1887
image of Capturing power in diplomatic language use

Abstract

Abstract

In this study we capture power dynamics in diplomacy from a pragmatic angle, by examining a closed-door diplomatic mediatory negotiation and its aftermath. We first analyse the transcript of a mediation session between representatives of Slovenia and Croatia and a European Economic Community (EEC) delegation during the breakup of Yugoslavia. While the EEC representatives officially acted as mediators, they had earlier secretly agreed with the Yugoslav side to keep Yugoslavia intact. Second, we examine the transcript of a meeting between Slovenian politicians shortly after the mediation session. Studying these two datasets helps us to capture how power manifests itself in the mediatory negotiation studied, and how it is judged by the powerless afterwards. Focusing on language behaviour in the two datasets provides insight into the presence of power in a diplomatic situation where it should in theory not be played out. We use speech acts to analyse our data.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24036.hou
2024-12-05
2025-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/jlp.24036.hou/jlp.24036.hou.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24036.hou&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Astor, Hilary
    2005 “Some contemporary theories of power in mediation: A primer for the puzzled practitioner.” Australian Dispute Resolution Journal: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2007 “Mediator neutrality: Making sense of theory and practice.” Social & Legal Studies (): –. 10.1177/0964663907076531
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663907076531 [Google Scholar]
  3. Awwad, Mona
    2023 “The failure of diplomatic mediations in the Syrian conflict — A comparative analysis.” Queios. https://www.qeios.com/read/CLCHV3. 10.32388/CLCHV3
    https://doi.org/10.32388/CLCHV3 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ayyad, Ahmad
    2012 “Uncovering ideology in translation: A case study of Arabic and Hebrew translations of the ‘Roadmap Plan’.” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.11.2.05ayy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.2.05ayy [Google Scholar]
  5. Beardsley, Kyle, David Cunningham, and Peter White
    2018 “Mediation, peacekeeping, and the severity of civil war.” Journal of Conflict Resolution (): –. 10.1177/0022002718817092
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002718817092 [Google Scholar]
  6. Barbé, Esther, Anna Herranz-Surrallés, and Michał Natorski
    2015 “Contending metaphors of the European Union as a global actor.” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.14.1.02bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.1.02bar [Google Scholar]
  7. Bendazzoli, Claudio
    2023 “Breaching protocol and flouting norms on the European Parliament floor: Reactions from a micro- and macro-context perspective in 22 languages.” Contrastive Pragmatics (): –. 10.1163/26660393‑bja10072
    https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-bja10072 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bercovitch, Jacob
    (ed.) 2009International Conflict Mediation: New Approaches and Findings. London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bercovitch, Jacob, and Jeffrey Rubin
    (eds.) 1994Mediation in International Relations: Multiple Approaches to Conflict Management. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bercovitch, Jabob, and Scott Gartner
    2007 “Is there method in the madness of mediation? Some lessons for mediators from quantitative studies of mediation.” International Interactions: Empirical and Theoretical Research in International Relations (): –. 10.1080/03050620601011024
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03050620601011024 [Google Scholar]
  11. Blakemore, Scott
    2019 “Faith-based diplomacy and interfaith dialogue.” Brill Research Perspectives in Diplomacy and Foreign Policy (): –. 10.1163/24056006‑12340010
    https://doi.org/10.1163/24056006-12340010 [Google Scholar]
  12. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper
    1989Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ciftci, Hilal
    2022 “Mediation as a diplomatic tool in Ottoman capitulations.” Codrul Cosminului (): –. 10.4316/CC.2022.01.02
    https://doi.org/10.4316/CC.2022.01.02 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cohen, Raymond
    1997Negotiating across Cultures: International Communication in an Interdependent World (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press
    [Google Scholar]
  15. de Lange, Deborah
    2010 “Examples of diplomatic behavior: Backroom-bargaining and negotiations.” InDeborah Lange (ed.), Power and Influence. London: Palgrave. 10.1057/9780230115545_8
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230115545_8 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dunmire, Patricia
    2012 “Political discourse analysis: Exploring the language of politics and the politics of language.” Language and Linguistics Compass (): –. 10.1002/lnc3.365
    https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.365 [Google Scholar]
  17. Edmondson, Willis, and Juliane House
    1981Let’s Talk and Talk About It: A Pedagogic Interactional Grammar of English. Munich: Urban & Schwarzenberg.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Edmondson, Willis, House, Juliane, and Daniel Z. Kadar
    2023Expressions, Speech Acts and Discourse: A Pedagogic Interactional Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108954662
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954662 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fairclough, Norman
    1989Language and Power. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Friedman, Elie
    2017 “Evasion strategies in international documents: when ‘constructive ambiguity’ leads to oppositional interpretation.” Critical Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1080/17405904.2017.1292932
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1292932 [Google Scholar]
  21. Friedman, Elie, Zohar Kampf, and Meital Balmas
    2017 “Exploring message targeting at home and abroad: The role of political and media considerations in the rhetorical dynamics of conflict resolution.” International Journal of Communication: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gaffney, Imelda
    2022 “Impartiality and neutrality in mediation.” Journal of Mediation and Applied Conflict Analysis (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gilboa, Eytan
    2001 “Diplomacy in the media age: Three models of uses and effects.” Diplomacy and Statecraft (): –. 10.1080/09592290108406201
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09592290108406201 [Google Scholar]
  24. Glaurdic, Josip
    2013 “The owl of Minerva flies only at dusk? British diplomacy on the eve of Yugoslav wars.” East European Politics & Societies (): –. 10.1177/0888325413484758
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325413484758 [Google Scholar]
  25. Goffman, E.
    1979 “Footing.” Semiotica: –. 10.1515/semi.1979.25.1‑2.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1979.25.1-2.1 [Google Scholar]
  26. Grant, Leigh, Ifat Maoz, and Boaz Keysar
    2023 “Lingua franca as a hidden barrier to conflict resolution.” Journal of Conflict Resolution (): –. 10.1177/00220027221123316
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00220027221123316 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gürkan, Emrah
    2015 “Mediating boundaries: Mediterranean go-betweens and cross-confessional diplomacy in Constantinople, 1560–1600.” Journal of Early Modern History (): –. 10.1163/15700658‑12342453
    https://doi.org/10.1163/15700658-12342453 [Google Scholar]
  28. Habermas, Juergen
    1979Communication and the Evolution of Society. T. McCarthy (trans.) New York: Beacon.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. House, Juliane, and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2021Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108954587
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954587 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2023 Speech acts and interaction in second language pragmatics: A position paper. Language Teaching. 10.1017/S0261444822000477
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444822000477 [Google Scholar]
  31. House, Juliane, and Dániel Z. Kádár, Fengguang Liu, and Yulong Song
    2022 Aggression in diplomatic notes — a pragmatic analysis of a Chinese-American conflict in times of colonisation. Text & Talk (). –. 10.1515/text‑2021‑0036
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2021-0036 [Google Scholar]
  32. Jacobs, Scott
    2002 “Maintaining neutrality in dispute mediation: Managing disagreement while managing not to disagree.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00071‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00071-1 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh
    2013Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139382717
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kádár, Dániel Z. and Juliane House
    2022 “Offensiveness and (de)escalation in mediatised rites of aggression.” Language & Communication: -. 10.1016/j.langcom.2022.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kádár, Dániel Z., Juliane House, Tadej Todorović, Tomaž Onič, David Hazemali, Katja Plemenitaš, and Donathan Brown
    2024 “The language of diplomatic mediation — A case study of an emergency meeting in the wake of the Yugoslav Wars.” Submitted toLanguage and Communication: –. 10.1016/j.langcom.2024.02.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2024.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kampf, Zohar
    2015 “Political discourse analysis.” InKaren Tracy (ed.), The International Encyclopaedia of Language and Social Interaction. New York: Wiley. 10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi096
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi096 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kissine, Mikhail
    2013From Utterances to Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511842191
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511842191 [Google Scholar]
  38. Levinson, Stephen
    2017 “Speech acts.” InYan Huang (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics, pp.–. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Lyddon, Peter
    1996 The Fall and Rise of Coercive Diplomacy in the Balkans. Doctoral dissertation, United States Army Command and General Staff College, Kansas.
  40. Maley, Yon
    1995 “From adjudication to mediation: Third party discourse in conflict resolution.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00030‑I
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00030-I [Google Scholar]
  41. Maver, Ales
    2022 Zapleteni zemljepis demokratizacije. Prehodi v demokracijo v srednji in vzhodni Evropi ob koncu 20. Stoletja. Studia Historica Slovenia (): –. 10.32874/SHS.2022‑21
    https://doi.org/10.32874/SHS.2022-21 [Google Scholar]
  42. Murau, Daniela
    2012 “Strategic maneuvering in diplomatic mediation.” Journal of Argumentation in Context (): –. 10.1075/jaic.1.3.04mur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.1.3.04mur [Google Scholar]
  43. Osojnik, Janez
    2022 “Predlog Socialistične stranke Slovenije oktobra 1990 za izvedbo plebiscita o samostojnosti Republike Slovenije in odzivi nanj v Sloveniji.” Studia Historica Slovenica (): –. 10.32874/SHS.2022‑13
    https://doi.org/10.32874/SHS.2022-13 [Google Scholar]
  44. Pérez-González, Luis
    2012 “Translation, interpreting and the genealogy of conflict.” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.11.2.01int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.2.01int [Google Scholar]
  45. Ran, Yongping, and Linsen Zhao
    2018 “Building mutual affection-based face in conflict mediation: A Chinese relationship management model.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.01.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.01.013 [Google Scholar]
  46. Ran, Yongping, Linsen Zhao, and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2020 The rite of reintegrative shaming in Chinese public dispute mediation. Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/prag.19019.ran
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19019.ran [Google Scholar]
  47. Repe, Bozo
    2002Jutri je nov dan. Slovenci in razpad Jugoslavije. Ljubljana: Mladinska knjiga.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 2004Viri o demokratizaciji in osamosvojitvi Slovenije (III. del: osamosvojitev in mednarodno priznanje). Viri 19. Ljubljana: Arhivsko društvo Slovenije.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Rodríguez, Juan
    2012 “The interplay of greetings and promises: Political encounters between the Warao and the new indigenous leadership in the Orinoco Delta, Venezuela.” Pragmatics (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Rojo, Luisa
    2017 “Language and power”. InOfelia Garcia, Nelson Flores, and Massimiliano Spotti (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language and Society, pp.–. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Santora, Kimberley
    2013 Exploring Self-Orientation in Personal Narratives of Mental Health among a Latino Clinical Sample. PhD thesis, Northeastern University, Massachusetts. 10.17760/d20003293
    https://doi.org/10.17760/d20003293 [Google Scholar]
  52. Shire, Mohammed
    2020 “Dialoguing and negotiating with Al-Shabaab: the role of clan elders as insider-partial mediators.” Journal of Eastern African Studies (): –. 10.1080/17531055.2020.1863099
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2020.1863099 [Google Scholar]
  53. Siniver, Asaf
    2006 “Power, impartiality and timing: Three hypotheses on third party mediation in the Middle East.” Political Studies (): –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9248.2006.00635.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00635.x [Google Scholar]
  54. 2022 “The power to blame as a source of leverage: International mediation and ‘Dead Cat Diplomacy’.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy: –. 10.1163/1871191X‑bja10098
    https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-bja10098 [Google Scholar]
  55. Smith, Dan
    1997 “Language and discourse in conflict and conflict resolution.” Current Issues in Language and Society (): –. 10.1080/13520529709615498
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13520529709615498 [Google Scholar]
  56. Svensson, Isak, and Mathilda Lindgen
    2013 “Peace from the inside: Exploring the role of the insider-partial mediator.” International Interactions: Empirical and Theoretical Research in International Relations (): –. 10.1080/03050629.2013.834261
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2013.834261 [Google Scholar]
  57. Rosoux, Valérie
    2022 “How not to mediate conflict.” International Affairs (): –. 10.1093/ia/iiac058
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiac058 [Google Scholar]
  58. Thornborrow, Johanna
    2002Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Tome, Vicente
    1992 “Maintaining credibility as a partial mediator: United States mediation in Southern Africa, 1981–1988” Negotiation Journal: –. 10.1111/j.1571‑9979.1992.tb00671.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.1992.tb00671.x [Google Scholar]
  60. Touval, Saadia
    1985 “The context of mediation.” Negotiation Journal: –. 10.1111/j.1571‑9979.1985.tb00327.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.1985.tb00327.x [Google Scholar]
  61. Van Gelder, Maartje, and Tijana Krstić
    2015 “Introduction: Cross-confessional diplomacy and diplomatic intermediaries in the early modern Mediterranean.” Journal of Early Modern History (): –. 10.1163/15700658‑12342452
    https://doi.org/10.1163/15700658-12342452 [Google Scholar]
  62. Vanderveken, Daniel
    1990Meaning and Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Wallensteen, Peter, and Isak Svensson
    2014 “Talking peace: International mediation in armed conflicts.” Journal of Peace Research (): –. 10.1177/0022343313512223
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343313512223 [Google Scholar]
  64. Wehr, Paul, and John Lederach
    1991 “Mediating conflict in central America.” Journal of Peace Research (): –. 10.1177/0022343391028001009
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343391028001009 [Google Scholar]
  65. Zartman, William
    (ed.) 2007Peacemaking in International Conflict: Methods & Techniques (Revised edition). Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24036.hou
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24036.hou
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: negotiation ; speech acts ; diplomatic mediation ; power ; Yugoslavia
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error