1887
image of The static welfare claimant vs. the dynamic migrant
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The study analyses YouTube comments attached to an episode of (a British factual welfare television programme) which enregister two figures of personhood: “The static, unmotivated British benefits claimant” and “the dynamic, driven migrant”. Using Park’s (2021) critical heuristic of time, space and affect, the study finds that the welfare claimant figure is constructed as a social failure, and the migrant as both a yardstick (to measure the failure) and a rattan stick (to punish it). The key factor is mobility: The migrant experiences social mobility via mental mobility (i.e., motivation) and spatial mobility (i.e., travelling for opportunities). The welfare claimant’s lack of mental and spatial mobility prevents their social mobility. Ultimately, the paper argues that contrasting the figures represents an attack on rootedness and a celebration of neoliberal mobility based in ideals of meritocracy and the erasure of social class as a relevant construct.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.23192.dal
2024-05-24
2024-06-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agha, Asif
    2005 ‘Voice, Footing, Enregisterment’. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology (): –. 10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.38
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.38 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2011 ‘Large and Small Scale Forms of Personhood’. Language & Communication (): –. 10.1016/j.langcom.2011.02.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2011.02.006 [Google Scholar]
  3. Aldamen, Yasmin
    2023 ‘Xenophobia and Hate Speech towards Refugees on Social Media: Reinforcing Causes, Negative Effects, Defense and Response Mechanisms against That Speech’. Societies (): . 10.3390/soc13040083
    https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13040083 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, Paul, and Tony McEnery
    2015 ‘Who Benefits When Discourse Gets Democratised?’ InCorpora and Discourse Studies, edited byPaul Baker and Tony McEnery, –. London: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9781137431738_12
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137431738_12 [Google Scholar]
  5. Barlai, Melani, Birte Fähnrich, Christina Griessler, and Markus Rhomberg
    2017The Migrant Crisis: European Perspectives and National Discourses. Vol.. LIT Verlag Münster.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bennett, Samuel, Jessika ter Wal, Artur Lipiński, Małgorzata Fabiszak, and Michał Krzyżanowski
    2013 ‘The Representation of Third-Country Nationals in European News Discourse: Journalistic Perceptions and Practices.’ Journalism Practice (): –. 10.1080/17512786.2012.740239
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.740239 [Google Scholar]
  7. Block, David
    2014Social Class in Applied Linguistics. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Blommaert, Jan
    2005Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511610295
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610295 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brighton Analytics
    Brighton Analytics 2024 ‘Shoplifting Crime and Safety Statistics | CrimeRate’ 2024 https://crimerate.co.uk/shoplifting
  10. Brooker, Charlie
    2014 ‘Benefits Street – Poverty Porn, or Just the Latest Target for Pent-up British Fury?’ The Guardian, January 2014. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/12/benefits-street-poverty-porn-british-fury
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Channel 4
    Channel 4 2014 ‘“Demonised” or “Humane”? Row Breaks out on Benefits Street’ 2014 https://www.channel4.com/news/benefits-street-birmingham-channel-4-twitter-row
  12. Clegg, Nick
    2017 ‘Bridging the Generational Divide in the UK’ 2017 https://www.oecd.org/unitedkingdom/bridging-the-generational-divide-in-the-uk.htm
  13. Creese, Angela, and Adrian Blackledge
    2020 ‘Stereotypes and Chronotopes: The Peasant and the Cosmopolitan in Narratives about Migration’. Journal of Sociolinguistics (): –. 10.1111/josl.12376
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12376 [Google Scholar]
  14. Crystal, David
    1989 ‘Asian Americans and the Myth of the Model Minority’. Social Casework (): –. 10.1177/104438948907000702
    https://doi.org/10.1177/104438948907000702 [Google Scholar]
  15. Daly, John Scott
    2024 ‘The Selective Foregrounding of Social Structures in Factual Welfare Television: A Multimodal Analysis’. Social Semiotics (): –. 10.1080/10350330.2022.2041364
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2022.2041364 [Google Scholar]
  16. De Benedictis, Sara, Kim Allen, and Tracey Jensen
    2017 ‘Portraying Poverty: The Economics and Ethics of Factual Welfare Television’. Cultural Sociology (): –. 10.1177/1749975517712132
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975517712132 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dean, Jodi
    2021 ‘Neofeudalism: The End of Capitalism?’ InArchitecture and Collective Life, edited byPenny Lewis, Lorens Holm, and Sandra Costa Santos, –. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003118985‑5
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003118985-5 [Google Scholar]
  18. Donnelly, Tom, Jason Begley, and Clive Collis
    2017 ‘The West Midlands Automotive Industry: The Road Downhill’. Business History (): –. 10.1080/00076791.2016.1235559
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2016.1235559 [Google Scholar]
  19. Duncan, Seth, and Lisa Feldman Barrett
    2007 ‘Affect Is a Form of Cognition: A Neurobiological Analysis’. Cognition and Emotion (): –. 10.1080/02699930701437931
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930701437931 [Google Scholar]
  20. Dweck, Carol S.
    2006Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Edgerly, Stephanie, Emily K. Vraga, Kajsa E. Dalrymple, Timothy Macafee, and Timothy K. F. Fung
    2013 ‘Directing the Dialogue: The Relationship between YouTube Videos and the Comments They Spur’. Journal of Information Technology & Politics (): –. 10.1080/19331681.2013.794120
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2013.794120 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ellis, John
    2014 ‘Benefits Street – Who Benefits?’ CST Online. https://cstonline.net/benefits-street-who-benefits-by-john-ellis/
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Feltwell, Tom, John Vines, Karen Salt, Mark Blythe, Ben Kirman, Julie Barnett, Phillip Brooker, and Shaun Lawson
    2017 ‘Counter-Discourse Activism on Social Media: The Case of Challenging “Poverty Porn” Television’. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (): –. 10.1007/s10606‑017‑9275‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017-9275-z [Google Scholar]
  24. Fisher, Mark
    2014 ‘Classless Broadcasting: Benefits Street’. New Humanist. https://newhumanist.org.uk/articles/4583/classless-broadcasting-benefits-street
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Foucault, Michel
    1969L’Archéologie du Savoir. Paris: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Goodhart, David
    2017The Road to Somewhere: The Populist Revolt and the Future of Politics. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. gov.uk
  28. gov.uk
  29. Hudson, Michael
    2012 ‘The Road to Debt Deflation, Debt Peonage, and Neofeudalism’. Levy Economics Institute of Bard College Working Paper, no.. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2007284. 10.2139/ssrn.2007284
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2007284 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jensen, Tracey
    2014 ‘Welfare Commonsense, Poverty Porn and Doxosophy’. Sociological Research Online (): –. 10.5153/sro.3441
    https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3441 [Google Scholar]
  31. Jensen, Tracey, and Imogen Tyler
    2015 ‘“Benefits Broods”: The Cultural and Political Crafting of Anti-Welfare Commonsense’. Critical Social Policy (): –. 10.1177/0261018315600835
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018315600835 [Google Scholar]
  32. Johnstone, Barbara
    2016 ‘Enregisterment: How Linguistic Items Become Linked with Ways of Speaking’. Language and Linguistics Compass (): –. 10.1111/lnc3.12210
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12210 [Google Scholar]
  33. KhosraviNik, Majid
    2010 ‘The Representation of Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Immigrants in British Newspapers: A Critical Discourse Analysis’. Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.9.1.01kho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.1.01kho [Google Scholar]
  34. Kotz, David M.
    2009 ‘The Financial and Economic Crisis of 2008: A Systemic Crisis of Neoliberal Capitalism’. Review of Radical Political Economics (): –. 10.1177/0486613409335093
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613409335093 [Google Scholar]
  35. Leeuwen, Theo van
    2003 ‘The Representation of Social Actors’. InTexts and Practices, edited byCarmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard, –. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203431382-9/representation-social-actors-theo-van-leeuwen
    [Google Scholar]
  36. MacDonald, Robert, Tracy Shildrick, and Andy Furlong
    2014 ‘“Benefits Street” and the Myth of Workless Communities’. Sociological Research Online (): –. 10.5153/sro.3438
    https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3438 [Google Scholar]
  37. McCann, Philip
    2016The UK Regional-National Economic Problem: Geography, Globalisation and Governance. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315627151/uk-regional-national-economic-problem-philip-mccann. 10.4324/9781315627151
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315627151 [Google Scholar]
  38. McGiffin, Carol
    2014 ‘Benefits Street Is “Poverty Porn” and of Little Benefit to Anyone but Channel 4’. The Daily Mirror, 30 August 2014. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/benefits-street-poverty-porn-little-4135540
    [Google Scholar]
  39. McIntosh, Marjorie K.
    2005 ‘Poverty, Charity, and Coercion in Elizabethan England’. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, –. 10.1162/0022195052564234
    https://doi.org/10.1162/0022195052564234 [Google Scholar]
  40. McKenzie, Lisa
    2017 ‘“We Don’t Exist to Them, Do We?”: Why Working-Class People Voted for Brexit’. Competition & Change(): –. 10.1177/1024529417704134
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529417704134 [Google Scholar]
  41. Morrison, James
    2019Scroungers: Moral Panics and Media Myths. London: Zed Books. 10.5040/9781350222472
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350222472 [Google Scholar]
  42. Nelson, Fraser
    2014 ‘In Defence of Channel 4’s Benefits Street’. The Spectator (blog) 2014 https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2014/01/in-defence-of-channel-4s-benefits-street/
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Osborne, George
    2010 Comprehensive Spending Review Speech. October20. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11585941.
  44. Park, Joseph Sung-Yul
    2014 ‘Figures of Personhood’. Paper presented atAAA-AAAL Colloquium “Conceptualizing Linguistic Difference: Perspectives from Linguistic Anthropology,” AAAL Annual Meeting, Portland, Oregon, March 22–25, 2014. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/48679062.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 2021 ‘Figures of Personhood: Time, Space, and Affect as Heuristics for Metapragmatic Analysis’. International Journal of the Sociology of Language (): –. 10.1515/ijsl‑2020‑0096
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2020-0096 [Google Scholar]
  46. Paterson, Laura L., Laura Coffey-Glover, and David Peplow
    2016 ‘Negotiating Stance within Discourses of Class: Reactions to Benefits Street’. Discourse & Society (): –. 10.1177/0957926515611558
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926515611558 [Google Scholar]
  47. Reyes, Angela
    2004 ‘Asian American Stereotypes as Circulating Resource’. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Silverstein, Michael
    2003 ‘Indexical Order and the Dialectics of Sociolinguistic Life’. Language & Communication (): –. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(03)00013‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2 [Google Scholar]
  49. Suart, Paul
    2014 ‘Benefits Street TV Show Lied to Us, Say Winson Green Residents’. BirminghamLive 2014 https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news/benefits-street-tv-show-lied-6470342
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Taylor-Gooby, Peter
    2013The Double Crisis of the Welfare State and What We Can Do about It. Basingstoke: Springer. 10.1057/9781137328113
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137328113 [Google Scholar]
  51. Welshman, John
    2013Underclass: A History of the Excluded since 1880. 2nd ed.Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Wiggan, Jay
    2012 ‘Telling Stories of 21st Century Welfare: The UK Coalition Government and the Neo-Liberal Discourse of Worklessness and Dependency’. Critical Social Policy (): –. 10.1177/0261018312444413
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018312444413 [Google Scholar]
  53. Wild, Trevor
    1989 ‘Deindustrialisation and New Industrialisation in Britain and West Germany’. Area (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Wood, Helen
    2014 ‘Benefits Britain the Live Debate: Hiding in the Light’. CST Online (blog) 2014 https://cstonline.net/benefits-britain-the-live-debate-hiding-in-the-light-by-helen-wood/
    [Google Scholar]
  55. YouTube comment, DaWei [pseudonym]
    YouTube comment, DaWei [pseudonym] 2018 commenting on ‘Benefits street episode 3, series 1’, YouTube video, 45:31, posted by Paul Brown [pseudonym], December 24, 2026. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nYneg3qR8U&t=365s
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.23192.dal
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.23192.dal
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error