1887
image of Far-right discourse in Brazil
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Although it is almost common sense in Brazil that far-right leaders typically deploy impolite language as part of their rhetoric, the issue is still understudied and lacks empirical evidence. We explore the trendiest hashtags and their accompanying posts used as replies to the Brazilian Supreme Court’s official Twitter/X account between October 2021 and October 2022, which covers a year before the 2022 presidential election. After analyzing 414,652 posts, our results showed that shameless impolite language was deployed in 94.9% of the hashtags. The data confirms that online verbal attacks on the judiciary were a common posting practice on Twitter/X. The strategy’s main element has been combining impolite language with lies and manipulation to defame perceived opponents and attract followers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.23120.oli
2024-09-13
2024-10-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barrett, Louise, Robin Dunbar, and John Lycett
    2002Human evolutionary psychology. NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barakos, Elisabeth, and Johann Wolfgang Unger
    editors 2016Discursive Approaches to Language Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑53134‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53134-6 [Google Scholar]
  3. Billingham, Paul, and Tom Parr
    2020 “Enforcing Social Norms: The Morality of Public Shaming.” European Journal of Philosophy, no.: –. 10.1111/ejop.12554
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12554 [Google Scholar]
  4. BRASIL
    BRASIL 2018 “Constitution of the Federal Republic of Brazil.” Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil, Brazilian Government. www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm.
  5. Brezina, Vaclav, and William Platt
    2023LancsBox X [software]. Lancaster University. lancsbox.lancs.ac.uk
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  7. Caldas-Coulthard, Carmen Rosa
    2022 “Sexismo Cotidiano Banal e Persistente na Política Brasileira.” Ilha do Desterro (): –. 10.5007/2175‑8026.2022.e86409
    https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2022.e86409 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cesarino, Leticia
    2020 “How Social Media Affords Populist Politics: Remarks on Liminality Based on the Brazilian Case.” Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada [online] (): –. 10.1590/01031813686191620200410
    https://doi.org/10.1590/01031813686191620200410 [Google Scholar]
  9. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2010 “Conventionalized Impoliteness Formulae.” Journal of Pragmatics(): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2021 “Impoliteness and Hate Speech: Compare and Contrast.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.019 [Google Scholar]
  12. De la Torre, Carlos
    2019 “Global Populism Histories, Trajectories, Problems, and Challenges.” InRoutledge Handbook of Global Populism, edited byCarlos de la Torre and Luca Scuccimarra. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Drinóczi, Tímea., and Agnieszka Bień-Kacała
    2022Illiberal Constitutionalism in Poland and Hungary: The Deterioration of Democracy, Misuse of Human Rights and Abuse of the Rule of Law. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Drinóczi, Tímea
    2022 “The Unfolding Illiberalism in Hungary.” Review of Central and East European Law(): –. 10.1163/15730352‑bja10071
    https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-bja10071 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dynel, Marta
    2023 “Hashtag Swearing: Pragmatic Polysemy and Polyfunctionality of #FuckPutin as Solidary Flaming.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ekström, Mats, and Bengt. Johansson
    2008 “Talk Scandals.” Media, Culture & Society(): –. 10.1177/0163443707084350
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443707084350 [Google Scholar]
  17. Frantz, Erica, and Andrea Kendall-Taylor
    2017 “The Evolution of Autocracy: Why Authoritarianism is Becoming More Formidable?” Survival: Global Politics and Strategy(2017): . 10.1080/00396338.2017.1375229
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2017.1375229 [Google Scholar]
  18. Fournier, Théo
    2019 “From Rhetoric to Action: A Constitutional Analysis of Populism.” German Law Journal(): –. 10.1017/glj.2019.22
    https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2019.22 [Google Scholar]
  19. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2022 “Moral Emotions, Good Moral Panics, Social Regulation, and Online Public Shaming.” Language & Communication: –. 10.1016/j.langcom.2022.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kalil, Isabela
    2022 “Do ‘Cidadão de Bem’ ao ‘Patriota’: Eleições, Desinformação e Extremismo.” InDemocracia e Eleições no Brasil: Para Onde Vamos?, edited byMagna Inácio and Vanessa Elias de Oliveira. São Paulo: Hucitec.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lagunes, Paul F., and Jan Svejnar
    2020Corruption and the Lava Jato Scandal in Latin America. Oxon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003024286
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003024286 [Google Scholar]
  22. Laruelle, Marlene
    2022 “Illiberalism: A Conceptual Introduction.” East European Politics–. 10.1080/21599165.2022.2037079
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2022.2037079 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lewin, Tessa
    2021 “Nothing Is as It Seems: ‘Discourse Capture’ and Backlash Politics.” Gender & Development(): –. 10.1080/13552074.2021.1977047
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2021.1977047 [Google Scholar]
  24. Louault, Frédéric
    2022 “Populism and Authoritarianism: The Presidency of Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil.” InContemporary Populists in Power, edited byA. Dieckhoff, C. Jaffrelot, and E. Massicard. The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑84079‑2_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84079-2_6 [Google Scholar]
  25. Mafei, Rafael, Thomas Bustamante, and Emilio Meyer
    2021 “From Antiestablishment­arianism to Bolsonarism in Brazil.” InRoutledge Handbook of Illiberalism, edited byAndrás Sajó, Renáta Uitz, and Stephen Holmes. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Main, Thomas J.
    2021The Rise of Illiberalism. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. McIntosh, Janet, and Norma Mendoza-Denton
    2020Language in the Trump Era: Scandals and Emergencies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108887410
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108887410 [Google Scholar]
  28. Meyer, Emilio P. N.
    2021Constitutional Erosion in Brazil. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. 10.5040/9781509941971
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509941971 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2023 “Illiberalism in Brazil: From Constitutional Authoritarianism to Bolsonarism.” Journal of Illiberalism Studies(): –. 10.53483/XCMT3554
    https://doi.org/10.53483/XCMT3554 [Google Scholar]
  30. Müller, Jan-Wener
    2016What Is Populism?Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press. 10.9783/9780812293784
    https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812293784 [Google Scholar]
  31. Norris, Pippa
    2020 “Measuring Populism Worldwide.” Party Politics(): –. 10.1177/1354068820927686
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820927686 [Google Scholar]
  32. Oliveira, Ana Larissa A. M., and Marisa M. Carneiro
    2018 “#elesim, #elenão, #elasim, #elanão: O Twitter e as Hashtags de Amor e de Ódio na Campanha Presidencial Brasileira de 2018.” Linguagem em (Dis)curso: –. 10.1590/1982‑4017‑200103‑9718
    https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4017-200103-9718 [Google Scholar]
  33. Oliveira, Ana Larissa A. M., and Marisa M. Carneiro
    2020 “#elesim, #elenão, #elasim, #elanão: O Twitter e as Hashtags de Amor e de Ódio na Campanha Presidencial Brasileira de 2018.” Linguagem em (Dis)curso: –. 10.1590/1982‑4017‑200103‑9718
    https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4017-200103-9718 [Google Scholar]
  34. Sajó, András, Renáta Uitz, and Stephen Holmes
    2022 “Preface.” InRoutledge Handbook on Illiberalism, edited byA. Sajó, R. Uitz, and S. Holmes. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Scheppele, Kim Lane
    2020, March12. “The Rise of Authoritarian Democracies.” Vital Interests. Retrieved fromwww.centeronnationalsecurity.org/vital-interests-issue-22-kim-lane-scheppele
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Sifianou, Maria
    2019 “Im/politeness and In/civility: A Neglected Relationship?” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.008 [Google Scholar]
  37. Silva, Janaína Lima Penalva da, and Vera Karam de Chueiri
    2023 “Feminism for a Future Brazilian Constitutionalism.” The Rights of Women in Comparative Constitutional Law. Routledge. –. 10.4324/9781003349488‑11
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003349488-11 [Google Scholar]
  38. Sobieraj, Sarah, and Jeffrey Berry
    2011 “From Incivility to Outrage: Political Discourse in Blogs, Talk Radio, and Cable News.” Political Communication(): –. 10.1080/10584609.2010.542360
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.542360 [Google Scholar]
  39. Tamaki, Eduardo R., and Mario Fuks
    2020 “Populism in Brazil’s 2018 General Elections: An Analysis of Bolsonaro’s Campaign Speeches.” Lua Nova: –. 10.1590/0102‑103127/109
    https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-103127/109 [Google Scholar]
  40. Vásquez, Camilla
    2021 “I Appreciate U Not Being a Total Prick…: Oppositional Stancetaking, Impoliteness and Relational Work in Adversarial Twitter Interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.08.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.08.009 [Google Scholar]
  41. Wodak, Ruth
    2009Discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2018 “The Radical Right and Antisemitism.” InThe Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right, edited byJens Rydgren, –. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 2021aThe Politics of Fear: The Shameless Normalization of Far-Right Discourse. 2nd ed.London: SAGE. 10.4135/9781529739664
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529739664 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2021b “Crisis Communication and Crisis Management During COVID-19.” Global Discourse(): –. 10.1332/204378921X16100431230102
    https://doi.org/10.1332/204378921X16100431230102 [Google Scholar]
  45. Wodak, Ruth, Jonathan Culpeper, and Elena Semino
    2021 “Shameless Normalisation of Impoliteness: Berlusconi’s and Trump’s Press Conferences.” Discourse & Society(): –. 10.1177/0957926520977217
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520977217 [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina, Maria Petrova, and Ruben Enikolopov
    2020 “Political Effects of the Internet and Social Media.” Annual Review of Economics(): –. 10.1146/annurev‑economics‑081919‑050239
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-050239 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.23120.oli
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.23120.oli
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error