1887
image of ‘We’re saying that we trust them but really we don’t’
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

One key consequence of the UK leaving the EU (Brexit) is that it now has full responsibility for making its own international trade policy. In this context, NatCen and the Centre for Inclusive Trade Policy initiated Citizens’ Juries on the topic of trade policy. From the transcripts of these juries, we created a corpus of 317,974 words. Using corpus-assisted discourse analysis, we focus on the concept of in trade policy. We find that trust conferred on actors in trade policy is limited. The greatest degree of trust is conferred on experts, on account of their epistemically-elevated position. The government is broadly not trusted. Jurors wished to be consulted about trade policy decisions and be assured that they are based on sound advice, but few wished to have a role in actually making them. Our findings highlight a deficit of trust among the jurors that could be remedied by greater perceived honesty and transparency from the government.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24178.rob
2025-09-29
2025-11-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aldred, Jonathan and Michael Jacobs
    2000 “Citizens and wetlands: Evaluating the Ely citizens’ jury”. Ecological Economics(): –. 10.1016/S0921‑8009(00)00159‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00159-2 [Google Scholar]
  2. Angelou, Angelos, Stella Ladi, Dimitra Panagiotatou, and Vasiliki Tsagkroni
    2024 “Paths to trust: Explaining citizens’ trust to experts and evidence-informed policymaking during the COVID-19 pandemic”. Public Administration(): –. 10.1111/padm.12962
    https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12962 [Google Scholar]
  3. Arnstein, Sherry R.
    1969 “A ladder of citizen participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners(): –. 10.1080/01944366908977225
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhagwati, Jagdish
    1988Protectionism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cairney, Paul and Adam Wellstead
    2021 “Covid-19: Effective policymaking depends on trust in experts, politicians and the public”. Policy Design and Practice(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Centre for Inclusive Trade Policy
    Centre for Inclusive Trade Policy 2023 “Research into public attitudes to trade”, CITP, University of Sussex, https://citp.ac.uk/public-attitudes-to-trade
  7. Clements, Michael and Laura King
    2023 “Trust in politicians reaches its lowest score in 40 years”, IPSOS, 14th December 2023, https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/ipsos-trust-in-professions-veracity-index-2023
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dommett, Katharine and Warren Pearce
    2019 “What do we know about public attitudes towards experts? Reviewing survey data in the United Kingdom and European Union”. Public Understanding of Science (): –. 10.1177/0963662519852038
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519852038 [Google Scholar]
  9. Eckert, Penelope
    2019 “The limits of social meaning: Social indexicality, variation, and the cline of interiority”. Language(): –. 10.1353/lan.2019.0072
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2019.0072 [Google Scholar]
  10. Goldstein, Judith
    1993Ideas, lnterests and American Trade Policy. Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Guest, Greg, Emily Namey, and Kevin McKenna
    2017 “How Many Focus Groups Are Enough? Building an Evidence Base for Nonprobability Sample Sizes”. Field Methods(): –. 10.1177/1525822X16639015
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X16639015 [Google Scholar]
  12. Henig, David and L. Alan Winters
    2024 “Restructuring the Board of Trade for the twenty-first century”. Centre for Inclusive Trade Policy, Working Paper 014. Available at: https://citp.ac.uk/publications/restructuring-the-board-of-trade-for-the-twenty-first-century
  13. Hosking, Geoffrey
    2019 “The decline of trust in government”. InTrust in Contemporary Society, ed. byMasamichi Sasaki, –. Boston: Brill. 10.1163/9789004390430_007
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004390430_007 [Google Scholar]
  14. Irwin, Douglas
    1996Against the Tide: An Intellectual History of Free Trade. Princeton, NJ: Princeston University Press. 10.1515/9780691213019
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691213019 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ipsos
    Ipsos 2024 “Trust in politicians reaches lowest score for 40 years”. https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/ipsos-trust-in-professions-veracity-index-2023
  16. Kenyon, Wendy, Nick Hanley, and Ceara Nevin
    2001 “Citizens’ Juries: An Aid to Environmental Valuation?” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy(): –. 10.1068/c4s
    https://doi.org/10.1068/c4s [Google Scholar]
  17. Kiesling, Scott F.
    2009 “Style as stance”. InStance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. byAlexandra Jaffe, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kilgarriff, Adam, Pavel Rychlý, Pavel Smrž, and David Tugwell
    2004 “The Sketch Engine”. Proceedings of the 11th EURALEX International Congress, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kilgarriff, Adam, Vít Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý, and Vít Suchomel
    2014 “The Sketch Engine: Ten years on”. Lexicography: –. 10.1007/s40607‑014‑0009‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9 [Google Scholar]
  20. Litva, Andrea, Joanna Coast, Jenny Donovan, John Eyles, Michael Shepherd, Jo Tacchi, Julia Abelson, and Kieran Morgan
    2002 “The public is too subjective’: public involvement at different levels of health-care decision making”. Social Science & Medicine(): –. 10.1016/S0277‑9536(01)00151‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00151-4 [Google Scholar]
  21. Love, Robbie, Claire Dembry, Andrew Hardie, Vaclav Brezina, and Tony McEnery
    2017 “The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Locke, John
    1960Two Treatises of Government. Ed.Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Macdonald, David
    2024 “Political trust and American public support for free trade”. Political Behaviour: –. 10.1007/s11109‑023‑09858‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-023-09858-x [Google Scholar]
  24. National Centre for Social Research
    National Centre for Social Research 2024 “Trust and confidence in Britain’s system of government at record low”. https://natcen.ac.uk/news/trust-and-confidence-britains-system-government-record-low
  25. Norrevik, Sara
    2020 “Trust and support for comprehensive trade agreements in the European parliament”. International Studies Quarterly (): –. 10.1093/isq/sqaa004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa004 [Google Scholar]
  26. Office for National Statistics
    Office for National Statistics 2024 “Trust in Government, UK: 2023”. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/wellbeing/bulletins/trustingovernmentuk/2023
  27. Partington, Alan
    2004 “Corpora and discourse: A most congruous beast”. InCorpora and Discourse, ed. byAlan Partington, John Morley, and Louann Haarman, –. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Rodrik, Dani
    2011The Globalization Paradox: Why Global Markets, States, and Democracy can’t Coexist. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Rychlý, Pavel
    2008 “A lexicographer-friendly association score”. InProceedings of Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing, ed. byPetr Sojka and Aleš Horák. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Winsvold, Marte, Atle Haugsgjerd, Jo Sagile, and Signe Bock Segaard
    2024 “What makes people trust or distrust politicians? Insights from open-ended survey questions”. West European Politics(): –. 10.1080/01402382.2023.2268459
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2023.2268459 [Google Scholar]
  31. Winters, L. Alan
    2020 “Brexit and Covid: Experts — who needs ‘em?”. UK in a Changing Europe, 7th November 2020. Available at: https://ukandeu.ac.uk/brexit-and-covid-experts-who-needs-em/
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24178.rob
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24178.rob
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error