1887
image of The (anti-)political logic of authoritarian institutionalism
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper develops the concept of — understood as a combination of authoritarianism as a form of discursive closure and institutionalism as a non-antagonistic construction of social relations following the logic of difference based on Laclau’s theory — which can yield insights from a discursive angle into the workings of “competitive authoritarian” regimes characterized by formally multi-party systems. Based on these considerations, the paper undertakes a periodization of party politics in Russia since 1993, which presents a useful case for probing the boundaries of authoritarian institutionalism given the regime-engineered dynamics of party competition since the days of so-called “managed democracy.” In applying the discourse-theoretical toolkit of difference/equivalence, the analysis identifies two phases of authoritarian consolidation since 2000 that have expanded the authoritarian dimension while curtailing the institutionalist operation of difference in the party system, raising the question of a “GDR-ization” of party politics since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24041.kim
2025-01-07
2025-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alyukov, Maksim
    2015Политика аполитичных. Гражданские движения в России 2011—2013 годов. Moscow: Новое литературное обозрение.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arditi, Benjamin
    2010 “Review Essay: Populism Is Hegemony Is Politics? On Ernesto Laclau’s ‘On Populist Reason’.” Constellations(): –. 10.1111/j.1467‑8675.2010.00587.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2010.00587.x [Google Scholar]
  3. De Cleen, Benjamin, and Yannis Stavrakakis
    2017 “Distinctions and Articulations: A Discourse Theoretical Framework for the Study of Populism and Nationalism.” Javnost — The Public(): –. 10.1080/13183222.2017.1330083
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2017.1330083 [Google Scholar]
  4. Dollbaum, Jan Matti
    2020 “Protest Trajectories in Electoral Authoritarianism: From Russia’s ‘For Fair Elections’ Movement to Alexei Navalny’s Presidential Campaign.” Post-Soviet Affairs(): –. 10.1080/1060586X.2020.1750275
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2020.1750275 [Google Scholar]
  5. Dollbaum, Jan Matti, and Seongcheol Kim
    2024 “Going Jingo: A Classification of the Wartime Positions of Russia’s ‘Systemic Opposition’ Parties.” Post-Soviet Affairs(): –. 10.1080/1060586X.2024.2324628
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2024.2324628 [Google Scholar]
  6. Enyedi, Zsolt
    2016 “Populist Polarization and Party System Institutionalization.” Problems of Post-Communism(): –. 10.1080/10758216.2015.1113883
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2015.1113883 [Google Scholar]
  7. Foucault, Michel
    [1969]2002Archaeology of Knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gabowitsch, Mischa
    2017Protest in Putin’s Russia. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gel’man, Vladimir
    2005 “Political Opposition in Russia: A Dying Species?” Post-Soviet Affairs(): –. 10.2747/1060‑586X.21.3.226
    https://doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.21.3.226 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2008 “Party Politics in Russia: From Competition to Hierarchy.” Europe-Asia Studies(): –. 10.1080/09668130802161165
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130802161165 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gerschewski, Johannes
    2023The Two Logics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009199407
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009199407 [Google Scholar]
  12. Glasius, Marlies
    2023Authoritarian Practices in a Global Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780192862655.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192862655.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  13. Golosov, Grigorii
    2012 “The Regional Roots of Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia.” InRussia’s Authoritarian Elections, edited byStephen White, –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Guriev, Sergei, and Daniel Treisman
    2022Spin Dictators: The Changing Face of Tyranny in the 21st Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Howarth, David, and Yannis Stavrakakis
    2000 “Introducing Discourse Theory and Political Analysis.” InDiscourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change, edited byDavid Howarth, Aletta Norval, and Yannis Stavrakakis, –. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kagarlitsky, Boris
    2002Russia Under Yeltsin and Putin: Neo-Liberal Autocracy. London: Pluto.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim, Seongcheol
    2017 “The Populism of the Alternative for Germany (AfD): An Extended Essex School Perspective.” Palgrave Communications(): –. 10.1057/s41599‑017‑0008‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0008-1 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2021 “… Because the Homeland Cannot Be in Opposition: Analysing the Discourses of Fidesz and Law and Justice (PiS) from Opposition to Power.” East European Politics(): –. 10.1080/21599165.2020.1791094
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2020.1791094 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2022 “The Russian Invasion in the Context of Post-Bolotnaya Authoritarian Consolidation.” Russian Analytical Digest: –. 10.3929/ethz‑b‑000539633
    https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000539633 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2023 “‘Illiberal Democracy’ after Post-Democracy: Revisiting the Case of Hungary.” The Political Quarterly(): –. 10.1111/1467‑923X.13255
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13255 [Google Scholar]
  21. Korgunyuk, Yury
    2017 “Classification of Russian Parties.” Russian Politics(): –. 10.1163/2451‑8921‑00203001
    https://doi.org/10.1163/2451-8921-00203001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Laclau, Ernesto
    2005aOn Populist Reason. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2005b “Populism: What’s in a Name?” InPopulism and the Mirror of Democracy, edited byFrancisco Panizza, –. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. [1996]2007Emancipation(s). London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
    [1985]2001Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lefort, Claude
    1986The Political Forms of Modern Society: Bureaucracy, Democracy, Totalitarianism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan A. Way
    2010Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511781353
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781353 [Google Scholar]
  28. Marchart, Oliver
    2007Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2018Thinking Antagonism: Political Ontology after Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9781474413329
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474413329 [Google Scholar]
  30. Mudde, Cas
    2007Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511492037
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492037 [Google Scholar]
  31. Orbán, Viktor
    2009 “Megőrizni a létezés magyar minőségét.” tdyweb.wbteam.com/Orban_Megorizni.htm
  32. Pavlovsky, Gleb
    2014 “Власти, эмоции и протесты в России.” Gefter. https://gefter.ru/archive/12661
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Pertsev, Andrei
    2023 “Партий больше нет. Письмо о том, как Путин возрождает ГДР.” https://bit.ly/gdru_kit
  34. Reuter, Ora John
    2017The Origins of Dominant Parties: Building Authoritarian Institutions in Post-Soviet Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316761649
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316761649 [Google Scholar]
  35. Sadurski, Wojciech
    2019Poland’s Constitutional Brakdown. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198840503.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198840503.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Saward, Michael
    2006 “The Representative Claim.” Contemporary Political Theory(): –. 10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300234
    https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300234 [Google Scholar]
  37. Schwenck, Anna
    2024Flexible Authoritarianism: Cultivating Ambition and Loyalty in Russia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197751589.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197751589.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Stavrakakis, Yannis
    2017 “Extreme Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Revisiting a Reified Association.” Critical Discourse Studies(): –. 10.1080/17405904.2017.1309325
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1309325 [Google Scholar]
  39. Wodak, Ruth
    2021The Politics of Fear: The Shameless Normalization of Far-Right Discourse. London: SAGE. 10.4135/9781529739664
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529739664 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24041.kim
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error