1887
image of Enemy narratives
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Within the fields of narratology, cognitive linguistics and discourse analysis, this article studies how “Vote Leave” – the “respectable” side of the pro-Brexit debate –, used storytelling to frame an exclusionary conception of the British nation. To do so, the article relies on a critical narrative analysis of the storytelling elements at the heart of a corpus of official documents from the 2016 campaign, and argues that those Brexit narratives were instrumental in the creation of a nativist conception of the British nation. The paper contributes to the rich literature on Brexit narratives by adopting an original approach focusing on what we call “enemy narratives” and on how this type of narratives helped construct a restrictive understanding of the British nation. The result will be correlated with the growing political polarization of post-Brexit British society and the emergence of what some researchers consider as a culture war

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24095.bon
2024-08-05
2024-09-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abbott, Porter
    2008The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816932
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816932 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, Benedict
    2006Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. 2e edition. London: Verso Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ashcroft, Richard T., and Mark Bevir
    2021 “Brexit and the Myth of British National Identity.” British Politics (): –. 10.1057/s41293‑021‑00167‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-021-00167-7 [Google Scholar]
  4. Atkins, Judi, and Alan Finlayson
    2012 “Show – Don’t Tell: Political Rhetoric Is Increasingly Anecdotal but Not Particularly Artful.” British Politics and Policy at LSE (blog). 31 May 2012. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/show-dont-tell-political-speech-anecdotes/
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bale, Tim
    2011The Conservative Party: From Thatcher to Cameron. Cambridge: Polity Press. 10.4135/9781446269220.n2
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446269220.n2 [Google Scholar]
  6. Barrington, Lowell W.
    ed. 2006After Independence: Making and Protecting the Nation in Postcolonial & Postcommunist States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.126246
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.126246 [Google Scholar]
  7. Berut, Benjamin
    2010 “Storytelling : Une Nouvelle Propagande Par Le Récit ?” Quaderni, no. (April), –. 10.4000/quaderni.479
    https://doi.org/10.4000/quaderni.479 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bonnet, Alma-Pierre
    2020 “Brexit and the Myth of Grandeur.” ELAD-SILDA, no. (July). 10.35562/elad‑silda.905
    https://doi.org/10.35562/elad-silda.905 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2023 “Le Storytelling de Boris Johnson à l’épreuve de La Crise Sanitaire.” Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique (). 10.4000/rfcb.10749
    https://doi.org/10.4000/rfcb.10749 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2024 “The ‘Turkey story’: A critical narrative analysis of a potential ‘Brexit conspiracy’.” ELAD-SILDA, no. (May). 10.35562/elad‑silda.1403
    https://doi.org/10.35562/elad-silda.1403 [Google Scholar]
  11. Browning, Christopher S.
    2018 “Brexit, Existential Anxiety and Ontological (in)Security.” European Security (): –. 10.1080/09662839.2018.1497982
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2018.1497982 [Google Scholar]
  12. Buckledee, Steve
    2018The Language of Brexit: How Britain Talked Its Way out of the European Union. London, UK ; New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Calhoun, Craig
    2017 “Populism, Nationalism and Brexit.” InBrexit: Sociological Responses, W. Outhwaite, –. London: Anthem Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Campbell, Rosie, and Oliver Heath
    2021 “Fueling the Populist Divide: Nativist and Cosmopolitan Preferences for Representation at the Elite and Mass Level.” Political Behavior (): –. 10.1007/s11109‑021‑09743‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09743-5 [Google Scholar]
  15. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2013Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. 2013th edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2019Metaphors of Brexit: No Cherries on the Cake?1st ed. 2019 édition. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑28768‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28768-9 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cillia, Rudolf De, and Ruth Wodak
    2021 “La Construction Discursive de l’identité Nationale.” Mots, no. (November), –. 10.4000/mots.28995
    https://doi.org/10.4000/mots.28995 [Google Scholar]
  18. Clarke, Harold D., Matthew Goodwin, and Paul Whiteley
    2017Brexit: Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316584408
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316584408 [Google Scholar]
  19. Clegg, Daniel
    2017 “Brexit, the UK Labour Market and the Lessons for Social Europe.” InSocial Policy in the European Union: State of Play 2017, Vanhercke, B., Sabato, S. and Bouget, D., –. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute (ETUI) and European Social Observatory (OSE).
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Daly, Eoin
    2020 “Constitutionalism and Crisis Narratives in Post-Brexit Politics.” Political Studies (): –. 10.1177/0032321720904936
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720904936 [Google Scholar]
  21. Dayan, Daniel
    2006 “Chapitre 6. Quand montrer c’est faire.” InLa terreur spectacle, –. Médias-Recherches. Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Supérieur. 10.3917/dbu.dayan.2006.01.0165
    https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.dayan.2006.01.0165 [Google Scholar]
  22. De Fina, Anna
    2017 “Narrative Analysis” (2017) InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, edited byR. Wodak and B. Forchtner, London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315183718‑18
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315183718-18 [Google Scholar]
  23. De Fina, Anna, and Alexandra Georgakopoulou
    2011Analyzing Narrative: Discourse and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. 1st ed.Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139051255
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051255 [Google Scholar]
  24. Dijk, Teun A Van van
    2001 “18 Critical Discourse Analysis.” InHandbook of Discourse Analysis, edited byD. Tannen, D. Schiffrin, H. Hamilton, –. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Dorey, Pete
    2021 “David Cameron’s Catastrophic Miscalculation : The EU Referendum, Brexit and the UK’s “Culture War’.” Observatoire de La Société Britannique, no. (October), –. 10.4000/osb.5444
    https://doi.org/10.4000/osb.5444 [Google Scholar]
  26. Doyle, Oran, Aileen McHarg, and Jo Murkens
    2021 “The Constitutional Tensions of Brexit.” InThe Brexit Challenge for Ireland and the United Kingdom, edited byOran Doyle, Aileen McHarg, and Jo Murkens, 1st ed., –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108966399.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108966399.002 [Google Scholar]
  27. Duffy, Bobby, Kirstie Hewlett, George Murkin, Rebecca Benson, Rachel Hesketh, Ben Page, Gideon Skinner, and Glenn Gottfried
    2021 “‘Culture Wars’ in the UK.” King’s College London. 10.18742/PUB01‑055
    https://doi.org/10.18742/PUB01-055 [Google Scholar]
  28. Eatwell, Roger, and Matthew Goodwin
    2018National Populism: The Revolt Against Liberal Democracy. London UK: Penguin UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ehrmann, Moritz, and Gearoid Millar
    2021 “The Power of Narratives in Conflict and Peace: The Case of Contemporary Iraq.” Civil Wars (): –. 10.1080/13698249.2021.2004044
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2021.2004044 [Google Scholar]
  30. Fabbrini, Sergio, and Tiziano Zgaga
    2024 “Right-Wing Sovereignism in the European Union: Definition, Features and Implications.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies (): –. 10.1111/jcms.13497
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13497 [Google Scholar]
  31. Federman, Sarah
    2016 “Narrative Approaches to Understanding and Responding to Conflict.” The International Journal of Conflict Engagement and Resolution (): –. 10.5553/IJCER/221199652016004002002
    https://doi.org/10.5553/IJCER/221199652016004002002 [Google Scholar]
  32. Feldman, Martha, Kaj Sköldberg, Ruth Brown, and Debra Horner
    2004 “Making Sense of Stories: A Rhetorical Approach to Narrative Analysis.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (April). 10.1093/jopart/muh010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh010 [Google Scholar]
  33. Fludernik, Monika
    2009An Introduction to Narratology. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203882887
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203882887 [Google Scholar]
  34. Forchtner, Bernhard
    2021 “Introducing ‘Narrative in Critical Discourse Studies’.” Critical Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1080/17405904.2020.1802765
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1802765 [Google Scholar]
  35. Gabriel, Yiannis
    2015 “Narratives and Stories in Organizational Life.” InThe Handbook of Narrative Analysis, edited byAnna De Fina and Alexandra Georgakopoulou, 1st ed., –. Wiley. 10.1002/9781118458204.ch14
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118458204.ch14 [Google Scholar]
  36. Galmisch, Raphaële
    2015 “Le Storytelling : Cercle de La Narration Au Service de l’ethos Du Leader.” Revue Française Des Sciences de l’information et de La Communication, no. (July). 10.4000/rfsic.1627
    https://doi.org/10.4000/rfsic.1627 [Google Scholar]
  37. Gellner, Ernest
    1988Nations and Nationalism. New Perspectives on the Past. New York Oxford: B. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Goodwin, Matthew
    2023Values, Voice and Virtue: The New British Politics. UK USA Canada Ireland Australia India New Zealand South Africa: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Hagström, Linus, and Karl Gustafsson
    2019 “Narrative Power: How Storytelling Shapes East Asian International Politics.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs (): –. 10.1080/09557571.2019.1623498
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1623498 [Google Scholar]
  40. Henkel, Imke
    2021Destructive Storytelling: Disinformation and the Eurosceptic Myth That Shaped Brexit. 1st ed. 2021 edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑69503‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69503-3 [Google Scholar]
  41. Hobsbawm, E. J.
    1992Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. 2nd ed.Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CCOL0521439612
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521439612 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hunter, James Davison
    1991Culture Wars: The Struggle To Define America. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Iakhnis, Evgeniia, Brian Rathbun, Jason Reifler, and Thomas J. Scotto
    2018 “Populist Referendum: Was ‘Brexit’ an Expression of Nativist and Anti-Elitist Sentiment?” Research & Politics (): 205316801877396. 10.1177/2053168018773964
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018773964 [Google Scholar]
  44. Ifversen, Jan
    2017 “Conceptual History”. InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, edited byR. Wodak and B. Forchtner, –. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315183718‑10
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315183718-10 [Google Scholar]
  45. Jamet, Denis, and Pauline Rodet
    2021 “How Is Brexit Linguistically-Constructed ? A Corpus Linguistic Analysis of Speeches by David Cameron, Theresa May and Boris Johnson.” Observatoire de La Société Britannique, no. (October), –. 10.4000/osb.5290
    https://doi.org/10.4000/osb.5290 [Google Scholar]
  46. Koegler, Caroline, Pavan Kumar Malreddy, and Marlena Tronicke
    2020 “The Colonial Remains of Brexit: Empire Nostalgia and Narcissistic Nationalism.” Journal of Postcolonial Writing (): –. 10.1080/17449855.2020.1818440
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17449855.2020.1818440 [Google Scholar]
  47. Kohn, Hans
    1965Nationalism Its Meaning and History. Reprint édition. Malabar, Fla: Krieger Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Koller, Veronika
    2019Discourses of Brexit. London ; New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351041867
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351041867 [Google Scholar]
  49. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2019 “Brexit and the Imaginary of ‘Crisis’: A Discourse-Conceptual Analysis of European News Media.” Critical Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1592001
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1592001 [Google Scholar]
  50. Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky
    1997 “Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience.” Journal of Narrative and Life History (): –. 10.1075/jnlh.7.02nar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.02nar [Google Scholar]
  51. Liebhart, KarinVE, Rudolf De Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Ruth Wodak
    2009The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748637355
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748637355 [Google Scholar]
  52. Lockwood, Matthew
    2018 “Right-Wing Populism and the Climate Change Agenda: Exploring the Linkages.” Environmental Politics (): –. 10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411 [Google Scholar]
  53. Maccaferri, Marzia, and George Newth
    2022 “The Delegitimisation of Europe in a Pro-European Country: ‘Sovereignism’ and Populism in the Political Discourse of Matteo Salvini’s Lega.” Journal of Language and Politics. John Benjamins. 10.1075/jlp.21066.mac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21066.mac [Google Scholar]
  54. March, Luke
    2007 “From Vanguard of the Proletariat to Vox Populi: Left-Populism as a ‘Shadow’ of Contemporary Socialism.” SAIS Review of International Affairs (): –. 10.1353/sais.2007.0013
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sais.2007.0013 [Google Scholar]
  55. Meislová, Monika Brusenbauch
    2021 “The EU as a Choice: Populist and Technocratic Narratives of the EU in the Brexit Referendum Campaign.” Journal of Contemporary European Research (). 10.30950/jcer.v17i2.1207
    https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v17i2.1207 [Google Scholar]
  56. Mudde, Cas
    2007Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. 1st ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511492037
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492037 [Google Scholar]
  57. Musolff, Andreas
    2021 “Having Your Cake, Eating It and Losing the (p)Lot : The Combination of Proverb, Hyperbole and Sarcasm in (and about) Brexiters’ Discourses.” Observatoire de La Société Britannique, no. (October), –. 10.4000/osb.5318
    https://doi.org/10.4000/osb.5318 [Google Scholar]
  58. Norris, Pippa, and Ronald Inglehart
    2019Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108595841
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108595841 [Google Scholar]
  59. Oppenheimer, Louis
    2006 “The Development of Enemy Images: A Theoretical Contribution.” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology (): –. 10.1207/s15327949pac1203_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327949pac1203_4 [Google Scholar]
  60. Ostiguy, Pierre, and Maria Esperanza Casullo
    2017 “Left versus Right Populism: Antagonism and the Social Other”. University of Glasgow.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Parekh, Bhikhu
    2009 “Being British”. InBritishness, edited byA. Gamble and T. Wright, –. London: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Patez, Fabrice
    1998 “Quelques Remarques Sur l’imaginaire National.” Les Cahiers Du Cériem:–.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Polletta, Francesca
    2006It Was Like a Fever: Storytelling in Protest and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226673776.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226673776.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  64. 2015 “Characters in Political Storytelling.” Storytelling, Self, Society (): –. 10.13110/storselfsoci.11.1.0034
    https://doi.org/10.13110/storselfsoci.11.1.0034 [Google Scholar]
  65. Reisigl, Martin
    2021 “‘“Narrative!” I Can’t Hear That Anymore’. A Linguistic Critique of an Overstretched Umbrella Term in Cultural and Social Science Studies, Discussed with the Example of the Discourse on Climate Change.” Critical Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1080/17405904.2020.1822897
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1822897 [Google Scholar]
  66. Ridge-Newman, Anthony, Fernando León-Solís, and Hugh O’Donnell
    2018 “Constructing Brexit: Crisis and International Political Communication.” InReporting the Road to Brexit, edited byAnthony Ridge-Newman, Fernando León-Solís, and Hugh O’Donnell, –. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑73682‑2_20
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73682-2_20 [Google Scholar]
  67. Salmon, Christian
    2008Storytelling: La machine à fabriquer des histoires et à formater les esprits. Paris: La Découverte.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Schnur Neile, Caren
    2015 “Introduction to the Special Issue: Storytelling and Politics.” Storytelling, Self, Society (): –. 10.13110/storselfsoci.11.1.0001
    https://doi.org/10.13110/storselfsoci.11.1.0001 [Google Scholar]
  69. Seargeant, Philip
    2020The Art of Political Storytelling: Why Stories Win Votes in Post-Truth Politics. London New York Oxford New Delhi Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic. 10.5040/9781350107427
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350107427 [Google Scholar]
  70. Sion, Liora
    2018 “Enemy Making”. InThe SAGE Encyclopedia of War: Social Science Perspectives, edited byPaul Joseph. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Sobolewska, Maria, and Robert Ford
    2020Brexitland. Cambridge, United Kingdom New York, NY Port Melbourne, Australia New Delhi, India Singapore: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108562485
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108562485 [Google Scholar]
  72. Souto-Manning, Mariana
    2014 “Critical Narrative Analysis: The Interplay of Critical Discourse and Narrative Analyses.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (): –. 10.1080/09518398.2012.737046
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2012.737046 [Google Scholar]
  73. Spencer, Alexander, and Kai Oppermann
    2020 “Narrative Genres of Brexit: The Leave Campaign and the Success of Romance.” Journal of European Public Policy (): –. 10.1080/13501763.2019.1662828
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1662828 [Google Scholar]
  74. Svendsen, Øyvind
    2021 “Security Communities in Crisis: Crisis Constitution, Struggles and Temporality.” Journal of Contemporary European Research (). 10.30950/jcer.v17i3.1050
    https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v17i3.1050 [Google Scholar]
  75. Taggart, Paul
    2012 “Populism Has the Potential to Damage European Democracy, but Demonising Populist Parties Is Self-Defeating.” EUROPP (blog). 13 December 2012. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2012/12/13/populism-has-the-potential-to-damage-european-democracy-paul-taggart/
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Wodak, Ruth
    2011 “Critical Discourse Analysis”. InThe Bloomsbury Companion to Discourse Analysis, edited byHyland K. and Paltridge, B.London: Bloomsbury. 10.4324/9781315852515.ch20
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315852515.ch20 [Google Scholar]
  77. 2020The Politics of Fear: The Shameless Normalization of Far-right Discourse. 2e édition. Los Angeles: Sage Publications Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Young, Hugo
    1998This Blessed Plot. Britain And Europe From Churchill To Blair. London: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Zappettini, Franco
    2019 “The Brexit Referendum: How Trade and Immigration in the Discourses of the Official Campaigns Have Legitimised a Toxic (Inter)National Logic.” Critical Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1593206
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1593206 [Google Scholar]
  80. 2022 “Taking the Left Way out of Europe: Labour Party’s Strategic, Ideological and Ambivalent de/Legitimation of Brexit.” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.21069.zap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21069.zap [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24095.bon
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24095.bon
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Introduction
Keywords: storytelling ; narrative analysis ; Vote Leave ; nativism ; Brexit ; critical discourse analysis
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error