1887
image of Legitimizing the interventions recommended in “European Research Area Policy Agenda 2022–2024”
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The EU Directorate General for Research and Innovation’s “European Research Area Policy Agenda: Overview of Actions for the Period 2022–2024” outlines twenty actions to boost research excellence, investment and reform, coordination and support, or green and digital transformation of the academia, in an attempt to create a truly common “European knowledge market.” Filled with strategic planning jargon, the policy specifies the recommended interventions for years to come and with billions of Euros of funding to follow. Using a qualitative critical discourse approach, this study explores policy-making from a linguistic perspective to capture the characteristics of current EU R&I discourse. Language choices have a constitutive role in policy papers due to the discursive capacity for legitimization and subsequent persuasion. The analysis focuses on the persuasive presuppositions induced by certain lexico-grammatical choices, including evaluative and rhetorical devices, and shows how the ERA policy fosters acceptance of a European vision of R&I values.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.23043.mol
2024-03-21
2024-10-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bauduceau, Nicolas, Berry, Pam, Cecchi, Claudio
    2015Towards an EU Research and Innovation Policy Agenda for Nature-based Solutions and Re-naturing Cities. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union. 10.2777/765301
    https://doi.org/10.2777/765301 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennett, Samuel
    2022 “Mythopoetic Legitimation and the Recontextualisation of Europe’s Foundational Myth.” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.21070.ben
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21070.ben [Google Scholar]
  3. Biegelbauer, Peter, and Matthias Weber
    2018 “EU Research, Technological Development and Innovation Policy.” InHandbook of European Policies, ed. byHubert Heinelt, and Sybille Münch. –. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. 10.4337/9781784719364.00021
    https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784719364.00021 [Google Scholar]
  4. Blommaert, Jan
    2007 “Sociolinguistic Scales.” Intercultural Pragmatics (): –. 10.1515/IP.2007.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IP.2007.001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cap, Piotr
    2008 “Towards the Proximization Model of the Analysis of Legitimization in Political Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chilton, Paul, and Christina Schäffner
    2002 “Introduction: Themes and Principles in Political Discourse Analysis.” InPolitics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, ed. byPaul Chilton, and Christina Schäffner. –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.4.03chi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.4.03chi [Google Scholar]
  7. DG (Directorate General Research and Innovation)
    DG (Directorate General Research and Innovation) 2021European Research Area Policy Agenda: Overview of Actions for the Period 2022–2024. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/document/download/0c2f5f95-3274-4ab8-9acb-d6673dc238b8_en?filename=ec_rtd_era-policy-agenda-2021.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough
    2012Political Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fairclough, Norman
    2003Analysing Discourse: Text Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203697078
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078 [Google Scholar]
  10. Heinelt, Hubert, and Sybille Münch
    (eds.) 2018Handbook of European Policies. Interpretive Approaches to the EU. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. 10.4337/9781784719364
    https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784719364 [Google Scholar]
  11. Jeffries, Leslie
    2010Critical Stylistics: The Power of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑04516‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04516-4 [Google Scholar]
  12. Kis, Andrea, Tur, Elena M., Lakens, Daniel, Vaesen, Krist, and Wybo Houkes
    2022 “Leaving Academia: PhD Attrition and Unhealthy Research Environments.” PLoS ONE (): e0274976. 10.1371/journal.pone.0274976
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274976 [Google Scholar]
  13. Levinson, Stephen
    1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
  14. Marginson, Simon
    2006 “Dynamics of National and Global Competition in Higher Education.” Higher Education: –. 10.1007/s10734‑004‑7649‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-7649-x [Google Scholar]
  15. Martin, James R., and Peter R. R. White
    2005The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  16. Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna
    2014 “The Style of EU Directives and the Discourse of Expert Rationality. Stylistyka: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2015 “Presupposition and Nominalization in Headlinese: A Critical Analysis of Framing Devices in Journalistic Discourse.” InDiscourses in Co(n)text: The Many Faces of Specialised Discourse, ed. byMagdalena Zabielska, Emilia Wąsikiewicz-Firlej, and Anna Szczepaniak-Kozak. –. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2023 “The Hybrid Discourse of the ‘European Green Deal’: Road-mapping Economic Transition to Environmental Sustainability (Almost) Seamlessly.” Critical Discourse Studies. 10.1080/17405904.2023.2197607
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2023.2197607 [Google Scholar]
  19. Münch, Sybille, and Hubert Heinelt
    (eds.) 2022EU Policymaking at a Crossroads: Negotiating the 2021–2027 Budget. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. 10.4337/9781788977654
    https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788977654 [Google Scholar]
  20. Muntigl, Peter
    2002 “Politicization and Depoliticization: Employment Policy in the European Union.” InPolitics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, ed. byPaul Chilton, and Christina Schäffner. –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.4.05mun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.4.05mun [Google Scholar]
  21. Peeples, Jennifer
    2015 “Discourse/Rhetorical Analysis Approaches to Environment, Media, and Communication.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication, ed. byAnders Hansen, and Robert Cox. –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
    1969The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, trans. byJohn Wilkinson, and Purcell Weaver. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Reisigl, Martin
    2017 “The Discourse-historical Approach.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. byJohn Flowerdew, and John Richardson. –. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315739342‑4
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342-4 [Google Scholar]
  24. Saarinen, Taina
    2008 “Persuasive Presuppositions in OECD and EU Higher Education Policy Documents.” Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445608089915
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445608089915 [Google Scholar]
  25. Van Eemeren, Frans
    2010Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
  26. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2007 “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.” Discourse & Communication (): –. 10.1177/1750481307071986
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986 [Google Scholar]
  27. Välimaa, Jussi, and David Hoffman
    2008 “Knowledge Society Discourse and Higher Education.” Higher Education (): –. 10.1007/s10734‑008‑9123‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9123-7 [Google Scholar]
  28. Wallerstein, Immanuel
    2006European Universalism: The Rhetoric of Power. New York: The New Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Williams, Glyn
    2010Knowledge Economy, Language and Culture. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847692528
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692528 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.23043.mol
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: critical policy analysis ; legitimization ; presupposition ; ERA policy agenda ; persuasion
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error