Racialising the resilient brain

References

1. Ahuja, Neel
   2020 “Reversible Human: Rectal Feeding, Plasticity, and Racial Control in US Carceral Warfare” Social Text(): –. 10.1215/01642472‑8164728
   https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-8164728 [Google Scholar]
2. Best, Jacqueline
   2013 “Redefining poverty as risk and vulnerability: Shifting strategies of liberal economic governance”. Third World Quarterly(): –. 10.1080/01436597.2013.755356
   https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.755356 [Google Scholar]
3. Blandón-Gitlin, Iris, Pezdek, Kathy, Saldivar, Sesar, and Steelman, Erin
   2014 “Oxytocin Eliminate the Own-Race Bias in Face Recognition Memory”. Brain Research (), –. 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.07.015
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2013.07.015 [Google Scholar]
4. Changeux, Jean Pierre
   2012 The Good, the True and the Beautiful: A Neuronal Approach. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Connolly, William E.
   2002 Neuropolitics: Thinking, Culture, Speed. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cubelli, Roberto, and Sergio Della Sala
   2018 “Taking race out of neuroscience too”. Cortex (): –. 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.04.023
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.04.023 [Google Scholar]
7. Rose, Nikolas and Abi-Rached, Joelle M.
   2013 Neuro: The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the Mind. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Damasio, Antonio
   1994 Descartes Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York, NY: Avon Books.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dillon, Michael, and Reid, Julian
   2009 The Liberal Way of War: Killing to Make Life Live. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203882542
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203882542 [Google Scholar]
10. Evans, Brad, and Reid, Julian
    2014 Resilient Life: The Art of Living Dangerously. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Fitzgerald, Des, and Callard, Felicity
    2015 “Social Science and Neuroscience beyond Interdisciplinarity: Experimental Entanglements”. Theory, Culture & Society, (), –. 10.1177/0263276414537319
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414537319 [Google Scholar]
12. Foucault, Michel
    2010 The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. Picador.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Friston, Karl
    2010 “The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?”. Nature Reviews Neuroscience: –. 10.1038/nrn2787
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787 [Google Scholar]
14. Galton, Francis
    1904 “Eugenics: Its Definition, Scope and Aims”. American Journal of Sociology(): –. 10.1086/211280
    https://doi.org/10.1086/211280 [Google Scholar]
15. Giordano, James, and DiEuliis, Diane
    2021 “Emerging neuroscience and technology (NeuroS/T): Current and near-term risks and threats to US — and global — biosecurity. A strategic multilayer assessment invited perspective paper”. Available at: https://nsiteam.com/social/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/SMA-Invited-Perspective_Emerging-NeuroST_Giordano-and-DiEuliis_FINAL.pdf (accessed31 October 2024).
16. Giordano, James and Wurzman, Rachel
    2016 “Integrative computational and neurocognitive science and technology for intelligence operations: Horizons of potential viability, value and opportunity”. Science, Technology, Engineering and Policy Studies, 30June. Available at: https://potomacinstitute.us/steps/featured-articles/85-integrative-computational-and-neurocognitive-science-and-technology-for-intelligence-operations-horizons-of-potential-viability-value-and-opportunity (accessed31 October 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
17. Golby, Alexandra J., Gabrieli, John D. E. Y., Chiao, Joan Y., and Eberhardt, Jennifer L.
    2001 ‘‘Differntial responses in the fusiform region to same-race and other-race faces”. Nature, (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hayles, Katherine
    1999 How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
19. Howell, Alison
    2017 “Neuroscience and war: Human enhancement, soldier rehabilitation, and the ethical limits of dual-use frameworks”. Millennium: Journal of International Studies(): –. 10.1177/0305829816672930
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829816672930 [Google Scholar]
20. Iman Jackson, Zakiyyah
    2020 Becoming Human: Matter and Meaning in an Antiblack World. New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kahn, Jonathan
    2017 “Pills for Prejudice: Implicit Bias and Technical Fix for Racism”. American Journal for Law & Medicine (), –. 10.1177/0098858817723664
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0098858817723664 [Google Scholar]
22. Kaiser Trujillo, Anelis, Kessé, E Ngubia, Rollins, Oliver, Della Sala, Sergio, and Cubelli, Roberto
    2022 ”A discussion on the notion of race in cognitive neuroscience research”. Cortex (): –. 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2021.11.007 [Google Scholar]
23. Kjellman, Ulrika
    2014 “How to picture race? The use of photography in the scientific practice of the Swedish State Institute for Race Biology”. Scandinavian Journal of History, (), –. 10.1080/03468755.2014.948054
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03468755.2014.948054 [Google Scholar]
24. Kubota, Jennifer T., Banaji, Mahzarin R., and Phelps, Elizabeth A.
    2012 ”The neuroscience of race”. Nature Neuroscience(). 10.1038/nn.3136
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3136 [Google Scholar]
25. Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe, Chantal
    1985 Hegemony and Socialist Strategy; Towards a Radical Democratic PoliticsLondon: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lopatina, Olga, Komleva, Yulia, Gorina Yana, Haruhiro, Higashida, Salmina, Alla
    2018 ”Neurobiological Aspects of Face Recognition: The Role of Oxytocin”, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (). 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00195
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00195 [Google Scholar]
27. Lundborg, Herman
    1919 ”Rashygieniska idéer och strävanden i nutiden”. Rasfrågor i modern belysning med särskild hänsyn till det svenska folket. Stockholm: Norstedts.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Malabou, Catherine
    2008 What Should We Do with Our Brain?. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Changeux, Jean-Pierre
    1985 Neuronal Man: The Biology of Mind. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Malabou, Catherine
    2019 Morphing Intelligence: From IQ Measurement to Artificial Brains. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. 10.7312/mala18736
    https://doi.org/10.7312/mala18736 [Google Scholar]
31. McCreight, Robert
    2014 “Brain Brinksmanship: Devising Neuroweapons Looking at Battlespace, Doctrine, and Strategy”, inNeurotechnology in National Security and Defense: Practical Considerations, Neuroethical Concerns, ed. byGiordano, James. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Pp.–.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Meloni, Maurizio
    2017 “Race in an epigenetic time: thinking biology in the plural”. British Journal of Sociology. (): –. 10.1111/1468‑4446.12248
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12248 [Google Scholar]
33. Meloni, Maurizio, Moss, Tessa, Issaka, Ayuba, Kuzawa, and Chirstopher, W.
    2022 “A biosocial return to race? A cautionary view for the postgenomic era”. American Journal of Human Biology(). 10.1002/ajhb.23742
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23742 [Google Scholar]
34. Metzinger, Thomas
    2009 The Ego Tunnel: The Science of the Mind and the Myth of the Self. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Mignolo, Walter. D.
    2015 “Sylvia Wynter: What does it mean to be human?”. InSylvia Wynter: On Being Human as Praxis, ed. byMcKittrick, Katerhine.) Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, –.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Moore, Adrian W.
    2012 The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics: Making Sense of Things. Cambridge NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. NSI
    NSI 2010 The neurobiology of political violence: New tools, new insights. A strategic multilayer assessment workshop, 1–2 December. Available at: https://nsiteam.com/social/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Proceedings-from-the-Neurobiology-of-Political-Violence-New-Tools-New-Insights-Workshop-December-2011.pdf (accessed27 December 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
38. NSI
    NSI 2011a Strategic Multi-Layer Assessment (SMA) 5th Annual Conference. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1066691.pdf (accessed23 August 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
39. NSI
    NSI 2011b Topical Strategic Multi-Layer Assessment and Air Force Research Laboratory Multi-Disciplinary White Paper in Support of Counter-Terrorism and Counter-WMD: Countering Violent Extremism: Scientific Methods & Strategies: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA552480.pdf (accessed23 August 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
40. NSI
    NSI 2012a National Security Challenges: Insights from Social, Neurobiological, and Complexity Sciences. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1093608.pdf (accessed23 August 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
41. NSI
    NSI 2012b A world in transformation: Challenges and opportunities: Strategic multilayer assessment, 6th annual conference, 6–8 November. Available at: https://nsiteam.com/social/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/A-World-in-Transformation-Challenges-and-Opportunities-6th-Annual-Conference.pdf (accessed27 December 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
42. NSI
    NSI 2012c Neuroscience Insights on Radicalization and Mobilization to Violence: A Review. Available at: https://nsiteam.com/neuroscience-insights-on-radicalization-and-mobilization-to-violence/ (accessed23 August 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
43. NSI
    NSI 2013a Strategic multi-layer assessment periodic white paper: Topics for operational considerations: Insights from neurobiology and neuropsychology on influence and extremism — an operational perspective. Available at: https://nsiteam.com/social/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Insights-from-Neurobiology-Neuropsychology-on-Influence-and-Extremism-An-Operational-Perspective-April-2013.pdf (accessed27 December 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
44. NSI
    NSI 2013b Strategic multi-layer assessment periodic white paper: Topics for operational considerations: Insights from neurobiology and neuropsychology on influence and extremism — an operational perspective. Available at: https://nsiteam.com/social/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Insights-from-Neurobiology-Neuropsychology-on-Influence-and-Extremism-An-Operational-Perspective-April-2013.pdf (accessed27 December 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
45. NSI
    NSI 2013c Topics in the Neurobiology of Aggression: Implications to Deterrence. A Strategic Multi-Layer (SMA) Periodic Publication. Available at: https://nsiteam.com/neurobiology-of-aggression-implications-to-deterrence/ (accessed23 August 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
46. NSI
    NSI 2014 White paper on Leveraging Neuroscientific and Neurotechnological (NeuroS&T) Developments with Focus on Influence and Deterrence in a Networked World: A Strategic Multi-Layer (SMA) Periodic Publication. Available at: https://nsiteam.com/neuroscientific-neurotechnological-effects-on-influence-and-deterrence/ (accessed23 August 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
47. NSI
    NSI 2014b 8th annual Strategic Multi-Layer Assessment (SMA) conference 28–29 October 2014: A new information paradigm? From genes to big data and Instagram to persistent surveillance: Implications for national security. Available at: https://nsiteam.com/social/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/A-New-Infor-mation-Paradigm-From-Genes-to-Big-Data-and-Instagram-to-Persistent-Surveillance…Implications-for-National-Security.pdf (accessed27 December 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
48. NSI
    NSI 2016 White Paper on Assessing and Anticipating Threats to US Security Interests: A Bio-Psycho-Social Science Approach for Understanding the Emergence of and Mitigating Violence and Terrorism — A Strategic Multi-Layer (SMA) Periodic Publication. Available at: https://nsiteam.com/bio-psycho-social-science-approach-to-understand-terrorism/ (accessed23 August 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
49. NSI
    NSI 2017 A Primer on the Neurocognitive Science of Aggression, Decision Making, and Deterrence. Available at: https://nsiteam.com/social/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/A-Primer-on-Neuroscientific-insights_Final.pdfaccessed23 August 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
50. NSI
    NSI 2017b White Paper on Influence in an Age of Rising Connectedness. A Strategic Multilayer Assessment (SMA) Periodic Publication. Available athttps://info.publicintelligence.net/SMA-InfluenceConnectedness.pdf (accessed3 January 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
51. NSI
    NSI 2017c 10th annual Strategic Multi-Layer Assessment (SMA) conference. Jointly held with DHS, NCTC, DNI/NIC. From control to influence? A view of — and vision for — the future. Joint Base Andrews, 25–26 April. Available at: https://nsiteam.com/social/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/U_Final_SMA-Conference-Proceedings-25-26-April-2017.pdf (accessed27 December 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
52. NSI
    NSI 2018 SMA white paper: What do others think and how do we know what they are thinking?Available at: https://nsiteam.com/social/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/White-Paper_What-Do-Others-Think_March2018_ FINAL.pdf (accessed27 December 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
53. NSI
    NSI 2019 12th annual Strategic Multilayer Assessment (SMA) conference. Jointly with DHS. The evolving anatomy of conflict in a dynamically changing world. Joint Base Andrews, 21–22 May. Available at: https://nsiteam.com/social/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/2019-SMA-Conference-Proceedings_FINAL.pdf (accessed27 December 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
54. Pitts-Taylor, Veronica
    2019 “Neurobiologically poor? Brain phenotypes, inequality, and biosocial determinism”. Science, Technology, & Human Values(): –. 10.1177/0162243919841695
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919841695 [Google Scholar]
55. Schreiber, Darren
    2017 “Neuropolitics: Twenty Years Later”, Politics and the Life Sciences(): –. 10.1017/pls.2017.25
    https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2017.25 [Google Scholar]
56. SMA Office
    SMA Office 2011 Influencing Violent Extremist Organizations Pilot Effort: Focus on Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP). Washington DC: DoD Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). Available at: https://nsiteam.com/influencing-violent-extremist-al-qaeda-in-the-arabian-peninsula-aqap/ (accessed23 August 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
57. Tängh Wrangel, Claes
    2024a “The Biopolitics of Algorithmic Governmentality: How the US Military Imagines War in the Age of Neurobiology and Artificial Intelligence”. Security Dialogue(): –. 10.1177/09670106241226622
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09670106241226622 [Google Scholar]
58. Tängh Wrangel, Claes
    2024b “Securing the Hopeful Subject? The Militarisation of Complexity Science and the Limits of Decolonial Critique”, inHope in the Anthropocene: Agency, Governance and Negation, ed. byWaldorf, Valerie, Bourgés, Pol, and Chandler, David. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Unsal, Serhat
    2006 “Implicit Racism and the Brain: How Neurobiology Can Inform an Anti-Colonial, Anti-Racist Pedagogy”, inAnti-Colonialism and Education: The Politics of Resistance, ed. bySefa Dei, George J., and Kempf, Arlo. Brill. 10.1163/9789087901110_005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087901110_005 [Google Scholar]
60. Xu, Xiaojing., Zuo, Xiangyu., Wang, Xiaoying., and Han, Shihui
    2009 “Do you feel my pain? Racial group membership modulates empathic neural responses”. Journal of Neuroscience(): –. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2418‑09.2009
    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2418-09.2009 [Google Scholar]
61. Yellow Bird, MichaelDecolonizing Social Work
    2013 “Neurodecolonization: Applying Mindfulness Research to Decolonizing Social Work”. InDecolonizing Social Work, ed. byGray, Mel, Coates, John, Yellow Bird, Michael, and Hetherington Tiani. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Zuo, Xiangyu, and Han, Shihui
    2013 “Cultural experiences reduce racial bias in neural responses to others’ suffering”. Culture and Brain(), –. 10.1007/s40167‑013‑0002‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167-013-0002-4 [Google Scholar]
63. Whitehead, Mark, Jones, Rhys, Lilley, Rachel, Pykett, Jessica, and Howell, Rachel
    2018 Neuroliberalism: Behavioral Government in the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Wright, Nicholas D.
    2021 Intelligent Biology: The Future Character of Information in Strategy: Forged by Cognition and Technology. Report for the Pentagon Joint Staff Strategic Multilayer Assessment Group. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense Joint Staff.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Wynter, Sylvia
    1984 “The ceremony must be found: After humanism”. boundary(): –. 10.2307/302808
    https://doi.org/10.2307/302808 [Google Scholar]
66. Wynter, Sylvia
    2003 “Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation — an argument”. The New Centennial Review(): –. 10.1353/ncr.2004.0015
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ncr.2004.0015 [Google Scholar]