Supplementing the tropes

References

1. Althusser, Louis
   1971 “Philosophy as a Revolutionary Weapon”. InLouis Althusser, Lenin and Philosophy and other Essays. Monthly Review Press, –.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Atkins, Judi, and Alan Finlayson
   2016 “‘As Shakespeare so Memorably Said…’: Quotation, Rhetoric, and the Performance of Politics.” Political Studies: –. 10.1111/1467‑9248.12156
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12156 [Google Scholar]
3. Bacchi, Carole
   2009 Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to Be?Pearson.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bevir, Mark and Rod A. Rhodes
   2007 Governance Stories. Routledge.
5. Bitzer, Lloyd
   1968 “The Rhetorical Situation.” Philosophy & Rhetoric(): –
   [Google Scholar]
6. Burke, Kenneth
   1969 A Rhetoric of Motives. University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520353237
   https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520353237 [Google Scholar]
7. Butler, Judith, Ernesto Laclau and Slavoj Zizek
   2000 Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. Verso Books.
   [Google Scholar]
8. De Cleen, Benjamin, Jason Glynos, Jana Goyvaerts and Yannis Stavrakakis
   2024 “The Turn to Practice in Discourse Theory: Lessons from the Populist Moment.” Journal of Language and Politics. 10.1075/jlp.24200.dec
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.24200.dec [Google Scholar]
9. De Cleen, Benjamin, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos and Yannis Stavrakakis
   2021 “Moving discourse theory forward: A five-track proposal for future research.” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.20076.dec
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20076.dec [Google Scholar]
10. Fairclough, Isabella and Norman Fairclough
    2012 Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Fairclough, Isabella and Norman Fairclough
    2013 “Argument, Deliberation, Dialectic and the Nature of the Political: A CDA Perspective”. Political Studies Review(): –. 10.1111/1478‑9302.12025
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12025 [Google Scholar]
12. Finlayson, Alan
    2013 “Critique and Political Argumentation.” Political Studies Review(): –. 10.1111/1478‑9302.12023
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12023 [Google Scholar]
13. Finlayson, Alan
    2018 ‘“Dancing with Doxa”: A ‘Rhetorical Political Analysis’ of David Cameron’s Britishness’. In‘Doing Politics’: Discursivity, performativity and mediation in political discourseedited byGeraldine Horan and Michael Kranert. John Benjamins, –. 10.1075/dapsac.80.03fin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.80.03fin [Google Scholar]
14. Galtung, Johan
    1969 “Violence, Peace, and Peace Research.” Journal of Peace Research(): –. 10.1177/002234336900600301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336900600301 [Google Scholar]
15. Glynos, Jason, David Howarth, Ryan Flitcroft, Craig Love, Konstantinos Roussos and Jimena Vazquez
    2021 “Logics, discourse theory and methods: Advances, challenges and ways forward.” Journal of Language and Politics(): –. 10.1075/jlp.20048.gly
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20048.gly [Google Scholar]
16. Glynos, Jason, Konstantinos Roussos, Savvas Voutyras and Rebecca Warren
    2023 “Paradoxes in the management of timebanks in the UK’s voluntary sector: discursive bricolage and its limits”. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations (): –. 10.1007/s11266‑022‑00467‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-022-00467-6 [Google Scholar]
17. Glynos, Jason, David Howarth, Aletta Norval and Ewen Speed, Ewen
    2009 Discourse Analysis: Varieties and Methods, National Centre for Research Methods NCRM/014 (https://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/id/eprint/796/1/discourse_analysis_NCRM_014.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
18. Griggs, Steven, and David Howarth
    2023 Contesting Aviation Expansion: Depoliticisation, Technologies of Government and Post-Aviation Futures. Policy Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hajer, Maaten A.
    1997 The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/019829333X.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/019829333X.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
20. Hall, Stuart
    2021 Selected Writings on Marxism. Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hay, Colin
    2013 “Political Discourse Analysis: The Dangers of Methodological Absolutism.” Political Studies Review(): –. 10.1111/1478‑9302.12026
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12026 [Google Scholar]
22. Howarth, David
    2005 “Applying Discourse Theory”. InDiscourse Theory in European Politicsedited byDavid Howarth and Jacob Torfing. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230523364_14
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523364_14 [Google Scholar]
23. Howarth, David, Neil Barnett, Steven Griggs and Stephen Hall
    2022 “Local Agency for the Public Purpose? Dissecting and evaluating the emerging discourses of municipal entrepreneurship in the UK”. Local Government Studies(): –. 10.1080/03003930.2021.1988935
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2021.1988935 [Google Scholar]
24. Kaplan, Michael
    2010 “The Rhetoric of Hegemony: Laclau, Radical Democracy, and the Rule of Tropes”. Philosophy and Rhetoric(): –. 10.5325/philrhet.43.3.0253
    https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.3.0253 [Google Scholar]
25. Laclau, Ernesto
    1977 Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory. New Left Books.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Laclau, Ernesto
    2005 On Populist Reason. Verso Books.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Laclau, Ernesto
    2001 “The Politics of Rhetoric”. InMaterial Events: Paul de Man and the Afterlife of Theoryedited byTom Cohen, Barbara Cohen, J. Hillis Miller, Andrzej Warminski. University of Minnesota Press, –.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Laclau, Ernesto
    2004 “Glimpsing the Future.” InLaclau: A Critical Reader, edited bySimon Critchley and Oliver Marchart. Routledge, –.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Laclau, Ernesto
    2006 “Why Constructing a People Is the Main Task of Radical Politics.” Critical Inquiry(): –. 10.1086/508086
    https://doi.org/10.1086/508086 [Google Scholar]
30. Laclau, Ernesto
    2014 The Rhetorical Foundations of Society. Verso Books.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Leff, Michael C.
    1983 “The Topics of Argumentative Invention in Latin Rhetorical Theory from Cicero to Boethius”. Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric: –. 10.1525/rh.1983.1.1.23
    https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1983.1.1.23 [Google Scholar]
32. Marchart, Oliver
    2018 Thinking Antagonism: Political Ontology After Laclau. Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9781474413329
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474413329 [Google Scholar]
33. Meyer, Michel
    2014 “What is the Use of Topics in Rhetoric?” Revue Internationale de Philosophie. : –. 10.3917/rip.270.0447
    https://doi.org/10.3917/rip.270.0447 [Google Scholar]
34. Mouffe, Chantal
    2018 For a Left Populism. Verso Books.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Perlman, Chaim, Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie
    1969 The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Riker, William. H.
    1986 The Art of Political Manipulation. Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Wodak, Ruth
    2018 “We have the character of an island nation”: A discourse-historical analysis of David Cameron’s “Bloomberg speech” on the European Union. In‘Doing Politics’: Discursivity, performativity and mediation in political discourseedited byGeraldine Horan and Michael Kranert. John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.80.02wod
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.80.02wod [Google Scholar]
38. Zerilli, Linda
    2005 “‘We Feel Our Freedom’: Imagination and Judgment in the Thought of Hannah Arendt.” Political Theory(): –. 10.1177/0090591704272958
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591704272958 [Google Scholar]