1887
Volume 22, Issue 6
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862

Abstract

Abstract

To better understand QAnon’s anti-immigration rhetoric, the study conducted a meta-discursive analysis of one of the group’s active Telegram channels by drawing on Hyland’s (2005) model of interaction. Specifically, engagement markers in their immigration-related discourse were analyzed to see how they contribute to endorsing the group’s macro conspiratorial arguments. The results illustrate a complex rhetorical manipulation and nearly unanimous expression of hate toward immigrants, with the use of ‘directives’ and ‘questions’ being the most prevalent metadiscursive markers. The former suggests that the commenters were more assertive or commanding in their tone, while the latter located within rhetorical persuasion, aimed at stimulating negative attitude toward immigrants. Conversely, a low frequency of the ‘shared knowledge’ markers indicates a lack of interest to establish credibility and constructive dialogue with the audience. The study aimed to unpack the nature of anti-immigration extremist discourse on social media, and its potential to incite violence among public.

Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.23038.ras
2023-09-22
2024-06-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jlp.23038.ras.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.23038.ras&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Al-Subhi, Aisha Saadi
    2022 “Metadiscourse in online advertising: Exploring linguistic and visual metadiscourse in social media advertisements.” Journal of Pragmatics1871: 24–40. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.027
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.027 [Google Scholar]
  2. Argentino, Marc-André
    2021 “QAnon and the storm of the US Capitol: The offline effect of online conspiracy theories.”. The Conversation. Last ModifiedJanuary 7, 2021. https://theconversation.com/qanon-and-the-storm-of-the-u-s-capitol-the-offline-effect-of-online-conspiracy-theories-152815
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Argentino, Marc-André, Blythe Crawford, Florence Keen, and Hannah Rose
    2021Far From Gone: The Evolution of Extremism in the First 100 Days of the Biden Administration. International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation (ICSR). https://icsr.info/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/ICSR-Infographic-Far-From-Gone-The-Evolution-of-Extremism-in-the-First-100-Days-of-the-Biden-Administration.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BBC
    BBC 2022 “Giorgia Meloni: Migrants’ fears over Italy’s new far-right prime minister.” AccessedApril 25, 2023. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-63330850
  5. Billig, Michael
    2001 “Humour and hatred: The racist jokes of the Ku Klux Klan.” Discourse & Society12 (3): 267–289. 10.1177/0957926501012003001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012003001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bloch, Katrina Rebecca, Tiffany Taylor, and Karen Martinez
    2020 “Playing the race card: White injury, White victimhood and the paradox of colour-blind ideology in anti-immigrant discourse.” Ethnic and Racial Studies43 (7): 1130–1148. 10.1080/01419870.2019.1648844
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2019.1648844 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge university press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  8. Burnette, Jessie, and Andreea S. Calude
    2022 “Wake up New Zealand! Directives, politeness and stance in Twitter# Covid19NZ posts.” Journal of Pragmatics1961: 6–23. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  9. Calderón, Carlos Arcila, Gonzalo de la Vega, and David Blanco Herrero
    2020 “Topic Modeling and Characterization of Hate Speech against Immigrants on Twitter around the Emergence of a Far-Right Party in Spain” Social Sciences9 (11): 188. 10.3390/socsci9110188
    https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9110188 [Google Scholar]
  10. Camille, Katherine
    2021 “But you have to have been there to know what we are talking about”: An Examination of the Rhetorical Environments of Cults and Other Extremist Groups and How They Lead to Violence.” Honors Thesis, The University of Maine. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors/641/
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cao, Andy, Jason M. Lindo, and Jiee Zhong
    2022Can Social Media Rhetoric Incite Hate Incidents? Evidence from Trump’s” Chinese Virus” Tweets. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w30588. 10.3386/w30588
    https://doi.org/10.3386/w30588 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chouliaraki, Lilie, and Norman Fairclough
    1999Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cinelli, Matteo, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Alessandro Galeazzi, Walter Quattrociocchi, and Michele Starnini
    2021 “The echo chamber effect on social media.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118 (9): e2023301118. 10.1073/pnas.2023301118
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cisneros, J David
    2008 “Contaminated communities: The metaphor of” immigrant as pollutant” in media representations of immigration.” Rhetoric & public affairs11 (4): 569–601. 10.1353/rap.0.0068
    https://doi.org/10.1353/rap.0.0068 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cole, Georgia
    2017 “The role of semiotics in connecting the spaces, words and embodied experiences of refugee politics.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers42 (2): 303–316. 10.1111/tran.12164
    https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12164 [Google Scholar]
  16. Crawford, Blyth, and Marc-Andre Argentino
    2021 “QAnon Women in Politics Part One: The QAnon Candidates.” Last ModifiedApril 28, 2021. https://gnet-research.org/2021/04/28/qanon-women-in-politics-part-one-the-qanon-candidates/
  17. Crowley, James
    2020 “6 celebs who have helped spread the QAnon conspiracy.”. Newsweek. AccessedAugust 20. https://www.newsweek.com/celebrities-who-have-tweeted-about-qanon-1526473
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Cruz, Freddy
    2022 “How anti-government extremists and QAnon took over the southern border.”. AccessedApril 14, 2023. https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2022/08/08/how-antigovernment-extremists-and-qanon-took-over-southern-border
  19. De Zeeuw, Daniël, and Alex Gekker
    2023 “A God-Tier LARP? QAnon as Conspiracy Fictioning.” Social Media+ Society9 (1). 10.1177/20563051231157300
    https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231157300 [Google Scholar]
  20. DeChaine, D Robert
    2009 “Bordering the civic imaginary: Alienization, fence logic, and the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps.” Quarterly Journal of Speech95 (1): 43–65. 10.1080/00335630802621078
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630802621078 [Google Scholar]
  21. Demata, Massimiliano, Virginia Zorzi, and Angela Zottola
    2022Conspiracy Theory Discourses. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/dapsac.98
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.98 [Google Scholar]
  22. Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga
    2021 “Engaging with the reader in research articles in English: Variation across disciplines and linguacultural backgrounds.” English for Specific Purposes631: 18–32. 10.1016/j.esp.2021.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ferraro, Vincent
    2016 “Immigration and Crime in the New Destinations, 2000–2007: A Test of the Disorganizing Effect of Migration.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology321: 23–45. 10.1007/s10940‑015‑9252‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-015-9252-y [Google Scholar]
  24. Flores, Lisa A.
    2003 “Constructing rhetorical borders: Peons, illegal aliens, and competing narratives of immigration.” Critical Studies in Media Communication20 (4): 362–387. 10.1080/0739318032000142025
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0739318032000142025 [Google Scholar]
  25. Forberg, Peter L.
    2022 “From the fringe to the fore: an algorithmic ethnography of the far-right conspiracy theory group QAnon.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography51 (3): 291–317. 10.1177/08912416211040560
    https://doi.org/10.1177/08912416211040560 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hakoköngäs, Eemeli, Otto Halmesvaara, and Inari Sakki
    2020 “Persuasion through bitter humor: Multimodal discourse analysis of rhetoric in internet memes of two far-right groups in Finland.” Social Media + Society6 (2). 10.1177/2056305120921575
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120921575 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hart, Christopher
    2008 “Critical discourse analysis and metaphor: Toward a theoretical framework.” Critical discourse studies5 (2): 91–106. 10.1080/17405900801990058
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900801990058 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hautli-Janisz, Annette, Katarzyna Budzynska, Conor McKillop, Brian Plüss, Valentin Gold, and Chris Reed
    2022 “Questions in argumentative dialogue.” Journal of Pragmatics1881: 56–79. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.029
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.029 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hoops, Joshua F., and Keli Braitman
    2018 “The influence of immigration terminology on attribution and empathy.” Critical Discourse Studies16 (2): 149–161. 10.1080/17405904.2018.1535989
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1535989 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hulteng, John L.
    1973The Opinion Function: Editorial and Interpretive Writing for the News Media. New York: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hyland, Ken
    2005Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 2012Disciplinary Identities: Individuality and Community in Academic Discourse. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. 10.1017/9781009406512
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009406512 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hyland, Ken, and Polly Tse
    2005 “Hooking the Reader: A Corpus Study of Evaluative That in Abstracts.” English for Specific Purposes241: 123–139. 10.1016/j.esp.2004.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  34. Jaspal, Rusi, and Glynis M. Breakwell
    eds. 2014Identity Process Theory: Identity, Social Action and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139136983
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139136983 [Google Scholar]
  35. KhosraviNik, Majid
    2010 “The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers: A critical discourse analysis.” Journal of language and Politics9 (1): 1–28. 10.1075/jlp.9.1.01kho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.1.01kho [Google Scholar]
  36. Knoblock, Natalia
    2020 “Negotiating dominance on Facebook: Positioning of self and others in pro-and anti-Trump comments on immigration.” Discourse & Society31 (5): 520–539. 10.1177/0957926520914684
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520914684 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kopytowska, Monika
    2013 “Blogging as the mediatization of politics and a new form of social interaction.” InAnalyzing genres in political communication, edited byPiotr Ka and Urszula Okulska, 379–421. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.50.15kop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.50.15kop [Google Scholar]
  38. Kopytowska, Monika, Łukasz Grabowski, and Julita Woźniak
    2017 “Mobilizing against the Other: Cyberhate, refugee crisis and proximization.” InContemporary discourses of hate and radicalism across space and genres, edited byMonika Kopytowska, 57–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.93.11kop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.93.11kop [Google Scholar]
  39. Lafuente-Millán, Enrique
    2013 “Reader engagement across cultures, languages and contexts of publication in business research articles.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics24 (2): 201–223. 10.1111/ijal.12019
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12019 [Google Scholar]
  40. Lee, Claire Seungeun, Juan Merizalde, John D. Colautti, Jisun An, and Haewoon Kwak
    2022 “Storm the Capitol: Linking Offline Political Speech and Online Twitter Extra-Representational Participation on QAnon and the January 6 Insurrection.” Frontiers in Sociology71. 10.3389/fsoc.2022.876070
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.876070 [Google Scholar]
  41. Light, Michael T.
    2017 “Re-examining the relationship between Latino immigration and racial/ethnic violence.” Social Science Research651: 222–239. 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  42. Ludemann, Dillon
    2018 “/pol/emics: Ambiguity, scales, and digital discourse on 4chan.” Discourse, context & media241: 92–98. 10.1016/j.dcm.2018.01.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.01.010 [Google Scholar]
  43. Lupu, Yonatan, Richard Sear, Nicolas Velásquez, Rhys Leahy, Nicholas Johnson Restrepo, Beth Goldberg, and Neil F. Johnson
    2023 “Offline events and online hate.” PLoS one18 (1): e0278511. 10.1371/journal.pone.0278511
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278511 [Google Scholar]
  44. MacMillen, Sarah Louise, and Timothy Rush
    2022 “QAnon – Religious Roots, Religious Responses.” Critical Sociology48 (6): 989–1004. 10.1177/08969205211063565
    https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205211063565 [Google Scholar]
  45. Marshall, Shantal R., and Jenessa R. Shapiro
    2018 “When ‘scurry’ vs.’hurry’ makes the difference: Vermin metaphors, disgust, and anti-immigrant attitudes.” Journal of Social Issues74 (4): 774–789. 10.1111/josi.12298
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12298 [Google Scholar]
  46. Masroor, Farzana
    2013 “Argumentative strategies of newspaper editorials in English across cultures.” The Asian ESP Journal Summer Edition9 (3): 35–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. McPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M. Cook
    2001 “Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks.” Annual Review of Sociology271: 415–444. 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 [Google Scholar]
  48. Mudde, Cas
    2019The far right today. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Müller, Karsten, and Carlo Schwarz
    2020 “From hashtag to hate crime: Twitter and anti-minority sentiment.” Social Science Research Network (SSRN). 10.2139/ssrn.3149103
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3149103 [Google Scholar]
  50. Ono, Kent A., and John M. Sloop
    2002Shifting borders: Rhetoric, immigration, and California’s Proposition 187. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Orts, María Ángeles
    2016 “Power distance and persuasion: The tension between imposition and legitimation in international legal genres.” Journal of Pragmatics921: 1–16. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.009 [Google Scholar]
  52. Peeters, Stijn, Tom Willaert, Marc Tuters, Katrien Beuls, Paul Van Eecke, and Jeroen Van Soest
    2023 “A Fringe Mainstreamed, or Tracing Antagonistic Slang between 4chan and Breitbart before and after Trump.” InHow Misinformation Propagates on Social Media: A Cross-platform Analysis, edited byRichard Rogers, 165–185. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Prooijen, Jan-Willem van, and Karen M. Douglas
    2017 “Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations.” Memory Studies10 (3): 323–333. 10.1177/1750698017701615
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017701615 [Google Scholar]
  54. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
    1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London and New York: Longman Group Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Reid, Lesley WIlliams, Harald E. Weiss, Robert M. Adelman, and Charles Jaret
    2005 “The immigration-crime relationship: Evidence across U.S. metropolitan areas.” Social Science Research34 (4): 757–780. 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  56. Relia, Kunal, Zhengyi Li, Stephanie H. Cook, and Rumi Chunara
    2019 “Race, Ethnicity and National Origin-Based Discrimination in Social Media and Hate Crimes across 100 U.S. Cities.” Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media13 (01): 417–427. 10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3354. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/3354
    https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3354 [Google Scholar]
  57. Richardson, John E., and Ruth Wodak
    2009 “Recontextualising fascist ideologies of the past: right-wing discourses on employment and nativism in Austria and the United Kingdom.” Critical Discourse Studies6 (4): 251–267. 10.1080/17405900903180996
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900903180996 [Google Scholar]
  58. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2001Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Rosenberg, Matthew, Astead. W. Herndon, and Nick Corasaniti
    2020 “Marjorie Taylor Greene, a QAnon supporter, wins House primary in Georgia.” The New York Times 2020, March 11, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/11/us/politics/marjorie-taylor-greene-qanon-georgia-primary.html
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Russonello, Giovanni
    2021 “QAnon now as popular in US as some major religions, poll suggests.” New York Times, May 27, 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/27/us/politics/qanon-republicans-trump.html
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Strom, Megan, and Emily Alcock
    2017 “Floods, waves, and surges: the representation of Latin@ immigrant children in the United States mainstream media.” Critical DIscourse Studies14 (4): 440–457. 10.1080/17405904.2017.1284137
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1284137 [Google Scholar]
  62. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    2015 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 466–485. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118584194.ch22
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch22 [Google Scholar]
  63. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2008Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford university press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  64. van Prooijen, Jan-Willem, and Karen M. Douglas
    2018 “Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain.” European journal of social psychology48 (7): 897–908. 10.1002/ejsp.2530
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2530 [Google Scholar]
  65. Webber, Pauline
    1994 “The function of questions in different medical journal genres.” English for Specific Purposes13 (3): 257–268. 10.1016/0889‑4906(94)90005‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90005-1 [Google Scholar]
  66. Winant, Howard
    1994Racial conditions: Politics, theory, comparisons. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/j.ctttss2b
    https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctttss2b [Google Scholar]
  67. Wodak, Ruth
    2016 “The Language of Walls.” YouTube Lecture, November 15, 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWa3T_6FNOQ
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
    2001 “Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory, and Methodology.” InMethods for Critical Discourse Analysis, edited byRuth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 1–33. London: SAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Yule, George
    1996Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford university press.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Zhang, Justine, Arthur Spirling, and Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil
    2017 “Asking too much? The rhetorical role of questions in political discourse.” InProceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1558–1572. Copenhagen, Denmark: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/D17‑1164
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D17-1164 [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhang, Yini, Zhiying Yue, Xiyu Yang, Fan Chen, and Nojin Kwak
    2022 “How a peripheral ideology becomes mainstream: Strategic performance, audience reaction, and news media amplification in the case of QAnon Twitter accounts.” New Media & Society. 10.1177/14614448221137324
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221137324 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.23038.ras
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.23038.ras
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error