1887
Volume 23, Issue 5
  • ISSN 1569-2159
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article outlines a framework for studying practices of boundary-making as pivotal to the various ways in which “rights” become objects of contention and sources of narrativization in contemporary constitutional democracies. Firstly, we reconsider the dynamics of boundary-making that underline polarization by drawing on the notion of “moral economy”. This concept is well-suited for making sense of how social groups draw lines of demarcation through the appropriation, circulation, and confrontation of values and emotions. However, we argue that the concept must be enriched by acknowledging the generative role of narratives. Hence, we introduce the notion of “narrative boundaries” for comprehending how moral economies are produced by storytelling practices. Based on this, we explore the paradoxical moral economy of constitutional struggles. While the discourse of rights pursues modes of inclusion, the struggles over their demarcation often result in narratives that build fences that reinforce the division between almost irreconcilable normative worlds.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24096.cor
2024-07-26
2025-04-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alexander, Jeffrey. C.
    1992 “Citizen and Enemy as Symbolic Classification: On the Polarizing Discourse of Civil Society.” InCultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality, edited byMichèle Lamont and Marcel Fourier, 289–308. The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander, J. C.
    2006The Civil Sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195162509.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195162509.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Andrews, Molly
    2007Shaping History. Narratives of Political Change. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511557859
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557859 [Google Scholar]
  4. Alter, Karen J., and Michael Zürn
    2020 “Conceptualising backlash politics: Introduction to a special issue on backlash politics in comparison.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations22(4): 563–584. 10.1177/1369148120947958
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120947958 [Google Scholar]
  5. Barthes, Ronald
    1975 An Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narrative. New Literary History6(2):237–72. 10.2307/468419
    https://doi.org/10.2307/468419 [Google Scholar]
  6. Blokker, Paul
    2017 “Politics and the Political in Sociological Constitutionalism.”. InSociological Constitutionalism, edited byPaul Blokker and Chris Thornhill, 178–208. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316403808.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316403808.006 [Google Scholar]
  7. Boltanski, Luc, and Laurent Thèvenot
    2006On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400827145
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400827145 [Google Scholar]
  8. Booth, William J.
    1994 “On the Idea of the Moral Economy.” American Political Science Review, 88(3), 653–667. 10.2307/2944801
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2944801 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bourdieu, Pierre
    2018Classification Struggles. General Sociology, Volume 1. Lectures at the Collège de France (1981–1982). Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, Wendy
    2000 “Suffering rights as paradoxes.” Constellations7 (2): 208–229. 10.1111/1467‑8675.00183
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.00183 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2019Nihilistic Times: Thinking with Max Weber. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bruner, Jerome
    1991 The Narrative Construction of Reality. Critical Inquiry181. 10.1086/448619
    https://doi.org/10.1086/448619 [Google Scholar]
  13. Calhoun, Craig, Dilip Parameshwar Gaonkar, and Charles Taylor
    2022Degenerations of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cordero, Rodrigo
    2019 “The Negative Dialectics of Law: Luhmann and the Sociology of Juridical Concepts.” Social & Legal Studies29(1): 3–18. 10.1177/0964663918819173
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663918819173 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cornejo, Marcela, Carolina Rocha, Diego Castro, Micaela Varela, Jorge Manzi, Roberto González, Gloria Jiménez-Moya, Héctor Carvacho, Belén Álvarez, Daniel Valdenegro, Manuel Cheyre, and Andrew Livingstone
    2021 “The intergenerational transmission of participation in collective action: The role of conversation and political practices in the family”. British Journal of Social Psychology60(1): 29–49. 10.1111/bjso.12420
    https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12420 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cover, Robert M.
    1983 “Foreword: Nomos and Narrative”. Harvard Law Review97(1): 4–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 1985 “Folktales of Justice: Tales of Jurisdiction”. Capital University Law Review141: 179–203.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. De, Rohit
    2018A People’s Constitution: The Everyday of Life in the Indian Republic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. De Fina, Anna, Alexandra Georgakopoulou
    2011Analyzing Narrative: Discourse and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139051255
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051255 [Google Scholar]
  20. Deppermann, Arnulf
    2015 “Positioning.” InThe Handbook of Narrative Analysis, edited byAnna De Fina and Alexandra Georgakopoulou, 369–387. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118458204.ch19
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118458204.ch19 [Google Scholar]
  21. Downey, Dennis J.
    2022 “Polarization and Persuasion: Engaging Sociology in the Moral Universe of a Divided Democracy.” Sociological Perspectives, 65(6): 1029–1051. 10.1177/07311214221124443
    https://doi.org/10.1177/07311214221124443 [Google Scholar]
  22. Eder, Klaus
    2006 “Europe’s Borders: The Narrative Construction of the Boundaries of Europe.” European Journal of Social Theory9(2): 255–71. 10.1177/1368431006063345
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431006063345 [Google Scholar]
  23. Engelken-Jorge, Marcos, Bernhard Forchtner, and Özgür Özvatan
    2023 “Theorizing exclusionary and inclusionary people-making: from narrative genres to collective learning processes.” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, onlinefirst. 10.1080/1600910X.2023.2219416
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2023.2219416 [Google Scholar]
  24. Elias, Nobert
    1994 “Introduction: A Theoretical Essay on Established and Outsider Relations”. InThe Established and the Outsiders: A Sociological Enquiry into Community Problems, 2nd edition, xv–lii. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446222126
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446222126 [Google Scholar]
  25. Fassin, Didier
    2009 “Moral Economies Revisited.” Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales64(6) : 1237–1266. 10.1017/S0395264900027499
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0395264900027499 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2012Humanitarian Reason: A Moral History of the Present. Berkeley and Los Angeles: California University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2018Life: A Critical User’s Manual. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2020 “Are the Two Approaches to Moral Economy Irreconcilable?” Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development11(2): 217–221. 10.1353/hum.2020.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/hum.2020.0010 [Google Scholar]
  29. Forchtner, Bernarnd, and Christoffer Kølvraa
    2012 “Narrating a ‘New Europe’: From ‘bitter Past’ to Self-Righteousness?” Discourse & Society23(4):377–400. 10.1177/0957926512441108
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926512441108 [Google Scholar]
  30. Forchtner, Bernard
    2012 “Critical Discourse Analysis”. In. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, edited byCarol A. Chapelle, 296–310. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0272
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0272 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2016Lessons from the Past? Memory, Narrativity, and Subjetivity. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑48322‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48322-5 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2021a “Introducing ‘Narrative’ in Critical Discourse Studies.” Critical Discourse Studies18(3): 304–313. 10.1080/17405904.2020.1802765
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1802765 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2021b “Critique, Habermas and narrative (genre): the discourse-historical approach in critical discourse studies.” Critical Discourse Studies18(3): 314–331. 10.1080/17405904.2020.1803093
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1803093 [Google Scholar]
  34. Forst, Rainer
    2017Normativity and Power: Analyzing Social Orders of Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198798873.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198798873.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  35. Frei, Raimundo
    2015 The living bond of generations: the narrative construction of post-dictatorial memories in Argentina and Chile. Doctoral thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2020 “‘In my home nobody spoke about religion, politics or football’: Communicative silences among generations in Argentina and Chile.” Memory Studies13(4): 570–585. 10.1177/1750698017754249
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017754249 [Google Scholar]
  37. Frye, Northrop
    1957Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400866908
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400866908 [Google Scholar]
  38. Garrett, Kristin, and Alexa Bankert
    2020 “The Moral Roots of Partisan Division: How Moral Conviction Heightens Affective Polarization.” British Journal of Political Science50(2): 621–640. 10.1017/S000712341700059X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341700059X [Google Scholar]
  39. Gergen, Mary
    1988 “Narrative Structures in Social Explanation”. InAnalysing Everyday Explanation. A Casebook of Methods, edited byCharles Antaki, 94–112. London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Götz, Norbert
    2015 “‘Moral economy’: Its conceptual history and analytical prospects.” Journal of Global Ethics11(2): 147–162. 10.1080/17449626.2015.1054556
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2015.1054556 [Google Scholar]
  41. Greene, Joshua
    2013Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap between Us and Them. New York: The Penguin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Gubrium, Jaber, and James Holstein
    2009Analizing Narrative Reality. California: Sage Publications. 10.4135/9781452234854
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452234854 [Google Scholar]
  43. Honneth, Axel
    1995The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Hobolt, Sara, Thomas Leeper, and James Tilley
    2021 “Divided by the Vote: Affective Polarization in the Wake of the Brexit Referendum.” British Journal of Political Science51(4): 1476–1493. 10.1017/S0007123420000125
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000125 [Google Scholar]
  45. Hochschild, Arlie
    2016Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York: The New Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Illouz, Eva
    2023The Emotional Life of Populism. How Fear, Disgust, Resentment, and Love Undermine Democracy. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Iyengar, Shanto, Yphtach Lelkes, Matthew Levendusky, Neil Malhotra, and Sean J. Westwood
    2019 “The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States.” Annual Review of Political Science22(1): 129–146. 10.1146/annurev‑polisci‑051117‑073034
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034 [Google Scholar]
  48. Iyengar, Shanto, Gaurav Sood, and Yphtach Lelkes
    2012 “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly76(3): 405–431. 10.1093/poq/nfs038
    https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038 [Google Scholar]
  49. Jacobs, Ronald
    1996 “Civil Society and Crisis: Culture, Discourse, and the Rodney King Beating.” The American Journal of Sociology101(5): 1238–72. 10.1086/230822
    https://doi.org/10.1086/230822 [Google Scholar]
  50. Jacobs, Ronald, and Phillip Smith
    1997 “Romance, Irony, and Solidarity.” Sociological Theory15(1): 60–80. 10.1111/0735‑2751.00023
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00023 [Google Scholar]
  51. Krzyżanowski, Michal, and Natalia Krzyżanowska
    2022 “Narrating the ‘new normal’ or pre-legitimising media control? COVID-19 and the discursive shifts in the far-right imaginary of ‘crisis’ as a normalisation strategy.” Discourse & Society33(6): 805–818. 10.1177/09579265221095420
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221095420 [Google Scholar]
  52. Lamont, Michèle, Stefan Beljean, and Mathew Clair
    2014 “What Is Missing? Cultural Processes and Causal Pathways to Inequality.” Socio-Economic Review12(3):573–608. 10.1093/ser/mwu011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu011 [Google Scholar]
  53. Lamont, Michèle, & Virág Molnár
    2002 “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology28(1): 167–195. 10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107 [Google Scholar]
  54. Labov, William
    1972Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 1997 “Some Further Steps in Narrative Analysis.” Journal of Narrative and Life History71: 394–415. 10.1075/jnlh.7.49som
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.49som [Google Scholar]
  56. 2013The Language of Life and Death: The Transformation of Experience in Oral Narrative. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139519632
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519632 [Google Scholar]
  57. Lechner, Norbert
    2023 “There Are Those Who Die of Fear.” InOn Democratic Politics: A Selection of Essays by Norbert Lechner, edited byVelia Cecilia Bobes and Francisco Valdés-Ugalde, 131–42. Pittsburgh: Latin America Research Commons. 10.25154/book12
    https://doi.org/10.25154/book12 [Google Scholar]
  58. Levitsky, Steven, and Daniel Ziblatt
    2019How Democracies Die. New York: Broadway Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. McCoy, Jennifer, and Murat Somer
    2019 “Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies: Comparative Evidence and Possible Remedies.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science681(1): 234–271. 10.1177/0002716218818782
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218818782 [Google Scholar]
  60. McCoy, Jennifer, Tahmina Rahman, and Murat Somer
    2018 “Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities.” American Behavioral Scientist62(1): 16–42. 10.1177/0002764218759576
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218759576 [Google Scholar]
  61. Menke, Christoph
    2020Critique of Rights. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Neves, Marcelo
    2022Symbolic Constitutionalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780192857149.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192857149.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  63. Palomera, Jaime, and Theodora Vetta
    2016 “Moral economy: Rethinking a radical concept.” Anthropological Theory, 16(4), 413–432. 10.1177/1463499616678097
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499616678097 [Google Scholar]
  64. Pierson, Paul, and Eric Schickler
    2020 “Madison’s Constitution Under Stress: A Developmental Analysis of Political Polarization.” Annual Review of Political Science23(1): 37–58. 10.1146/annurev‑polisci‑050718‑033629
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-033629 [Google Scholar]
  65. Polletta, Francesca
    2002 “Plotting Protest. Mobilizing Stories in the 1960 Student Sit-Ins.” InStories of Change. Narrative and Social Movements, edited byJoseph Davis, 31–51. New York: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Polletta, Francesca, and Jessica Callahan
    2017 “Deep Stories, Nostalgia Narratives, and Fake News: Storytelling in the Trump Era.” American Journal of Cultural Sociology51: 392–408. 10.1057/s41290‑017‑0037‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-017-0037-7 [Google Scholar]
  67. Przeworski, Adam
    2019Crises of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108671019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108671019 [Google Scholar]
  68. Revers, Matthias
    2023 “Performative Polarization: The Interactional and Cultural Drivers of Political Antagonism.” Cultural Sociology, 0(0). 10.1177/17499755231188808
    https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755231188808 [Google Scholar]
  69. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2009 “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” InMethods of critical discourse analysis, edited byMartin Reisigl and Ruth Wodak, 87–121. London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Ricoeur, Paul
    2000 “Who Is the Subject of Rights?” InThe Just, 1–10. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. 1984Time and Narrative. Volume I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226713519.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226713519.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  72. Sani, G Giacomo, and Sartori, Giovanni
    1983 “Polarization, fragmentation and competition in Western democracies.” InWestern European Party Systems: Continuity and Change, edited byDaalder Hans and Peter Mair, 307–340. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Sartori, Giovanni
    2005 [1976]Parties and Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Colchester: ECPR Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Schedler, Andreas
    2023 “Rethinking Political Polarization.” Political Science Quarterly, 138(3): 335–35. 10.1093/psquar/qqad038
    https://doi.org/10.1093/psquar/qqad038 [Google Scholar]
  75. Smith, Rogers M.
    2020That Is Not Who We Are! Populism and Peoplehood. New Heave: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. 2003Stories of Peoplehood: The Politics and Morals of Political Memberships. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511490347
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490347 [Google Scholar]
  77. Smith, Tammy
    2007 “Narrative boundaries and the dynamics of ethnic conflict and conciliation.” Poetics35(1): 22–46. 10.1016/j.poetic.2006.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  78. Somers, Margaret
    1994 “The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach.” Theory and Society231: 605–649. 10.1007/BF00992905
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992905 [Google Scholar]
  79. Somer, Murat, and Jennifer McCoy
    2019 “Transformations through Polarizations and Global Threats to Democracy.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science681(1): 8–22. 10.1177/0002716218818058
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218818058 [Google Scholar]
  80. Stavrakakis, Yannis
    2018 “Paradoxes of Polarization: Democracy’s Inherent Division and the (Anti-) Populist Challenge.” American Behavioral Scientist62(1): 43–58. 10.1177/0002764218756924
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218756924 [Google Scholar]
  81. Sustain, Cass R.
    2009Going to Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Taylor, Whitney K.
    2023The Social Constitution: Embedding Social Rights Through Legal Mobilization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009367738
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009367738 [Google Scholar]
  83. Tilly, Charles
    2002Stories, Identity, and Political Change. Lanham and Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Toolan, Michael
    2001Narrative. A Critical Linguistic Introduction. Second. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Ugur-Cinar, Meral
    2024Memory, Patriarchy and Economy in Turkey: Narratives of Political Power, Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9781399514507
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781399514507 [Google Scholar]
  86. Ugur-Cinar, Meral, and Rogers M. Smith
    2015 “Narrative Structures and the Politics of Peoplehood.” InPolitical Peoplehood: The Roles of Values, Interests, and Identities, 67–91. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Wagner-Pacifici, Robin
    2017What Is an Event?Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226439815.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226439815.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  88. Welzer, Harald, Sabine Moller, and Karoline Tschuggnall
    2002Opa War Kein Nazi. Nationalsozialismus Und Holocaust Im Familiengedächtnis. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. White, Hayden
    1973Metahistory. The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Wodak, Ruth, Durdolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart
    2009The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Zigon, Jarrett
    2012 “Narratives.” InA Companion to Moral Anthropology, edited byDidier Fassin, 204–220. Oxford: Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118290620.ch12
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118290620.ch12 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24096.cor
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error