1887
image of Political implicatures in Russian online media discourse
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The study examines the role and linguistic repertoire of political implicatures in online media discourse. A case study of ’s Telegram channel, based on a one-month feed, demonstrates that contributors employ multiple linguistic means of implicature expression to balance the legal restrictions on media coverage with the publishing house’s long-standing tradition of objective reporting. The current political climate in Russia encourages the use of political implicatures, which serve not only the purposes of politeness and cooperative communication but also, and primarily, the authors’ self-protection. In addition to classical expressive means such as irony, metaphor, and euphemism, contributors make use of creative neologisms, wordplay, and ‘talking’ photographs, which function as supplementary channels of implicature transmission. Through the use of political implicatures, ’s journalists cultivate a distinctive reporting style readily recognized by their readership. The perceptual assessment of ’s political implicatures by four reader groups differing in age and experience revealed a strong agreement with the explicitated meanings.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.25144.tym
2026-06-02
2026-06-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allan, Keith
    2012 “X-Phemism and Creativity.” Lexis. Journal in English Lexicology: –. 10.4000/lexis.340
    https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.340 [Google Scholar]
  2. Allott, Nicholas
    2018 “Conversational Implicature.” InOxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.205
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.205 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blome-Tillmann, Michael
    2013 “Conversational Implicatures (and How to Spot Them).” Philosophy Compass (): –. 10.1111/phc3.12003
    https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12003 [Google Scholar]
  4. Burgio, Valeria
    2019 “Uncertain Infographics: Expressing Doubt in Data Visualization.” Semiotica: –. 10.1515/sem‑2018‑0114
    https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0114 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chang, Charles, and Melanie Manion
    2021 “Political Self-Censorship in Authoritarian States: The Spatial-Temporal Dimension of Trouble.” Comparative Political Studies (): –. 10.1177/0010414021989762
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414021989762 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, Rong
    1990 Verbal Irony as Conversational Implicature. Doctoral dissertation, Ball State University.
  7. Cicchetti, Dante
    1994 “Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology.” Psychological Assessment: –. 10.1037/1040‑3590.6.4.284
    https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284 [Google Scholar]
  8. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2009 “Pragmatics.” InEnglish Language: Description, Variation and Context, –. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑07789‑9_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07789-9_11 [Google Scholar]
  9. Davis, Wayne
    2019 “Implicature.” InEdvard Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/implicature
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Druzhinin, Andrey, and Tatiana Fomina
    2022 “Euphemisms and Dysphemisms in the Construction of Experience.” Tomsk State University Journal of Philology: –. 10.17223/19986645/76/3
    https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/76/3 [Google Scholar]
  11. Druzhinin, Andrey, and Tzipora Rakedzon
    2024 “Why Language Kills: Semantic Patterns of (Self) Destruction.” Constructivist Foundations (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ekström, Hugo, Michał Krzyżanowski, and David Johnson
    2025 “Saying ‘Criminality’, Meaning ‘Immigration’? Proxy Discourses and Public Implicatures in the Normalisation of the Politics of Exclusion.” Critical Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1080/17405904.2023.2282506
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2023.2282506 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gabrielova, Elena, and Olga Maksimenko
    2021 “Implicit vs Explicit Evaluation: How English-Speaking Twitter Users Discuss Migration Problems.” Russian Journal of Linguistics: –. 10.22363/2687‑0088‑2021‑25‑1‑105‑124
    https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-1-105-124 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gambarota, Filippo, and Gianmarco Altoè
    2024 “Ordinal Regression Models Made Easy: A Tutorial on Parameter Interpretation, Data Simulation and Power Analysis.” International Journal of Psychology: –. 10.1002/ijop.13243
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.13243 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ghawaidi, Shaikah H., and Nuha Abdullah Alsmari
    2025 “The Art of the Unsaid: Analyzing the Use of Conversational Implicature in Political Communication.” World Journal of English Language (): –. 10.5430/wjel.v15n4p49
    https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n4p49 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gombrich, Ernst Hans
    1971The Ideas of Progress and Their Impact on Art. New York: Cooper Union School of Art and Architecture.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Greimas, Aldgirdas, Joseph Courtes, and Michael Rengstorf
    1989 “The Cognitive Dimension of Narrative Discourse.” New Literary History (): –. 10.2307/469354
    https://doi.org/10.2307/469354 [Google Scholar]
  18. Grice, Herbert Paul
    1975 “Logic and Conversation.” InSyntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts, edited byPeter Cole, –. New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 [Google Scholar]
  19. Katsos, Napoleon, and Chris Cummins
    2010 “Pragmatics: From Theory to Experiment and Back Again.” Language and Linguistics Compass (): –. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2010.00203.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00203.x [Google Scholar]
  20. Klumbys, Valdemaras
    2024 “Assumptions and Formation of the Aesopian Language in the Soviet Lithuania.” Deleted Journal (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kuranova, Tatiana
    2010 “The Functions of Language Play in the Media Text.” Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Larionova, Marina
    2015Spanish Newspaper and Journalistic Discourse: The Art of Information or the Skill of Manipulation?Moscow: MGIMO-University.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Levinson, Stephen
    2000Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Malysheva, Anastasiya
    2019 “Andrei Kolesnikov’s Ironic Journalistic Discourse: Basic Authorial Intentions and Their Implementation in the Printed Media Text.” Proceedings of Smolensk State University (): –. 10.35785/2072‑9464‑2019‑48‑4‑147‑158
    https://doi.org/10.35785/2072-9464-2019-48-4-147-158 [Google Scholar]
  25. Mathieu, David
    2012 A Contextual Approach to the Mediation of News Discourse. Doctoral thesis, Roskilde University.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Murzin, Yuriy
    2019 “Toponymical Derivatives as the Actualizer of Precedent Situation (The Case of the Spanish Media Texts).” Linguistics & Polyglot Studies (): –. 10.24833/2410‑2423‑2019‑3‑19‑21‑31
    https://doi.org/10.24833/2410-2423-2019-3-19-21-31 [Google Scholar]
  27. Oberlander, Jon
    1995 “Grice for Graphics: Pragmatic Implicature in Network Diagrams.” Information Design Journal (): –. 10.1075/idj.8.2.05obe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.8.2.05obe [Google Scholar]
  28. Pinker, Steven
    2007 “The Evolutionary Social Psychology of Off-Record Indirect Speech Acts.” Intercultural Pragmatics (): –. 10.1515/IP.2007.023
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IP.2007.023 [Google Scholar]
  29. Pirdaus, Dede Irman, and Вера
    2025 “Media and Internet Linguistics: Language Transformation in Digital Communication.” International Journal of Linguistics Communication and Broadcasting(): –. 10.46336/ijlcb.v3i2.226
    https://doi.org/10.46336/ijlcb.v3i2.226 [Google Scholar]
  30. Qasim, Huda, and Lina Younus
    2022 “Implicature in Internet Memes: A Cyberpragmatic Approach.” International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education (): –. 10.9756/INTJECSE/V14I5.774
    https://doi.org/10.9756/INTJECSE/V14I5.774 [Google Scholar]
  31. Refaie, El Elisabeth
    2003 “Understanding Visual Metaphor: The Example of Newspaper Cartoons.” Visual Communication (): –. 10.1177/1470357203002001755
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001755 [Google Scholar]
  32. Rosenfeld, Bryn
    2022 “Survey Research in Russia: In the Shadow of War.” Post-Soviet Affairs (): –. 10.1080/1060586X.2022.2151767
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2022.2151767 [Google Scholar]
  33. Sbisà, Marina
    2021 “Presupposition and Implicature: Varieties of Implicit Meaning in Explicitation Practices.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.027
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.027 [Google Scholar]
  34. Shumilina, Svetlana, and Vera Levina
    2021 “Implicit Ways to Express the Author’s Opinion in the Publicistic Discourse of the Runet Blogosphere.” Russian Language Studies: –. 10.22363/2618‑8163‑2021‑19‑4‑481‑495
    https://doi.org/10.22363/2618-8163-2021-19-4-481-495 [Google Scholar]
  35. Sinkkonen, Elina
    2021 “Dynamic Dictators: Improving the Research Agenda on Autocratization and Authoritarian Resilience.” Democratization (): –. 10.1080/13510347.2021.1903881
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1903881 [Google Scholar]
  36. Slastushinsky, Magdalena
    2011 “Evolution of Irony in Soviet and Post-Soviet Mass Media in Russia.” Seoul National University Journal Russian Studies (): –. 10.22414/rusins.2011.21.2.151
    https://doi.org/10.22414/rusins.2011.21.2.151 [Google Scholar]
  37. Stanley, Matthew L., and Christopher P. Neck
    2025 “Euphemism as a powerful framing device that influences moral judgments and punitive responses after wrongdoing.” Journal of Applied Psychology (), –. 10.1037/apl0001233
    https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001233 [Google Scholar]
  38. Van de Kauter, Marjan, Bart Desmet, and Veronique Hoste
    2015 “The Good, the Bad and the Implicit: A Comprehensive Approach to Annotating Explicit and Implicit Sentiment.” Language Resources & Evaluation: –. 10.1007/s10579‑015‑9297‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-015-9297-4 [Google Scholar]
  39. van Dijk, Teun
    1983 “Discourse Analysis: Its Development and Application to the Structure of News.” Journal of Communication (): –. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1983.tb02386.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1983.tb02386.x [Google Scholar]
  40. 2005 “War Rhetoric of a Little Ally: Political Implicatures and Aznar’s Legitimatization of the War in Iraq.” Journal of Language and Politics (): –. 10.1075/jlp.4.1.04dij
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.1.04dij [Google Scholar]
  41. Wijermars, Marielle, and Tatyana Lokot
    2022 “Is Telegram a ‘Harbinger of Freedom’? The Performance, Practices, and Perception of Platforms as Political Actors in Authoritarian States.” Post-Soviet Affairs (): –. 10.1080/1060586X.2022.2030645
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2022.2030645 [Google Scholar]
  42. Wilson, Deidre, and Dan Sperber
    2004 “Relevance Theory.” InThe Handbook of Pragmatics, edited byLaurence Horn and Gregory Ward, –. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhirmаn, Vladimir
    2019 “Ironic Reporting as a Genre of Journalism (Based on the Publications of A. Kolesnikov, Newspaper Kommersant).” Intercultural Communications: –.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.25144.tym
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlp.25144.tym
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: Telegram channels ; media discourse. ; Kommersant ; political implicatures
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error