1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Language and Politics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Setting boundaries between crime and rights
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on overturned two precedents, thus ending American women’s 50-year-old constitutional right to abortion. Drawing on Van Leeuwen’s legitimation framework and Labov’s model of narrative structure, this study focuses on how justices (de)legitimate abortion rights in contrasting narratives in through authorization, moral evaluation, rationalization, and mythopoesis. Specifically, we propose a theoretical model of judicial narrative strata to deconstruct the language of justices and explain how judicial narratives set boundaries between two different moral economies around abortion and realize the transformation of a conceived right into a punishable crime. Furthermore, this study suggests that in the post- era, the justices’ narrative reconfiguration of moral boundaries may turn into social boundaries and trigger more gender segregation, which might also have theoretical and practical implications for legislation and judicial practices in other jurisdictions.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24100.che
2024-08-27
2024-09-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24100.che
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amsterdam, Anthony G., and Jerome Bruner
    2002 Minding the Law. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Baum, Lawrence
    2019 The Supreme Court (13th Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bennett, Samuel
    2022 “Mythopoetic Legitimation and the Recontextualisation of Europe’s Foundational Myth.” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.21070.ben
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21070.ben [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheng, Le, and Winnie Cheng
    2012 “Legal Interpretation: Meaning as Social Construction.” Semiotica: –. 10.1515/sem‑2012‑0086
     https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2012-0086 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2014 “Documentary Evidence as Hegemonic Reconstruction.” Semiotica: –. 10.1515/sem‑2014‑0009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2014-0009 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chilton, Paul
    2004 Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203561218
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cordero, Rodrigo, and Raimundo Frei
    2024 “Demarcating Rights in Divided Social Worlds: An Introduction to the Moral Economy of Constitutional Struggles.” In Special Issue “Narrative Boundaries: The Moral Economy of Contemporary Constitutional Struggles”, edited byRodrigo Cordero and Raimundo Frei. Journal of Language and Politics10.1075/jlp.24096.cor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.24096.cor [Google Scholar]
  8. Cover, Robert M.
    1983 “The Supreme Court, 1982 Term – Foreword: Nomos and Narrative.” Harvard Law Review (): –. 10.2307/1340787
     https://doi.org/10.2307/1340787 [Google Scholar]
  9. De Fina, Anna, and Alexandra Georgakopoulou
    2012 Analyzing Narrative: Discourse and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Devins, Neal
    2009 “How Planned Parenthood v. Casey (Pretty Much) Settled the Abortion Wars.” The Yale Law Journal (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Dinan, John
    2023 “The Constitutional Politics of Abortion Policy after Dobbs: State Courts, Constitutions, and Lawmaking.” Montana Law Review (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Duncan, Richard
    2016 “Justice Scalia and the Rule of Law: Originalism VS. the Living Constitution.” Regent University Law Review (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Eder, Klaus
    2006 “Europe’s Borders: The Narrative Construction of the Boundaries of Europe.” European Journal of Social Theory (): –. 10.1177/1368431006063345
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431006063345 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fairclough, Norman
    2001 Language and Power (2nd Edition). New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak
    1997 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” InDiscourse as Social Interaction, edited byTeun A. van Dijk, –. London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Fassin, Didier
    2020 “Are the Two Approaches to Moral Economy Irreconcilable?” Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development (): –. 10.1353/hum.2020.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1353/hum.2020.0010 [Google Scholar]
  17. Fleck, Leonard M.
    2023 “The Dobbs Decision: Can It Be Justified by Public Reason?” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (): –. 10.1017/S0963180122000822
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180122000822 [Google Scholar]
  18. Forchtner, Bernhard
    2012 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” InThe Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, edited byCarol Chapelle, –. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0272
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0272 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2016 Lessons from the Past? Memory, Narrativity and Subjectivity. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑48322‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48322-5 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2021 “Introducing ‘Narrative in Critical Discourse Studies’.” Critical Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1080/17405904.2020.1802765
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1802765 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fried, Charles
    2005 Saying What the Law Is: The Constitution in the Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Gostin, Lawrence, Sarah Wetter, and Rebecca B. Reinglod
    2023 “One Year after Dobbs – Vast Changes to the Abortion Legal Landscape.” JAMA Health Forum (): –. 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3091
     https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3091 [Google Scholar]
  23. Götz, Norbert
    2015 “‘Moral Economy’: Its Conceptual History and Analytical Prospects.” Journal of Global Ethics (): –. 10.1080/17449626.2015.1054556
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2015.1054556 [Google Scholar]
  24. Haaland, Marte E. S., Joseph Mumba Zulu, Karen Marie Moland, Haldis Haukanes, and Astrid Blystad
    2020 “When Abortion Becomes Public – Everyday Politics of Reproduction in Rural Zambia.” Social Science & Medicine. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113502
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113502 [Google Scholar]
  25. Halliday, M. A. K.
    2014 An Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th Edition). Revised byC. M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  26. Han, Zhengrui, Vijay K. Bhatia, and Yunfeng Ge
    2018 “The Structural Format and Rhetorical Variation of Writing Chinese Judicial Opinions.” Pragmatics (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Harris, Sandra
    2001 “Fragmented Narratives and Multiple Tellers: Witness and Defendant Accounts in Trials.” Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445601003001003
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445601003001003 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hinsch, Wilfried
    2010 “Justice, Legitimacy, and Constitutional Rights.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (): –. 10.1080/13698230903326240
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230903326240 [Google Scholar]
  29. Johnson, Richard
    2022 “Dobbs v. Jackson and the Revival of the States’ Rights Constitution.” The Political Quarterly (): –. 10.1111/1467‑923X.13193
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13193 [Google Scholar]
  30. Labov, William
    1972 Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Lamont, Michele
    2012 “Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation.” Annual Review of Sociology: –. 10.1146/annurev‑soc‑070308‑120022
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120022 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lamont, Michele, Stefan Beljean, and Matthew Clair
    2014 “What is Missing? Cultural Processes and Causal Pathways to Inequality.” Socio-Economic Review (): –. 10.1093/ser/mwu011
     https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu011 [Google Scholar]
  33. Lamont, Michele, and Virag Molnár
    2002 “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology (): –. 10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ludlow, Jeannie
    2008 “Sometimes, It’s a Child and a Choice: Toward an Embodied Abortion Praxis.” NWSA Journal (): –. 10.1353/ff.2008.a236179
     https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2008.a236179 [Google Scholar]
  35. McKeown, Jamie
    2022 “Stancetaking in the U.S. Supreme Court’s Abortion Jurisprudence (1973-Present): Epistemic (Im)probability and Evidential (Dis)belief.” International Journal of Legal Discourse (): –. 10.1515/ijld‑2022‑2075
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2022-2075 [Google Scholar]
  36. Mertz, Elizabeth
    1988 “Consensus and Dissent in U.S. Legal Opinions: Narrative Structure and Social Voices.” Anthropological Linguistics (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Mey, Jacob L.
    2017 “Discourse, Interests, and the Law: Some Pragma-Legal Reflections.” International Journal of Legal Discourse (): –. 10.1515/ijld‑2017‑0004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2017-0004 [Google Scholar]
  38. Mostov, Julie
    1995 “‘OUR WOMEN’/’THEIR WOMEN’: Symbolic Boundaries, Territorial Markers, and Violence in the Balkans.” Peace & Change (): –. 10.1111/j.1468‑0130.1995.tb00250.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0130.1995.tb00250.x [Google Scholar]
  39. Olson, Greta
    2014 “Narration and Narrative in Legal Discourse.” InHandbook of Narratology (Volume), edited byPeter Hühn, Jan Christoph Meister, John Pier and Wolf Schmid, –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110316469.371
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110316469.371 [Google Scholar]
  40. Palomera, Jaime, and Theodora Vetta
    2016 “Moral Economy: Rethinking a Radical Concept.” Anthropological Theory(): –. 10.1177/1463499616678097
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499616678097 [Google Scholar]
  41. Paskey, Stephen
    2014 “The Law is Made of Stories: Erasing the False Dichotomy Between Stories and Legal Rules.” Legal Communication & Rhetoric: JALWD: –.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Patton-Imani, Sandra
    2022 “Saving Innocence.” Adoption & Culture (): –. 10.1353/ado.2022.0033
     https://doi.org/10.1353/ado.2022.0033 [Google Scholar]
  43. Powell, Robyn M.
    2023 “Including Disabled People in the Battle to Protect Abortion Rights: A Call-To-Action.” UCLA Law Review (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Reyes, Antonio
    2011 “Strategies of Legitimization in Political Discourse: From Words to Actions.” Discourse & Society (): –. 10.1177/0957926511419927
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927 [Google Scholar]
  45. Romanis, Elizabeth C.
    2023 “The End of (Reproductive) Liberty as We Know It: A Note on Dobbs V. Jackson Women’s Health 597 USC __ (2022).” Medical Law International (): –. 10.1177/09685332231154562
     https://doi.org/10.1177/09685332231154562 [Google Scholar]
  46. Schepple, Kim L.
    1989 “Foreword: Telling Stories.” Michigan Law Review (): –. 10.2307/1289300
     https://doi.org/10.2307/1289300 [Google Scholar]
  47. Schwarz, Claudia
    2009 “Sentenced to “Storification”: A Trial on Legal Narratives.” InLegal Narratives: European Perspectives on U.S. Law in Cultural Context, edited byGudrun M. Grabher and Anna Gamper, –. Nördlingen: SpringerWienNewYork. 10.1007/978‑3‑211‑92818‑9_11
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-92818-9_11 [Google Scholar]
  48. Shiffrin, Seana V.
    2023 “Reliance Arguments, Democratic Law, and Inequity.” Jurisprudence (): –. 10.1080/20403313.2023.2251315
     https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2023.2251315 [Google Scholar]
  49. Smith, Tammy
    2007 “Narrative Boundaries and the Dynamics of Ethnic Conflict and Conciliation.” Poetics (): –. 10.1016/j.poetic.2006.11.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  50. Solum, Lawrence
    2019 “Originalism versus Living Constitutionalism: The Conceptual Structure of the Great Debate.” Northwestern University Law Review (): –. 10.2139/ssrn.3324264
     https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3324264 [Google Scholar]
  51. Stern, Shai
    2023 “From Conciliation to Conflict: How Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization Reshapes the Supreme Court’s Role in American Polarized Society.” Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Taylor, Verta, and Nancy E. Whittier
    1992 “Collective Identity in Social Movement Communities: Lesbian Feminist Mobilization.” InWaves of Protest: Social Movements Since the Sixties, edited byJo Freeman and Victoria Johnson, –. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Thompson, E. P.
    1971 “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century.” Past and Present: –. 10.1093/past/50.1.76
     https://doi.org/10.1093/past/50.1.76 [Google Scholar]
  54. Toolan, Michael
    1988 Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction (2nd Edition). New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Treder, Kelly M., Ndidiamaka Amutah-Onukagha, and Katherine O. White
    2023 “Abortion Bans Will Exacerbate Already Severe Racial Inequities in Maternal Mortality.” Women’s Health Issues (): –. 10.1016/j.whi.2023.04.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2023.04.007 [Google Scholar]
  56. Vaara, Eero
    2014 “Struggles over Legitimacy in the Eurozone Crisis: Discursive Legitimation Strategies and Their Ideological Underpinnings.” Discourse & Society (): –. 10.1177/0957926514536962
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514536962 [Google Scholar]
  57. Van Dijk, Teun
    1993 “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Society (): –. 10.1177/0957926593004002006
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 [Google Scholar]
  58. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2008 Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  59. Weber, Max
    1947 The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. West, Robin
    2009 “From Choice to Reproductive Justice: De-Constitutionalizing Abortion Rights.” The Yale Law Journal (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24100.che
Loading
Setting boundaries between crime and rights
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.24100.che
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24100.che
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24100.che
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: narrative boundaries ; legal interpretation ; (de)legitimation ; the U.S. Supreme Court ; the Dobbs opinions ; moral economy ; abortion rights

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error