1887
image of Discourse Theory and Strategic Communication
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This contribution explores the nexus between Discourse Theory and Strategic Communication. Traditional positivist and rationalist approaches to business, economics, politics, and management often marginalize strategic communication as merely instrumental; whereas discursive approaches, and Discourse Theory in particular, recognize its constitutive role in shaping social realities. This contribution therefore argues for the development of a discourse-theoretical approach to Strategic Communication, highlighting its potential to offer new insights and understandings. It first examines existing uses of the notion of discourse in Strategic Communication, before discussing Discourse Theory’s potential added value to its study. Next, it emphasizes the importance of Discourse Theory scholars engaging with Strategic Communication topics. Finally, two examples contrasting non-discursive and discourse-theoretical approaches are presented, focusing respectively on populism and authenticity in corporate marketing campaigns. Overall, this paper advocates for a deeper integration of Discourse Theory within the study of Strategic Communication.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24199.jac
2025-01-07
2025-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aggerholm, Helle Kryger, and Birte Asmuß
    2016 “A Practice Perspective on Strategic Communication: The Discursive Legitimization of Managerial Decisions.” Journal of Communication Management (): –. 10.1108/JCOM‑07‑2015‑0052
    https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-07-2015-0052 [Google Scholar]
  2. Allan, David
    2019 Beyoncé: Say My (Brand) Name. SAGE Business Cases Originals. 10.4135/9781526475886
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526475886 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alvesson, Mats, and Hugh Willmott
    20126Making Sense of Management: A Critical Introduction. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Balogun, Julia, Claus Jacobs, Paula Jarzabkowski, Saku Mantere, and Eero Vaara
    2014 “Placing Strategy Discourse in Context: Sociomateriality, Sensemaking, and Power.” Journal of Management Studies (): –. 10.1111/joms.12059
    https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12059 [Google Scholar]
  5. Beetz, Johannes
    2016Materiality and subject in Marxism, (Post-)structuralism, and material semiotics. Berlin: Springer. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑59837‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59837-0 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bouzon, Arlette
    2013 “Theoretical approaches in organizational and strategic communication: a review of the french academic literature.” Organisational and Strategic Communication Research: European PerspectivesbyGisela Gonçalves, Ian Somerville and Ana Melo, pp.–. Lisbon: Labcom Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brooks, Bradley, Dawn Chanland, and Steven Cox
    2024 Dove’s advertising campaign highs and lows: From real beauty to real success to real controversy. Business Case Journal (): –. 10.4135/9781071944882
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071944882 [Google Scholar]
  8. Buhmann, Alexander, and Fraser Likely
    2018 “Evaluation and measurement in strategic communication.” In: The international encyclopedia of strategic communicationbyHeath, Robert Lawrence, and Winni Johansen, pp.–. Boston: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781119010722.iesc0103
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119010722.iesc0103 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cheney, George, and Lars Thøger Christensen
    2001 “Public Relations as Contested Terrain: A Critical Response.” InHandbook of Public RelationsbyRobert Heath & Gabriel Vasquez, pp.–. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 10.4135/9781452220727.n12
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452220727.n12 [Google Scholar]
  10. Critchley, Simon
    2012 “Is there a normative deficit in the theory of hegemony?” InLaclau: A Critical ReaderbySimon Critchley and Oliver Marchart, pp.–. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203714720
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203714720 [Google Scholar]
  11. De Cleen, Benjamin, and Yannis Stavrakakis
    2017 “Distinctions and Articulations: A Discourse Theoretical Framework for the Study of Populism and Nationalism.” Javnost-The Public (): –. 10.1080/13183222.2017.1330083
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2017.1330083 [Google Scholar]
  12. De Cleen, Benjamin, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos, Yannis Stavrakakis, and Ilija Tomanić Trivundža
    2021 “An introduction to the special issue on ‘Discourse Theory: Ways forward for theory development and research practice’.” Journal of Language and Politics, (): –. 10.1075/jlp.20077.dec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20077.dec [Google Scholar]
  13. De Cleen, Benjamin, Jason Glynos, Jana Goyvaerts, and Yannis Stravrakakis
    2024 “Discourse theory and the turn to practice: Lessons from the populist moment.” Journal of Language and Politics. 10.1075/jlp.24200.dec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.24200.dec [Google Scholar]
  14. Fougère, Martin, and Charles Barthold
    2020 “Onwards to the New Political Frontier: Macron’s Electoral Populism.” Organization (): –. 10.1177/1350508420910567
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420910567 [Google Scholar]
  15. Glynos, Jason, David Howarth, Ryan Flitcroft, Craig Love, Konstantinos Roussos, and Jimena Vazquez
    2021 “Logics, Discourse Theory and Methods: Advances, Challenges and Ways Forward.” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.20048.gly
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20048.gly [Google Scholar]
  16. Goldberg, Matthew H., and Abel Gustafson
    2023 “A framework for understanding the effects of strategic communication campaigns.” International Journal of Strategic Communication (): –. 10.1080/1553118X.2022.2137674
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2022.2137674 [Google Scholar]
  17. Golsorkhi, Damon, Linda Rouleau, David Seidl, and Eero Vaara
    2010 “What is strategy-as-practice.” In: Cambridge handbook of strategy as practicebyGolsorkhi, Damon, Linda Rouleau, David Seidl, and Eero Vaara, pp. -. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511777882.001
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511777882.001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hallahan, Kirk, Derina Holtzhausen, Betteke Van Ruler, Dejan Verčič, and Krishnamurthy Sriramesh
    2007 “Defining Strategic Communication.” International Journal of Strategic Communication (): –. 10.1080/15531180701285244
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15531180701285244 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2007 “Defining strategic communication.” International journal of strategic communication (): –. 10.1080/15531180701285244
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15531180701285244 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hardy, Cynthia, and Robyn Thomas
    2014 “Strategy, Discourse and Practice: The Intensification of Power.” Journal of Management Studies (): –. 10.1111/joms.12005
    https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12005 [Google Scholar]
  21. Herschinger, Eva
    2012 “‘Hell is the Other’: Conceptualising Hegemony and Identity through Discourse Theory.” Millennium (): –. 10.1177/0305829812449501
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829812449501 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hoffmann, Jochen, Karina Nyborg, Charlotte Averhoff, and Simone Olesen
    2020 “The contingency of corporate political advocacy: Nike’s ‘dream crazy’campaign with Colin Kaepernick.” Public Relations Inquiry (): –. 10.1177/2046147X20920802
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X20920802 [Google Scholar]
  23. Holtzhausen, Derina, and Ansgar Zerfass
    2014 “Strategic Communication: Opportunities and Challenges of the Research Area.” In: The Routledge Handbook of Strategic CommunicationbyDerina Holtzhausen and Ansgar Zerfass, pp.–. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203094440‑8
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203094440-8 [Google Scholar]
  24. Jacobs, Thomas
    2019 “Discourse Theory as an Independent Paradigm for Studying Institutions: Towards a New Definition of ‘Discursive Construction’ in Institutional Analysis.” Contemporary Political Theory, : –. 10.1057/s41296‑018‑0279‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-018-0279-3 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2022Hegemony, Discourse, and Political Strategy: Towards a Post-Marxist Understanding of Contestation and Politicization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.97
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.97 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jaynes, Steve
    . “Making Strategic Change: a Critical Discourse Analysis” 2015Journal of Organizational Change Management (): –. 10.1108/JOCM‑04‑2013‑0053
    https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-04-2013-0053 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kim, Joon Kyoung, Holly Overton, Nandini Bhalla, and Jo-Yun Li
    2020 “Nike, Colin Kaepernick, and the politicization of sports: Examining perceived organizational motives and public responses.” Public Relations Review (): –. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101856
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101856 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kotler, Philip
    2020 “Marketing and Value Creation.” Journal of Creating Value (): –. 10.1177/2394964320903559
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2394964320903559 [Google Scholar]
  29. Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
    1985/2014Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Laclau, Ernesto
    2005On populist reason. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Macnamara, Jim
    2018 “A Review of New Evaluation Models for Strategic Communication: Progress and Gaps.” International Journal of Strategic Communication (): –. 10.1080/1553118X.2018.1428978
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1428978 [Google Scholar]
  32. Mahoney, James
    2023Strategic communication: Campaign planning. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003317579
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003317579 [Google Scholar]
  33. Marttila, Tomas
    2015Post-foundational Discourse Analysis: From Political Difference to Empirical Research. Berlin: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Matthews, Jamie
    2019 “Populism, Inequality and Representation: Negotiating ‘the 99%’ with Occupy London.” The Sociological Review (): –. 10.1177/0038026119851648
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026119851648 [Google Scholar]
  35. Molleda, Juan-Carlos
    2010 “Authenticity and the construct’s dimensions in public relations and communication research.” Journal of communication management (): –. 10.1108/13632541011064508
    https://doi.org/10.1108/13632541011064508 [Google Scholar]
  36. Nonhoff, Martin
    2017 “Discourse analysis as critique.” Palgrave Communications (): –. 10.1057/palcomms.2017.74
    https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.74 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2019 “Hegemony Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Research Practice.” In: Discourse, Culture and Organization, byTomas Marttila, pp.–. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑94123‑3_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94123-3_4 [Google Scholar]
  38. Nothhaft, Howard, Kelly Page Werder, Dejan Verčič, and Ansgar Zerfass
    2020 “Strategic communication: Reflections on an elusive concept.” In: Future directions of Strategic CommunicationbyHoward Nothhaft, Kelly Page Werder, Dejan Verčič, and Ansgar Zerfass, pp.–. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429295638
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429295638 [Google Scholar]
  39. Pérez, Andrea
    2019 “Building a theoretical framework of message authenticity in CSR communication.” Corporate Communications: An International Journal (): –. 10.1108/CCIJ‑04‑2018‑0051
    https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2018-0051 [Google Scholar]
  40. Putnam, Linda L., and Anne Maydan Nicotera
    2010 “Communicative Constitution of Organization is a Question: Critical Issues for Addressing it.” Management Communication Quarterly (): –. 10.1177/0893318909351581
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909351581 [Google Scholar]
  41. Raaz, Oliver
    2021 “The Antagonist of the Antagonist: Towards the Deconstruction of the Communication-scientific distinction between Advertising and Public Relations.” Publizistik: –. 10.1007/s11616‑021‑00664‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-021-00664-1 [Google Scholar]
  42. Saren, Michael
    Ed. 2007Critical marketing: Defining the field. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Sánchez, Gustavo, Francisco Valenzuela, and Matías Sanfuentes
    2024 “In pursuit of (post-)bureaucratic promises: Analyzing the logics of career self-management discourse at a privatized company.” Scandinavian Journal of Management (): –. 10.1016/j.scaman.2023.101318
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2023.101318 [Google Scholar]
  44. Schoeneborn, Dennis, Steffen Blaschke, François Cooren, Robert D. McPhee, David Seidl, and James R. Taylor
    2014 “The Three Schools of CCO Thinking: Interactive Dialogue and Systematic Comparison.” Management Communication Quarterly (): –. 10.1177/0893318914527000
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318914527000 [Google Scholar]
  45. Seiffert-Brockmann, Jens, Bradley Wiggins, and Howard Nothhaft
    2023 “The meme’s-eye view of strategic communication: A case study of social movements from a memetic perspective.” International Journal of Strategic Communication (): –. 10.1080/1553118X.2023.2234348
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2023.2234348 [Google Scholar]
  46. Skålén, Per, Martin Fougère, and Markus Fellesson
    2007Marketing Discourse: A Critical Perspective. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203932995
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203932995 [Google Scholar]
  47. Stavrakakis, Yannis
    2017 Discourse Theory in Populism Research: Three Challenges and a Dilemma. Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.17025.sta
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17025.sta [Google Scholar]
  48. Taylor, James R., and Elizabeth J. Van Every
    2010The Situated Organization: Case Studies in the Pragmatics of Communication Research. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203848074
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203848074 [Google Scholar]
  49. The Drum
    The Drum 2017 “‘I originally had Nike in mind’: Meet the student behind that powerful Adidas ad that’s courting attention from WPP and Droga5.” Available online at 〈https://www.thedrum.com/news/2017/01/09/i-originally-had-nike-mind-meet-the-student-behind-powerful-adidas-ad-thats-courting〉, last verified on8/10/2024.
  50. Thomas, Gail Fann, and Kimberlie J. Stephens
    2015 “An introduction to strategic communication.” International Journal of Business Communication (): –. 10.1177/2329488414560469
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488414560469 [Google Scholar]
  51. Torp, Simon Møberg
    2014 “The Strategic Turn in Communication Science: On the History and Role of Strategy in Communication Science from Ancient Greece until the Present Day.” In: The Routledge Handbook of Strategic CommunicationbyDerina Holtzhausen and Ansgar Zerfass, pp.–. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Tunderman, Simon
    2023Hegemony and the Politics of Labour: Towards a Discourse Theory of Value in Contemporary Capitalism. London: Taylor & Francis. 10.4324/9781003440567
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003440567 [Google Scholar]
  53. Vesa, Mikko, and Eero Vaara
    2014 “Strategic Ethnography 2.0: Four Methods for Advancing Strategy Process and Practice Research.” Strategic Organization (): –. 10.1177/1476127014554745
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127014554745 [Google Scholar]
  54. Werder, Kelly Page, Howard Nothhaft, Dejan Verčič, and Ansgar Zerfass
    2020 “Strategic Communication as an Emerging Interdisciplinary Paradigm.” In: Future directions of Strategic CommunicationbyHoward Nothhaft, Kelly Page Werder, Dejan Verčič, and Ansgar Zerfass, pp.–. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Weyland, Kurt
    2001 “Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics”. Comparative politics (): –. 10.2307/422412
    https://doi.org/10.2307/422412 [Google Scholar]
  56. 2017 “A Political-strategic approach.” In: The Oxford Handbook of PopulismbyCristóbal Kaltwasser, Paul A. Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo, and Pierre Ostiguy, pp.–. Oxford: Oxford University press
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Whittington, Richard
    1996 “Strategy as Practice.” Long Range Planning (): –. 10.1016/0024‑6301(96)00068‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(96)00068-4 [Google Scholar]
  58. Winkler, Peter, and Michael Etter
    2018 “Strategic Communication and Emergence: A Dual Narrative Framework.” International Journal of Strategic Communication (): –. 10.1080/1553118X.2018.1452241
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1452241 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24199.jac
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error