1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Language and Politics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of ‘Presidential’ is in the ear of the beholder
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

President Donald Trump’s communication style is idiosyncratic, with a conversational but aggressive or threatening tone, hypermasculinity, and lower linguistic complexity (Reyes 2020; Scotto di Carlo 2020; Smith and Higgins 2020). These unique qualities should set him apart from other US presidents, making him easily recognizable. This study tests whether Americans can recognize Trump, Bush, and Obama based on their quotations. It was predicted partisans could easily identify Trump when reviewing threatening (compared with reassuring or neutral) statements because of his signature style and because anxiety prompts greater deliberation. While liberals and moderates enjoyed some success, conservatives couldn’t distinguish Trump from Obama at any threat level. Findings indicate that partisans fail to reach the same conclusions because they perceive statements differently, suggesting that divergent partisan perspectives begin with early differences in partisan perception. Thus, what’s perceived as “normal” depends upon ideology and the degree of threat, triggered by rhetorical cues.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24030.mea
2025-03-20
2025-04-25

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24030.mea
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahmadian, Sara, Sara Azarshahi, and Delroy L. Paulhus
    2017 “Explaining Donald Trump via Communication Style: Grandiosity, Informality, and Dynamism.” Personality and Individual Differences: –. 10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.018
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.018 [Google Scholar]
  2. Albertson, Bethany, and Shana Kushner Gadarian
    2015 Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139963107
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139963107 [Google Scholar]
  3. Associated Press
    Associated Press. April5 2024 “Americans Think a President’s Power Should be Checked, AP-NORC Poll Finds — Unless Their Side Wins.” ByNicholas Riccardi and Linley Sanders. https://apnews.com/article/american-presidential-power-ap-norc-poll-e7e0f499b7d8bb93420f76ec4c72aae0
  4. Baddeley, Alan
    2007 Working Memory, Thought, and Action. Vol.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bartlett, Jamie
    2014 “Populism, Social Media and Democratic Strain.” European Populism and Winning the Immigration Debate: –.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bartolucci, Valentina
    2012 “Terrorism Rhetoric Under the Bush Administration: Discourses and Effects.” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.11.4.05bar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.4.05bar [Google Scholar]
  7. Bicchieri, Cristina, Eugen Dimant, Simon Gaechter, and Daniele Nosenzo
    2020 Observability, Social Proximity, and the Erosion of Norm Compliance. No.. CESifo Working Paper. 10.2139/ssrn.3576289
     https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3576289 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bishop, Sonia, John Duncan, Matthew Brett, and Andrew D. Lawrence
    2004 “Prefrontal Cortical Function and Anxiety: Controlling Attention to Threat-Related Stimuli.” Nature Neuroscience (): –. 10.1038/nn1173
     https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1173 [Google Scholar]
  9. Boczkowski, Pablo J., and Zizi Papacharissi
    eds. 2018 Trump and the Media. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/11464.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11464.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  10. Borah, Porismita
    2016 “Political Facebook Use: Campaign Strategies Used in 2008 and 2012 Presidential Elections.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics (): –. 10.1080/19331681.2016.1163519
     https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1163519 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bostdorff, Denise M.
    2017 “Obama, Trump, and Reflections on the Rhetoric of Political Change.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs (): –. 10.14321/rhetpublaffa.20.4.0695
     https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.20.4.0695 [Google Scholar]
  12. Brady, Justin T., Molly E. Kelly, and Sharon L. Stein
    2017 “The Trump Effect: With No Peer Review, How Do We Know What to Really Believe on Social Media?” Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery (): –. 10.1055/s‑0037‑1604256
     https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1604256 [Google Scholar]
  13. Broersma, Marcel, and Todd Graham
    2015 “Tipping the Balance of Power: Social Media and the Transformation of Political Journalism.” InThe Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics: –. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315716299‑7
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716299-7 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cacioppo, John T., Richard E. Petty, and Katherine J. Morris
    1983 “Effects of Need for Cognition on Message Evaluation, Recall, and Persuasion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (): –. 10.1037/0022‑3514.45.4.805
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.805 [Google Scholar]
  15. Choma, Becky L., and Yaniv Hanoch
    2017 “Cognitive Ability and Authoritarianism: Understanding Support for Trump and Clinton.” Personality and Individual Differences: –. 10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.054
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.054 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cichocka, Aleksandra, Michał Bilewicz, John T. Jost, Natasza Marrouch, and Marta Witkowska
    2016 “On the Grammar of Politics — or Why Conservatives Prefer Nouns.” Political Psychology (): –. 10.1111/pops.12327
     https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12327 [Google Scholar]
  17. Clarke, Isobelle, and Jack Grieve
    2019 “Stylistic Variation on the Donald Trump Twitter Account: A Linguistic Analysis of Tweets Posted between 2009 and 2018.” PloS one, (): . 10.1371/journal.pone.0222062
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222062 [Google Scholar]
  18. Coppock, Alexander
    2019 “Generalizing from Survey Experiments Conducted on Mechanical Turk: A Replication Approach.” Political Science Research and Methods (): –. 10.1017/psrm.2018.10
     https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.10 [Google Scholar]
  19. Cornfield, Michael
    2017 “Empowering the Party-Crasher: Donald J. Trump, the First 2016 GOP Presidential Debate, and the Twitter Marketplace for Political Campaigns.” Journal of Political Marketing (): –. 10.1080/15377857.2017.1345836
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2017.1345836 [Google Scholar]
  20. Curnalia, Rebecca M. L.
    2009 “Fear Appeals in Political Ads: Threats to Health, Safety, and Financial Security in the 2004 Presidential Election.” Ohio Communication Journal: –.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Deppe, Kristen D., Frank J. Gonzalez, Jayme Neiman, Jackson Pahlke, Kevin Smith, and John R. Hibbing
    2015 “Reflective Liberal and Intuitive Conservatives: A look at the Cognitive Reflection Test and Ideology.” Judgment and Decision Making (): –. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/poliscifacpub/98
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Diez-Bosch, Miriam, and Pere Franch
    2017 “In God We Trust, with God We Fight. Religion in US Presidential War Rhetoric: From Johnson to Obama.” Journal of Media and Religion (): –. 10.1080/15348423.2017.1274588
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2017.1274588 [Google Scholar]
  23. Dolcos, Florin, and Gregory McCarthy
    2006 “Brain Systems Mediating Cognitive Interference by Emotional Distraction.” Journal of Neuroscience (): –. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5042‑05.2006
     https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5042-05.2006 [Google Scholar]
  24. Donovan, Todd, and David Redlawsk
    2018 “Donald Trump And Right-Wing Populists in Comparative Perspective.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties (): –. 10.1080/17457289.2018.1441844
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2018.1441844 [Google Scholar]
  25. Eatwell, Roger
    2017 Populism and Fascism. The Oxford Handbook of Populism, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Engesser, Sven, Nicole Ernst, Frank Esser, and Florin Büchel
    2017 “Populism and Social Media: How Politicians Spread a Fragmented Ideology.” Information, communication & society (): –. 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697 [Google Scholar]
  27. Enli, Gunn
    2017 “Twitter as Arena for the Authentic Outsider: Exploring The Social Media Campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US Presidential Election.” European Journal of Communication (): –. 10.1177/0267323116682802
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116682802 [Google Scholar]
  28. Foster, David E.
    2010 “Pulling at Our Heartstrings: The Republican Party’s Use of Pathos in Their Presidential Campaign Rhetoric as an Explanation for Their Success in Recent Presidential Elections.” Kentucky Journal of Communication (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Garcia-Marques, Teresa, and Diane M. Mackie
    2007 “Familiarity Impacts Person Perception.” European Journal of Social Psychology (): –. 10.1002/ejsp.387
     https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.387 [Google Scholar]
  30. Goethals, George R.
    2018 “Donald Trump, Perceptions of Justice, and Populism.” Leadership (): –. 10.1177/1742715018793741
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715018793741 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hale, Jerold L., Robert Lemieux, and Paul A. Mongeau
    1995 “Cognitive Processing of Fear-Arousing Message Content.” Communication Research (): –. 10.1177/009365095022004004
     https://doi.org/10.1177/009365095022004004 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hart, Roderick P.
    1987 The Sound of Leadership: Presidential Communication in the Modern Age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. (2020) “Donald Trump and the Return of the Paranoid Style.” Presidential Studies Quarterly (): –. 10.1111/psq.12637
     https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12637 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hodges, Adam
    2015 “Ideologies of Language and Race in US Media Discourse About the Trayvon Martin Shooting.” Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S004740451500024X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740451500024X [Google Scholar]
  35. Johnson, Shontavia Jackson
    2018 “Donald Trump, Disruptive Technologies, and Twitter's Role in the 2016 American Presidential Election.” Widener Commwealth Law Review: .
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Jordan, Kayla N., and James W. Pennebaker
    2017 “The Exception or the Rule: Using Words to Assess Analytic Thinking, Donald Trump, and the American Presidency.” Translational Issues in Psychological Science (): –. 10.1037/tps0000125
     https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000125 [Google Scholar]
  37. Jost, John T., Christopher M. Federico, and Jaime L. Napier
    2009 “Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities.” Annual Review of Psychology (): -. 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600 [Google Scholar]
  38. Jost, John T.
    2017 “Ideological Asymmetries and the Essence of Political Psychology.” Political Psychology (): –. 10.1111/pops.12407
     https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12407 [Google Scholar]
  39. Jost, John, and Orsolya Hunyady
    2003 “The Psychology of System Justification and the Palliative Function of Ideology.” European Review of Social Psychology (): –. 10.1080/10463280240000046
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280240000046 [Google Scholar]
  40. Jost, John T., Jack Glaser, Arie W. Kruglanski, and Frank J. Sulloway
    2003 “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition.” Psychological Bulletin (): –. 10.1037/0033‑2909.129.3.339
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 [Google Scholar]
  41. Jost, John T., and Margarita Krochik
    2014 “Ideological Differences in Epistemic Motivation: Implications for Attitude Structure, Depth of Information Processing, Susceptibility to Persuasion, and Stereotyping.” InAdvances in Motivation Science, : –. London: Elsevier Science and Technology.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Karapostoli, Paraskevi
    2022 “From Election to Insurrection: A Speech Act Theory Study of Donald Trump’s Tweets in the Wake of the 2020 Election.” https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1677327/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  43. Kayam, Orly
    2020 “Straight to the People: Donald Trump’s Rhetorical Style on Twitter in the 2016 US Presidential Election.” Language and Dialogue, (): –. 10.1075/ld.00064.kay
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00064.kay [Google Scholar]
  44. Kazin, Michael
    2016 “Trump and American Populism: Old Whine, New Bottles.” Foreign Affairs: –.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Keinan, Giora
    1987 “Decision Making Under Stress: Scanning of Alternatives Under Controllable and Uncontrollable Threats.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (): –. 10.1037/0022‑3514.52.3.639
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.639 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kreis, Ramona
    2017 “The “Tweet Politics” of President Trump.” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.17032.kre
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17032.kre [Google Scholar]
  47. Krupnikov, Yanna, and Adam Seth Levine
    2014 “Cross-Sample Comparisons and External Validity.” Journal of Experimental Political Science (): –. 10.1017/xps.2014.7
     https://doi.org/10.1017/xps.2014.7 [Google Scholar]
  48. Lavine, Howard, Milton Lodge, James Polichak, and Charles Taber
    2002 “Explicating the Black Box Through Experimentation: Studies of Authoritarianism and Threat.” Political Analysis (): –. 10.1093/pan/10.4.343
     https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/10.4.343 [Google Scholar]
  49. Marcus, George E., W. Russell Neuman, and Michael MacKuen
    2000 Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Macmillan, Neil A., and C. Douglas Creelman
    2004 Detection Theory: A User’s Guide. New York: Psychology press. 10.4324/9781410611147
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611147 [Google Scholar]
  51. McDonnell, Andrea
    2020 “Clinton Stated, Trump Exclaimed!: Gendered Language on Twitter During the 2016 Presidential Debates.” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.19085.mcd
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19085.mcd [Google Scholar]
  52. Mendl, Michael
    1999 “Performing Under Pressure: Stress and Cognitive Function.” Applied Animal Behaviour Science (): –. 10.1016/S0168‑1591(99)00088‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00088-X [Google Scholar]
  53. Miller, Andrea L., Margarita Krochik, and John T. Jost
    2009 “Political Ideology and Persuasion: Systematic and Heuristic Processing Among Liberals and Conservatives.” Yale Review of Undergraduate Research in Psychology: –.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Mourão, Rachel R., Esther Thorson, Kevin Kryston, and Carin Tunney
    2023 “Predicting Audience Verification Intention: The impact of Partisanship, Source, Importance, and Information Familiarity on Willingness to Verify Headlines.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly (): –. 10.1177/10776990221130992
     https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990221130992 [Google Scholar]
  55. Mullinix, Kevin J., Thomas J. Leeper, James N. Druckman, and Jeremy Freese
    2015 “The Generalizability of Survey Experiments.” Journal of Experimental Political Science (): –. 10.1017/XPS.2015.19
     https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2015.19 [Google Scholar]
  56. Nacos, B. L., Shapiro, R. Y., & Bloch-Elkon, Y.
    2020 “Donald Trump.” Perspectives on Terrorism (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Nai, Alessandro, and Jürgen Maier
    2020 “Dark necessities? Candidates’ Aversive Personality Traits and Negative Campaigning in the 2018 American Midterms.” Electoral Studies: . 10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102233
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102233 [Google Scholar]
  58. Obama, Barack
    . January25 2011 “State of the Union Address.” State of the Union Address, Washington, D.C.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. O’Hara, Kieron
    2011 Conservatism. London: Great Britain: Reaktion Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Ott, Brian L.
    2017 “The Age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the Politics of Debasement.” Critical Studies in Media Communication (): –. 10.1080/15295036.2016.1266686
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1266686 [Google Scholar]
  61. Oxley, Douglas R., Kevin B. Smith, John R. Alford, Matthew V. Hibbing, Jennifer L. Miller, Mario Scalora, Peter K. Hatemi, and John R. Hibbing
    2008 “Political Attitudes Vary with Physiological Traits.” Science (): -. 10.1126/science.1157627
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1157627 [Google Scholar]
  62. Pavitt, Charles, Gail G. Whitchurch, Heather Siple, and Nancy Petersen
    1997 “Communication and Emergent Group Leadership: Does Content Count?.” Communication Research Reports (): –. 10.1080/08824099709388690
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099709388690 [Google Scholar]
  63. Petty, Richard E., and John T. Cacioppo
    1986 Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag. 10.1007/978‑1‑4612‑4964‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1 [Google Scholar]
  64. Pew
    Pew 2024a https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2024/01/31/americans-social-media-use/
  65. Pew
    Pew 2024b https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2024/06/12/how-americans-get-news-on-tiktok-x-facebook-and-instagram/
  66. Reyes, Antonio
    2020 “I, Trump: The Cult of Personality, Anti-Intellectualism and the Post-Truth Era.” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.20002.rey
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20002.rey [Google Scholar]
  67. Riehl, J.
    2008 “The Next Great Communicator? A Comparison of the Rhetorical Styles of Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama.” InConference Papers — National Communication Association, Political Communication Division: –.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Rothwell, Jonathan T., and Pablo Diego-Rosell
    2016 “Explaining Nationalist Political Views: The Case of Donald Trump.” Available at SSRN 2822059. 10.2139/ssrn.2822059
     https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2822059 [Google Scholar]
  69. Sandi, Carmen
    2013 “Stress and Cognition.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science (): –. 10.1002/wcs.1222
     https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1222 [Google Scholar]
  70. Scotto di Carlo, Giuseppina
    2020 “Trumping Twitter: Sexism in President Trump’s tweets.” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.19034.sco
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19034.sco [Google Scholar]
  71. Smith, Angela, and Michael Higgins
    2020 “Tough Guys and Little Rocket Men: @Realdonaldtrump’s Twitter Feed and the Normalisation of Banal Masculinity.” Social Semiotics (): –. 10.1080/10350330.2020.1763657
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1763657 [Google Scholar]
  72. Shaffer, Barbara, and John Duckitt
    2013 “The Dimensional Structure of People’s Fears, Threats, and Concerns and their Relationship with Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation.” International Journal of Psychology (): –. 10.1080/00207594.2012.696651
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.696651 [Google Scholar]
  73. Svendsen, Jakob
    2021 “Fear and Paranoia in Republican Presidential Campaigns: How Republican Presidential Candidates Have Used Issues of Crime, Race, and Immigration to Mobilize Voters in the 1988 and 2016 Presidential Elections.” Master’s thesis, University of Agder.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Traberg, Cecilie Steenbuch, and Sander van der Linden
    2022 “Birds of a feather are persuaded together: Perceived source credibility mediates the effect of political bias on misinformation susceptibility.” Personality and Individual Differences: . 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111269
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111269 [Google Scholar]
  75. Van der Linden, Sander, Anthony Leiserowitz, and Edward Maibach
    2019 “The Gateway Belief Model: A Large-Scale Replication.” Journal of Environmental Psychology: –. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.009 [Google Scholar]
  76. Watters, Paul Andrew, Frances Martin, and Zoltan Schreter
    1997 “Caffeine and Cognitive Performance: The Nonlinear Yerkes–Dodson law.” Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental (): –. 10.1002/(SICI)1099‑1077(199705/06)12:3<249::AID‑HUP865>3.0.CO;2‑J
     https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1077(199705/06)12:3<249::AID-HUP865>3.0.CO;2-J [Google Scholar]
  77. Weeks, Brian E.
    2015 “Emotions, Partisanship and Misconceptions: How Anger and Anxiety Moderate the Effect of Partisan Bias on Susceptibility to Political Misinformation.” Journal of Communication (): –. 10.1111/jcom.12164
     https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12164 [Google Scholar]
  78. Wignell, Peter, Sabine Tan, Kay L. O’Halloran, and Kevin Chai
    2021 “The Twittering Presidents: An Analysis of Tweets from @BarackObama and @realDonaldTrump.” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.19046.wig
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19046.wig [Google Scholar]
  79. Wilson, G. D.
    1973 The Psychology of Conservatism. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Wodak, Ruth
    2017 “The “Establishment”, the “Élites”, and the “People”: Who’s who?” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.17030.wod
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17030.wod [Google Scholar]
  81. Wojczewski, Thorsten
    2020 “Trump, Populism, and American Foreign Policy.” Foreign Policy Analysis (): –. 10.1093/fpa/orz021
     https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orz021 [Google Scholar]
  82. Yerkes, Robert Mearns, and John D. Dodson
    1908 “The Relation of Strength of Stimulus to Rapidity of Habit-Formation.” Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, : –. 10.1002/cne.920180503
     https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.920180503 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24030.mea
Loading
‘Presidential’ is in the ear of the beholder
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.24030.mea
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24030.mea
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24030.mea
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: rhetoric ; presidential voice ; social media ; ideology ; threat ; Trump

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error