oa Discourse of self-legitimation

References

1. Archick, Kristin
   2014 “US–EU Cooperation Against Terrorism.” CRS Report No. RS22030. December 1, 2014, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RS22030.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bäckstrand, Karin, and Frederik Söderbaum
   2018 “Legitimation and Delegitimation in Global Governance: Discursive, Institutional, and Behavioral Practices.” InLegitimacy in Global Governance: Sources, Processes, and Consequences, edited byJonas Tallberg, Karin Bäckstrand, and Jan Aart Scholte, –. Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bennett, Samuel
   2019 “Values as tools of legitimation in EU and UK Brexit discourses.” InDiscourses of Brexit, edited byVeronika Koller, Susanne Kopf, and Marlene Miglbauer, –. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351041867‑2
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351041867-2 [Google Scholar]
4. Bennett, Samuel
   2022 “Mythopoetic legitimation and the recontextualization of Europe’s foundational myth.” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.21070.ben
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21070.ben [Google Scholar]
5. Bressanelli, Edoardo, Nicola Chelotti, and Wilhelm Lehmann
   2019 “Negotiating Brexit: The European Parliament between participation and influence.” Journal of European Integration (): –. 10.1080/07036337.2019.1599372
   https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1599372 [Google Scholar]
6. Bressanelli, Edoardo, Nicola Chelotti, and Wilhelm Lehmann
   2021 “Managing Disintegration: How the European Parliament Responded and Adapted to Brexit” Politics and Governance (): –. 10.17645/pag.v9i1.3684
   https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3684 [Google Scholar]
7. Brusenbauch Meislová, Monika
   2019 “The European parliament in the Brexit process: Leading role, supporting role or just a small cameo?”. InBrexit and democracy. The role of parliaments in the UK and the European union, edited byThomas Christiansen and Diane Fromage, –. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑06043‑5_10
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06043-5_10 [Google Scholar]
8. Brusenbauch Meislová, Monika
   2021 “In the spotlight, or behind the scenes? The European parliament as an actor in article 50 withdrawal negotiations.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies (), –. 10.1080/14782804.2020.1816162
   https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2020.1816162 [Google Scholar]
9. Brusenbauch Meislová, Monika
   2023 “Game of deals: bargaining behaviour of the European parliament in the Brexit process.” Journal of Legislative Studies, online first. 10.1080/13572334.2023.2233202
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2023.2233202 [Google Scholar]
10. Carta, Caterina, and Jean-Frederic Morin
    2014 “Introduction: EU Foreign Policy through the Lens of Discourse Analysis Making Sense of Diversity.” InEU Foreign Policy through the Lens of Discourse Analysis Making Sense of Diversity, edited byCaterina Carta and Jean-Frederic Morin, –. London: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cheng, Le, and David Machin
    2023 “The law and critical discourse studies.” Critical Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1080/17405904.2022.2102520
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2022.2102520 [Google Scholar]
12. Closa Montero, Carlos, Felipa González de León, and Gisela Hernández González
    2021 “Pragmatism and the limits to the European parliament’s strategies for self-empowerment.” Politics and Governance (): –. 10.17645/pag.v9i3.4243
    https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.4243 [Google Scholar]
13. Condor, Sarah
    2013 Interpretation of Legal Discourse. North Charleston: CreateSpace Independent Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Coulthard, Malcolm
    ed. 2013 Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203200063
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203200063 [Google Scholar]
15. Crawford, E.
    2021 Non-Binding Norms in International Humanitarian Law: Efficacy, Legitimacy, and Legality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198819851.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198819851.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
16. de Cillia, Rudolf, Martin Reisigl, and Ruth Wodak
    1999 “The Discursive Construction of National Identities.” Discourse & Society (): –. 10.1177/0957926599010002002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010002002 [Google Scholar]
17. Diez, Thomas
    2014a “Setting the limits: Discourse and EU foreign policy. Cooperation and Conflict.” Conflict and Cooperation (): –. 10.1177/0010836713494997
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836713494997 [Google Scholar]
18. Diez, Thomas
    2014b “Speaking Europe, Drawing Boundaries: Reflections on the Role of Discourse in EU Foreign Policy and Identity.” InEU Foreign Policy through the Lens of Discourse Analysis Making Sense of Diversity, edited byCaterina Carta and Jean-Frederic Morin, –. London: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Elnakkouzi, Rania
    2023 “In the name of the nobility of the cause, what I did is right: Legitimating the use of force via the hero-protector narrative used as argument.” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.22066.eln
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22066.eln [Google Scholar]
20. European Parliament
    European Parliament 2016 European Parliament resolution of 28 June 2016 on the decision to leave the EU resulting from the UK referendum (2016/2800(RSP). 28June. www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P8-TA-2016-0294+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN
21. European Parliament
    European Parliament 2017a European Parliament resolution of 3 October 2017 on the state of play of negotiations with the United Kingdom (2017/2847(RSP)). 3October. www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P8-TA-2017-0361+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN
22. European Parliament
    European Parliament 2017b European Parliament resolution of 5 April 2017 on negotiations with the United Kingdom following its notification that it intends to withdraw from the European Union (2017/2593(RSP)). 5April. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0102_EN.html
23. European Parliament
    European Parliament 2017c European Parliament resolution of 13 December 2017 on the state of play of negotiations with the United Kingdom. (2017/2964(RSP)). 13December. www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P8-TA-2017-0490+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN
24. European Parliament
    European Parliament 2018 European Parliament resolution of 14 March 2018 on the framework of the future EU-UK relationship (2018/2573(RSP)). 14March. www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P8-TA-2018-0069+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN
25. European Parliament
    European Parliament 2020a European Parliament resolution of 15 January 2020 on implementing and monitoring the provisions on citizens’ rights in the Withdrawal Agreement ((2020/2505(RSP). 15January. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/238182/TA-9-2020-0006_EN.pdf
26. European Parliament
    European Parliament 2020b European Parliament resolution of 12 February 2020 on the proposed mandate for negotiations for a new partnership with the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (2020/2557(RSP)). 12February. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0033_EN.html
27. European Parliament
    European Parliament 2020c European Parliament recommendation of 18 June 2020 on the negotiations for a new partnership with the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (2020/2023(INI)). 18June. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0152_EN.html
28. European Parliament
    European Parliament 2021 European Parliament legislative resolution of 28 April 2021 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement (05022/2021 — C9-0086/2021 — 2020/0382(NLE)). 28April. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021AP0140
29. European Parliament
    European Parliament 2022 European Parliament resolution of 5 April 2022 on the future of fisheries in the Channel, North Sea, Irish Sea and Atlantic Ocean in the light of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU (2021/2016(INI)). 5April. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52022IP0103
30. Fairclough, Isabel, and Norman Fairclough
    2012 Political Discourse Analysis. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Fairclough, Norman
    2003 Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203697078
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078 [Google Scholar]
32. Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak
    1997 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” InDiscourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, edited byT. van Dijk, –. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Firth, Alan
    1995 The Discourse of Negotiation. Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Gibbons, John Peter
    1999 “Language and the Law.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, –. EAP Background Reading. www.uefap.com/prepare/research/langlaw.htm. 10.1017/S0267190599190081
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190599190081 [Google Scholar]
35. Gilley, Bruce
    2009 The Right to Rule: How States Win and Lose Legitimacy. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Goodrich, Peter
    1990 Languages of Law: From logics of memory to nomadic masks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Gostyńska-Jakubowska, Agata
    2017 “Parliamentarians in Brexit talks: Bulls in a china shop?” Centre for European Reform, February.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Hall, Stephen G. F., Tobias Lenz, and Anastassia Obydenkova
    2022 “Environmental commitments and rhetoric over the Pandemic crisis: social media and legitimation of the AIIB, the EAEU, and the EU.” Post-Communist Economies (): –. 10.1080/14631377.2021.1954824
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1954824 [Google Scholar]
39. Halliday, Terence C., Susan Block-Lieb, and Bruce G. Carruthers
    2010 “Rhetorical legitimation: Global scripts as strategic devices of international organizations.” Socio-Economic Review (): –. 10.1093/ser/mwp024
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwp024 [Google Scholar]
40. Hart, Nina M.
    2020 “A ‘Legal Eccentricity’: The European Parliament, its Non-binding Resolution, and the Legitimacy of the EU’s Trade Agreements.” University of Bologna Law Review (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Huisman, Rosemary
    1991 “The relevance of discourse analysis to legal practice.” Australian Journal of Law and Society (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Hurrelmann, Achim, Anna Gora, and Andrea Wagner
    2013 “The legitimation of the European Union in the news media: three treaty reform debates.” Journal of European Public Policy (): –. 10.1080/13501763.2012.726478
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.726478 [Google Scholar]
43. Kirman, Allan, Pierre Livet, and Miriam Teschl
    2010 “Rationality and emotions.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (): –. 10.1098/rstb.2009.0194
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0194 [Google Scholar]
44. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2010 The Discursive Construction of European Identities: A Multilevel Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union. Peter Lang: Frankfurt am Main.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Ruth Wodak
    2008 “Theorising and analysing social change in central and Eastern Europe: The contribution of critical discourse analysis.” InDiscourse and transformation in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Aleksandra Galasinska and Michał Krzyzanowski, –. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Larik, Joris
    2021 “‘The mother of all parliaments’? How the ratification of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement boosts the European Parliament’s Profile.” Brexit Institute. https://dcubrexitinstitute.eu/2021/04/the-mother-of-all-parliaments-how-the-ratification-of-the-trade-and-cooperation-agreement-boosts-the-european-parliaments-profile/
    [Google Scholar]
47. Larsen, Henrik
    2018 “Discourse analysis in the study of European foreign policy.” InRethinking European Union Foreign Policy, –. Manchaster: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Liebrecht, Christine, Lettica Hustinx, and Margot van Mulken
    2019 “The Relative Power of Negativity: The Influence of Language Intensity on Perceived Strength.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology. (): –. 10.1177/0261927X18808562
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X18808562 [Google Scholar]
49. Martill, Benjamin and Monika Sus
    2022 “With or Without EU: Differentiated Integration and the Politics of Post-Brexit EU-UK Security Collaboration.” European Papers (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Martill, Benjamin, and Uta Steiger
    2018 “Cultures of Negotiation: Explaining Britain’s hard bargaining in the Brexit negotiations.” Dahrendorf Forum IV, Working Paper No. 04. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/european-institute/sites/european-institute/files/cultures-of-negotiation-paper.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
51. Meissner, Katharina L., and Magnus G. Schoeller
    2019 “Rising despite the polycrisis? The European Parliament’s strategies of self-empowerment after Lisbon.” Journal of European Public Policy (): –. 10.1080/13501763.2019.1619187
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1619187 [Google Scholar]
52. Rautajoki, Hanna, and Richard Fitzgerald
    2022 “Populating ‘solidarity’ in political debate: Interrelational strategies of persuasion within the European Parliament in the aftermath of the Brexit.” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.21023.rau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21023.rau [Google Scholar]
53. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2001 Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Reyes, Antonio
    2011 “Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions.” Discourse & Society (): –. 10.1177/0957926511419927
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927 [Google Scholar]
55. Suchman, Mark C.
    1995 “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” The Academy of Management Review (): –. 10.2307/258788
    https://doi.org/10.2307/258788 [Google Scholar]
56. Szymańska, Jolanta
    2017 “Profiling of New Europeans in the British Conservative Press: A Case Study of the Daily Telegraph.” InRepresenting the Other in European Media Discourses, edited byJan Chovanec and Katarzyna Molek-Kozakowska, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/dapsac.74.05szy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.74.05szy [Google Scholar]
57. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1993 “Principles of critical discourse analysis.” Critical Discourse Analysis (): –. 10.1177/0957926593004002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 [Google Scholar]
58. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1997 “What is Political Discourse Analysis?” Political Linguistics: –. 10.1075/bjl.11.03dij
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij [Google Scholar]
59. van Leeuwen, Theo
    2008 Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
60. von der Burchard, Hans
    2021 “EU Parliament promised ‘exceptional’ powers to police post-Brexit trade deal.” Politico, 27April. https://www.politico.eu/article/euparliament-exceptional-powers-post-brexit-trade-deal/
    [Google Scholar]
61. Wodak, Ruth
    2001 “The Discourse-Historical Approach.” InMethods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited byR. Wodak, and M. Meyer, –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Zappettini, Franco, and Samuel Bennett
    2022 “(De)legitimising EUrope in times of crisis.” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.21075.zap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21075.zap [Google Scholar]