1887
image of “We pursue justice”

Abstract

Abstract

Philanthropic foundations are key players in global sustainability governance. This paper explores the legitimation strategies these foundations use to justify their actions and positions in the sustainable development community. By combining Theo van Leeuwen’s legitimation framework with our novel analytical justice framework, we offer a new tool to analyse hard-to-research actors. Analysing data from 41 foundation websites, we find that foundations emphasize Global Egalitarian Cosmopolitanism in their values and objectives to align with global sustainability discourses. However, Libertarian ideas dominate when discussing programs and founders. This indicates there may be internal conflicts within foundations over the relationship between extreme wealth accumulation required for global philanthropy and sustainability objectives. In turn, this has implications for how foundations position themselves as agents of justice in sustainable development. While discourse analysis provides valuable insights into philanthropic legitimation strategies, further research is needed to fully understand how justice intersects with organizational decision-making.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24040.deh
2025-01-06
2025-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/jlp.24040.deh/jlp.24040.deh.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24040.deh&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bennett, Samuel
    2022 “Mythopoetic Legitimation and the Recontextualisation of Europe’s Foundational Myth.” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.21070.ben
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21070.ben [Google Scholar]
  2. Berkey, Brian
    2021 “The Philosophical Core of Effective Altruism.” Journal of Social Philosophy (): –. 10.1111/josp.12347
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12347 [Google Scholar]
  3. Betsill, Michele, Ashley Enrici, Elodie Le Cornu, and Rebecca Gruby
    2021 “Philanthropic Foundations as Agents of Environmental Governance: A Research Agenda.” Environmental Politics (): –. 10.1080/09644016.2021.1955494
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1955494 [Google Scholar]
  4. Biermann, Frank, Thomas Hickmann, Carole-Anne Sénit, Marianne Beisheim, Steven Bernstein, Pamela Chasek, Leonie Grob,
    2022 “Scientific Evidence on the Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals.” Nature Sustainability:–. 10.1038/s41893‑022‑00909‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00909-5 [Google Scholar]
  5. Biermann, Frank, Thomas Hickmann, Carole-Anne Sénit, and Leonie Grob
    2022 “The Sustainable Development Goals as a Transformative Force?” InThe Political Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals: Transforming Governance Through Global Goals?, ed. byFrank Biermann, Thomas Hickmann, and Carole-Anne Sénit, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009082945.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009082945.009 [Google Scholar]
  6. Biermann, Frank, and Agni Kalfagianni
    2020 “Planetary Justice: A Research Framework.” Earth System Governance. 10.1016/j.esg.2020.100049
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2020.100049 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bishop, Matthew, and Michael Green
    2008Philanthrocapitalism: How the Rich Can Save the World and Why We Should Let Them. London: A & C Black.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Blackwatters, Jeffrey, Michele Betsill, Ashley Enrici, Elodie Le Cornu, Xavier Basurto, and Rebecca Gruby
    2023 “More than Funders: The Roles of Philanthropic Foundations in Marine Conservation Governance.” Conservation Science and Practice (): –. 10.1111/csp2.12829
    https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12829 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bogers, Maya, Frank Biermann, Agni Kalfagianni, and Rakhyun Kim
    2022 “Sustainable Development Goals Fail to Advance Policy Integration: A Large-n Text Analysis of 159 International Organizations.” Environmental Science and Policy:–. 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bogers, Maya, Frank Biermann, Agni Kalfagianni, Rakhyun Kim, Jelle Treep, and Martine de Vos
    2022 “The Impact of the Sustainable Development Goals on a Network of 276 International Organizations.” Global Environmental Change. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102567
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102567 [Google Scholar]
  11. Breeze, Beth
    2021 “Interviewing Elite Donors: Gaining Access, Developing Rapport and Dealing with the Dazzle.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations:–. 10.1007/s11266‑021‑00390‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00390-2 [Google Scholar]
  12. Budabin, Alexandra, Louise Rasmussen, and Lisa Richey
    2017 “Celebrity-Led Development Organisations: The Legitimating Function of Elite Engagement.” Third World Quarterly (): –. 10.1080/01436597.2017.1322465
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1322465 [Google Scholar]
  13. Correa-Cabrera, Guadalupe, Lucas Núñez, and Hayden Ludwig
    2021 “Assessing the International Influence of Private Philanthropy: The Case of Open Society Foundations.” Global Studies Quarterly (): –. 10.1093/isagsq/ksab039
    https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksab039 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dijk, Teun van
    2006 “Discourse, Context and Cognition.” Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445606059565
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059565 [Google Scholar]
  15. Eikenberry, Angela, and Roseanne Mirabella
    2018 “Extreme Philanthropy: Philanthrocapitalism, Effective Altruism, and the Discourse of Neoliberalism.” PS: Political Science & Politics (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gabriel, Iason
    2017 “Effective Altruism and Its Critics.” Journal of Applied Philosophy (): –. 10.1111/japp.12176
    https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12176 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia
    2017 “Cultural Approach to CDA: From Theory to Practice.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. byJohn Flowerdew and John Richardson, –. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315739342‑9
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342-9 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gruby, Rebecca, Ashley Enrici, Michele Betsill, Elodie Le Cornu, and Xavier Basurto
    2021 “Opening the Black Box of Conservation Philanthropy: A Co-Produced Research Agenda on Private Foundations in Marine Conservation.” Marine Policy. 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104645
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104645 [Google Scholar]
  19. Harrow, Jenny, and Tobias Jung
    2015 “Debate: Thou Shalt Have Impact, Total Impact — Government Involvement in Philanthropic Foundations’ Decision-Making.” Public Money & Management (): –. 10.1080/09540962.2015.1027488
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2015.1027488 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kagan, Jennifer, and Jennifer Dodge
    2023 “The Third Sector and Climate Change: A Literature Review and Agenda for Future Research and Action.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly (): –. 10.1177/08997640221123587
    https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221123587 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kalfagianni, Agni
    2022 “Philanthropic Foundations as Agents of Justice in Global Sustainability Governance.” Global Studies Quarterly:–. 10.1093/isagsq/ksac033
    https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksac033 [Google Scholar]
  22. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2014 “Values, Imaginaries and Templates of Journalistic Practice: A Critical Discourse Analysis.” Social Semiotics (): –. 10.1080/10350330.2014.930607
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2014.930607 [Google Scholar]
  23. Leeuwen, Theo van
    2007 “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.” Discourse & Communication (): –. 10.1177/1750481307071986
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2008Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2018 “Moral Evaluation in Critical Discourse Analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1080/17405904.2018.1427120
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1427120 [Google Scholar]
  26. Leeuwen, Theo van, and Ruth Wodak
    1999 “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445699001001005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001005 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lenz, Tobias, and Fredrik Söderbaum
    2023 “The Origins of Legitimation Strategies in International Organizations: Agents, Audiences and Environments.” International Affairs (): –. 10.1093/ia/iiad110
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad110 [Google Scholar]
  28. Luyckx, Joost, and Maddy Janssens
    2020 “Ideology and (de)Legitimation: The Belgian Public Debate on Corporate Restructuring during the Great Recession.” Organization (): –. 10.1177/1350508419830623
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508419830623 [Google Scholar]
  29. Ma, Ji, and René Bekkers
    2024 “Consensus Formation in Nonprofit and Philanthropic Studies: Networks, Reputation, and Gender.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly (): –. 10.1177/08997640221146948
    https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221146948 [Google Scholar]
  30. Machin, David, and Yueyue Liu
    2023 “How Tick List Sustainability Distracts from Actual Sustainable Action: The UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.” Critical Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1080/17405904.2023.2197606
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2023.2197606 [Google Scholar]
  31. Maclean, Mairi, Charles Harvey, Roy Suddaby, and Kevin O’Gorman
    2018 “Political Ideology and the Discursive Construction of the Multinational Hotel Industry.” Human Relations (): –. 10.1177/0018726717718919
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717718919 [Google Scholar]
  32. McGoey, Linsey
    2015No Such Thing as a Free Gift. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Monier, Anne
    2023 “The Mobilization of the Philanthropic Sector for the Climate: A New Engagement?” InThe Palgrave Handbook of Environmental Politics and Theory, ed. byJoel Kassiola and Timothy Luke, –. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑14346‑5_16
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14346-5_16 [Google Scholar]
  34. Moran, Michael
    2023 “Global Philanthropy.” InInternational Organization and Global Governance, ed. byThomas Weiss, 3rd ed., –. Milton: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003266365‑37
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003266365-37 [Google Scholar]
  35. Morena, Edouard
    2016The Price of Climate Action: Philanthropic Foundations in the International Climate Debate. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑42484‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42484-2 [Google Scholar]
  36. Papin, Marielle, and Philippe Beauregard
    2023 “Can’t Buy Me Love: Billionaire Entrepreneurs’ Legitimation Strategies in Transnational Climate Governance.” Environmental Politics (): –. 10.1080/09644016.2023.2180909
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2023.2180909 [Google Scholar]
  37. Reich, Rob
    2018Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy and How It Can Do Better. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 10.2307/j.ctvc77jz8
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77jz8 [Google Scholar]
  38. Reisigl, Martin
    2018 “The Discourse-Historical Approach.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, –. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2016 “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” InMethods of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. byRuth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 3rd ed., –. London: SAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Schmitz, Hans, and Elena McCollim
    2021 “Billionaires in Global Philanthropy: A Decade of the Giving Pledge.” Society:–. 10.1007/s12115‑021‑00580‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-021-00580-0 [Google Scholar]
  41. Schnurbein, Georg von, Marta Rey-Garcia, and Michaela Neumayr
    2021 “Contemporary Philanthropy in the Spotlight: Pushing the Boundaries of Research on a Global and Contested Social Practice.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations:–. 10.1007/s11266‑021‑00343‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00343-9 [Google Scholar]
  42. Suchman, Mark
    1995 “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” The Academy of Management Review (): –. 10.2307/258788
    https://doi.org/10.2307/258788 [Google Scholar]
  43. Vaara, Eero
    2014 “Struggles over Legitimacy in the Eurozone Crisis: Discursive Legitimation Strategies and Their Ideological Underpinnings.” Discourse & Society (): –. 10.1177/0957926514536962
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514536962 [Google Scholar]
  44. Vaara, Eero, Ana Aranda, and Helen Etchanchu
    2024 “Discursive Legitimation: An Integrative Theoretical Framework and Agenda for Future Research.” Journal of Management (): –. 10.1177/01492063241230511
    https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241230511 [Google Scholar]
  45. Wiener, Antje
    2007 “The Dual Quality of Norms and Governance Beyond the State: Sociological and Normative Approaches to ‘Interaction.’” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (): –. 10.1080/13698230601122412
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230601122412 [Google Scholar]
  46. Wierzbicka, Anna
    1998 “German ‘Cultural Scripts’: Public Signs as a Key to Social Attitudes and Cultural Values.” Discourse & Society (): –. 10.1177/0957926598009002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926598009002006 [Google Scholar]
  47. Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
    2009 “Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory, and Methodology.” InMethods for Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. byRuth Wodak and Michael Meyer, –. London: SAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Youde, Jeremy
    2019 “The Role of Philanthropy in International Relations.” Review of International Studies (): –. 10.1017/S0260210518000220
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210518000220 [Google Scholar]
  49. Bezos Earth Fund
    Bezos Earth Fund. n.d. “Bezos Earth Fund.” AccessedApril 25, 2023. https://www.bezosearthfund.org/
  50. Bloomberg Philanthropies
    Bloomberg Philanthropies. n.d. “Public Health.” Annual Report 2021. AccessedApril 25, 2023. https://www.bloomberg.org/annualreport/all-programs/#public-health
  51. Charles Stewart Mott Foundation
    Charles Stewart Mott Foundation. n.d. “History and Founder.” AccessedApril 25, 2023. https://www.mott.org/about/history/
  52. Gates, Bill
    2022 “My Wish for 2023: The Future Our Grandchildren Deserve.” GatesNotes: The Blog of Bill Gates (blog). December 20, 2022. https://www.gatesnotes.com/The-Year-Ahead-2023
    [Google Scholar]
  53. McKnight Foundation
    McKnight Foundation. n.d. “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Statement.” AccessedApril 26, 2023. https://www.mcknight.org/about/diversity-equity-and-inclusion-statement/
  54. Porticus
    Porticus. n.d. “Our Values.” AccessedAugust 14, 2023. https://www.porticus.com/en/our-values
  55. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
    The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. n.d. “Agricultural Development.” AccessedApril 25, 2023. https://www.gatesfoundation.org/our-work/programs/global-growth-and-opportunity/agricultural-development
  56. The Nathan Cummings Foundation
    The Nathan Cummings Foundation. n.d. “Our Legacy.” AccessedApril 25, 2023. https://nathancummings.org/our-legacy/
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24040.deh
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24040.deh
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: justice ; critical discourse studies ; sustainable development ; philanthropy ; legitimation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error