1887
image of When performance studies meet discourse theory

Abstract

Abstract

Despite its versatility as a methodological tool, discourse analysis suffers from a logocentric bias, a tendency to primarily focus on text while ignoring the non-textual components of discourse. Although poststructural approaches to discourse analysis like Discourse Theory (DT) have developed an understanding of discourse going beyond language, there are few practical methodological tools for scholars from these traditions to engage with these non-textual elements. This article fills that gap by providing an original qualitative methodological tool, the Political Performance Analysis Protocol (PPAP) which adapts one of the signature methods of Performance Studies to political performances. It does so by describing the four constitutive elements of political performances — background symbols and foreground scripts, actor, audience and mise-en-scène — and empirically illustrating them through the case of Greta Thunberg’s “How dare you?” performance at a United Nations to show the PPAP’s relevance as a tool complementing other forms of discourse analysis.

Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24196.aio
2025-01-07
2025-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/jlp.24196.aio/jlp.24196.aio.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24196.aio&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ahmed, Sarah
    2014The Cultural Politics of Emotion (2nd Edition). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748691142
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748691142 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander, Jeffrey
    2006 “Cultural Pragmatics: Social Performance between Ritual and Strategy.” InSocial Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual, ed. byJeffrey Alexander, Bernhard Giesen & Jason L. Mast, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511616839.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616839.002 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ankersmit, Frank
    2002Political Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 10.1515/9781503619036
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503619036 [Google Scholar]
  4. Auslander, Philip
    2004 “Performance Analysis and Popular Music: A Manifesto”. Contemporary Theatre Review, (): –. 10.1080/1026716032000128674
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1026716032000128674 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich
    1981The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Blommaert, Jan
    2004Workshopping: Professional Vision, Practices, and Critique in Discourse Analysis. Gent: Academia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, Katy
    2024 “New Opportunities for Discourse Studies: Combining Discourse Theory, Critical Discourse Studies and Corpus Linguistics.” Journal of Language and Politics. 10.1075/jlp.23066.bro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.23066.bro [Google Scholar]
  8. Butler, Judith
    1990Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Carpentier, Nico
    2017The Discursive-Material Knot Cyprus in Conflict and Community Media Participation. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cronin, Thomas E.
    2008 “‘All The World’s A Stage…’ Acting and the Art of Political Leadership”. The Leadership Quarterly, (): –. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.05.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.05.009 [Google Scholar]
  11. De Cleen, Benjamin, Goyvaerts, Jana, Carpentier, Nico, Glynos, Jason & Yannis Stavrakakis, Y.
    2021 “Moving discourse theory forward: A five-track proposal for future research”. Journal of Language and Politics, (): –. 10.1075/jlp.20076.dec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20076.dec [Google Scholar]
  12. Eklundh, Emmy
    2019Emotions, Protest, Democracy: Collective Identities in Contemporary Spain. Oxon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351205719
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351205719 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fairclough, Norman
    1995Critical Discourse Analysis: the Critical Study of Language. London and New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fischer-Lichte, Erika
    2008 “Reality and Fiction in Contemporary Theatre”. Theatre Research International, (): –. 10.1017/S0307883307003410
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0307883307003410 [Google Scholar]
  15. Foucault, M.
    1972The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Grobe, Christopher A.
    2020 “The Artist is President: Performance Art and Other Keywords in the Age of Donald Trump”. Critical Inquiry, (): –. 10.1086/709223
    https://doi.org/10.1086/709223 [Google Scholar]
  17. Howarth, David
    2000Discourse. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2005 “Applying discourse theory: The method of articulation.” InDiscourse Theory in European Politics, edited byDavid Howarth, and Jakob Torfing, –. London: Palgrave. 10.1057/9780230523364_14
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523364_14 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kershaw, Baz, & Helen Nicholson
    (eds) 2011Research Methods in Theatre and Performance. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748646081
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748646081 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kress, Gunther & Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2001Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Küppers, Roni
    2024 “The Far Right in Spain: An ‘Exception’ to What? Challenging Conventions in the Study of Populism through Innovative Methodologies.” European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, –. 10.1080/23254823.2024.2321905
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2024.2321905 [Google Scholar]
  22. Laclau, Ernesto
    2005On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Laclau, Ernesto & Chantal Mouffe
    1985Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Luff, Paul & Christian Heath
    2015 “Transcribing Embodied Action.” In: The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd Edition), edited byDeborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton & Deborah Schiffrin, –. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118584194.ch17
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch17 [Google Scholar]
  25. Machin, David & Mayr, Andreas
    2023How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Miller, Arthur
    2001On Politics and the Art of Acting. New York: Viking.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Nikisianis, Nikos, Thomas Siomos, Yannis Stavrakakis, Titika Dimitroulia, and Grigoris Markou
    2019 “Populism Versus Anti-Populism in the Greek Press: Post-Structuralist Discourse Theory Meets Corpus Linguistics.” InDiscourse, Culture and Organization: Inquiries into Relational Structures of Power, edited byTomas Marttila, –. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑94123‑3_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94123-3_12 [Google Scholar]
  28. Norris, Sigrid
    2004Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. New York & London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203379493
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203379493 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2011Identity in (Inter)action: Introducing Multimodal (Inter)action Analysis. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9781934078280
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078280 [Google Scholar]
  30. Pavis, Patrice
    1985 “Theatre Analysis: Some Questions and a Questionnaire”. New Theatre Quarterly(): –. 10.1017/S0266464X00001573
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266464X00001573 [Google Scholar]
  31. 1988 “From Text to Performance.” In: Performing Texts, edited byMichael Issacharoff & Robin F. Jones, –. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 10.9783/9781512802870‑008
    https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512802870-008 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2003Analyzing Performance: Theater, Dance, and Film. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.10924
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.10924 [Google Scholar]
  33. Petrovic Lotina, Goran
    2021Choreographing Agonism Politics, Strategies and Performances of the Left. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑79446‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79446-0 [Google Scholar]
  34. Rai, Shirin M.
    2014 “Political Performance: A Framework for Analysing Democratic Politics”. Political Studies, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Roch, Juan
    2019 “Exploring the Non-Discursive: A Three-Layered Approach to Discourse and Its Boundaries.” In: Fuzzy Boundaries in Discourse Studies: Theoretical, Methodological, and Lexico-Grammatical Fuzziness, edited byPéter B. Furkó, Ildikó Vaskó, Csilla Ilona Dér & Dorte Madsen, –. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑27573‑0_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27573-0_2 [Google Scholar]
  36. Rowe, Cami
    2013The Politics of Protest and US Foreign Policy: Performative Construction of the War on Terror. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203584842
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203584842 [Google Scholar]
  37. Saward, Michael
    2010The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579389.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579389.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Schechner, Richard
    2013Performance Studies: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Schiffrin, Deborah, Tannen Deborah & Heidi E. Hamilton
    2015 “Introduction to the First Edition”. In: The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd Edition), edited byDeborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton & Deborah Schiffrin. –. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118584194.ch0
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch0 [Google Scholar]
  40. Taylor, Diana
    2003The Archive and the Repertoire. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Thunberg, Greta
    2019 “The World is Waking Up”. In: No One Is Too Small to Make a Difference, –. London: Penguin Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2015 “Multimodality”. In: The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd Edition). Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton & Deborah Schiffrin, –. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118584194.ch21
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch21 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24196.aio
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error