus, and Anne Spencer Jamison
    2019 “Tracking Organizations in the World: The Correlates of War IGO Version 3.0 Datasets.” Journal of Peace Research, December, 0022343319881175. 10.1177/0022343319881175
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343319881175 [Google Scholar]
  44. Pevehouse, Jon, and Bruce Russett
    2006 “Democratic International Governmental Organizations Promote Peace.” International Organization (): –. 10.1017/S0020818306060322
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818306060322 [Google Scholar]
  45. Posner, Eric A.
    2014The Twilight of Human Rights Law / Eric A. Posner. Inalienable Rights Series. Oxford, UK ; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Risse, Thomas, Steve C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink
    1999The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change / Edited byThomas Risse, Stephen C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink. Cambridge Studies in International Relations 66. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511598777
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598777 [Google Scholar]
  47. Ruggie, John Gerard
    1998 “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge.” International Organization (): –. 10.1162/002081898550770
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550770 [Google Scholar]
  48. Ryu, Ki Eun
    2020 “Dynamics of International Treaty Diffusion.” University of Iowa. 10.17077/etd.005580
    https://doi.org/10.17077/etd.005580 [Google Scholar]
  49. Sakamoto, Takuto
    2020 “Cross-National Analysis of Global Security Discourse Using Word Embeddings.” Preprint. Politics and International Relations. 10.33774/apsa‑2020‑5k2mt
    https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2020-5k2mt [Google Scholar]
  50. Schönfeld, Mirco, Steffen Eckhard, Ronny Patz, and Hilde van Meegdenburg
    2018 “Discursive Landscapes and Unsupervised Topic Modeling in IR: A Validation of Text-as-Data Approaches through a New Corpus of UN Security Council Speeches on Afghanistan.” arXiv Preprint arXiv:1810.05572.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Simmons, Beth A., and Robert Shaffer
    2019 “Globalization and Border Securitization in International Discourse.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3480613. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. 10.2139/ssrn.3480613
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3480613 [Google Scholar]
  52. Suzuki, Shogo
    2015 “The Rise of the Chinese ‘Other’in Japan’s Construction of Identity: Is China a Focal Point of Japanese Nationalism?” The Pacific Review (): –. 10.1080/09512748.2014.970049
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2014.970049 [Google Scholar]
  53. Watanabe, Kohei, and Yuan Zhou
    2020 “Theory-Driven Analysis of Large Corpora: Semisupervised Topic Classification of the UN Speeches.” Social Science Computer Review, February, 0894439320907027. 10.1177/0894439320907027
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320907027 [Google Scholar]
  54. Wendt, Alexander
    1999Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511612183
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612183 [Google Scholar]
  55. World Bank
    World Bank 2019 “World Development Indicators” 2019 https://databank.worldbank.org/
  56. Zürn, Michael, and Jeffrey T. Checkel
    2005 “Getting Socialized to Build Bridges: Constructivism and Rationalism, Europe and the Nation-State.” International Organization, –. 10.1017/S0020818305050356
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050356 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.23016.kim
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.23016.kim
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: text analysis ; human rights ; United Nations
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error