oa Subverting EU legal concepts

References

1. Arnull, Anthony
   2012 “Judicial Dialogue in the European Union.” InPhilosophical Foundations of European Union Law, ed. byJ. Dickson, and P. Eleftheriadis, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588770.003.0005
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588770.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
2. Barát, Erzsébet
   2017 “Populist Discourses in the Hungarian Public Sphere: From Right to Left (and Beyond)?” Journal of Language and Politics (): –, 10.1075/jlp.17026.bar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17026.bar [Google Scholar]
3. Bennett, Samuel
   2022 “Mythopoetic Legitimation and the Recontextualisation of Europe’s Foundational Myth.” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.21070.ben
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21070.ben [Google Scholar]
4. Besselink, Leonard F. M.
   2010 “National and Constitutional Identity before and after Lisbon.” Utrecht Law Review(): –. 10.18352/ulr.139
   https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.139 [Google Scholar]
5. Blokker, Paul
   2021 “Political and Constitutional Imaginaries.” Social Imaginaries series Rowman and Littlefield, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3784225
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bridger, Jeffrey C. and David R. Maines
   1998 « « Narrative Structures and the Catholic Church Closings in Detroit.‘’ Qualitative Sociology(): –. 10.1023/A:1022198604543
   https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022198604543 [Google Scholar]
7. BVerfG, Judgement of the Second Senate of 30 June 2009 — 2 be 2/08 —, paras
   BVerfG, Judgement of the Second Senate of 30 June 2009 — 2 be 2/08 —, paras. –, https://www.bverfg.de/e/es20090630_2bve000208en.html
8. Cheng, Le and David Machin
   2023 ”The Law and Critical Discourse Studies.” Critical Discourse Studies:: –, 10.1080/17405904.2022.2102520
   https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2022.2102520 [Google Scholar]
9. Claes, Monica
   2016 “The Validity and Primacy of EU Law and the ‘Cooperative Relationship’ between National Constitutional Courts and the Court of Justice of the European Union.” Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law:: –. 10.1177/1023263X1602300109
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X1602300109 [Google Scholar]
10. Cordero, Rodrigo
    2019 “The Negative Dialectics of Law: Luhmann and the Sociology of Juridical Concepts.” Social & Legal Studies(): –: 09646639188191710.1177/0964663918819173
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663918819173 [Google Scholar]
11. Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)
    Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) 2015 Joined Cases C-643/15 and C-647/15, https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-643/15&language=en
12. CJEU
    CJEU 2020 C-808/18 — Commission v Hungary, 17 December 2020, https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-808/18
13. CJEU
    CJEU 2022 C-157/21 — Hungary v Parliament and Council, 16 February 2020, https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=254061&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=3037439
14. CJEU
    CJEU 2023 C-823/21 — Commission v Hungary, https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?lgrec=fr&td=%3BALL&language=en&num=C-823/21&jur=C
15. Davies, Gareth
    2018 “Does the Court of Justice Own the Treaties? Interpretative Pluralism as a Solution to over-constitutionalisation.” Eur Law J. : –. 10.1111/eulj.12298
    https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12298 [Google Scholar]
16. Halmai, Gábor
    2012 “From the “Rule of Law Revolution” to the Constitutional Counter-Revolution in Hungary.“ European Yearbook on Human Rights 2012: –.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Halmai, Gábor
    2018 “Abuse of Constitutional Identity. The Hungarian Constitutional Court on Interpretation of Article E) (2) of the Fundamental Law.” Review of Central and East European Law(): –. 10.1163/15730352‑04301002
    https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-04301002 [Google Scholar]
18. Hungarian Helsinki Committee
    Hungarian Helsinki Committee 2021 Amicus Curiae Brief, https://helsinki.hu/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/12/Amicus_curiae_EN_final.pdf
19. Hungarian Constitutional Court
    Hungarian Constitutional Court 2010 Decision 143/2010. () AB, mkab.hu/letoltesek/en_0143_2010.pdf
20. Hungarian Constitutional Court
    Hungarian Constitutional Court 2016 Decision 22/2016. (.) AB, paras. –, public.mkab.hu/dev/dontesek.nsf/0/1361afa3cea26b84c1257f10005dd958/$FILE/EN_22_2016.pdf
21. Hungarian Constitutional Court
    Hungarian Constitutional Court 2019a Decision 2/2019. (.) AB, paras. –, public.mkab.hu/dev/dontesek.nsf/0/a69aec612ba90baec125830c005216db/$FILE/2_2019_EN_final.pdf
22. Hungarian Constitutional Court
    Hungarian Constitutional Court 2019b Decision 3/2019. (.) AB, paras. –, public.mkab.hu/dev/dontesek.nsf/0/db659534a12560d4c12583300058b33d/$FILE/3_2019%20AB%20hat%C3%A1rozat.pdf
23. Hungarian Constitutional Court
    Hungarian Constitutional Court 2021 Decision 32/2021. (.) AB, paras. –, https://api.alkotmanybirosag.hu/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2021/12/32_2021_ab_eng.pdf
24. Hunyady, György
    2002 Stereotypes During the Decline and Fall of Communism. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203451847
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203451847 [Google Scholar]
25. Holmes, Stephen, & Krastev, Ivan
    2018 “Explaining Eastern Europe: Imitation and Its Discontents.” Journal of Democracy(): –. 10.1353/jod.2018.0049
    https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0049 [Google Scholar]
26. Kreko, Peter
    2020 “The Stolen Transition” — Conspiracy Theories in Post-Communist and Post-Democratic Hungary.” Social Psychological Bulletin, 10.32872/spb.v14i4.2323
    https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.v14i4.2323 [Google Scholar]
27. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2016 Recontextualisation of Neoliberalism and the Increasingly Conceptual Nature of Discourse: Challenges for Critical Discourse Studies. Discourse & Society, (), –. 10.1177/0957926516630901
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630901 [Google Scholar]
28. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2020 “Discursive Shifts and the Normalisation of Racism: Imaginaries of Immigration, Moral Panics and the Discourse of Contemporary Right-wing Populism.” Social Semiotics(): –. 10.1080/10350330.2020.1766199
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1766199 [Google Scholar]
29. Krzyżanowski, Michał, Ruth Wodak, Hannah Bradby, Mattias Gardell, Aristotle Kallis, Natalia Krzyżanowska, Cas Mudde, Jens Rydgren
    2023 “Discourses and Practices of the ‘New Normal’: Towards an Interdisciplinary Research Agenda on Crisis and the Normalization of Anti — and Post-democratic Action.” Journal of Language and Politics(): – . 10.1075/jlp.23024.krz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.23024.krz [Google Scholar]
30. Lamour, Christian
    2022 “Orbán Urbi et Orbi: Christianity as a Nodal Point of Radical-right Populism.” Politics and Religion(): –. 10.1017/S1755048321000134
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048321000134 [Google Scholar]
31. Loughlin, Martin
    2015 “The Constitutional Imagination.” The Modern Law Review(): –. 10.1111/1468‑2230.12104
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12104 [Google Scholar]
32. MacIntyre, Alasdair
    2007 After Virtue. A Study in Moral Virtue. Third edition. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. McCrudden, Christopher
    2008 “Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights.” European Journal of International LawVol., Issue: –. 10.1093/ejil/chn043
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn043 [Google Scholar]
34. Ministry of Justice Hungary
    Ministry of Justice Hungary 2023 The Fundamental Law of Hungary, https://njt.hu/jogszabaly/en/2011-4301-02-00
35. Mos, Martijn
    2020 “Ambiguity and Interpretive Politics in the Crisis of European Values: Evidence from Hungary.” East European Politics(): –. 10.1080/21599165.2020.1724965
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2020.1724965 [Google Scholar]
36. Patterson, Molly and Kristen R. Monroe
    1998 “Narrative in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science (June): –. 10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.315
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.315 [Google Scholar]
37. Polletta, Francesca
    1998 ‘Contending Stories: Narrative in Social Movements.’ Qualitative Sociology (December): –. 10.1023/A:1023332410633
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023332410633 [Google Scholar]
38. Smith, Rogers M.
    2003 Stories of Peoplehood: The Politics and Morals of Political Membership. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511490347
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490347 [Google Scholar]
39. Somers, Margaret R.
    1994 “The Narrative Constitution of Identity: A Relational and Network Approach.” Theory and SocietyVol., No.: –. 10.1007/BF00992905
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992905 [Google Scholar]
40. The Member States
    The Member States 2007 “Treaty of Lisbon.” Official Journal of the European Union OJ C: –.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Uğur-Çınar, Meral
    2024 “The Populist Repertoire: Stories of Development, Patriarchy and History in Austria, Hungary and Turkey” inMemory, Patriarchy and Economy in Turkey: Narratives of Political Power, ed. byMeral Uğur-Çınar, –. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press. 10.1515/9781399514507‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781399514507-006 [Google Scholar]
42. Van Hout, Tom and Peter Burger
    2017 “Text Bite News: the Metapragmatics of Feature News.” Text & Talk(): –. 10.1515/text‑2017‑0015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2017-0015 [Google Scholar]
43. Wodak, Ruth & Norman Fairclough
    2010 “Recontextualizing European Higher Education Policies: the Cases of Austria and Romania.” Critical Discourse Studies:, –, 10.1080/17405900903453922
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900903453922 [Google Scholar]
44. Wodak, Ruth
    2017 “Discourses of Nationalism” InThe Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studiesed. byJ. Flowerdew and J. Richardson, –. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315739342‑28
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342-28 [Google Scholar]