oa The utility of (political) dogwhistles – a life cycle perspective

References

1. Albertson, Bethany L.
   2015 “Dog-whistle politics: Multivocal communication and religious appeals.” Political Behavior, (): –. 10.1007/s11109‑013‑9265‑x
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9265-x [Google Scholar]
2. Bartels, Larry M.
   1986 “Issue Voting Under Uncertainty: An Empirical Test.” American Journal of Political Science, (): –. 10.2307/2111269
   https://doi.org/10.2307/2111269 [Google Scholar]
3. Bhat, Prashanth, and Ofra Klein
   2020 “Covert hate speech: White nationalists and dog whistle communication on twitter.” InTwitter, the public sphere, and the chaos of online deliberation, Edited byGwen Bouvier and Judith E. Rosenbaum, –. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑41421‑4_7
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41421-4_7 [Google Scholar]
4. Boholm, Max, and Asad Sayeed
   2023 Political dogwhistles and community divergence in semantic change. Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Historical Language Change: –. 10.18653/v1/2023.lchange‑1.6
   https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.lchange-1.6 [Google Scholar]
5. Breitholtz, Ellen
   2020 Enthymemes and Topoi in Dialogue: the use of common sense reasoning in conversation. Leiden: Brill.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Breitholtz, Ellen, and Robin Cooper
   2021 ”Dogwhistles as Inferences in Interaction.” Proceedings of the Reasoning and Interaction Conference (ReInAct2021): –.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cooper, Robin
   2019 “Representing Types as Neural Events”. Journal of Language, Logic and Information. (), –. 10.1007/s10849‑019‑09285‑4
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-019-09285-4 [Google Scholar]
8. Drakulich, Kevin, Kevin H. Wozniak, John Hagan, and Devon Johnson
   2020 “Race and policing in the 2016 presidential election: Black lives matter, the police, and dog whistle politics.” Criminology, (): –. 10.1111/1745‑9125.12239
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12239 [Google Scholar]
9. Ducrot, Oswald
   1988 “Topoi and formes topiques.” Bulletin d’études de la linguistique français, : –.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Garrett, R. Kelly, Dustin Carnahan, and Emily K. Lynch
    2013 “A turn toward avoidance? Selective exposure to online political information.” Political Behavior, (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Goodin, Robert E., and Michael Saward
    2005 “Dog whistles and democratic mandates.” The Political Quarterly, (): –. 10.1111/j.1467‑923X.2005.00708.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2005.00708.x [Google Scholar]
12. Goodman, Noah and Michael C. Frank
    2016 “Pragmatic language interpretation as probabilistic inference”. Trends in cognitive sciences, (): –. 10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.005 [Google Scholar]
13. Haney-López, Ian
    2014 Dog whistle politics: How coded racial appeals have reinvented racism and wrecked the middle class: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Henderson, Robert, and Elin McCready
    2019 “Dog-whistles and the at-issue/not-at-issue distinction”. InSecondary Content, Edited byDaniel Gutzmann and Katherine Turgay, –. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004393127_010
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004393127_010 [Google Scholar]
15. Kennedy, George A.
    2007 Aristotle On Rhetoric, a theory of civic discourse. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Khoo, Justin
    2017 “Code words in political discourse”. Philosophical Topics, (): –. 10.5840/philtopics201745213
    https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics201745213 [Google Scholar]
17. Klein, Olivier, Russell Spears, and Stephen Reicher
    2007 “Social identity performance: Extending the strategic side of SIDE.” Personality and Social Psychology Review, (): –. 10.1177/1088868306294588
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294588 [Google Scholar]
18. Lamis, Alexander P.
    1984 The Two-Party South. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lewandowsky, Stephan., Ullrich, U. K., Colleen M. Seifert, Norbert Schwarz, and John Cook
    2012 “Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing.” Psychological science in the public interest, (): –. 10.1177/1529100612451018
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018 [Google Scholar]
20. Lindgren, Elina, Björn Rönnerstrand, Ellen Breitholtz, Robin Cooper, Gregor Rettenegger, and Asad Sayeed
    2023 “Can Politicians Broaden Their Support by Using Dog Whistle Communication?” 119th APSA Annual Meeting & Exhibition, August 31 – September 3, 2023. Los Angeles, California.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Mendelberg, Tali
    2001 The race card: Campaign strategy, implicit messages, and the norm of equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400889181
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400889181 [Google Scholar]
22. Myrendal, Jenny
    2019 Negotiating meanings online: Disagreements about word meaning in discussion forum communication. Discourse Studies, (): –. 10.1177/1461445619829234
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445619829234 [Google Scholar]
23. Perry, Samuel L.
    2023 “Mating Call, Dog Whistle, Trigger: Asymmetric Alignments, Race, and the Use of Reactionary Religious Rhetoric in American Politics.” Sociological Theory, (): –. 10.1177/07352751231153664
    https://doi.org/10.1177/07352751231153664 [Google Scholar]
24. Potts, Christopher
    2007 “The expressive dimension.” Theoretical Linguistics, (): –. 10.1515/TL.2007.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TL.2007.011 [Google Scholar]
25. Rovny, Jan
    2012 “Who emphasizes and who blurs? Party strategies in multidimensional competition.” European Union Politics, (): –. 10.1177/1465116511435822
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116511435822 [Google Scholar]
26. Shepsle, Kenneth A.
    1972 “The Strategy of Ambiguity: Uncertainty and Electoral Competition.” American Political Science Review, (): –. 10.2307/1957799
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1957799 [Google Scholar]
27. Somer-Topcu, Zeynep
    2015 “Everything to everyone: The electoral consequences of the broad-appeal strategy in Europe.” American Journal of Political Science (): –. 10.1111/ajps.12165
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12165 [Google Scholar]
28. Stanley, Jason
    2015 How propaganda works. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Svensson, A.
    2019 “Veckans nyord: Hundvissla.” Språktidningen, May 20, 2019. https://spraktidningen.se/2019/05/veckans-nyord-hundvissla/
    [Google Scholar]
30. Tomz, Michael, and Robert P. van Houweling
    2009 “The Electoral Implications of Candidate Ambiguity.” American Political Science Review, (): –. 10.1017/S0003055409090066
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409090066 [Google Scholar]
31. Valentino, Nicholas A., and Vincent L. Hutchings, and Ismail K. White
    2002 “Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns.” American Political Science Review (): –. 10.1017/S0003055402004240
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055402004240 [Google Scholar]
32. Wetts, Rachel, and Robb Willer
    2019 “Who is called by the dog whistle? Experimental evidence that racial resentment and political ideology condition responses to racially encoded messages.” Socius, : –. 10.1177/2378023119866268
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023119866268 [Google Scholar]
33. White, Ismail K.
    2007 “When race matters and when it doesn’t: Racial group differences in response to racial cues.” American Political Science Review, (): –. 10.1017/S0003055407070177
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070177 [Google Scholar]
34. Åkerlund, Mathilda
    2021 “Dog whistling far-right code words: the case of ‘culture enricher’ on the Swedish web.” Information, Communication & Society, (): –.
    [Google Scholar]