1887
image of Community organising and radical democracy

Abstract

Abstract

Community organising is a way of doing democratic politics distinct from electoral and radical protest politics yet has been largely overlooked in discourse studies and activist scholarship, particularly when compared to the attention paid to ‘flashier’ grassroots movements. We aim to contribute to rectifying this shortcoming by exploring the conceptual connections between community organising and the political discourse theory of radical democracy. Our theoretical argument is supplemented with an illustrative vignette-based exploration, drawing on the experiences of community alliances and their members within Citizens UK, the UK’s community organising umbrella organization. We show that while radical democratic theory can help ground community organising practice and its dilemmas in a conceptually illuminating way, community organising practice, in turn, can help put some valuable ‘flesh’ onto what many consider to be the rather abstract pronouncements associated with radical democracy and its failure to elaborate what an agonistic politics looks like in practice.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24201.sch
2025-01-07
2025-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/jlp.24201.sch/jlp.24201.sch.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24201.sch&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alinsky, Saul
    1971Rules for Radicals — A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals. Vintage Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beck, Dave, and Rod Purcell
    2013International Community Organising — Taking Power, Making Change. Policy Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bolton, Matthew
    2017How to Resist — Turn Protest to Power. Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brady, Shane R., Andrew C. Schoeneman, and Jason Sawyer
    2015 “Critiquing and Analysing the Effects of Neoliberalism on Community Organising: Implications and Recommendations for Practitioners and Educators.” Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology (): –. 10.33043/JSACP.6.1.36‑60
    https://doi.org/10.33043/JSACP.6.1.36-60 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bretherton, Luke
    2015Resurrecting Democracy — Faith, Citizenship and the Politics of a Common Life. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bunyan, Paul
    2016 “The Role of Civil Society in Reducing Poverty and Inequality: A Case Study of the Living Wage Campaign in the UK.” Local Economy (): –. 10.1177/0269094216646993
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094216646993 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2021 “Hallmarks of the Political in Community Organising: An Arendtian Perspective.” Voluntas (): –. 10.1007/s11266‑021‑00372‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00372-4 [Google Scholar]
  8. Coles, Romand
    2004 “Moving Democracy — Industrial Areas Foundation Social Movements and the Political Arts of Listening, Traveling, and Tabling.” Political Theory (): –. 10.1177/0090591704263036
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591704263036 [Google Scholar]
  9. De Cleen, Benjamin, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos, and Yannis Stavrakakis
    2021 “Moving Discourse Theory Forward — A Five-Track Proposal for Future Research.” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.20076.dec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20076.dec [Google Scholar]
  10. della Porta, Donatella
    2015Social Movements in Times of Austerity — Bringing Capitalism Back into Protest Analysis. Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Feagin, Joe R., and Anthony M. Orum, and Gideon Sjoberg
    1991A Case for the Case Study, University of North Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ganz, Marshall
    2013/2009What is Public Narrative: Self, Us & Now. Working Paper. URL: nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:30760283 (accessed11/01/2024).
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gibson-Graham, J. K.
    2006A Postcapitalist Politics. University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Glynos, Jason and David Howarth
    2007Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203934753
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934753 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2019 “The Retroductive Cycle: The Research Process in Poststructuralist Discourse Analysis.” InDiscourse, Culture and Organization: Inquiries into Relational Structures of Power, edited byTomas Marttila. Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑94123‑3_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94123-3_5 [Google Scholar]
  16. Glynos, Jason, David Howarth, Ryan Flitcroft, David Craig, Konstantinos Roussos, and Jimena Vazquez
    2021 “Logics, discourse theory, and methods: Advances, challenges and ways forward.” InJournal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.20048.gly
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20048.gly [Google Scholar]
  17. Greene, Hunter
    2022Reflecting on Critiques of Broad-Based Community Organising. URL: https://kenan.ethics.duke.edu/author/huntergreene/ (accessed07/01/2024).
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kioupkiolis, Alexandros, and Giorgos Katsambekis
    eds. 2016Radical Democracy and Collective Movements Today: The Biopolitics of the Multitude versus the Hegemony of the People. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315603469
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315603469 [Google Scholar]
  19. Laclau, Ernesto
    2005On Populist Reason. Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
    1985Hegemony and Socialist Strategy — Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lynd, Staughton
    2015The Alinsky Method — A Critique. URL: https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/09/25/the-alinksy-method-a-critique/ (accessed07/01/2024).
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Marchart, Oliver
    2018Thinking Antagonism: Political Ontology After Laclau. Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9781474413329
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474413329 [Google Scholar]
  23. Marchart, Oliver, Allan Hansen, Vassilios Paipais, David Payne, and Dimitris Vardoulakis
    2020 “Thinking Antagonism: A Book Review Symposium.” InEthics & Politics().
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Montero, Maritza
    2009 “Community Action and Research as Citizenship Construction.” InAmerican Journal of Community Psychology (): –. 10.1007/s10464‑008‑9224‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9224-6 [Google Scholar]
  25. Mouffe, Chantal
    2005The Democratic Paradox. Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2013Agonistics — Thinking the World Politically. Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Pyles, Loretta
    2009Progressive Community Organising: The Roots of Social Change. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Sabl, Andrew
    2002a “Community Organising as Tocquevillean Politics: The Art, Practices, and Ethos of Organisation.” InAmerican Journal of Political Science (): –. 10.2307/3088411
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3088411 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2002bRuling Passions — Political Offices and Democratic Ethics. Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Schaap, Andrew
    2007 “Political Theory and the Agony of Politics.” Political Studies Review (): –. 10.1111/j.1478‑9299.2007.00123.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9299.2007.00123.x [Google Scholar]
  31. Silverman, David
    2020Qualitative Research. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Symbiosis Research Collective
    Symbiosis Research Collective 2018Rethinking Community Organising. URL: https://theecologist.org/2018/jul/10/rethinking-alinsky-community-organising (accessed07/01/2024).
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Warren, Rebecca, Anne Steinhoff, Konstantinos Roussos, and Jason Glynos
    2024 “The Accountability Assembly as a Counter-Accounting Performance”. InHandbook of Accounting in Society, edited byHendrik Vollmer. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. 10.4337/9781803922003.00037
    https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803922003.00037 [Google Scholar]
  34. Wingenbach, Ed
    2011Institutionalizing Agonistic Democracy: Post-foundationalism and Political Liberalism. Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Wodak, Ruth, and Michal Krzyzanowski
    (eds) 2008Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences. Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑04798‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04798-4 [Google Scholar]
  36. Worsham, Lynn, & Gary A. Olson
    1999 “Hegemony and the Future of Democracy: Ernesto Laclau’s Political Philosophy.” InJAC (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Zerilli, Linda M. G.
    2005Feminism and the Abyss of Freedom. Chicago University Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226814056.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226814056.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.24201.sch
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: social movements ; discourse theory ; agonism ; Citizens UK ; community organising ; radical democracy
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error