1887
image of The language of power or the power of language?
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

In the study, the discursive construction of political leadership was examined in the daily addresses by President Zelensky to Ukrainian people during two months of the Russian invasion of Ukraine: in March 2022 and March 2023. The research employs traditional tools of Critical Discourse Analysis, supplemented by quantitative methods, namely, the psychometric procedures offered by LIWC. Political leadership was researched as a discursive construct built intentionally and interactively by means of various linguistic resources: lexical, grammatical, and stylistic. It was shown that political leaders create their public identities in accordance with the encompassing socio-political conditions, pragmatically and psycholinguistically adapting their performances to the needs and wants of their audiences. The analysis of President Zelensky’s daily speeches at the early stages of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine enabled us to determine the main linguistic features and communicative strategies characteristic of the discursive behavior of a political leader in times of crisis.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24051.ush
2025-09-15
2026-07-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barkho, Leon and John E. Richardson
    2010 “A Critique of BBC’s Middle East News Production Strategy.” American Communication Journal(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baudrillard, Jean
    1981Simulacres et Simulation. Paris: Galilée.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Benwell, Bethan and Elizabeth Stokoe
    2006Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748626533
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748626533 [Google Scholar]
  4. Blommaert, Jan
    2009Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boyd, Ryan, Ashokkumar, Ashwini, Seraj, Sarah, and James Pennebaker
    2022The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC-22. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin. URL: https://www.liwc.app (accessed betweenAugust 2022 and December 2023)
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Braun, Friederike
    1988Terms of Address: Problems of Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures. Berlin/NY/Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110848113
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110848113 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bucholtz, Mary and Kira Hall
    2005 “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies(): –. 10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chilton, Paul and Christina Schäffner
    (eds.) 2002Politics as Text and Talk. Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.4 [Google Scholar]
  9. Davydenko, Borys and Oleksandr Nadelniuk
    2023 “Сила слова. Зеленський виступав з початку війни понад 560 разів. Як його промови вплинули на Україну та світ.” (“The power of the word. Zelensky delivered about 560 speeches from the beginning of war. How his speeches influenced Ukraine and the world.”). 24 February 2023. Forbes. URL: https://forbes.ua/war-in-ukraine/sila-slova-zelenskiy-vistupav-z-pochatku-viyni-ponad-560-raziv-yak-yogo-promovi-vplinuli-ukrainu-ta-svit-24022023-11965 (accessed25 June, 2025)
    [Google Scholar]
  10. De Fina, Anna
    2011 “Discourse and Identity.” InDiscourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introductioned. byTeun A. van Dijk, –. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446289068.n13
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446289068.n13 [Google Scholar]
  11. de Vries, Reinout E., Angelique Bakker-Pieper, Robert Alting-Siberg, Kim van-Gameren, & Martin Vlug
    2009 “The content and dimensionality of communication styles.” Communication Research(): -. 10.1177/0093650208330250
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208330250 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dijk, Teun A. van
    2008aDiscourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. CambridgeNew York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511481499
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481499 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2008bDiscourse and Power. London: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑07299‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07299-3 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fairclough, Norman
    1989Language and Power. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 1998Critical Discourse Analysis. London/New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Fetzer, Anita, & Bull, Peter
    2012 “Doing leadership in political speech: Semantic processes and pragmatic inferences.” Discourse & Society(): -. 10.1177/0957926511431510
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511431510 [Google Scholar]
  17. Fillmore, Charles J. and Beryl T. Atkins
    1992 “Toward a Frame-Based Lexicon: The Semantics of RISK and its Neighbors.” InFrames, Fields and Contrasts, ed. byAdrienne Lehrer & Eva Feder Kittay, –. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hart, Christopher
    2014Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Harter, Susan
    2002 “Authenticity.” InHandbook of Positive Psychologyed. byC. R. Snyder & Shane Lopez, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kacewicz, Ewa, Pennebaker, James W., Davis, Matthew, Jeon, Moongee and Arthur C. Graesser
    2014 “Pronoun Use Reflects Standings in Social Hierarchies.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology(): –. 10.1177/0261927X13502654
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X13502654 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kalichman, Seth C. and Joshua M. Smyth
    2023 “And You Don’t Like, Don’t Like the Way I Talk”: Authenticity in the Language of Bruce Springsteen.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts(): –. 10.1037/aca0000402
    https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000402 [Google Scholar]
  22. KhosraviNik, Majid and Johann W. Unger
    2016 “Critical Discourse Studies and Social Media: Power, Resistance and Critique in Changing Media Ecologies.” InMethods of Critical Discourse Studiesed. byRuth Wodak & Michael Meyer, (3rd ed.), –. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Pennebaker, James W.
    2013The Secret Life of Pronouns: What Our Words Say About Us. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Pennebaker, James W., Booth, Roger J., Boyd, Ryan and Marta E. Francis
    2015Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC2015. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin. https://www.liwc.app (accessed betweenAugust 2022 and December 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Pennebaker, James W., Boyd, Ryan, Jordan, Kayla and Kate Blackburn
    2015The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin. https://www.liwc.app (accessed betweenAugust 2022 and December 2023)
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Pennebaker, James W., Chung, Cindy K., Frazee, Joey, Lavergne, Gary M. and David Beaver
    2014 “When Small Words Foretell Academic Success: The Case of College Admissions Essays.” PLoS ONE(). 10.1371/journal.pone.0115844
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115844 [Google Scholar]
  27. Silverstein, Michael
    2023Language in Culture. Lectures on the Social Semiotics of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Windsor, Darlene, Biedma, Lucia, & Roper, Alan
    2017 Leadership discourse in the age of globalization: A critical review. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, (), –. 10.1177/1548051817727456
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051817727456 [Google Scholar]
  29. Wodak, Ruth and Michael Meyer
    2009Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Zarefsky, David
    2004 “Presidential Rhetoric and the Power of Definition.” Presidential Studies Quartely(): –. 10.1111/j.1741‑5705.2004.00214.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2004.00214.x [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24051.ush
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24051.ush
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error