1887
image of “Serial rorters or mere mortals?” 
Gendered mediation in comments to newspapers about how male and female
government leaders handle money

Abstract

Abstract

This article examines the acceptability of female government leaders to members of the public through online reader comments to newspapers, focusing on the differing appraisal of male and female leaders’ relationship to money/finance. We examined 20,000 reader comments to two national Australian newspapers about 13 male and 14 female government leaders between 2013 and 2018, employing corpus-assisted discourse analysis. Dissatisfaction with handling of money was significantly more frequent for female leaders than male, including topoi of misuse/abuse of government funds, leaders’ sense of entitlement and disapproval of the size of female government leaders’ salaries. Linguistic appraisal included intensification, exaggeration and supposition supported by strategies to strengthen and authorise claims, which was markedly more frequent for females. Conversely, money-related comments about males demonstrated mitigation of alleged wrongdoings. Results support higher negative judgement of female leaders and strong engagement by commenters in the topos of fiscal dishonesty presented by mainstream media.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24112.dac
2025-06-30
2025-07-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/jlp.24112.dac/jlp.24112.dac.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24112.dac&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. “Administration of Travel Entitlements Provided to Parliamentarians” 2022 Australian National Audit Office. https://www.anao.gov.au/work/performance-audit/administration-travel-entitlements-provided-parliamentarians
  2. Axelson, Rick D., Catherine M. Solow, Kristi J. Ferguson, and Michael B. Cohen
    2010 “Assessing Implicit Gender Bias in Medical Student Performance Evaluations.” Evaluation & the Health Professions (): –. 10.1177/0163278710375097
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278710375097 [Google Scholar]
  3. Beattie, Peter
    2019 “The Supply Side: What Affects the Supply of Information Provided by the Media.” InSocial Evolution, Political Psychology, and the Media in Democracy. Cham.: Palgrave-McMillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑02801‑5_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02801-5_6 [Google Scholar]
  4. Burgoyne, Carole
    2004 “Heart-Strings and Purse-Strings: Money in Heterosexual Marriage.” Feminism & Psychology (): –. 10.1177/0959353504040319
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353504040319 [Google Scholar]
  5. Caldas-Coulthard, Carmen Rosa, and Rosamund Moon
    2010 “‘Curvy, Hunky, Kinky’: Using Corpora as Tools for Critical Analysis.” Discourse and Society (): –. 10.1177/0957926509353843
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509353843 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cavasso, Luca, and Maite Taboada
    2021 “A corpus analysis of online news comments using the Appraisal framework.” Journal of Corpora and Discourse Studies: –. 10.18573/jcads.61
    https://doi.org/10.18573/jcads.61 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dijk, Teun A van
    2015Racism and the Press. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315682662
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315682662 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2017 “How Globo Media Manipulated the Impeachment of Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff.” Discourse & Communication (): –. 10.1177/1750481317691838
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481317691838 [Google Scholar]
  9. Engels, Friedrich
    2001The origin of the family, private property and the state. Wellred Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Evershed, Nick
    2013 “Was Julia Gillard the Most Productive Prime Minister in Australia’s History?” The Guardian, June 28, 2013. https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2013/jun/28/australia-productive-prime-minister
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fiske, Susan T.
    2010 “Interpersonal Stratification: Status, Power, and Subordination.” Handbook of Social Psychology, –. 10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002026
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002026 [Google Scholar]
  12. German, Lindsey
    2018 “Marxism, Class and Women’s Oppression.” Critical and Radical Social Work (): –. 10.1332/204986018X15321003074231
    https://doi.org/10.1332/204986018X15321003074231 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ghazarian, Zareh
    2024 “The Australian party system.” In. Diana Perche; Nicholas Barry; Alan Fenna; Zareh Ghazarian; and Yvonne Haigh. Sydney University Press. https://oercollective.caul.edu.au/aust-politics-policy/chapter/the-australian-party-system/
  14. Gillings, Mathew, Gerlinde Mautner, and Paul Baker
    2023Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009168144
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009168144 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hardie, Andrew
    2014 “Log Ratio--An Informal Introduction.” Retreived from http://Cass. Lancs. Ac. UkHardie, A.cass.lancs.ac.uk/log-ratio-an-informal-introduction/
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Harmer, Emily
    2021Women, Media, and Elections: Representation and Marginalization in British Politics. Policy Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hartsock, Nancy
    1985Money, Sex, and Power: Toward a Feminist Historical Materialism. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hood, Clifton
    . “American Gold Digger: Marriage, Money, and the Law from the Ziegfeld Follies to Anna Nicole Smith” (2021): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hunt, Elle, Nick Evershed, and Ri Liu
    2016 From Julia Gillard to Hillary Clinton: online abuse of politicians around the world. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/datablog/ng-interactive/2016/jun/27/from-julia-gillard-to-hillary-clinton-online-abuse-of-p
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Johnson, Sally, and Astrid Ensslin
    2007 “‘But Her Language Skills Shifted the Family Dynamics Dramatically’: Language, Gender and the Construction of Publics in Two British Newspapers.” Gender and Language (): –. 10.1558/genl.v1i2.229
    https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.v1i2.229 [Google Scholar]
  21. “Labor Governments and Women.” May14 2024 Australian Labor Party. https://www.alp.org.au/our-history/labor-governments-and-women/
  22. Leeuwen, Theo Van
    2008Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Manwaring, Rob
    2017 “New Developments: Recalibrating Civil Society — the Case of Australia.” Public Money & Management (): –. 10.1080/09540962.2016.1266161
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2016.1266161 [Google Scholar]
  24. Martin, James and P. R. R. White
    2005The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  25. McArthur, Tom
    1981Longman Lexicon of Contemporary English. Longman. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. McElhinny, Bonnie
    2014 “Theorizing Gender in Sociolinguistics and Linguistic Anthropology.” InThe Handbook of Language and Gender, ed. byJanet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff, –. Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756942.ch1
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756942.ch1 [Google Scholar]
  27. Partington, Alan
    2008 “The Armchair and the Machine: Corpus-Assisted Discourse Research.” Corpora for University Language Teachers: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Partington, Alan, and Anna Marchi
    2015 “Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis.” InThe Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics. 10.1017/CBO9781139764377.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139764377.013 [Google Scholar]
  29. Rayson, Paul
    2002 “Matrix: A Statistical Method and Software Tool for Linguistic Analysis through Corpus Comparison,” no. : . eprints.lancs.ac.uk/12287/
  30. Rosengreen, Carley
    2019 “Nostradamus of the 21st Century’: How Professor Bela Stantic Revealed What Opinion Polls Missed.” Griffith University 2019 https://news.griffith.edu.au/2019/06/13/nostradamus-of-the-21st-century-how-professor-bela-stantic-revealed-what-opinion-polls-missed/
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Saldana, Johnny
    2012 “An Introduction to Codes and Coding.” The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, no.: –. 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ddfd0a
    https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ddfd0a [Google Scholar]
  32. Sandlin, Jennifer A., Jennie Stearns, Julie Garlen Maudlin, and Jake Burdick
    2011 “‘Now I Ain’t Sayin’She a Gold Digger’ Wal-Mart Shoppers, Welfare Queens, and Other Gendered Stereotypes of Poor Women in the Big Curriculum of Consumption.” Cultural Studies? Critical Methodologies (): –. 10.1177/1532708611423210
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708611423210 [Google Scholar]
  33. Sawer, Marian
    2013 “Misogyny and Misrepresentation: Women in Australian Parliaments.” Political Science (): –. 10.1177/0032318713488316
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0032318713488316 [Google Scholar]
  34. Southern, Rosalynd, and Emily Harmer
    2021 “Twitter, Incivility and ‘Everyday’ Gendered Othering: An Analysis of Tweets Sent to UK Members of Parliament” (): –. 10.1177/0894439319865519
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319865519 [Google Scholar]
  35. Williams, Blair Elizabeth
    2019From Tightrope to Gendered Trope: A Comparative Study of The Print Mediation of Women Prime Ministers. Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2020 “There’s a big problem with the Murdoch media no one is talking about–how it treats women leaders’.” The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/theres-a-big-problem-with-the-murdoch-media-no-one-is-talking-about-how-it-treats-women-leaders-149986?utm_source=clipboard&utm_medium=bylinecopy_url_button
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
    2014 “Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory, and Methodology.” Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, –. 10.1016/S0376‑7361(09)70018‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7361(09)70018-4 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24112.dac
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24112.dac
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error