Normalization of ecological civilization in Chinese news media

References

1. Arantes, Virginie
   2023 China’s Green Consensus: Participation, Co-optation, and Legitimation. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak
   2008 “A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press.” Discourse & Society(): –. 10.1177/0957926508088962
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar]
3. Bednarek, Monika
   2025 “Topic modelling in corpus-based discourse analysis.” Discourse Studies(): –. 10.1177/14614456241293075
   https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456241293075 [Google Scholar]
4. Blei, David M., and John D. Lafferty
   2006 “Dynamic topic models.” InProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning, –. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. 10.1145/1143844.1143859
   https://doi.org/10.1145/1143844.1143859 [Google Scholar]
5. Brookes, Gavin, and Tony McEnery
   2019 “The utility of topic modelling for discourse studies.” Discourse Studies(): –. 10.1177/1461445618814032
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445618814032 [Google Scholar]
6. Chen, Fu, and Guofeng Wang
   2023 “A topic modeling-assisted diachronic study of ‘One Country, Two Systems’ represented in Anglo-American newspapers.” Journal of Language and Politics(): –. 10.1075/jlp.21038.che
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21038.che [Google Scholar]
7. Chen, Sibo, and Yuezhi Zhao
   2022 “Ecological civilization: A blindspot in global media coverage of China’s environmental governance.” Environmental Communication(): –. 10.1080/17524032.2021.1981419
   https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1981419 [Google Scholar]
8. Denroche, Charles
   2018 “Text metaphtonymy: The interplay of metonymy and metaphor in discourse.” Metaphor and the Social World(): –. 10.1075/msw.16011.den
   https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.16011.den [Google Scholar]
9. Economy, Elizabeth
   2018 The Third Revolution: Xi Jinping and the New Chinese State. New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ekström, Hugo, Michał Krzyżanowski, and David Johnson
    2025 “Saying ‘criminality’, meaning ‘immigration’? Proxy discourses and public implicatures in the normalisation of the politics of exclusion.” Critical Discourse Studies(): –. 10.1080/17405904.2023.2282506
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2023.2282506 [Google Scholar]
11. Fairclough, Norman
    1995 Media Discourse. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fairclough, Norman
    2003 Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203697078
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078 [Google Scholar]
13. Foucault, Michel
    1995 Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Goron, Coraline
    2018 “Ecological civilisation and the political limits of a Chinese concept of sustainability.” China Perspectives (): –. 10.4000/chinaperspectives.8463
    https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.8463 [Google Scholar]
15. Hansen, Mette Halskov, Hongtao Li, and Rune Svarverud
    2018 “Ecological civilization: Interpreting the Chinese past, projecting the global future.” Global Environmental Change: –. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.014 [Google Scholar]
16. He, Wei, and Ming Cheng
    2023 “Construction of ecological discourse system.” Foreign Languages in China(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Heurtebise, Jean-Yves
    2017 “Sustainability and ecological civilization in the age of Anthropocene.” Sustainability(): . 10.3390/su9081331
    https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081331 [Google Scholar]
18. Huang, Ping, and Linda Westman
    2021 “China’s imaginary of ecological civilization: A resonance between the state-led discourse and sociocultural dynamics.” Energy Research and Social Science: . 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102253
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102253 [Google Scholar]
19. Jasanoff, Sheila
    2004 States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203413845
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413845 [Google Scholar]
20. Jasanoff, Sheila
    2015 “Future imperfect: Science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity.” InDreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, eds. bySheila Jasanoff and Sang-Hyun Kim, –. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226276663.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226276663.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
21. Krzyżanowska, Natalia
    2020 “The commodification of motherhood: Normalisation of consumerism in mediated discourse on mothering.” Social Semiotics(): –. 10.1080/10350330.2020.1762986
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1762986 [Google Scholar]
22. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2016 “Recontextualisation of neoliberalism and the increasingly conceptual nature of discourse: Challenges for critical discourse studies.” Discourse & Society(): –. 10.1177/0957926516630901
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630901 [Google Scholar]
23. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2019 “Brexit and the imaginary of ‘crisis’: A discourse-conceptual analysis of European news media.” Critical Discourse Studies(): –. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1592001
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1592001 [Google Scholar]
24. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2020a “Discursive shifts and the normalisation of racism: Imaginaries of immigration, moral panics and the discourse of contemporary right-wing populism.” Social Semiotics(): –. 10.1080/10350330.2020.1766199
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1766199 [Google Scholar]
25. Krzyżanowski, Michał
    2020b “Normalization and the discursive construction of ‘new’ norms and ‘new’ normality: Discourse in the paradoxes of populism and neoliberalism.” Social Semiotics(): –. 10.1080/10350330.2020.1766193
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1766193 [Google Scholar]
26. Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Natalia Krzyżanowska
    2022 “Narrating the ‘new normal’ or pre-legitimising media control? COVID-19 and the discursive shifts in the far-right imaginary of ‘crisis’ as a normalisation strategy.” Discourse & Society(): –. 10.1177/09579265221095420
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221095420 [Google Scholar]
27. Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Natalia Krzyżanowska
    2024 “Conceptual flipsiding in/and illiberal imagination: Towards a discourse-conceptual analysis.” Journal of Illiberalism Studies(): –. 10.53483/XCPU3574
    https://doi.org/10.53483/XCPU3574 [Google Scholar]
28. Liu, Chen, Lily Chen, Robert M. Vanderbeck, Gill Valentine, Mei Zhang, Kristina Diprose, and Katie McQuaid
    2018 “A Chinese route to sustainability: Postsocialist transitions and the construction of ecological civilization.” Sustainable Development(): –. 10.1002/sd.1743
    https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1743 [Google Scholar]
29. Liu, Shiliang, Yuhong Dong, Kim R. McConkey, Lam-Son Phan Tran, Fangfang Wang, Hua Liu, and Gang Wu
    2023 “Scientific concept and practices of life community of mountains, rivers, forests, farmlands, lakes, grasslands, and deserts in China.” Ambio(): –. 10.1007/s13280‑023‑01898‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-023-01898-1 [Google Scholar]
30. LROCPC (Literature Research Office of the Communist Party of China) (ed.)
    LROCPC (Literature Research Office of the Communist Party of China) (ed.) 2017 Excerpts from Xi Jinping’s Discourses on Socialist Ecological Civilization Construction. Beijing: Central Party Literature Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Luo, Austin Jun
    2015 “Media system in China: A Chinese perspective.” International Communication of Chinese Culture(): –. 10.1007/s40636‑015‑0012‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40636-015-0012-3 [Google Scholar]
32. Marinelli, Maurizio
    2018 “How to build a ‘Beautiful China’ in the Anthropocene: The political discourse and the intellectual debate on ecological civilization.” Journal of Chinese Political Science(): –. 10.1007/s11366‑018‑9538‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-018-9538-7 [Google Scholar]
33. Mazzucato, Mariana
    2013 The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. London: Anthem Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Ouyang, Yao
    2025 “Concentrating national resources in China for technological innovation: Evolution stages, underlying logic and practical path.” Comparative Economic & Social Systems(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
35. PDCPC (Publicity Department of the Communist Party of China), and MEEPRC (Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China) (eds.)
    PDCPC (Publicity Department of the Communist Party of China), and MEEPRC (Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China) (eds.) 2022 Guidelines for Studying Xi Jinping’s Thought on Ecological Civilization. Beijing: Learning Publishing House and People’s Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
36. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1998 Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
37. van Leeuwen, Theo
    2008 Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
38. Vaughan, Diane
    1996 The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Wang, Alex L.
    2018 “Symbolic legitimacy and Chinese environmental reform.” Environmental Law(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Wang, Xiao, and Xiufeng Zhao
    2023 “From growth obsession to ecological promotion: The discursive construction of party image in Chinese political discourse on ecological civilization.” Discourse & Communication(): –. 10.1177/17504813231181080
    https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813231181080 [Google Scholar]
41. Wang-Kaeding, Heidi
    2021 China’s Environmental Foreign Relations. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003149927
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003149927 [Google Scholar]
42. Wiertz, Thilo, Lilith Kuhn, and Annika Mattissek
    2023 “A turn to geopolitics: Shifts in the German energy transition discourse in light of Russia’s war against Ukraine.” Energy Research and Social Science: . 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103036
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103036 [Google Scholar]
43. Wodak, Ruth
    2000 “Recontextualization and the transformation of meanings: A critical discourse analysis of decision making in EU meetings about employment policies.” InDiscourse and Social Life, eds. bySrikant Sarangi and Malcolm Coulthard, –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Wodak, Ruth
    2001 “The discourse-historical approach.” InMethods of Critical Discourse Analysis, eds. byRuth Wodak and Michael Meyer, –. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Xiong, Zirui, and Yong Wang
    2025 “Ambivalent or beneficial? An ecolinguistic study of news reports on the northward migration of a herd of Asian elephants.” Social Semiotics(): –. 10.1080/10350330.2023.2258359
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2023.2258359 [Google Scholar]
46. Xu, Feng, and Yi Gao
    2023 “A study on the self-shaping of China’s national ecological image from the perspective of discourse analysis.” Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Sciences Edition)(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Xu, Zhaohan
    2024 “Corpus-based study on the evolution of China’s ecological image.” Shandong Foreign Language Teaching(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Yang, Kaiwen, and Ya Sun
    2025 “To change or not to change: Transformations of ecological metaphors in Chinese government microblogs.” Discourse & Society(): –. 10.1177/09579265241265512
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265241265512 [Google Scholar]
49. Zhang, Wen, and Qingye Tang
    2025 “Towards ‘ecological civilization’: Development discourse in People’s Daily’s climate change communication (1995–2023).” Critical Arts–. 10.1080/02560046.2025.2500435
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2025.2500435 [Google Scholar]
50. Zheng, Yan, and Guiyang Zhuang
    2021 “Systemic governance of mountains, rivers, forests, farmlands, lakes and grasslands.” Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies(): . 10.1142/S2345748121500214
    https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345748121500214 [Google Scholar]