New opportunities for discourse studies

References

1. Bachmann, Ingo
   2011 ‘Civil Partnership – “Gay Marriage in All but Name”: A Corpus-Driven Analysis of Discourses of Same-Sex Relationships in the UK Parliament’. Corpora6 (1): 77–105. 10.3366/cor.2011.0005
   https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2011.0005 [Google Scholar]
2. Baker, Paul
   2023 Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. 2 edition. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350083783
   https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350083783 [Google Scholar]
3. Brown, Katy
   2020 ‘When Eurosceptics Become Europhiles: Far-Right Opposition to Turkish Involvement in the European Union’. Identities27 (6): 633–54. 10.1080/1070289X.2019.1617530
   https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2019.1617530 [Google Scholar]
4. Brown, Katy
   2022 ‘Talking “with” and “about” the Far Right: Putting the Mainstream in Mainstreaming’. Bath: University of Bath.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Brown, Katy
   2024 ‘Researching the Far Right: Towards an Ethics of Talking “About”’. InThe Ethics of Researching the Far Right. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Brown, Katy, and Aurelien Mondon
   2021 ‘Populism, the Media, and the Mainstreaming of the Far Right: The Guardian’s Coverage of Populism as a Case Study’. Politics41 (3): 279–95. 10.1177/0263395720955036
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395720955036 [Google Scholar]
7. Brown, Katy, Aurelien Mondon, and Aaron Winter
   2021 ‘“I’m Not ‘Racist’ but” – Liberalism, Populism and Euphemisation in The Guardian’. InDes Freedman Capitalism’s Conscience: 200 Years of the Guardian. 10.2307/j.ctv1k531g5.19
   https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1k531g5.19 [Google Scholar]
8. Brown, Katy, and George Newth
   . forthcoming. ‘“Post-Fascism”, or How the Far Right Talks about Itself: The 2022 Italian Election Campaign as a Case Study’.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bednarek, Monika, and Helen Caple
   2014 ‘Why Do News Values Matter? Towards a New Methodological Framework for Analysing News Discourse in Critical Discourse Analysis and Beyond’. Discourse & Society25 (2): 135–58. 10.1177/0957926513516041
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513516041 [Google Scholar]
10. Bucholtz, Mary
    2001 ‘Reflexivity and Critique in Discourse Analysis’. Critique of Anthropology21 (2): 165–83. 10.1177/0308275X0102100203
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X0102100203 [Google Scholar]
11. De Cleen, Benjamin, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos, Yannis Stavrakakis, and Ilija Tomanić Trivundža
    2021a ‘An introduction to the special issue on “Discourse Theory: Ways forward for theory development and research practice”.’ Journal of Language and Politics, 20(1): 1–9. 10.1075/jlp.20077.dec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20077.dec [Google Scholar]
12. De Cleen, Benjamin, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos, and Yannis Stavrakakis
    2021b ‘Moving Discourse Theory Forward: A Five-Track Proposal for Future Research’. Journal of Language and Politics20 (1): 22–46. 10.1075/jlp.20076.dec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20076.dec [Google Scholar]
13. Dean, Jonathan, and Bice Maiguashca
    2020 ‘Did Somebody Say Populism? Towards a Renewal and Reorientation of Populism Studies’. Journal of Political Ideologies25 (1): 11–27. 10.1080/13569317.2020.1699712
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2020.1699712 [Google Scholar]
14. Eklundh, Emmy
    2020 ‘Excluding Emotions: The Performative Function of Populism’. PARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO13 (1): 107–31.
    [Google Scholar]
15. El-Enany, Nadine
    2018 ‘The next British Empire’. IPPR Progressive Review25 (1): 30–38. 10.1111/newe.12089
    https://doi.org/10.1111/newe.12089 [Google Scholar]
16. Fairclough, Norman
    2010 Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Flowerdew, Lynne
    2009 ‘Applying Corpus Linguistics to Pedagogy’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics14 (3): 393–417. 10.1075/ijcl.14.3.05flo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.3.05flo [Google Scholar]
18. Forchtner, Bernhard
    2011 ‘Critique, the Discourse–Historical Approach, and the Frankfurt School’. Critical Discourse Studies8 (1): 1–14. 10.1080/17405904.2011.533564
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2011.533564 [Google Scholar]
19. Glynos, Jason, and David Howarth
    2007 Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203934753
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934753 [Google Scholar]
20. Glynos, Jason, and David Howarth
    2019 ‘The Retroductive Cycle: The Research Process in Poststructuralist Discourse Analysis’. InDiscourse, Culture and Organization: Inquiries into Relational Structures of Power, edited byTomas Marttila, 105–28. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑94123‑3_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94123-3_5 [Google Scholar]
21. Glynos, Jason, and Aurelien Mondon
    2019 ‘The Political Logic of Populist Hype: The Case of Right-Wing Populism’s “Meteoric Rise” and Its Relation to the Status Quo’. InPopulism and Passions, edited byPaolo Cossarini and Fernando Vallespín, 82–101. Routledge. 10.4324/9781351205474‑6
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351205474-6 [Google Scholar]
22. Harding, Sandra
    1988 ‘Introduction: Is There a Feminist Method?’ InFeminism and Methodology, 1–14. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hart, Christopher, and Piotr Cap
    eds. 2017 Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Horsburgh, Dorothy
    2003 ‘Evaluation of Qualitative Research: Evaluation of Qualitative Research’. Journal of Clinical Nursing12 (2): 307–12. 10.1046/j.1365‑2702.2003.00683.x
    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00683.x [Google Scholar]
25. Howarth, David
    2000 Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Howarth, David R., and Yannis Stavrakakis
    2000 ‘Introducing Discourse Theory and Political Analysis’. InDiscourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change, edited byDavid R. Howarth, Yannis Stavrakakis, and Aletta J. Norval, 1–23. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hunt, Sally
    2015 ‘Representations of Gender and Agency in the Harry Potter Series’. InCorpora and Discourse Studies: Integrating Discourse and Corpora, edited byPaul Baker and Tony McEnery, 266–84. Palgrave Advances in Language and Linguistics. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. 10.1057/9781137431738_13
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137431738_13 [Google Scholar]
28. Jørgensen, Marianne, and Louise J. Phillips
    2002 Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: SAGE. 10.4135/9781849208871
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208871 [Google Scholar]
29. Kumar, Deepa
    2012 Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire. Chicago: Haymarket.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Krzyżanowski, Michal
    2010 Frankfurt: Peter Lang. The Discursive Construction of European Identities: A Multi-level Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Krzyżanowski, Michal. and Forchtner, Bernard
    2016 ‘Theories and concepts in critical discourse studies: Facing challenges, moving beyond foundations.’ Discourse & Society, 27(3): 253–261. 10.1177/0957926516630900
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630900 [Google Scholar]
32. Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
    1987 ‘Post-Marxism without Apologies’. New Left Review1661: 79–106.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
    2014 Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. 2nd ed.London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Ledin, Per, and David Machin
    2019 ‘Doing critical discourse studies with multimodality: from metafunctions to materiality.’ Critical Discourse Studies, 16(5): 497–513. 10.1080/17405904.2018.1468789
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1468789 [Google Scholar]
35. Meer, Nasar
    2019 ‘The Wreckage of White Supremacy’. Identities26 (5): 501–9. 10.1080/1070289X.2019.1654662
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2019.1654662 [Google Scholar]
36. Mills, Charles W.
    1999 The Racial Contract. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Moravcsik, Andrew
    2014 “Transparency: The Revolution in Qualitative Research”. Political Science & Politics47 (1): 48–53. 10.1017/S1049096513001789
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001789 [Google Scholar]
38. Nikisianis, Nikos, Thomas Siomos, Yannis Stavrakakis, Dimitroulia Titika, and Grigoris Markou
    2019 ‘Populism Versus Anti-Populism in the Greek Press: Post-Structuralist Discourse Theory Meets Corpus Linguistics’. InDiscourse, Culture and Organization: Inquiries into Relational Structures of Power, edited byTomas Marttila, 267–98. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑94123‑3_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94123-3_12 [Google Scholar]
39. O’Keeffe, Anne, and Michael McCarthy
    eds. 2012 The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. Routledge Handbooks in Applied Linguistics. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Rear, David
    2013 ‘Laclau and Mouffe’s Discourse Theory and Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis: An Introduction and Comparison’.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Reisigl, Martin
    2018 ‘The Discourse-Historical Approach’. InThe Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, edited byJohn Flowerdew and John E. Richardson, 44–59. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2009 ‘The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA)’. InMethods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited byRuth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 2nd ed., 87–121. London: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Samaie, Mahmoud, and Bahareh Malmir
    2017 ‘US News Media Portrayal of Islam and Muslims: A Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse Analysis’. Educational Philosophy and Theory49 (14): 1351–66. 10.1080/00131857.2017.1281789
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1281789 [Google Scholar]
44. Sjölander, Annika Egan
    2011 ‘Introduction: Comparing Critical Discourse Analysis and Discourse Theory’. InTracking Discourses: Politics, Identity and Social Change, edited byAnnika Egan Sjölander and Jenny Gunnarsson Payne, 13–48. Lund: Nordic Academic Press. 10.2307/jj.919512.4
    https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.919512.4 [Google Scholar]
45. Smith, Linda Tuhiwai
    1999 Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London; New York; Dunedin: Zed Books.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Taylor, Charlotte
    2014 ‘Investigating the Representation of Migrants in the UK and Italian Press: A Cross-Linguistic Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analysis’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics19 (3): 368–400. 10.1075/ijcl.19.3.03tay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19.3.03tay [Google Scholar]
47. Taylor, Charlotte
    2020 ‘Representing the Windrush Generation: Metaphor in Discourses Then and Now’. Critical Discourse Studies17 (1): 1–21. 10.1080/17405904.2018.1554535
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1554535 [Google Scholar]
48. Thornbury, Scott
    2010 ‘What Can a Corpus Tell Us about Discourse?’ InThe Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203856949‑20
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949-20 [Google Scholar]
49. van Dijk, Teun A.
    ed. 1997 Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Vol.11. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446221884
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221884 [Google Scholar]
50. Wilkinson, Mark
    2022 ‘Radical Contingency, Radical Historicity and the Spread of “Homosexualism”: A Diachronic Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis of Queer Representation in The Times between 1957–1967 and 1979–1990’. Discourse, Context & Media. 10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100623
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100623 [Google Scholar]
51. Wodak, Ruth
    2011 ‘Suppression of the Nazi Past, Coded Languages, and Discourses of Silence: Applying the Discourse-Historical Approach to Post-War Anti-Semitism in Austria’. InPolitical Languages in the Age of Extremes, edited byWillibald Steinmetz, 351–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Wodak, Ruth, and Michal Krzyżanowski
    2008 Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑04798‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04798-4 [Google Scholar]
53. Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
    2015 Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. 3 edition. London ; Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Wodak, Ruth, and Markus Rheindorf
    2022 Identity Politics Past and Present :Political Discourses From Post-War Austria to the Covid Crisis. Exeter: University of Exeter Press. 10.47788/RLNW3226
    https://doi.org/10.47788/RLNW3226 [Google Scholar]
55. Wood, Linda A., and Rolf O. Kroger
    2000 Doing Discourse Analysis: Methods for Studying Action in Talk and Text. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781452233291
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233291 [Google Scholar]
56. Wright, David, and Gavin Brookes
    2019 ‘“This Is England, Speak English!”: A Corpus-Assisted Critical Study of Language Ideologies in the Right-Leaning British Press’. Critical Discourse Studies161. 10.1080/17405904.2018.1511439
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1511439 [Google Scholar]
57. Zuberi, Tukufu, and Eduardo Bonilla-Silva
    2008 White Logic, White Methods: Racism and Methodology. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]