oa Exploring the evolution of the concept of liberty in the U.S. presidential inaugurals

References

1. Anderson, Roger, and Olive Demetrius
   1993 “A flow-map method of representing cognitive structure based on respondents’ narrative using science content.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching301: 953–969. 10.1002/tea.3660300811
   https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300811 [Google Scholar]
2. Bercovitch, Sacvan
   (ed.) 1995 The Cambridge History of American Literature: Vol. 1, 1590–1820. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CHOL9780521301060
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521301060 [Google Scholar]
3. Binder, W.
   2019 Social imaginaries and the limits of differential meaning. Österreich Zeitschrift für Soziologie44 (2): 17–35. 10.1007/s11614‑019‑00371‑2
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-019-00371-2 [Google Scholar]
4. Biria, Reza, and Azadeh Mohammadi
   2012 “The socio pragmatic functions of inaugural speech: A critical discourse analysis approach.” Journal of Pragmatics44 (10): 1290–1302. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.013
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.013 [Google Scholar]
5. Bizas, Konstantinos
   2021 “Freedom and its diachrony.” Global Intellectual History6 (2): 238–246. 10.1080/23801883.2021.1912702
   https://doi.org/10.1080/23801883.2021.1912702 [Google Scholar]
6. Bondi, Marina
   2014 “Changing voices: Authorial voice in abstracts.” InAbstracts in academic discourse: Variation and change, ed. byMarina Bondi, and Rosa Lorés Sanz, 243–270. Linguistic Insights1871. Bristol: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑0351‑0701‑2/23
   https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0701-2/23 [Google Scholar]
7. Campbell, Karlyn, and Kathleen Jamieson
   2008 Presidents Creating the Presidency: Deeds Done in Words. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Coseriu, Eugenio
   1975 “Vers une typologie des champs lexicaux.” Cahiers de lexicologie271: 30–51.
   [Google Scholar]
9. De Dijn, Annelien
   2020 Freedom: an unruly history. London: Harvard University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ericson, David
    1997 “Presidential inaugural addresses and American political culture.” Presidential Studies Quarterly27 (4): 727–744.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Fillmore, Charles, and Collin Baker
    2012 “A frames approach to semantic analysis.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, ed. byBernd Heine, and Heiko Narrog, 313–339. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0013
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0013 [Google Scholar]
12. Fillmore, Charles, and Sue Atkins
    1992 “Towards a frame-based lexicon: the semantics of RISK and its neighbors.” InFrames, Fields and Contrasts. New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization, ed. byAdrienne Lehrer, and Eva Feder Kittay, 75–102. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Huriot, Jean-Marie, and Lise Bourdeau-Lepage
    2012 “Utopia, equality and liberty: The impossible ideal.” Utopia and Spatial Justice51: 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ilie, Cornelia
    (ed.) 2010 European Parliaments under scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.38
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.38 [Google Scholar]
15. Ilie, Cornelia
    2015 “Parliamentary discourse.” InThe International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ed. byKaren Tracy, Cornelia Ilie, and Todd Sandel, 1113–1133. London: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi201
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi201 [Google Scholar]
16. Koselleck, Reinhart
    1982 Begriffsgeschichte and social history. Economy and Society111: 409–427. 10.1080/03085148200000015
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03085148200000015 [Google Scholar]
17. Krzyżanowski, Michal
    2019 “Brexit and the imaginary of ‘crisis’: a discourse-conceptual analysis of European news media.” Critical Discourse Studies16:4: 465–490, 10.1080/17405904.2019.1592001
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1592001 [Google Scholar]
18. Krzyżanowski, Michal
    2010 The Discursive Construction of European Identities. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Krzyżanowski, Michal
    2016 “Recontextualization of neoliberalism and the increasingly conceptual nature of discourse: Challenges for critical discourse studies.” Discourse & Society27(3): 308–321. 10.1177/0957926516630901
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630901 [Google Scholar]
20. Krzyżanowski, Michal, and Natalia Krzyżanowska
    2022 “Narrating the ‘new normal’ or pre-legitimizing media control? COVID-19 and the discursive shifts in the far-right imaginary of ‘crisis’ as a normalization strategy.” Discourse & Society33(6): 805–818. 10.1177/09579265221095420
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221095420 [Google Scholar]
21. Kubát, Miroslav, and Radek Čech
    2016 “Quantitative Analysis of U.S. Presidential Inaugural Addresses.” Glottometrics341: 14–27.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lauer, Ilon
    2015 “Epideictic rhetoric.” Communication Research Trends34 (2): 4–18.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lehrer, Adrienne, and Eva Feder Kittay
    (eds.) 1992 Frames, Fields and Contrasts. New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lewis, Charlton
    1890 An Elementary Latin Dictionary. New York: American Book Company.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Liu, Fang
    2012 “Genre Analysis of American Presidential Inaugural Speech.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies2 (11): 2407–2411. 10.4304/tpls.2.11.2407‑2411
    https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.11.2407-2411 [Google Scholar]
26. Llácer-Llorca, Eusebio, and Rosa Giménez-Moreno
    2025 “Analysis of the right to equality through the US inaugural presidential speeches.” Atlantis47 (1). June 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
27. McGee, Michael Calvin
    1980 “The ‘ideograph’: A link between rhetoric and ideology.” Quarterly Journal of Speech661: 1–16. 10.1080/00335638009383499
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638009383499 [Google Scholar]
28. Mohammadi, Vali, Reza Abdi, and Eisazadeh Hadi
    2020 “Inaugural Addresses of American Presidents: A CDA-oriented Analysis of Party Affiliation.” Applied Research on English Language9 (4): 539–560.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Rundblad, Gabriella, and David Kronenfeld
    2003 “The semantic structure of lexical fields: Variation and change.” InVariation and Change Words in Time. Diachronic semantics from different points of view, ed. byRegine Eckardt, Klaus von Heusinger, and Christoph Schwarze, 67–114. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Ryan, Halford
    (ed.) 1993 Inaugural Addresses of Twentieth-Century American Presidents. Westport: Praeger Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Sansome, Rosemary
    1986 “Connotation and lexical field Analysis.” Cahiers de lexicologie2 (49): 13–33.
    [Google Scholar]