Environmental conservation and urban development as competing stories of place and space in Singapore

References

1. Carbaugh, Donal, and Tovar Cerulli
   2013 “Cultural Discourses of Dwelling: Investigating Environmental Communication as a Place-Based Practice.” Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture7 (1): 4–23. 10.1080/17524032.2012.749296
   https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2012.749296 [Google Scholar]
2. Chen, Catherine, and Christian Aschenbrenner
   2023 “Environmental Policymaking in Authoritarian Countries: The Cases of Singapore and Russia.” InRoutledge Handbook of Environmental Policy, edited byHelge Jorgens, Christoph Knill and Yves Steinebach. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003043843‑32
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003043843-32 [Google Scholar]
3. Cheo, Pei Rong, and Barry Mulligan
   . n.d.Collaboration in Conservation: Multidisciplinary Solutions to Wicked Problems. National Parks Board.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chua, Beng Huat
   2000 “Public Housing Residents as Clients of the State.” Housing Studies15 (1): 45–60. 10.1080/02673030082469
   https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030082469 [Google Scholar]
5. Chua, Beng Huat
   2024 Public Subsidy, Private Accumulation: The Political Economy of Singapore’s Public Housing. NUS Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Clark, Justin Tyler
   2019 “From Global City to ‘City of Villages’: Tracing the State Discourse of Cosmopolitanism in Modern Singaporean History.” Journal of Intercultural Studies40 (4): 399–416. 10.1080/07256868.2019.1628718
   https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2019.1628718 [Google Scholar]
7. Corlett, Richard T.
   1992 “The Ecological Transformation of Singapore, 1819–1990.” Journal of Biogeography191: 411–420. 10.2307/2845569
   https://doi.org/10.2307/2845569 [Google Scholar]
8. Corlett, Richard T.
   2013 “Singapore: Half Full or Half Empty?” InConservation Biology: Voices from the Tropics, edited byNavjot S. Sodhi, Luke Gibson and Peter H. Raven. Wiley. 10.1002/9781118679838.ch17
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118679838.ch17 [Google Scholar]
9. Daniels, Stephen
   2011 “Geographical Imagination.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36 (2): 182–87. 10.1111/j.1475‑5661.2011.00440.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00440.x [Google Scholar]
10. de Certeau, Michel
    2011 The Practice of Everyday Life. University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Elangovan, Navene
    2021 “The Big Read: As Clamour Grows for Preservation in Land-Scarce Singapore, Something’s Got to Give.” Today. January 30.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Engberg, Jan
    2001 “Illiberal Democracy in Southeast Asia”. InAsia-Pacific Transitions, edited byDavid E. Anderson and Jessie P. H. Poon. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230628458_6
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230628458_6 [Google Scholar]
13. Ewalt, Jonathan
    2017 “Mapping and Spatial Studies.” InOxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.651
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.651 [Google Scholar]
14. Fletcher, Robert
    2010 “Neoliberal Environmentality: Towards a Poststructuralist Political Ecology of the Conservation Debate.” Conservation and Society8 (3): 171–181. 10.4103/0972‑4923.73806
    https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.73806 [Google Scholar]
15. Gilley, Bruce
    2014 The Nature of Asian Politics. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139045377
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139045377 [Google Scholar]
16. Grundy-Warr, Carl, and Victor R. Savage
    2016 “Singapore: Sustaining a Global City-State and the Challenges of Environmental Governance in the Twenty-First Century.” InRoutledge Handbook of the Environment in Southeast Asia, edited byPhilip Hirsch. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Han, Heejin
    2016 “Singapore, a Garden City: Authoritarian Environmentalism in a Developmental State.” Journal of Environment & Development26 (1): 3–24. 10.1177/1070496516677365
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496516677365 [Google Scholar]
18. Ho, Kong Chong, Zaheer Baber, and Habibul Khondker
    2002 “‘Sites’ of Resistance: Alternative Websites and State-Society Relations.” The British Journal of Sociology531: 127–148. 10.1080/00071310120109366
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310120109366 [Google Scholar]
19. Hobson, Kersty
    2005 “Considering ‘Green’ Practices: NGOs and Singapore’s Emergent Environmental-Political Landscape.” Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia20 (2): 155–176. 10.1355/SJ20‑2C
    https://doi.org/10.1355/SJ20-2C [Google Scholar]
20. Hourihane, Zachary
    2021 “The Plight of Dover Forest, and One Secondary School Teacher’s Fight to Save It.” Rice Media, March 26. https://www.ricemedia.co/current-affairs-features-the-plight-of-dover-forest/
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hudson, Chris
    2014 “Green is the New Green: Eco-Aesthetics in Singapore.” InGreen Consumption: The Global Rise of Eco-Chic, edited byBart Barendregt and Rivke Jaffe. Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Igoe, Jim, and Dan Brockington
    2007 “Neoliberal Conservation: A Brief Introduction.” Conservation and Society5 (4): 432–449.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Koh, Gillian
    1997 “Bureaucratic Rationality in an Evolving Developmental State: Challenges to Governance in Singapore.” Asian Journal of Political Science5 (2): 114–141. 10.1080/02185379708434108
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02185379708434108 [Google Scholar]
24. Lee, Jack Tsen-Ta
    2004 “A Dictionary of Singlish and Singapore English.” www.mysmu.edu/faculty/jacklee/
25. Liew, Khai Khiun, and Natalie Pang
    2015 “Neoliberal Visions, Post-Capitalist Memories: Heritage Politics and the Counter-Mapping of Singapore’s Cityscape.” Ethnography16 (3): 331–351. 10.1177/1466138114552939
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138114552939 [Google Scholar]
26. Liow, Eugene Dili
    2012 “The Neoliberal-Developmental State: Singapore as Case Study.” Critical Sociology38 (2): 241–264. 10.1177/0896920511419900
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920511419900 [Google Scholar]
27. Lye, Lin Heng
    2007 “Land Use Planning, Environmental Management, and the Garden City as an Urban Development Approach in Singapore.” InLand Use Law for Sustainable Development, edited byNathalie J. Chalifour, Patricia Kameri-Mbote, Lin Heng Lye, and John R. Nolon. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Ministry of National Development
    Ministry of National Development 2013 “A High-Quality Living Environment for All Singaporeans: Land Use Plan to Support Singapore’s Future Population.” January. www.mnd.gov.sg/landuseplan
29. Ministry of National Development
    Ministry of National Development 2021a “Oral Answer by Ministry of National Development on Development Plans for Green Spaces.” February 1. https://www.mnd.gov.sg/newsroom/parliament-matters/speeches/view/oral-answer-by-ministry-of-national-development-on-development-plans-for-green-spaces
30. Ministry of National Development
    Ministry of National Development 2021b “Ministry of National Development Website: FAQs: Land Planning and Conservation.” April 15. https://www.mnd.gov.sg/faqs/land-planning-and-conservation/general
31. Neo, Harvey
    2021 “The Post-Politics of Environmental Engagement in Singapore.” InEnvironmental Movements and Politics of the Asian Anthropocene, edited byPaul Jobin, Ming-sho Ho and Hsin-Huang Michael Hsiao. ISEAS Publishing. 10.1355/9789814951401‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814951401-008 [Google Scholar]
32. Newman, Peter
    2010 “Green Urbanism and Its Application to Singapore.” Environment and Urbanization ASIA1 (2): 149–170. 10.1177/097542531000100204
    https://doi.org/10.1177/097542531000100204 [Google Scholar]
33. Ng, Keng Gene
    2021a “All Feedback on Future of Dover Forest will be Studied Closely: Desmond Lee.” The Straits Times, January 28.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Ng, Keng Gene
    2021b “First Housing Project in Part of Forest to be Launched in 2022.” The Straits Times, July30.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Ng, Keng Gene
    2021c “Keeping Half of Dover Forest as Nature Park a Win for All: Nature Groups, Residents.” The Straits Times, July30.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Pezzullo, Phaedra C., and Robert Cox
    2017 Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere (5th ed.). SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Puwar, Nirmal
    2004 Space Invaders: Race, Gender and Bodies Out of Place. Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Rodan, Garry
    2021 “Consultation as Non-Democratic Participation: Singapore and Its Implications”. InDeliberative Democracy in Asia, edited byBaogang He, Michael Breen and James Fishkin. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003102441‑7
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003102441-7 [Google Scholar]
39. Shatkin, Gavin
    2014 “Reinterpreting the Meaning of the ‘Singapore Model’: State Capitalism and Urban Planning.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research38 (1): 116–137. 10.1111/1468‑2427.12095
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12095 [Google Scholar]
40. Sini, Raffaella
    2020 Singapore’s Park System Master Planning: A Nation Building Tool to Construct Narratives in Post-Colonial Countries. Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑13‑6746‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6746-5 [Google Scholar]
41. Swyngedouw, Erik
    2007 “Impossible ‘Sustainability’ and the Postpolitical Condition”. InThe Sustainable Development Paradox, edited byRob J. Krueger and David Gibbs. The Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Tan, Audrey
    2021a “Dover Forest Plan Revision a Benchmark for Future Major Projects.” The Straits Times, July 30.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Tan, Audrey
    2021b “More than 150 Animal Species Recorded in Environmental Study.” The Straits Times, July 30.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Tan, Puay Yoke, James Wang, and Angelia Sia
    2013 “Perspectives on Five Decades of the Urban Greening of Singapore.” Cities321: 24–32. 10.1016/j.cities.2013.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.02.001 [Google Scholar]
45. Tan, Shin Bin, and Donald Low
    2019 “Re-Examining Singapore’s Urban Planning and Governance Framework”. InPlanning Singapore: The Experimental City, edited byStephen Hamnett and Belinda Yuen. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Teo, Youyenn
    2010 “Shaping the Singapore Family, Producing the State and Society.” Economy and Society39 (3): 337–359. 10.1080/03085147.2010.486215
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2010.486215 [Google Scholar]
47. The Straits Times
    The Straits Times 2021 “A Public Housing Approach for the Future.” The Straits Times, August 1.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Topinka, Robert J.
    2012 “Resisting the Fixity of Suburban Space: The Walker as Rhetorician.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly42 (1): 65–84. 10.1080/02773945.2011.622342
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2011.622342 [Google Scholar]
49. Wang, Jun
    2012 “The Developmental State in the Global Hegemony of Neoliberalism: A New Strategy for Public Housing in Singapore.” Cities29 (6): 369–378. 10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.004 [Google Scholar]
50. Zhang, Weiyu
    2013 “Redefining Youth Activism through Digital Technology in Singapore.” International Communication Gazette75 (3): 253–270. 10.1177/1748048512472858
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048512472858 [Google Scholar]